It's fine if you like DiRT, but it must have been the only rally game you've ever played if you believe this is true.
Really?
So in other words you are saying every other rally game is more realistic than DiRT?
If not, then your presumption that TunerFocus has never played any other rally games is completely off base.
I realize you have a long history of exaggerating things, especially when it comes to criticizing Gran Turismo games, and promoting games like Forza and PGR but it really only makes your opinion that much more difficult to take seriously.
However, if you can list all the Rally games that you "feel" are more realistic than DiRT... in race series, graphics, sounds, tracks, cars, damage, "invisible barriers", tuning, options, cockpit views, replays, etc. then by all means do so.
Heck, even with DiRT's simcade physics, the only rally game I've played on a console with more realistic overall physics (handling, brakes, etc) was Richard Burns Rally.... and DiRT beats RBR on that vast majority of the other categories of realism.
I love rally games, and have played at least a dozen different ones on various platforms like PC, PS2 and Xbox, and among those by absolute was RBR for what it offered, and considering how long ago it was released, it was quite an effort from
Warthog in terms of realism.
I have also been a big fan of the series of WRC games from Evolution Studios, and still occasionally even play their original 2001 game on the PS2. I have also enjoy the Colin McRae games, all though not nearly as much as RBR and WRC.
However, despite RBR's superb physics, despite WRC's excellent reproductions of a real championship, and despite the wide variety of cars and gameplay in the CMR games, all fall well short of being as realistic as DiRT in terms of all the different categories of realism.
Anyone who says that DiRT is the most unrealistic rally game of all rally games ever released has either completely lost their mind, or is blatantly lying.