Anyone planning to drop GT5?

  • Thread starter adramire
  • 1,661 comments
  • 95,073 views

Anyone planning on dropping GT5?

  • Yes

    Votes: 105 12.2%
  • No

    Votes: 672 78.1%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 83 9.7%

  • Total voters
    860
I'm certainly not going to put my emotional preference into it (re: the "heart and soul" comment). Both companies are just that - companies, that, despite the story-weaving and fan-mongering (on both sides), are there to make money.

Yes, DLC is a money grab. So is releasing a demo and charging nearly as much as a full game.

Not to mention, it's a bit of a disservice to the folks at T10 that undoubtedly do put a lot of their own passion into the game. It's not one-sided, as much as many people want to see it that way.


I think it's safe to say Turn 10 and Microsoft are more company-like than PD and Sony. Sony has been in the disc gaming era the longest. Kaz has been in the car Sim business the longest.

Microsoft's counterattack to the PlaySation is Xbox just like you know what I'm about to say.

Experience means everything. Also, the circumstances in which both series's began are completely different and dare I say, reflective of the company creating the game.

There's no denying which one looks more like a "company" (outsourcing to Hollywood for the lighting engine says a lot, too), but if Forza's purpose for being created isn't the definition of "company", then GT5 must be the very definition of "perfection". I know GT5 only has an 84 metacritic rating.

Yes, DLC is a money grab. So is releasing a demo and charging nearly as much as a full game.
That's funny, DLC makes companies money? Releasing a "demo" that offers as much, if not more, content/replayability as a PSN game while still updating that "demo" for free is just as money-hungry as monthly DLC packs and no content/feature updates for free?
Not only accepting, but justifying, monthly DLC packs, yearly payments for xbox live, season pass for FM4, while there's a code for Top Gear soccer and bowling so people who buy the game used miss out on that... i lost me train of thought. Can someone help me find it?

Anyway, if you want to spend your money on a good investment, GOOOOOO for Gran Turismo.

Forza destroyed GT in almost everything.

We mourn but wont drop GT..
I was shocked at how many weak reviews Forza.

Oh wait, that was GT5. I guess that means we hate playing GT5 because other people told us they hated it. What a waste of money.
Something tells me when Tuesday comes, the only people that'll have fun are those who buy FM4. And then suffer +30 second loading times for races. At least you get to look at a car while you wait.
 
Last edited:
Besides Cote d'Azur and what car models? I know some, but I want to know so I can know in the future.


That can't really be measured.

It's a hoot watching you comment, cause you're not specific enough either and yet you ask for people to be, then when they are you just dismiss it because it conflicts with your intrest. Also another tid bit how is it that you can measure the tiers but no one else can? You compared Forza to the Premiums in GT (which will probably go up with Spec II) yet you don't really give a standard that your working with that makes you come to the conclusion. Opinion is probably what it is

@ CSL well friend I hate to say it but even the Forza guys on here talked about how the Enzo and F40 front ends look a bit off and the stance is all wrong at certain angles. The Viper also seems to have this issue and that bothers me that the stance of the car is like a off road truck and not a hyper car.

@ Tenacious You keep bringing up Forza forums every time you comment on these type of threads, if you have some hate for Forza forums and that goes over to the game shouldn't you keep it to yourself...since this isn't the same Forza forum that treated you so bad? Also shouldn't your bias come out of game play and not that community? Finally since this thread is GT first doesn't mean it's the only thing they care about, FM fans have just as much say. I'm sure you realize that but you come off as if you don't.
 
Last edited:
I think it's safe to say Turn 10 and Microsoft are more company-like than PD and Sony. Sony has been in the disc gaming era the longest. Kaz has been in the car Sim business the longest.

Microsoft's counterattack to the PlaySation is Xbox just like you know what I'm about to say.

Experience means everything. Also, the circumstances in which both series's began are completely different and dare I say, reflective of the company creating the game.

There's no denying which one looks more like a "company" (outsourcing to Hollywood for the lighting engine says a lot, too), but if Forza's purpose for being created isn't the definition of "company", then GT5 must be the very definition of "perfection". I know GT5 only has an 84 metacritic rating.

Is that for real?

