Here;
Whether or not you interpreted my initial wording wrong, I don't know, but that certainly seemed like it.
No that's me asking how they have it easier in likeness to Fangio, more so than the best current drivers.
Well sure, if I said something as an absolute but I didn't so not sure why you thought I made the same error, other than just to do so.
Which is why this is a pretty pointless argument until time travel becomes a thing, which will probably be never.
You never know, could happen.
I never said he hadn't. It's nearly common knowledge to know that both him and Alonso have driven the MP4/4, but not at balls to the wall pace, for obvious reasons.
Well yeah obviously, it was a facetious statement because it all seems silly in the end.
Schumacher and his return to drive for Mercedes can be seen as hurting that legacy for going on too long. Senna in '91'92/'93, where he stepped up another level again, firther securing his status as a great of the sport, Raikonnen's drop off in recent years (not including these last few races where he has stepped up a bit), to name a few.
Kimi I don't feel really had a drop off, just didn't have a car that suited him, putting him in the same scope as Jenson. A driver with a very limited range, but then I remember the various cars he drove that were quite different and wonder why these past couple years were so problematic.
I agree. I can't see someone like James Hunt dealing with all the dials and settings that a modern F1 car has.
Dials don't get you the ladies
And again, in the few instances they have, it relates to something like all the dials, and steering wheel settings and the like. Until we get a '89 Prost, for example, to drive his car for that season and a 2016 Mercedes, at the same track, and a '16 Hamilton to do the same and compare, we'll never know. And the likelihood of that ever happening, is incredibly low.
Well yeah, so why are we arguing if we agree?