What age did you lose your virginity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casio
  • 192 comments
  • 14,234 views

What age did you lose your vignitiy?


  • Total voters
    225
15 or 16, depending on how virginity is defined.

Actually, I've spent the rest of my life getting there again, and it just keeps getting better and better.

Roger on that one. If it (it, which really means you) doesn't get better, then you're not learning anything.

Danoff
You just keep trying to do a better job for her, and she does the same for you.

Head explodes trying to contain pun.


M
 
Why? I've never been a "grass is greener on the other side of the fence" guy. I haven't discovered everything there is to know about this woman yet. Why would I need to look elsewhere? Why have 'woman ADD'?

I suppose I do it simply because I can - it's fun to do different things with different girls. My friends all accuse me of moving from girl to girl too often and not having committed relationships, but commitment isn't what I'm after at this stage in my life. I just can't imagine only being with one woman - I get bored way too easily. I guess for me the thrill is in the chase, and once I'm done chasing, the thrill is gone.
 
I suppose I do it simply because I can - it's fun to do different things with different girls. My friends all accuse me of moving from girl to girl too often and not having committed relationships, but commitment isn't what I'm after at this stage in my life. I just can't imagine only being with one woman - I get bored way too easily. I guess for me the thrill is in the chase, and once I'm done chasing, the thrill is gone.

Next thing you know you'll be singing the blues with B.B. King man.
 
I suppose I do it simply because I can - it's fun to do different things with different girls. My friends all accuse me of moving from girl to girl too often and not having committed relationships, but commitment isn't what I'm after at this stage in my life. I just can't imagine only being with one woman - I get bored way too easily. I guess for me the thrill is in the chase, and once I'm done chasing, the thrill is gone.

The chase sucks. But I can see how some people like the validation. It makes you feel good about yourself to have people want to be with you. The more people who want to be with you, the better you feel.

But when you're approaching it from the point of view of the "chase" and the "score" and the objective being self-congratulation, you're not going to find someone you want to spend more than one night with. It's something of a self-fullfilling prophecy.

After you've had a relationship with a few women, you should know yourself well enough to know what you're interested in most in a partner. At that point, your goal should be much more important and long term than self-validation.


Edit:

Let me put it another way. Relationships are about much much more than sex. When you find the right person, you know you'll never be bored with them.
 
I suppose I do it simply because I can - it's fun to do different things with different girls. My friends all accuse me of moving from girl to girl too often and not having committed relationships, but commitment isn't what I'm after at this stage in my life. I just can't imagine only being with one woman - I get bored way too easily. I guess for me the thrill is in the chase, and once I'm done chasing, the thrill is gone.

Hey Doug, calling it "the chase" is pretty corny.

[/heads up]
 
The score is not the hard part - the keep and keep fresh is the tricky bit.
 
The chase sucks. But I can see how some people like the validation. It makes you feel good about yourself to have people want to be with you. The more people who want to be with you, the better you feel.

But when you're approaching it from the point of view of the "chase" and the "score" and the objective being self-congratulation, you're not going to find someone you want to spend more than one night with. It's something of a self-fullfilling prophecy.

After you've had a relationship with a few women, you should know yourself well enough to know what you're interested in most in a partner. At that point, your goal should be much more important and long term than self-validation.


Edit:

Let me put it another way. Relationships are about much much more than sex. When you find the right person, you know you'll never be bored with them.

I couldn't agree more!
 
I havn't and I don't plan on losing it until I'm married.

While that's certainly a fine goal for many reasons, keep in mind what I said about the first time and how that impacts your wedding night.

...just trying to make sure you've thought it through. Not to dissuade you.
 
While that's certainly a fine goal for many reasons, keep in mind what I said about the first time and how that impacts your wedding night.

...just trying to make sure you've thought it through. Not to dissuade you.

Who says we have to have sex on the wedding night? As it's already been said in this thread, marriage isn't entirely about sex. If it's as akward the first time as you say it is, then perhaps by the end of the honeymoon, it will not be as akward and will be more enjoyable? Although if I know I want to spend the rest of my life with a person, and we both feel the same way, then I may make an exception.
 
Let me put it another way. Relationships are about much much more than sex. When you find the right person, you know you'll never be bored with them.

