6 Rotor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thatman
  • 40 comments
  • 3,386 views
Messages
2,267
United States
W92.46 N44.02
Messages
Thatmanthere
Messages
A Zany Husky
Lead me to the discussion on this if someone beat me to itl:drool:

 
The first video was posted in the import thread but I have not seen a thread on this engine. Quite the awesome thing
 
Oh my gawd...

That could easily make 1000hp, but I bet the MPG would be awful.
Idle is awesome though.
 
disgusted-mother-of-god.png


Me want higher quality sound...

Glad to see someone make something more than 4 rotors! :drool:
 
That sounded awful after idle. Idle had a nice lope to it.
 
OMG!!! A six rotor?! :eek::drool:

Amazing engineering went to this rotrary. And I'm shocked to see that they are putting this engine inside a RX-4! And boy, that's gonna be some wild fabrication to the car's engine bay, just to put it in!

I'm thinking it going to be pushing over 1,000hp, close to 2,000hp. Nice. :D
 
Quick question: what causes that interruption in the exhaust note at idle? (that *braaaap* *quiet* *braaaap* *quiet*) Is it because the rotors don't fire one immediately after another like on your typical engine? Or something more simple?

Still cool though. More power for less space=win. Gas mileage=fail.
 
Last edited:
Quick question: what causes that interruption in the exhaust note at idle? (that *braaaap* *quiet* *braaaap* *quiet*) Is it because the rotors don't fire one immediately after another like on your typical engine? Or something more simple?

Still cool though. More power for less space=win. Gas mileage=fail.

It's a peripheral port, so there is a large amount of port overlap between the exhaust and intake ports. Basically some of the exhaust gasses wind up in the induction and combustion phases so that rotor won't fire until the next rotation. As a result the rotor will fire-skip-fire-skip which creates the 'brap brap'

edit: Found a bit more articulate explanation courtesy of RX7club:

if your familiar with piston engines, porting a rotary is just like installing a bigger cam. the rotary doesnt have to deal with valves, only port timing. that is the amount of time that a port is open to ingest or expell air. when you enlarge the ports, you're making the port open earlier and close later. when you advance the opening of the intake port and delay the closing of the exhaust port enough,you have overlap.

overlap is the amount of time that the exhaust port and the intake port are open at the same time. on a stock ported rotary, overlap is non-existant. that is the hummmmm. on a large street port, half -bridge, bridge-port, monster-port, j-port, and peri-port, the port-overlap steadily increases with each style of port. exhaust gasses are allowed into the intake charge contaminating it and causes a slight to moderate "stumble" or "brap-brap". the more overlap, the higher the idle rpm, the more brap.

one of the drawbacks of overlap is less low end torque and less streetability. the benefit is increased upper rpm range and higher horsepower. hope this helps.

It sounds like one fire then one misfire, but it's actually 3 misfires followed by 3 fires, per rotor, because of the three-sided rotor. From Mazda:

33ignitionmisfire.jpg


Brap Brap: Defined.
 
Last edited:
Please let it be in the next RX (If that will ever happen), MPG would be a problem, maybe putting it in an RX8 will fix the lack of power :sly:
 
Needs more Le Mans, you mean. Drag strip would be too little and insignificant playground for such a motor.
 
Needs more Le Mans, you mean. Drag strip would be too little and insignificant playground for such a motor.

As long as I can see and hear the car thundering down a strip of asphalt I'm good. Just revving it doesn't do it justice.
 
I don't think we'll ever see a production 6 rotor, sadly. It would be unbelievably smooth and powerful though. The piston-engined equivalent would be an 11.7 liter(!!!) straight-eighteen(!!!!!!)

The would-be production 6-rotor would be a true continent-crushing engine, provided the fuel tanks are large enough. :)
 
Holy ****! Not only does that sound soil pants left and right, but 813 HP at the rear wheels? That's pretty damn nice :lol: Gotta wonder what that beast of an engine would bring to the table if someone turbocharged it...
 
Maybe around the 1000hp mark or even 1100hp! Depending on the number of psi that the turbo can do from tuning it and adjusting the ECU. 💡
 
Er, you do know that there's already a 1664bhp 4-rotor turbo running around? So, this one would easily be at 200bhp at least. Also, I prefer it N/A.. Dat induction noise.. Hhhhnnnngggg.. 3.9l of win if measured in the old fashioned piston displacement method.
 
Back