Actually is very interesting when you consider that about 20%-25% is designed to be perfect, while the other 75%-80% percent is created under normal company reuse of assets, and you haven't seen the average that FM4 is getting on metacritic which is over 9.0, the reason is simple, T10 actually managed to create a game closer to "perfection" than PD did.

Not sure what you want to say there, but actually and statistically T10 and Forza are closer to perfection by a large margin compared to GT(their newest assets match and surpass GT premium quality, while the older assets are refurnish and updated to almost match GT premium quality).

That's funny, DLC makes companies money? Releasing a "demo" that offers as much, if not more, content/replayability as a PSN game while still updating that "demo" for free is just as money-hungry as monthly DLC packs and no content/feature updates for free?
Not only accepting, but justifying, monthly DLC packs, yearly payments for xbox live, season pass for FM4, while there's a code for Top Gear soccer and bowling so people who buy the game used miss out on that... i lost me train of thought. Can someone help me find it?

Anyway, if you want to spend your money on a good investment, GOOOOOO for Gran Turismo.

Not sure, if you have to pay $40USD for a demo its at least fair that you get some decent content out of it. FM4 actually costs 60USD and you get all assets with top tier quality without having to reuse older low poly models, unlike the other game.

Oh wait, that was GT5. I guess that means we hate playing GT5 because other people told us they hated it. What a waste of money.
Something tells me when Tuesday comes, the only people that'll have fun are those who buy FM4. And then suffer +30 second loading times for races. At least you get to look at a car while you wait.

GT5's loading times are at least +55 secs, besides if there are a lot of people criticizing a game for its flaws is because they exists and this people they are not enjoying the game as they should, if it was the other way around I'm pretty sure everyone will be playing instead of posting.
 
I can't believe you're defending T10 on this, I seriously can't.

It's obvious they care more about the money than trying to make as good a game as possible. Why else would they release three games (with just minor changes/improvements between the three) within 4 years plus a bunch of DLC packs, while PD put their heart and soul into only one game for 6 years and counting.

I can't believe your asking for emotional pity instead of just looking at the rational facts at the end of the day. You have a choice to buy FM4 and what not just like you had a choice to buy GT5 CE. The point is even if you they didn't sale it in so called parts, from what I've seen you still have other reasons to hate it. Slip is an unbiased mod adding balance to it...why should one party get special treatment to slander and beat the crap out of the other parties game? Because you want a war that is a waste of energy, but you find purpose in fighting? Wow sometimes this site just really teaches me that I haven't seen it all.

@ another_jackhole, I showed you earlier that Kaz hasn't been in the sim business the longest. You are distorting facts to try and argue a moot point for a pointless type war. Why not be a bit unbiased, gov't is biased enough for the lot of us.
 
Okay. At least 55 seconds? I'm done. I find this ridiculous now. Mr wombat
AUP
*You will not behave in an abusive and/or hateful manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack any individual or any group.
You going to resort to this aren't you?

Its a pretty weak defence mechanism if I'm honest but then:

ha ok. I might be on drugs, but I'm no Kazolyte.

I have Kaz-fever if that's what you mean, is it?

I was mainly talking about the blandness of it.

So...

And the same video, it shows how limited GT5 can be(and driving an F1 at -30fps can be tricky, and also annoying).
 
@ CSL well friend I hate to say it but even the Forza guys on here talked about how the Enzo and F40 front ends look a bit off and the stance is all wrong at certain angles. The Viper also seems to have this issue and that bothers me that the stance of the car is like a off road truck and not a hyper car.
Well, assuming they are, I'm still positive the average car in FM4 looks better then the average car in GT5.
That's not to excuse FM for improper modeling, but at the same time, I have to look at all the work they've accomplished also, and they seem to have been busy.
I'm not sure what you mean by stance, I'd have to see it. I know Viper's stand like they're jacked on steroids from the right angle, so I have to wonder.
 
Well, assuming they are, I'm still positive the average car in FM4 looks better then the average car in GT5.
That's not to excuse FM for improper modeling, but at the same time, I have to look at all the work they've accomplished also, and they seem to have been busy.
I'm not sure what you mean by stance, I'd have to see it. I know Viper's stand like they're jacked on steroids from the right angle, so I have to wonder.

