Motorcycles in GT5?

  • Thread starter Patrik
  • 1,143 comments
  • 110,875 views

You want bikes in GT5?

  • Yeah, that would rock!

    Votes: 55 32.2%
  • Hell no! GT is about cars!

    Votes: 99 57.9%
  • Don't care..

    Votes: 17 9.9%

  • Total voters
    171
  • Poll closed .
I would love them to combine the two!

If you don't like them don't use them!

Yes I would agree, but as per poll, 60% here strongly believe that bikes would take something away from the cars. I strongly disagree, as cars are clearly Ky's first love, he would never allow them to dilute his franchise, or ruin it as some here might want you to believe.

I keep hearing members talk about bikers and cars in the same game as being unrealistic and not real world, as in the real world cars and bikes are never competed on the same platform. Well that is not totally true, because a close friend of mine competes his bike in sprint races, where there is a class open to all, bikes and cars.

Cars and bikes may not share any actual real competitive track time together, but they do share (as mentioned) tarmac on the ring, where yes 'officially' they are not racing. Well try tell Mr A on his motorcycle not to race Mr. B in his 911 or vice versa, when one is overtaken by the other. It happens, be sure.

I ride a motorcycle, and while I am out riding some nice roads, I have many times come across well driven car. My Last little encounter was with a Bentley Continental GT. We had the country roads all to ourselves, for about 30 miles until we got into London, at which point we decided to call it a day. Thumbs up and then we went our separate ways. My 9 years of riding, I have had many encounters with cars, none of which ended up in tears. To best avoid that kind of thing, avoid Squids if you are a driver wanting to play with a bike, and avoid ricers if you are a bike playing with a car. I normally play with the middle age guy in a 911 etc

Bikes share our public roads with cars, and as from the above, time to time we cross paths, and a little race may take place - unfortunately illegally, but none the less it happens. Since its incarnation back in 98, YES GT has been about cars, it’s never been specifically about real world racing series, although some are included to spice things up. We have many Instances of unrealistic vehicle scenarios presented in GT, like the possibility of F1 cars lapping it up with Suzuki Cappuccinos!! I do not think that has ever happened and never will. There are many other examples, like a full blown WRC car on a road circuit racing with what ever you like. If you are all going to use 'real life' as a base for an argument, then you have to come up with more then that. And yes, these scenarios may be car on car, but they are more unrealistic then a bike vs an F1 car, as this has happend several time to date - in the real world I might add!

All of the GT's have all offered very unrealistic scenarios that have nothing to do with the 'real world' or motorsport as a whole. So bikes and cars sharing the same strip of tarmac, may not be the most realistic, but is is definatley not the most unrealistic we have seen, and is a more viable prospect than some scenario's already included in GT to date - seeing as bikes in the real world, as in day to day share our roads with cars, as well as every day, day in day out at the Ring lapping it up with cars.

I do not care how bikes arrive in GT, as long as: If I want to create a race myself, involving the 2 then I think most that want bikes here will be happy. I would certainly be happy with bikes just as DLC.


I think we are all forgetting, anything is possible in a game, and that is what makes them fantastic. I would never in my life get the chance to fly an F15, at 30000ft, while having a dogfight with a MIG, but from the comfort of my chair, I can, nor in real life can I shoot aliens that have invaded earth etc, but Gears of War and countless other titles allow me to do this! There is a boxing game coming out where you can compete with Ali and fight Mike tyson, not likely to happen in the real world, but awsome none the less - so what is wrong with a car and a bike missing it up on track. And before you say burnout or PGR 2, please I want a serious sim, not an unrealistic arcade game.

Of course, games have to stick within there parameters, as in no lawnmowers lapping it up on the ring, but including bikes in GT is not a leap of faith, nor is it a ridiculous proposition. From a performance perspective, the objectives of a bike and car are the same, they both combust fuel, ignite it, often making fantastic sounds. We fit exhaust, tweak suspension and brakes just like our car foe's..... and we like to race with the aim of winning. Only the lack of 2 wheels really makes a bike different, but the purpose and PASSION is the same. A bike in GT should be treated as any other vehicle, so why all the fear of it ruining the GT series I do not know.


TT2 will be great, but I can't wait for 2 more years for something that may never come. To me it just makes sense, having bikes in GT5. It will become the complete motoring Sim that it always should have been.




As for lap time, of course, we all know that ultimately a car is faster than a bike. Personally I am not hugely interested comparing an F1 car, with and gp bike, as one quick Google search will give us the answer on any track that they might share - though, for the sake of it, I would compare them hehe.

