Sorry but the theory you have adapted follows the train of thinking that everything came from nothing still. Time and chance do not amount to anything on their own so don't go there.
If you can provide any evidence that proves "time and chance do not amount to anything on their own", now is the time to do so.
Here's what I suspect:
1) You don't have any
2) You wouldn't know what to look for even if you wanted some
You're doing exactly what so many other people adept in biblical knowledge but sorely lacking in scientific knowledge have done before in this thread (and the CvE one). You've picked up on token phrases like "we evolved from monkeys", "everything came from nothing", "the universe is ordered", all of which are simplistic and essentially meaningless.
You then attribute meaning to them (based on misunderstanding and lack of knowledge) and come to the conclusion that even the most developed scientific theory is less convincing than "god did it". And in fairness, you're right: "we evolved from monkeys" is nonsensical, but since that isn't how we evolved and we have much more accurate theories to describe that, then it doesn't matter that it's nonsensical.
***
"Time and chance do not amount to anything on their own" is another incredibly simplistic phrase. It's another phrase that appears convincing because the concept behind it makes little sense, but that's because it's been hugely over-simplified from the reality.
Over vast, vast time periods, the tiniest, most imperceptible change can make a huge difference. The fact we'll all grow old and die at some point illustrates that on a small scale. Cells in our bodies replace themselves nearly constantly. We don't feel ourselves ageing (other than occasionally waking up in the morning with a new ailment) but it's still happening. Visually, you can only witness it over extended time periods, or witness it in people you know if you only ever see them every ten years. But just because you can't see it day to day, that doesn't mean it isn't happening.
Now expand the average 80-90 year lifespan over billions of years. It may take, hundreds of thousands of years for something in the universe to visually change, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening. Of course "time" can amount to things on its own, if you have enough of it. Everything in the universe is at the mercy of time, to one extent or another. Everything travels through time in the same direction. The universe is an increasingly disordered place. Entropy increases. It only looks "constant" and "ordered" because we're witnessing a mere fraction of it. Massive distances and timescales don't make sense to the human mind. Some people (like yourself) seem to dismiss it as a result.
Likewise, "chance". Dangerous word. Does indeed imply that something can come from nothing. But implying this would also be inaccurate.
Again, imagine something ordered. Let's say, a pack of cards. Clubs, Diamonds, Hearts and Spades, each suit in order. In a perfect, ordered universe, you would always know what card came next. You might even be tempted to bet a large sum of money, always knowing you'd guess the right card. On "chance" alone, the order would never change.
But we've already established that the universe isn't ordered. It's not like a perfectly shuffled pack of cards. Imagine betting everything you own that you
know the pack of cards is ordered. Perhaps the first few cards have been in order - a small window of consistency, just like we have when witnessing our small window of time on the universe. Except, the universe isn't ordered. Nor are the cards. After the six of clubs, there's an element of disorder - a seven of diamonds. You lose all your money. And learn that what appears to be an ordered system is nothing of the sort - the tiniest, tiniest change (a mis-placed card, an imbalance in the embryotic, tightly-packed universe) can have huge consequences - you lose all your money, or the universe comes from apparently "nothing".
***
"Time" and "chance" are entirely subjective. And a subjective view of each is not the basis for an argument as to why our current theories of the universe are wrong. And it certainly isn't, by process of elimination, proof that God made the universe instead.