Yeah on the car list for FM4 they were talking about it and should the examples. The front end of the Enzo looks off when you compare it to an actual enzo picture, same with the F40. The F40 also looks similar to the Viper you mentioned and seem like an off road car instead.
 
Well, assuming they are, I'm still positive the average car in FM4 looks better then the average car in GT5.
That's not to excuse FM for improper modeling, but at the same time, I have to look at all the work they've accomplished also, and they seem to have been busy.
I'm not sure what you mean by stance, I'd have to see it. I know Viper's stand like they're jacked on steroids from the right angle, so I have to wonder.

Average car? What do you mean by that? Do you mean standard cars? The premiums are on another level.
 
Akiraacewombat whatever you think how finished the game is, a majority will still attest to it being worth the cost, despite whatever flaws you may insist. Everyone has there own reasons why. (I usually suspect just the overall driving feeling of GT both cars and tracks being unmatched in consoles is what does it(although may be opinion seems to be like a huge factor on the reason.)Or this wouldn't be part of any discussion of what people think it's worth.

Now regardless, this is a fruitless argument. When people usually start trying really hard to convince people of something, it's usually because they are trying to convince themselves whatever they believe is justified. It feels like FM peoples are really trying to convince the GT fans of something, but I think the fourth will speak for itself, and if it's good in what people like, people have the chance and logic to make that choice themselves, because it being great can justify it, but if people don't like it then they can choose the latter. Because of whatever reasons they feel.

In games like this it usually starts
-at the driving
-at the cars
-at the tracks
Then from there peoples opinions stray on importance and people will find their niche, and we can just leave it at that.

NEXT- I stopped trusting reviews about 5 years ago. It's become like news journalist these days, just biased to promote something.(Not referring to any specifics of games, just presenting an idea.) I learned that playing games for a while, I'm pretty justified in saying what's a good game for myself(and also game design wise), and I don't need anyone else to tell me or convince me of anything or think for me.

Regardless both FM and this Spec II for GT(with future DLC) come out on Tues. And let's wait till then to start discussing aspects of the continuing Racing genre of console games.
 
Akiraacecombat whatever you think how finished the game is, a majority will still attest to it being worth the cost, despite whatever flaws you may insist. Everyone has there own reasons why. (I usually suspect just the overall driving feeling of GT both cars and tracks being unmatched in consoles is what does it(although may be opinion seems to be like a huge factor on the reason.)Or this wouldn't be part of any discussion of what people think it's worth.

So there should not be any critics to GT5? Specially when you pay for a game and you want to experience what they advertise? and there are no new racing games to get into?(Also notice that FM is not the only thing in the last 3 years).

Now regardless, this is a fruitless argument. When people usually start trying really hard to convince people of something, it's usually because they are trying to convince themselves whatever they believe is justified. It feels like FM peoples are really trying to convince the GT fans of something, but I think the fourth will speak for itself, and if it's good in what people like, people have the chance and logic to make that choice themselves, because it being great can justify it, but if people don't like it then they can choose the latter. Because of whatever reasons they feel.

It depends, I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, I just pointing out flaws on that the game has, if these flaws exist and they affect how you experience the game, then those are pretty good reasons to drop the game, I wont recommend the latest FM version to anyone, but GT5 is far to be an enjoyable long term experience, even with spec II it still lacks in plenty of areas.

NEXT- I stopped trusting reviews about 5 years ago. It's become like news journalist these days, just biased to promote something.(Not referring to any specifics of games, just presenting an idea.) I learned that playing games for a while, I'm pretty justified in saying what's a good game for myself(and also game design wise), and I don't need anyone else to tell me or convince me of anything or think for me.

True, but metacritic sums reviews and there are plenty of reviewers, IGN Kotaku and Gamespot are pretty sensationalist, but those are not the only reviewers. Besides what they do if qualify how enjoyable is the game and how many time you expend with it without getting bored, if GT5 doesn't match a excellent average is because it doesn't match the level of entertainment that fans claim.
 
