- 27,385

- Toronto
- NewAesthetic
- SlipZtrEm
Dear Leader.
Yeah, this ends now.
Dear Leader.
That's basically how I feel about this, I don't think GT (despite however PD will market a GT game) will be a hardcore sim racer.GT isn't a full-on sim, and I doubt it'll ever aim to be: that's not where commercial success lies. iRacing has a total of what, 60,000 subscribers?
That's basically how I feel about this, I don't think GT (despite however PD will market a GT game) will be a hardcore sim racer.
and more frankly, I honestly don't want it to become one either. I might sound silly for this, but I feel that if GT became a hardcore sim racer like iRacing; it just wouldn't feel like Gran Turismo anymore.
GT isn't a full-on sim, and I doubt it'll ever aim to be: that's not where commercial success lies. iRacing has a total of what, 60,000 subscribers?
Arcade games, by definition, are not simulations or simulators.
Opinions do not matter, only the facts matter.
Is that the correct term? The answer is no.
Who cares!
...Uhh, okay. Still not seeing much correlation between this and what you've quoted from my post, though.
That's basically how I feel about this, I don't think GT (despite however PD will market a GT game) will be a hardcore sim racer.
and more frankly, I honestly don't want it to become one either. I might sound silly for this, but I feel that if GT became a hardcore sim racer like iRacing; it just wouldn't feel like Gran Turismo anymore.
This is where you lose touch with reality, people want to know what type of racing game they are going to buy BEFORE they buy it that's why simcade defines it perfectly.
I'm pretty happy in this forum among others, thank you very much. Think I'll stay a while if it's ok with you.Luckely its not November yet!
I dont give a rats ass how we call it, i start reading here on GT Planet because i love GT so whatever people say or call it. This is my racing game that i want the most! Perfect? Now but witch game is? Nice pyssics Asetto, but geahics crap, menu crap and so on..... i love GT because its a well desinged game because its GT because i feel iam good in the Nordscleife witch my asome Corvette Gr3. Its hard enough to do laps without any mistake so its not that easy but also not to hard that i get sweat on my head, if i want that i take a real car and go to real ring! Thats real racing and if yoy have the change try it sometime because there is no game that simulates the real deal.
Now please let us enjoy GT because thats where this started with and hopefully stays focused on.
Like other games? Now problem go to those forums and let us be loving Granturismo with all its flaws! Because GT is life, o wait now its getting cheesy haha
This is what I do: I tell other people they are childish for having a discussion because it's just a game at the end of the day.Simulation-arcade debate?
At the end of the day, GT Sport (and all other racing games), is a game made purely for an entertainment purpose.
If you want realism/physics go and jump in an actual car for a drive and stop the childish debate whether it's a sim or whatever - because it is just a game at the end of the day. That will be forgotten one day, sitting on a shelf collecting when you have moved onto the next GranTurismo or other racing game.
This is what I do: Do I have fun playing it? Yes - then keep playing, No - oh well move onto something else and all other aspects irrelevant.
I'm pretty happy in this forum among others, thank you very much. Think I'll stay a while if it's ok with you.
This is what I do: I tell other people they are childish for having a discussion because it's just a game at the end of the day.
Sega rally 1995/2 ftw!!!F355 challenge? Pfft, I preferred Sega Super GT cus it was 'simcade'Ferrari F40 every time.
Sega rally 1995/2 ftw!!!
I dunno. Pretty damn close.No one drives their car in the physical reality with a DualShock 4.
wtf, whats that? The DeLorean from Back to the Future?I dunno. Pretty damn close.
![]()
First of all, I never said that it would make it too "difficult". When I refer to a sim as "hardcore", I mean on how realistic they make the experience from the features provided to the likes of physics. Anyway, that wasn't my point at all; my point was that GT going completely the route of a hardcore sim like iRacing would not make it feel like Gran Turismo anymore. It would lose what made it Gran Turismo in the first place and become too serious.Real≠Difficult.
http://www.gran-turismo.com/us/products/gtsport/driving/
Enough with that "hardcore" nonsense. iRacing is online-only, it has no road-legal vehicles, and it is designed for people who care about online racing only. Also, we do not want a simulator that requires an internet connection in order to use it.
GTS' simulation being of the highest fidelity possible will not make it more 'difficult' and less enjoyable. Only clueless people say things like that.
Offended?I meant other subforums wise nose. Again not so serious pfff cant post anything witout somebody feels offended or whatever.
IMO this is a very common misunderstanding. More realistic physics don't necessarily make cars harder to drive especially in the Gran Turismo context. There are more than enough driving aids, tire options and controller optimization in a GT game to make all cars relatively easy to drive, even with AC or PCars style of physics. The physics don't change the surrounding game, it would still be a GT game, whatever that means in the GTS context that is.First of all, I never said that it would make it too "difficult". When I refer to a sim as "hardcore", I mean on how realistic they make the experience from the features provided to the likes of physics. Anyway, that wasn't my point at all; my point was that GT going completely the route of a hardcore sim like iRacing would not make it feel like Gran Turismo anymore. It would lose what made it Gran Turismo in the first place and become too serious.
Ignoring the words that are literally the names of things and thus easy to get right, this just looks like someone's battering a keyboard at maximum speed without a care in the world for making any actual sense.Luckely ... pyssics ... Asetto ... geahics ... desinged ... iam ... Nordscleife ... witch ... asome ... yoy
You don't get an entirely free pass to spout gibberish because English isn't your first language. You've agreed to use English and with decent grammar, when you could freely have not agreed to.You will post all messages in English.
You will not use “textspeak” (“r”, “u”, “plz”, etc.) in your messages. Decent grammar is expected at all times, including proper usage of capital letters.
I meant other subforums wise nose.
If you can't address other people in a civil manner, do not post.You are also a wise nose
People are free to discuss the flaws if that's what they wish to discuss.Like other games? Now problem go to those forums and let us be loving Granturismo with all its flaws!
I know. I've played Assetto Corsa and Raceroom Racing experience and haven't had a hard time driving in both of those sims with a controller. The only time a sim has given me trouble is Project CARS, but I think that was due to poor controller optimization.IMO this is a very common misunderstanding. More realistic physics don't necessarily make cars harder to drive especially in the Gran Turismo context. There are more than enough driving aids, tire options and controller optimization in a GT game to make all cars relatively easy to drive, even with AC or PCars style of physics. The physics don't change the surrounding game, it would still be a GT game, whatever that means in the GTS context that is.