- 37,208

- Addison,Texas
- GTP_RACECAR
some of you are completely Oblivious to this because your thinking that everyone watches motorsport..
Again, who is saying this? I don't see anyone even making that sort of post.
some of you are completely Oblivious to this because your thinking that everyone watches motorsport..
If only it could be like this but think Hamilton, Alonso and Vettel instead:
You know what? Screw the Olympics, there should be a mandatory non-championship F1 kart race at the end of the F1 season.![]()
If only it could be like this but think Hamilton, Alonso and Vettel instead:
You know what? Screw the Olympics, there should be a mandatory non-championship F1 kart race at the end of the F1 season.![]()
Any form of sport that uses motorisation is outlawed by the Olympic charter. I'm not sure how shooting is still in under these terms, but it is.
Motor Racing as An Olympic Sport - How?
Not possible.How do you think it should be handled, if at all?
👍👍👍Motorsport as an Olympic event would always be controversial, largely because the sport depends on an engine, and engines can break. It would hardly be fair if a competitor was eliminated simply because of an engine fault. That said, the equestrian events see competitors riding horses, and although the horses are trained, they can still think for themselves. Everything that happens in an engine is a result of physics.
I could only see it working if it was styled as a spec series, probably using karts. It would only be open to amateur competitors - no-one who has raced in a professional series would be elegible to enter. The karts themselves would have to be owned and controlled by the IOC, and at the end of each race, placed into parc ferme and taken apart to ensure they are in working order. Competitors would be randomly assigned a chassis and engine combination before each event took place.
As for the event itself, there would be no qualifying. Rather, races would be contested between four or six drivers at any one time (though this number would be fixed so that there would be four drivers in every race, or six drivers in every race). The circuit would have to be designed with a straight long enough to negate any advantage gained from starting position. At the end of the race, the top two (if there are four drivers) or top three (if there are six) competitors progress to the next round. The races themselves would have to be long enough to allow the competitors to actually race one another, but not so long that the karts can break.
👍👍👍Because its inclusion would be controversial to begin with. Motorsport would have to prove that it is a viable Olympic sport, and if countries are only going to send the Lewis Hamiltons and Fernando Alonsos of the world, there's no point to holding it. By rights, all of those other sports should be limited to amateurs as well. That's the way the Olympics was founded - competitors are not permitted to accept any money from sponsors in order to compete.
If Motorsport is ever going to be an Olympic Sport, this is the way to go.I reckon that there should be a whole Motorsport Olympics.
Held in the lean year between winter and summer Olympics, a country is chosen to host, rather than a city. Different circuits host different disciplines.
eg the UK
Single Seaters - Silverstone
Motorbikes - Donington Park
Touring Cars - Brands Hatch
Drag Racing - Santa Pod
Oval racing - Rockingham
GT/Prototype racing - Snetterton
Rallying - The stages at Wales rally GB
Street supreme - Birmingham Superprix
The street supreme is a street circuit race for all-comers including those in other classes.
The Olympics is about people winning things using their own bodies to do so. For example - Cycling - People have to pedal a bike, which (quite obviously) is using their own energy to propel themselves. Motor is different, you may need to be strong to be good, but all you need to do to move is press the accelerator, which, isn't strenuous on the human body. Therefore, I feel that motor racing should never be an Olympic sport, no matter how much I like it.
Any form of sport that uses motorisation is outlawed by the Olympic charter.
So..., you mean the world's best drivers from different nations come together to compete in motorsport? We already have this. It's called Formula One. It doesn't get the same global viewership of the Olympics, but it does get quite a bit more viewership than any other motorsport by a massive margin.
I think you just answered your own question:This is dumb. Why do they allow teams to make changes to/develop bob sleds? And the athletes who use different skies?
Bobsleighs, luge and skeleton sleds move under the force of gravity. There are no mechanised parts to them. Likewise, skis only operate under the power of the person wearing them.Its OK to use different equipment as long as its not motorized
The rules on what is allowed and what is not are actually very, very clear. I don't think I've ever heard of a challenge mounted against someone for using incorrect equipment.That can be easily overturned if challenged
prisonermonkeysI think you just answered your own question:
Bobsleighs, luge and skeleton sleds move under the force of gravity. There are no mechanised parts to them. Likewise, skis only operate under the power of the person wearing them.
prisonermonkeysThe rules on what is allowed and what is not are actually very, very clear. I don't think I've ever heard of a challenge mounted against someone for using incorrect equipment.
But those skis and bobsleighs are not motorised.Why should motorized equipment be banned when they allow some sports to use different equipment with advantages over one another? For example Lindsey Vonn using larger skies for men that her competitors cant handle or Geoff Bodine developing the US bob sled
But those skis and bobsleighs are not motorised.
I will never be able to row fast, due to my build,