AKI keeps it real to be honest, and even though I don't agree with him on many things he is very fair with his opinion, can't get mad at that. 👍 GT5 is sacred in my house. My little 6 year old understand that she is allowed to play with my PS3 , but NEVER allowed to touch the GT5 :lol: On a serious note though GT5 stays in my PS3 the best game for me right now. So many things you can do in GT5 it's crazy. and having 8 siblings that are also GT nuts make it even better. I will never drop GT5 until GT6 comes out. This is one of my favorite saying from Kaz.


People think GT series is going backward/down have it all wrong. The GT series is just getting started my friends. :gtpflag:
 
Last edited:
@AkiraAce
Of course flaws should be analyzed, but with a much more objective approach and understanding. And yes your just a consumer, do what you must with what you buy.

Everything has flaws, you take it for what it is. You don't like, cool, just don't like it. But understand you are just consumer, and don't do any of the hard work involved. And understand, it is what is in this console world of limitations. We can only hope to continue to voice our opinions on what to be implemented to PD, as it seems to have some worth since we are getting this Spec II update(With features people have asked for) for free. Regardless of what you think shoulda woulda coulda, we are where we are at now and it's getting better. If you don't like it cool also, but also understand why people do.

All your doing is still giving me your opinions still on what GT5 lacks, because the same can be said for opinions on why to keep playing the game. If you wanna take opinions for any worth, this poll is pretty much a collective opinion of the opposite of what you think. So take that for what it's worth, as it shows the value still held within this game.
With that being said, opinions are like assholes.. Everyone has one.

Any ways I pointed out about the core opinions of a racing game, and I think, among with the majority of this poll, is why people still choose to continue to play this game. Or else this wouldn't be discussed.( And this was conducted before the announcement of SpecII, so take that for what it's worth aswell.) Although the games not doing many things for you right, it seems overall it's holding up well with the majority.
 
@AkiraAce
Of course flaws should be analyzed, but with a much more objective approach and understanding. And yes your just a consumer, do what you must with what you buy.

Everything has flaws, you take it for what it is. You don't like, cool, just don't like it. But understand you are just consumer, and don't do any of the hard work involved. And understand, it is what is in this console world of limitations. We can only hope to continue to voice our opinions on what to implemented to PD, as it seems to have some worth since we are getting this Spec II update for free. Regardless of what you think shoulda woulda coulda, we are where we are at now and it's getting better.

All your doing is still giving me your opinions still on what GT5 lacks, because the same can be said for opinions on what to keep playing the game. If you wanna take opinions for any worth, this poll is pretty much a collective opinion of the opposite of what you think. So take that for what it's worth, as it shows the value still held within this game.
With that being said, opinions are like assholes.. Everyone has one.

Any ways I pointed out about the core opinions of a racing game, and I think, among with the majority of this poll, is why people still choose to continue to play this game. Or else this wouldn't be discussed.( And this was conducted before the announcement of SpecII, so take that for what it's worth aswell.) Although the games not doing many things for you right, it's seems overall it's holding up well with the majority.

Amen, this would of went perfected with why I disagree with AKI. Well said my friend. 👍
 
People think GT series is going backward/down have it all wrong. The GT series is just getting started my friends. :gtpflag:

It's not that...those who are new to GT and those who have been around were just expecting better from PD. I think Spec II will be great, but we all known GT should have got started a year ago when it came out and kept on going strong with steam. I guess better late than never.
 
That's human nature LMS, expectations. But even if expectations aren't reached, it's much more productive to find understanding, especially when you/we are only in front of the curtain.
 
That's human nature LMS, expectations. But even if expectations aren't reached, it's much more productive to find understanding, especially when you/we are only in front of the curtain.

I thought I did just have understanding in my last comment, unless your acknowledging that? Sorry long day so much racing to watch!
 
I thought I did just have understanding in my last comment, unless your acknowledging that? Sorry long day so much racing to watch!

