I must admit, for an article in the "News" section, this article appears to contain no actual "News" in it. There are NO NEW facts included, so where is the News?
All it seems to contain is supposition?
Much of it refers to the history of Covid19 (which is not news, it's history) GT3/4/5/6 (which is not news, it's history) and then supposes what might be the situation IF PS6 is delayed. Which is reported rumour(s) as stated in the article and not a fact.
And therefore everything that follows is, by definition, supposition (educated guesswork).
Based on the rumour, the article lists out possible impacts on "GT8" (a game which does not officially exist and does not officially have that title - nor does it have an official release date).
Where does the "anticipated timeline" come from (unless the author knows something I don't), I don't have any anticipated timeline for the next Gran Turismo game, other than sometime in the future. On what basis is there a thought that the PS6 and "GT8" are working towards similar windows? As the article reminds us, GT6 didn't come out on PS4 in the release, neither did GT Sport or GT7 come out in the same window as PS5. So, why might PD be working towards that for "GT8"?
Also, since Sony have never stated when the PS6 will release it has not been/cannot be delayed, so the title of the article appears to be incorrect?
To be delayed, a definite time reference has to occur (e.g.definition a period of time to which something is late or postponed) .
PS6 has never had a release date therefore it is not late or postponed and therefore it can not be delayed.
In the same way as the only GT game that has ever been delayed is GT Sport, because that is the only time the official release date as announced was changed to a later date.
The news article therefore appears to me to be history, rumour and supposition.