I am more interested with road bikes and road cars, because at this level, things are not as clear cut and much closer. Road cars have there advantages, in most cases under braking, hold a more constant speed though corners, though data logging has proven that on most corners apex speeds are the same. As we all know, bikes accelerate faster than the vast majority of cars, though the big hitters like the Enzo Ferrari, Pagani Ronda, etc, are not that far off of the top bikes, but certainly accelerate faster from 160mph onward.

Either way, I would like to know how a ZX10R compares with a an M5 at the ring, I suspect the ZX10R will take it, but what If the M5 had a race exhaust , and perhaps some sport suspension, now it is more even. The scenarios are endless. Look on these boards, and you will see the things members do, tuning challengers, where we have FF cars, with a budget of 150000cr to build a car, then we compare laps. We have people comparing run of the mill road cars, and trying to find out how much it costs to make it competitive with a WRC car on the ring! This is the magical thing about GT, and is a huge selling point for me and many others.


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12...10r-vs-clk-dtm

(ABOVE)This is a great vid of a ZX10R Following/racing a car - make your own mind up. Therer are many more like this on the net.
 
Last edited:
That is a great story. But it still doesnt change the fact that their is no imersion into a bike game. the phisics are allways horid, you just canot simulate a bikes controls with a controler, joystick, steering wheel. or anything else you can emagine. It not the fact that I dont like bikes. I have a 04 Augusta F4 in the garage and it is my pride and joy. but I have always hated bike games including torist trophy. the only bike game I found half entertaining was the Isle of man TT on the PS2, and then that was only when I was racing the sidecars. And again GT is a car game always has been and always will. adding bikes wont ruin it, but i think it will definatly lower the tone of the game.

And thets not forget the fact that PD are working towards a damage model, so that mixed with the Car vs Bike in a crash situation, and all the imature rammers we get online.

The look of things to come.

GRAN TURISMO: THE REAL DRIVING SIMULATOR
15facts.jpg


P.s what country road wher you going down. I fined the A34 is a nice thrash from southampton to Guildford.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't mind bikes in GT5. It'd be better than having to wait for the next Tourist Trophy.

But in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the next Tourist Trophy was just a downloadable GT5 expansion on the PSN.
 
I have to say one thing if they were to include bikes I would want them to be separate, ie no races where bikes and cars were featured.

I could actually see it being a PSN download that is a good idea.
 
they late, they late, and they don't have enough time...
it would be a joke if they spent precious time to perform fake motorbikes...
i really hope that motorbike are only a thought....
 
Another thing to consider is, would you rather have bikes or weather? Or day-night cycles? Or damage? Or liveries and racemod? I'd rather have another feature of real world racing than motorcycles. Save that for TT HD.
 
That is a great story. But it still doesnt change the fact that their is no imersion into a bike game. the phisics are allways horid, you just canot simulate a bikes controls with a controler, joystick, steering wheel. or anything else you can emagine. It not the fact that I dont like bikes. I have a 04 Augusta F4 in the garage and it is my pride and joy. but I have always hated bike games including torist trophy. the only bike game I found half entertaining was the Isle of man TT on the PS2, and then that was only when I was racing the sidecars. And again GT is a car game always has been and always will. adding bikes wont ruin it, but i think it will definatly lower the tone of the game.

And thets not forget the fact that PD are working towards a damage model, so that mixed with the Car vs Bike in a crash situation, and all the imature rammers we get online.

The look of things to come.


GRAN TURISMO: THE REAL DRIVING SIMULATOR
15facts.jpg


P.s what country road wher you going down. I fined the A34 is a nice thrash from southampton to Guildford.




I always found TT quite good for controlling a bike. It was very difficult at first, but once I got good, I found the control system very involving, and cetainly better than any Other bike effort I played. I don't see why we can't have a bike specific controler much like the Wii has a controller for every kind of game.

As for the country road I was blasting on, it was the A413 from Aylesbury to London. I was heading back after spending a day with a friend of mine late one evening. It is a road that is often very clear, especially late at night. It is quite a fast road, and plays into the hands of a fast well driven car. We could have went allot faster, but we kept it safe, as we past through small built up areas.

