I'm curious why the moderators keep trying to hone in on "best" when I clearly stated, and reiterated, "ONE of the best", which would mean that it is among the best out there. I'm not sure why that's in dispute or why I would have to defend it.
All I've seen is that you guy disagree. No examples as to why. I don't understand why I have to defend my statement, as the game celebrates 100 million sales and is likely to celebrate a 30th anniversary.
Ya, you win being a part of ONE OF THE BEST racing games in video game history.
Here's an idea, post up an article on the main page where the moderators vote and rank their top 10 best racing games in history. I'd be interested in seeing which 10 games you guys (collectively) think are better, unless of course, GT ends up in that top 10.
I think the argument comes down to "one of the best" being an objective statement on a subjective proposition.
There are probably people out there who seriously dislike classic GT, so to them it wouldn't be one of the best.
Critically though (in terms of scores) it historically has reviewed really highly. If you count that as objective then in that sense GT as a series is one of the best (or some of the games within the series).
You could argue these reviews are just another subjective opinion, which is true, though I do feel like there are some things that are objective qualities, such as visuals.
But when it comes to game design, ultimately, though there is what you would call established qualities in the industry, even that is not a monolith of opinion.
One could argue that a game should control as tightly as possible on the sticks, someone else might say "no, it should be slower for more immersion". I fall in the camp of "maximise the directness of control" but you could argue the other and end up possibly doing it in a way where the first person could be like "yeah, actually, this works". It depends on the game I think.
But I think even if there are agreements for some game design elements among developers/designers, it still comes down to a collection of individual opinions.
All that to say, I just think the issue is saying it's one of the best rather than "I think it's one of the best", since the former is an objective statement and the latter is subjective.
I would agree that GT is one of the best but that comes from my experience playing it and that I feel it (historically) blends really good gameplay feel with the career, the UI, the sound effects, all of it.
Critic reviews tend to be a good indication for me, but now I think of it, maybe not for everyone, depending on what they like in a game.