Having just seen it myself in BBC highlights that's exactly how I felt about it. Very much a case of Alonso putting himself into a position that was only ever going to get worse for him.Vettel was unlucky, I think the penalty was a bit iffy. Alonso decided to put his car in a gap that was always going to get smaller, you could see Vettel moving over BEFORE Alonso made the "move" and then had a hissy fit when it did get smaller and he was off the track. Seems a bit odd to me.
So if Vettel had wrecked Alonso would he recieve a 1 race ban?
So if Vettel had wrecked Alonso would he recieve a 1 race ban?
I can see where this is going, but that's not true - he left a fair chunk less room.
Last year, Alonso left a car's width plus a little bit more, and also moved further to the right (his right, not right on the TV feed) when he noticed Vettel was alongside. This year, Vettel left effectively half a car's width - when Alonso went off, their wheels were actually overlapping - and only moved over after Alonso was clean off the circuit.
There's the possibility that Vettel simply didn't know Alonso was there, but since the natural racing line out of that corner is somewhere in the middle of the circuit and Vettel was much wider, I strongly suspect he knew exactly where Alonso was.
To be honest, Alonso's attempt was a rather silly one, as many people run very wide on that exit, so if he'd gotten ahead of Vettel there, he could have gotten a rear full of Red Bull as Vettel understeered on the way out. But the incident happened too early in the corner for Vettel to claim that this was precisely what happened.![]()
People are annoyed about it because there was a similar incident last year, and Alonso was not penalised. For Vettel to be penalised now - despite the stewards' crackdown on dangerous and aggressive driving - has led people to believe that the FIA is favouring Ferrari.I don't get why people are blaming Alonso for trying to make such a risky pass. He saw a gap, and went for it. Once he was there, it now became Vettel's responsibility to make sure that that gap continued to exist, and was large enough for Alonso to stay on track. Vettel failed to do that, and so was penalized.
People are annoyed about it because there was a similar incident last year, and Alonso was not penalised. For Vettel to be penalised now - despite the stewards' crackdown on dangerous and aggressive driving - has led people to believe that the FIA is favouring Ferrari.
I don't get why people are blaming Alonso for trying to make such a risky pass. He saw a gap, and went for it. Once he was there, it now became Vettel's responsibility to make sure that that gap continued to exist, and was large enough for Alonso to stay on track. Vettel failed to do that, and so was penalized.
The only thing the stewards got wrong today was not penalizing di Resta for bumping Senna off in the braking zone. He could've scored more points today had it not been for that incident.
Like I said in one of my previous posts the gap Alonso put his car in was always going to get smaller. Vettel was slightly out of shape from defending against Alonso the previous chicane, plus the line he took is the racing line.
You can't just shove your car somewhere and then say right it's your responsibility to make sure we don't crash. You can see from the replays that Vettel was moving to the outside before Alonso made the move, yet the Spaniard still decided he was going to put his car there. And he then seemed surprised that he had ended up in the grass.
Apart from that he drove supremely.
The gap was big enough up to the point when Alonso was interlocknig wheels with Vettel. The gap disappeared because Vettel made it disappear.
Perez is faster once every five or six races. The Ferrari is ALWAYS fast. Moving to Ferrari is going to be a good move.
I'm so sick of them. How many are there in a season? Six? Seven?
I'm personally quite astonished at how well Raikkonen is doing... 3rd place now, and only 1 point off 2nd place...
No, Fernando is always fast. Massa's turns of speed are even more irregular than Perez's. Going to Ferrari would be good for Perez, but only if they can produce a consistently fast and consistently driveable car.Perez is faster once every five or six races. The Ferrari is ALWAYS fast. Moving to Ferrari is going to be a good move.
You can take it up with Helmet Marko.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=262433
Raikkonen in for a sneaky championship similar to 2007.
If Alonso gets punted down the order every race, Hamilton, Vettel and Kimi will all have good chances.
People are annoyed about it because there was a similar incident last year, and Alonso was not penalised. For Vettel to be penalised now - despite the stewards' crackdown on dangerous and aggressive driving - has led people to believe that the FIA is favouring Ferrari.
And Sergio Perez's drive was excellent, either way. I think it made Lewis quite uncomfortable when he had a hard time overtaking that Sauber after the pits cycled through and Perez was still out on those hards. Yes, the car seems very good on tires, but it was still a bit of work to keep Hamilton at bay.