04 Agusta, Nice ride. I ride a 97 TL1000S with mods ;-)






Me in Belgium New Years day




And tenacious D, again, what makes you think that PD will sacrifice any content for the sake of bikes? Maybe PD are taking soo long, becuase weather and day and night cycles are included, as well as bikes. If they were to add bikes, I think we would see a very small amount, then in addition we would have DLC. Bikes will take nothing away from GT, only contribute to an already fantastic franchise. You guys think that if GT has bikes, it will be Semi GT, split 50/50 for bikes, it will never be like this. GT has WRC cars, it does not make it a WRC game, GT has Imports, it does not make it an Import Game, GT has touring cars, and therefore not a Touring car game. The additiom of bikes will not make it a bike game. GT will always be primarely about cars, and if we have a selection of bikes, this will not change anything.
 
Last edited:
Very well said, PAPPACLART. All these simple arguments of "GT is a car game, that's what TT is for" are getting extremely old.

And thets not forget the fact that PD are working towards a damage model, so that mixed with the Car vs Bike in a crash situation, and all the imature rammers we get online.

The look of things to come.

GRAN TURISMO: THE REAL DRIVING SIMULATOR
15facts.jpg

The inclusion of damage alone will attract immature racers. Just look at Forza 2's online community and all of the "destruction derbies" they hold. That's where the beauty of modern online structure comes in to play. We have a huge community right here on GTP full of mature racers. All you would have to do is lock the room to everyone except those invited.

stanfox.jpg


S*** happens.
 
Another thing to consider is, would you rather have bikes or weather? Or day-night cycles? Or damage? Or liveries and racemod? I'd rather have another feature of real world racing than motorcycles. Save that for TT HD.

Very well said, PAPPACLART. All these simple arguments of "GT is a car game, that's what TT is for" are getting extremely old.



The inclusion of damage alone will attract immature racers. Just look at Forza 2's online community and all of the "destruction derbies" they hold. That's where the beauty of modern online structure comes in to play. We have a huge community right here on GTP full of mature racers. All you would have to do is lock the room to everyone except those invited.

stanfox.jpg


S*** happens.


Agreed. Private rooms are the solution. I guess PD can impliment a fair play rating system, bad races get points against, good racers get points added.

PS

I see 2 legs dangling - ouch!!!

PS

I think that bike vs car crash is fake - from what I here, was a police promo for anti speeding.
 
Bikes will take nothing away from GT, only contribute to an already fantastic franchise. You guys think that if GT has bikes, it will be Semi GT, split 50/50 for bikes, it will never be like this. GT has WRC cars, it does not make it a WRC game, GT has Imports, it does not make it an Import Game, GT has touring cars, and therefore not a Touring car game. The additiom of bikes will not make it a bike game. GT will always be primarely about cars, and if we have a selection of bikes, this will not change anything.
Actually, it would mean at least one thing: fewer cars. I respect you bike folk, but I think this aspect belongs in the DLC category, or in Tourist Trophy II.
 
Actually, it would mean at least one thing: fewer cars. I respect you bike folk, but I think this aspect belongs in the DLC category, or in Tourist Trophy II.


I just don't see how it would mean less cars? Anyway, DLC is fine, I would be more than happy with that.
 
How do you justify including bikes on GT5 and not including trucks, aircraft, boats, horses or runners? I mean, if GT is about racing, might as well throw the house at it....
 
Now when I'm thinking that option more... I think PD will put some Bikes to GT5.

They have that Tourist Trophy brand, and if there will be second part of that, it would be very good way to marketing their knowledge about Bike-simulator. I'd like to test how it feels to drive motorcycle in driving simulator. After that it would be much easier to decide do I buy Tourist Trophy II, or not.

I dont think few bikes will take anything important away from GT5. If they ask from me, I would suggest them to leave Suzuki Alto, or some other chicane away from GT5 if needed...
 
I would enjoy it as I have a steering wheel and I would get the same satisfaction from an analogue control.
 
^ Exactly. These vehicles don't model and code themselves, after all.

+100.

Have any of you guys seen a motorbike, they maybe smaller but thay are alot more introcate than a car. all the wheel spokes (depending on bike). The chain, just emagine trying to model a chain. oh and then their is the suspension, witch unlike a car is always on show and has to be modeld to show every movement. And then their is the phisics of them. its not like modeling bikes is less time than cars, I think you will fined it would take longer to model a bike to the same standerd as the cars in gt5.
 
How do you justify including bikes on GT5 and not including trucks, aircraft, boats, horses or runners? I mean, if GT is about racing, might as well throw the house at it....

I never said that we can't have trucks, but Boats and Planes, not even a distant relative of a car - you are being silly:)






It means less cars because for every bike made a car is not made.

If PD decide on 600 cars, and then think mmm, how about 5 bikes too?