I guess was just referring more to the "we expected better from PD" as I can only assume they were trying their best to reach expectation of themselves, so it's kinda hard to say "expect better". I would say it more like, "I expected they would be able to accomplish more, but I guess making a first game from scratch for new console with multiple thoughts on what to implement is a much harder task then we expected." But that's just me. :)
 
Not just any ordinary Doubloon....

mikeydoubloon.jpg
 
I guess was just referring more to the "we expected better from PD" as I can only assume they were trying their best to reach expectation of themselves, so it's kinda hard to say "expect better". I would say it more like, "I expected they would be able to accomplish more, but I guess making a first game from scratch for new console with multiple thoughts on what to implement is a much harder task then we expected." But that's just me. :)

I did say "better late than never" so I am giving PD a break in that sense. Sorry but I have high expectations for a great team like PD or I should say realistic.
 
Congrats to the person we all knew was going to win! wooo! It's amazing, he's only what, 23?

Whaaat! now i gotta let everyone know!




@LMS

I gotcha doode. :)



Who the hell is that?



haha jk I can't stop laughing. HEY YOU GUYS!!! Classic within a classic said by a classic character.

I think I love GT5 as much as he loves Baby Ruth.
 
Well, for that first bit - because frankly, as was mentioned earlier by SimonK, plenty of Forza's DLC ends up being brand new cars. Should they delay an entire year so they can include all of them? At some point, you draw a line. If their plan calls for monthly DLC packs, it's not surprising that they'll have one ready and announced before the game even hits. And because of that monthly schedule, you would always run into the issue at hand.

Don't forget that excluding the track DLC (not even announced yet so it doesn't matter) you don't even need to pay for the DLC in Forza.

All the car packs have a free version that gives you one of the cars in the pack and allows you to see the proper cars when opponents use the DLC.
 
@AkiraAce
Of course flaws should be analyzed, but with a much more objective approach and understanding. And yes your just a consumer, do what you must with what you buy.

Everything has flaws, you take it for what it is. You don't like, cool, just don't like it. But understand you are just consumer, and don't do any of the hard work involved. And understand, it is what is in this console world of limitations. We can only hope to continue to voice our opinions on what to be implemented to PD, as it seems to have some worth since we are getting this Spec II update(With features people have asked for) for free. Regardless of what you think shoulda woulda coulda, we are where we are at now and it's getting better. If you don't like it cool also, but also understand why people do.

I'm pretty aware of consumer limitations and I'm aware of development processes, but its not admissible that stuff that should be fix(and can be fixed) are completely overlook, and its equally not admissible that people cannot have an opinion on it. It seem that plenty of people is staying on GT5 but is also fair to listen from people who is dropping the game, which is also plenty of people.

All your doing is still giving me your opinions still on what GT5 lacks, because the same can be said for opinions on why to keep playing the game. If you wanna take opinions for any worth, this poll is pretty much a collective opinion of the opposite of what you think. So take that for what it's worth, as it shows the value still held within this game.
With that being said, opinions are like assholes.. Everyone has one.

I'm expressing what I think and I used to play GT5 long enough to get annoyed by stuff that is in included in the game. And again, an opinion has no worth if its is orientated to be critical, so an opinion like "Levelling out systems should be revised" or an opinion like "A-spec events should be added" have no worth because they are not announced in the update, besides and the thread title is "Anyone planning to drop GT5?".

I know the results of the poll and I find critical that 1:5 people of people who play the game now they wont play it, besides of being a "fan site" at least 20% of the fandoom is dropping the game, and that only accounts the people who post in the GT5 section(poll), so take it for what is worth.

Any ways I pointed out about the core opinions of a racing game, and I think, among with the majority of this poll, is why people still choose to continue to play this game. Or else this wouldn't be discussed.( And this was conducted before the announcement of SpecII, so take that for what it's worth aswell.) Although the games not doing many things for you right, it seems overall it's holding up well with the majority.

But, the core opinions of a racing game doesn't sum all the opinions of a racing game, besides I believe that you are dismissing the purpose of this thread because people are aware of other racing games and this is mentioned on the OP, which contradicts what you are saying.
 
@ Tenacious ... Finally since this thread is GT first doesn't mean it's the only thing they care about, FM fans have just as much say. I'm sure you realize that but you come off as if you don't.
I think you're reading too much in what I'm saying, but hey, I love to hear myself type and I do have a few more things to post, take them for what they're worth. I'm going to address akira's remarks below in one post.