There's a BIG difference between having sex and making love. :sly:

Sex is usually with a one night stand or someone with whom you're with just to do it... making love is what you do with your wife/significant other with whom you have a real relationship.
 
The chase sucks. But I can see how some people like the validation. It makes you feel good about yourself to have people want to be with you. The more people who want to be with you, the better you feel.

But when you're approaching it from the point of view of the "chase" and the "score" and the objective being self-congratulation, you're not going to find someone you want to spend more than one night with. It's something of a self-fullfilling prophecy.

But at this point in my life, I'm not too interested in long-term relationships, so I don't mind if I don't find someone I'll be with for a long time. I've had several dating relationships, two of which lasted longer than six months, and while I don't mind that, I'm young and there's no sense - in my view - in committing to anything, or trying to commit to anything, at this time.
 
The chase sucks.

It wasn't that bad for me. There's a certain appeal to it and I can see why some guys enjoy it.

Don't get me wrong; I'm happily married now and would never trade it for being single and playing the field again.

But I liked dating and getting to know all the different girls. Sometimes it was fun even if it didn't work out. Worse case was you learned what you don't like in a girlfriend/wife.

Except when you unexpectedly end up with some crazy *****. That sucked. :lol:


There's a BIG difference between having sex and making love. :sly:

Hey, with the right woman, you can do both. In one night. :sly:


M
 
14th birthday present from some dirty girl in my class that I'm sure everyone lost it too that year. :lol:
 
As it's already been said in this thread, marriage isn't entirely about sex.
But it's an important part of it, and I think people should have sex before they get married. What if it's not good? Maybe you don't match in bed, there's no chemistry. This things happen, and I wouldn't want to find that out only after I married the person.
 
Sex is very important, but for someone who's a virgin to lose it to his wife, he's not going to be thinking "damn, she's crap, I've had way better than that". He'll more than likely enjoy it because he's never had it any other way. I see peoples points about it, but I think it's respectable that he's made that choice himself. Just because he's not going to have sex before marriage, doesn't mean theres going to be nothing that can spark sexual chemistry. A friend of mine saved himself till he got married on religous grounds, he was fine with that before and after the marrieage.

There's a BIG difference between having sex and making love. :sly:
Making love is always sex, but sex isn't always making love.
 
But it's an important part of it, and I think people should have sex before they get married. What if it's not good? Maybe you don't match in bed, there's no chemistry. This things happen, and I wouldn't want to find that out only after I married the person.

I have to agree with this.

My wife has this girlfriend who got married to someone without having sex first (she apparently wanted to atone for being somewhat promiscuous when she was younger) and not only did he turn into a first class jerk, she discovered he was lousy in the sack. They're long divorced now. She jokes that she could have saved herself all that trouble if she'd just done it in the first place :lol:


M
 
But it's an important part of it, and I think people should have sex before they get married. What if it's not good? Maybe you don't match in bed, there's no chemistry. This things happen, and I wouldn't want to find that out only after I married the person.

You can have a perfectly healthy relationship without sex. How do you think old people get along? :lol: Seriously though, sex is not necessary to make a happy marriage. If you can have a healthy happy dating relationship and not have sex, what makes marriage any different? All marriage means is that you commit to stay with that one person for the rest of your life.

IMO.
 
But at this point in my life, I'm not too interested in long-term relationships, so I don't mind if I don't find someone I'll be with for a long time. I've had several dating relationships, two of which lasted longer than six months, and while I don't mind that, I'm young and there's no sense - in my view - in committing to anything, or trying to commit to anything, at this time.

That's fine, sounds like it's something that's important to you. But in my experience it's quite rare to find the right person. Just don't let that slip by for a few flings.... not that you asked for my advice. I'll shut up now.
 
Just don't let that slip by for a few flings....

I worry about that occaisionally, but I've never been a big believer in the 'there's one person out there for everyone' theory, so I think I'll get a couple of chances.
 
Hah, don't subscribe to the "soulmate" theory?


Funny quote I found once on Eric D. Snider's website:

Dear Eric: Do you believe that there's one person, "The Person," out there for everyone? -- Wondering out West
Dear WOW: Yes. Your person is named Ming Chi. She was born in Beijing in 1656 and died of malaria 19 years later. Sorry.
 