Just are all just creating an issue that is not there.

PS

The way I see it, the more Toyota Yaris's and alike there are, the less Supercars we get:sly:

We will get the cars we get, regardless of bikes
 
My opinion is that bikes would be great!

Because of all the "bike guys" that laughs at us car guys: "Your cars doesn't stand a chance against a bike...." and so forth.

It would be great to se how much you have to tune a regular car to beat a R-bike. And learn how much faster the car is in the corners against the bikes. This would to me be awesome!
 
motorcycle_hits_tires.jpg


now imagine online where 20 of these guys are doing this

As hilariously epic as that photo is, people are going to pursposefully crash regardless of what vehicles are in the game. Is this a problem in Tourist Trophy or any of the other motorcycle games out there? Ignore the immature, that's what private rooms are for!!!

If PD decide on 600 cars, and then think mmm, how about 5 bikes too?

Not to mention the fact that the people here that don't want bikes say that's what Tourist Trophy is for. If that's the case, and (hypothetically) PD is actually thinking about TT2, the effort is going to go into bikes anyway. Why not just stick them in GT5 and skip all the extra development that goes into creating a whole separate game?

Honestly, other than the people that say they want to get 100% and not have to race bikes to get it, I don't see any reason why bikes can't be in.
 
Last edited:
Ok just incase anybody missed the point of GT this is what the Dictionary says.

GT gran turismo: a touring car, usually a fast sports.

Motor bike: A two wheeld powerd mode of transport.
 
Ok just incase anybody missed the point of GT this is what the Dictionary says.

GT gran turismo: a touring car, usually a fast sports.

Motor bike: A two wheeld powerd mode of transport.


Grand Turismo = Grand Touring - not F1 car but we have F1 cars in GT racing Toyota Yaris's!!

GT is commonly associated with cars which is also a perception, but we have GT Motorcyles and GT pushbikes. GT can be pretty much anything automotive providing it fits a specific criteria, and that has nothing to do with how many wheels!

So Gran Turismo is not as exsclusive as a name in it's inclusion or exsclusion of other vehicles. What I am trying to say is - GT does not necessarily mean cars!! So please get you facts right :)

Grand tourers differ from typical sports cars (e.g. Lotus Elise, Porsche 911) in that they are usually larger, heavier (sometimes more than 3,500 lb (1,600 kg)), and tend to make less compromise in comfort for the sake of driving ability. For this reason, most have front-mounted engines, which leave more space for the cabin than mid-mounted engines. They tend to have softer suspensions to provide good ride quality. They also provide bigger storage space and more accessories. However, grand tourers do have similarities with sports cars, such as their use mainly of rear- or four-wheel drive, and the term sports car may be used to describe a car with grand touring qualities. Very high-performance grand tourers, such as the Aston Martin DB9, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, HSV GTS, Nissan GT-R and the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren, may be considered to be supercars.

Because of their powerful engines, grand tourers can still compete with many sports cars in top-speed and acceleration. However, in terms of handling they are a magnitude below sports cars, because of their weight and softer suspension. Grand tourers excel at high speed, long distance travel, or races, and make more practical daily drivers than sports cars.
 
Last edited:
For one thing, Toyota Yaris GT car
2600357838_fdacf343ea.jpg


So...... Toyota Yaris, plus tuning plus some vynal. = Toyota Yaris GT car

And I my self dont think F1 cars should be in GT.

And thets just read your little post here.

"Grand tourers differ from typical sports cars (e.g. Lotus Elise, Porsche 911) in that they are usually larger, heavier (sometimes more than 3,500 lb (1,600 kg)), and tend to make less compromise in comfort for the sake of driving ability. For this reason, most have front-mounted engines, which leave more space for the cabin than mid-mounted engines. They tend to have softer suspensions to provide good ride quality. They also provide bigger storage space and more accessories. However, grand tourers do have similarities with sports cars, such as their use mainly of rear- or four-wheel drive, and the term sports car may be used to describe a car with grand touring qualities. Very high-performance grand tourers, such as the Aston Martin DB9, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, HSV GTS, Nissan GT-R and the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren, may be considered to be supercars.

Because of their powerful engines, grand tourers can still compete with many sports cars in top-speed and acceleration. However, in terms of handling they are a magnitude below sports cars, because of their weight and softer suspension. Grand tourers excel at high speed, long distance travel, or races, and make more practical daily drivers than sports cars."


So do tell me where does that say anything about motorbikes?