My point with this is that people should try before buy, and people should try before judge, is logical to assume that what you like is what many people like, but sometimes that is simply not the case..
I wont recommend the latest FM version to anyone, but GT5 is far to be an enjoyable long term experience, even with spec II it still lacks in plenty of areas.
These are kind of problematic. The first quote because in many games, you have to play them for some time before you decide they're really worth it.

I played Forza 3 for weeks before the flaws bit me, and they bit pretty hard. First, the Photo Mode, which I didn't get into right away for obvious reasons, I wanted to race and paint up some race cars first. I was aware that the previous games have problems with the Livery Editor working right with many of the cars, and this was the same in F3, so I was half ready for it. I also knew that I had to go through the ridiculous rigmarole of uploading pics to the Forza site, but I didn't realize how much they were being mucked up in the process until I started looking at them closely, and then tried to correct them, and how much work it was. And then the file handling bog came up, when you have more than 120 some odd of pics, vinyl groups or liveries. There is no sorting, everything just stacks up in a line, and the flipping through them all became a chore, even after a patch to try and fix it. It was taking forever to do what I wanted to do, paint up race cars and snap pics of them, the real joy of Forza to me, and I'm not independently wealthy or immortal. For others who just want to race and hotlap, do the online stuff and drifting, Forza is a dream game, and my remarks on it have no bearing for them.

With GT5, some of the flaws are more apparent, like the Standard cars and tracks, others a bit deeper, like the XP grinding ordeal. But at the same time, the goodies take spending some time with the game. Those who will only race Premiums won't know how fun some of the BMWs are, or the 3000GTs, or the racing Altezzas or Diablo. For some gamers, less potent sounds correlate directly to lesser physics and feel, for others, impeccable graphics rule. Those who don't like the graphic issues or exhaust sounds and turn their nose up at GT5 completely won't experience the marvelous physics. There are too many things for me to think of offhand of why I love this game. I was up till 3 am racing in it. ;)

Forza 3 right off was loads of fun for me, even though I don't like Forza's driving views, but it took almost a month to realize that it had a huge crucial flaw. I stuck with it for another two or three weeks until I couldn't take it anymore.

GT5 right off was a lot of fun, though I hated the XP system which locked me out of buying cars I could afford, and the paint shop which had no paint of its own! As well as the limited A-Spec "career" which had very few races, and used very few of the tracks in the game! But the more I raced it, and the more I unlocked, the more cars I collected and experienced, the more I realized that the real treasure took some time to uncover.

From the looks of things around here, the hardcore GT players have for the most part embraced the frankly weird quirks the game has, some that make no sense. And from the look of the online racers, the casuals don't care about any of that. They just want to race, and in a world in which games are increasingly worth five days of play before being traded in, GT5 offers them infinitely more "long term" enjoyment, even if that's only a month or two.

Sure, Forza 4 is being unfairly judged around here. They're the upstarts who basically copied Gran Turismo rather than trying to chart their own path, but it's established now, and M$ will almost spend whatever it takes to keep it relevant. But the game does look incredible. The demo has impressed amar212 and Scaff, who are in the biz so to speak - Scaff in the real life auto world itself, so their word has quite a bit of weight to it. Yes, it's Forza, made by T10, and there's going to be a certain flavor which runs through the series, just like Gran Turismo has. If you don't like it... oh well, you probably won't like F4, but you won't know for sure. You really have to spend a lot of time with these racers, not a demo, to grasp what the organics of them are.

I'll be giving Forza 4 a fair shake in a couple of days, so we'll see how it goes.

As for Microsoft being just another business... yeah, right. No other company updated my credit card info without permission, but that's the sort of thing I expect from a monopoly. :P
 
Day1, week1 or first month DLC is a farce.

It seems Forza4 will have 4 DLC worth 40$ and you can buy season pass for 30$ and save 10$, that means the game is 90-100$. They are basically selling the game in parts.

Yeah? Well I paid $100 for GT5 and only got 200+ "premium" cars and EIGHT-FRICKIN-HUNDRED other cars copied from the PS2 and PSP. Forza is delivering way more to its fans than GT is. I'll gladly pay extra for FM4 DLC, because they've already gone above and beyond to make a COMPLETE experience for car enthusiasts. The DLC is just icing.
 

Latest Posts

Back