Roger on that one. If it (it, which really means you) doesn't get better, then you're not learning anything.
Exactly. Like I said, it's taken 24 years to get this far, and it shows no sign of declining any time soon. Why in the name of trees would I want to start from scratch?
I suppose I do it simply because I can - it's fun to do different things with different girls. My friends all accuse me of moving from girl to girl too often and not having committed relationships, but commitment isn't what I'm after at this stage in my life. I just can't imagine only being with one woman - I get bored way too easily. I guess for me the thrill is in the chase, and once I'm done chasing, the thrill is gone.
So you're telling me that you made yourself wait until you graduated high school... and 10 months later you've used enough skanks to post like this?
But when you're approaching it from the point of view of the "chase" and the "score" and the objective being self-congratulation, you're not going to find someone you want to spend more than one night with. It's something of a self-fullfilling prophecy.

Let me put it another way. Relationships are about much much more than sex. When you find the right person, you know you'll never be bored with them.
Like I said, I've never been a "grass is greener" guy. If you lose interest in something as soon as you get it, you wanted the wrong thing the first place.

IMHO.
Hey, with the right woman, you can do both. In one night. :sly:
With the right woman, you can do both at the same time.
But it's an important part of it, and I think people should have sex before they get married. What if it's not good? Maybe you don't match in bed, there's no chemistry. This things happen, and I wouldn't want to find that out only after I married the person.
Roger that, too. You'll never find someone you can spend a lifetime with by having sex with a lot of different people. But you can eliminate a few you might have thought you could spend a lifetime with, without messy divorces. You need to start with the personality, though, and then try the sex, not vice versa.
You can have a perfectly healthy relationship without sex. How do you think old people get along? :lol: Seriously though, sex is not necessary to make a happy marriage. If you can have a healthy happy dating relationship and not have sex, what makes marriage any different? All marriage means is that you commit to stay with that one person for the rest of your life.
Here's a big hint for you - old people have sex. :indiff:

It is possible to have a happy marriage without sex - if both partners have a low sex drive, and are in agreement ahead of time. If you're committing to one person for the rest of your life, you'd better make darn sure of that before hand. The mismatches are what make the divorce rate high.
I worry about that occasionally, but I've never been a big believer in the 'there's one person out there for everyone' theory, so I think I'll get a couple of chances.
Well, good luck with that. There's definitely ONE person for me. Even when I've wanted to kill her, I've rarely wanted to leave her. And on those rare occasions back in the day when I did leave her, I never managed to stay gone.
 
I worry about that occaisionally, but I've never been a big believer in the 'there's one person out there for everyone' theory, so I think I'll get a couple of chances.

I never said there's someone out there for everyone. I just said it's rare. I've only met one person in my entire life that I'd consider even close to marryable (for me) - my wife. I'll let you know when I meet another one. Until then, I'll subscribe to the theory that you don't get many shots. Consider yourself lucky if you find even one person.
 
12??? 🤬 12????

real nervous now cos my son is soon to be that age :nervous:


The score is not the hard part - the keep and keep fresh is the tricky bit.


the best thing in this thread!

not sure bout the virginity till married tho, no disrespect, but your physical love life is part of your married life, and whether you believe it at the moment or not, it will become important when you start 'getting it!' So like all other aspects, you have to know your compatible....
Don't you?
 
Eh, don't worry about it. Just let him watch enough porn to not have the desire. Anyway, he's probably a loser like me who no one would have sex with anyway.
 
Eh, don't worry about it. Just let him watch enough porn to not have the desire. Anyway, he's probably a loser like me who no one would have sex with anyway.

I've met him. He isn't.
 
On the whole marriage night without sex thing....

going back to an old english law (where the girl had to be a virgin and the blood soaked sheets were shown to the guests to prove it), i believe that the law still stands (as it became un-needed so forgotten) and if the marriage is not consimated (check the spelling for me famine and edit where nec....) divorce is instantly granted for unreconsilable differences! So, you could argue that sex is a very important part of the wedding night


especially if your hoping to keep 50% of everything
:sly:
 
Back