And as for GT pushbikes. GT stands for, or did when the companey was first formed "GRASS TRIALS" not "Grand Turismo".

So again. Gran Turismo should not have Motorbikes in it. And as for making a whole new game just for Tourist Trophy. All PD will do is turn GT5 into Tourist Trophy 2. all they need to do is add bikes and remove the cars.

So where did I get my fact's wrong then?

GT gran turismo: a touring car, usually a fast sports.

Motor bike: A two wheeld powerd mode of transport.

Or do you disagree that a Motorbike has Two wheels
 
Last edited:
For one thing, Toyota Yaris GT car
2600357838_fdacf343ea.jpg


So...... Toyota Yaris, plus tuning plus some vynal. = Toyota Yaris GT car

And I my self dont think F1 cars should be in GT.

And thets just read your little post here.

"Grand tourers differ from typical sports cars (e.g. Lotus Elise, Porsche 911) in that they are usually larger, heavier (sometimes more than 3,500 lb (1,600 kg)), and tend to make less compromise in comfort for the sake of driving ability. For this reason, most have front-mounted engines, which leave more space for the cabin than mid-mounted engines. They tend to have softer suspensions to provide good ride quality. They also provide bigger storage space and more accessories. However, grand tourers do have similarities with sports cars, such as their use mainly of rear- or four-wheel drive, and the term sports car may be used to describe a car with grand touring qualities. Very high-performance grand tourers, such as the Aston Martin DB9, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, HSV GTS, Nissan GT-R and the Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren, may be considered to be supercars.

Because of their powerful engines, grand tourers can still compete with many sports cars in top-speed and acceleration. However, in terms of handling they are a magnitude below sports cars, because of their weight and softer suspension. Grand tourers excel at high speed, long distance travel, or races, and make more practical daily drivers than sports cars."


So do tell me where does that say anything about motorbikes?

And as for GT pushbikes. GT stands for, or did when the companey was first formed "GRASS TRIALS" not "Grand Turismo".

So again. Gran Turismo should not have Motorbikes in it. And as for making a whole new game just for Tourist Trophy. All PD will do is turn GT5 into Tourist Trophy 2. all they need to do is add bikes and remove the cars.

So where did I get my fact's wrong then?

I was never saying that a Yaris was not a GT car, more pointing how rediculous an unrealistic the prospect of an f1 car sharing the same space on track. And seeing how everybody is talking about realism, and nit picking about the name of the game etc.


'GT' does not mean 'car' just mostly associated as one, seeing as cars are very common!!. GT has reference to other vehicles other than cars. We can have a red car or a blue car, the colour does not make it a car, but a red car is a red car and so on. A GT car is a GT car!

A GT 'Vehicle' in essance, stands for in short for somthing in between an out and out sports vehicle, and a comfy tourer.

The truth is, GT is quite a loose term/tmeaning, and really is open to interpretation - hence the Yaris GT:crazy:

(edit)
And as for pushbikes, yes you are correct, but why can I by a pushbike with 52 chain ring, large thin rims and thin slick tyres, sold as a GT bike. Hardly a bike for Grass trails! Please... I am also an avid Pushbiker, motorcyclist and car enthusiast :-)
 
Last edited:
I was never saying that a Yaris was not a GT car, more pointing how rediculous an unrealistic the prospect of an f1 car sharing the same space on track. And seeing how everybody is talking about realism, and nit picking about the name of the game etc.


'GT' does not mean 'car'. GT has reference to other vehicles other than cars. We can have a red car or a blue car, the Colour does not make it a car, but a red car is a red car and so on. A GT car is a GT car!

A GT 'Vehicle' in essance, stands for in short for somthing in between an out and out sports vehicle, and a comfy tourer.

The truth is, GT is quite a loose meaning, and really is open to interpretation - hence the Yaris GT:crazy:

GT may have a loose meaning and be used for other such things. But Gran Turismo does mean CAR racing. as your previous post prooved.

And tell me what races in GT5P can you race a F2007 against a Yaris. I must have missed something.

Fact remains Grand Turismo means Car racing. and covers alot of different cars. GT1, GT2, GT3. GT300. to name a few. Motorcycling is comonly in the GP catogory, or World super bikes, or MX. or trials.

But just incase you are stuck for bike racing games. here are a few that you might like to try.

333839ps_500h.jpg

moto%20gp%2008.jpg

334356ps_500h.jpg


The funny thing is none of these bike games Have Gran Turismo as a title, and not one of them have CARS in them. WOW what a suprise.
 
Last edited:
Back