- 616
- Finland
Nope. I will try. Thanks for the tip.
Well aware the issue is vast majority of skinners back then slightly less so now would work in 2D and the end user license agreement is violated with the model export and yes I have explained this to the devs many times that poor templates leave modders no choice. Having helped make several of the skins in AC and ACC they are all done in 3d anyways by Zelimper and later Tatit both of which have insane talent.Many thanks for your response,
I have looked at the skin and you are right that UV wrapping is not so good.
Many years ago it was a disaster to make such skins yes ,
but now there are programs with which you can skin on the 3D model with Mudbox or Photoshop 3D
https://www.overtake.gg/threads/ski...om-nothing-using-mudbox-and-photoshop.147080/
but you have to be familiar with these programs for complex skins anyway
which I am not😢
I used to be part of the team left years ago all I help with now is money stuff and references, a lot of racing teams in the UK are very happy to help modding projects. I got access to some BMW concepts to be made in AC which should have been completed years ago if Charles could stop getting his rocks off to anime games.
I do wish one of the teams would go in a different direction rather than playing follow the leader and start pumping out mid to late 90's early 00's Le Mans protos and GT2/3 cars. Really flesh out the fields with left field creations like some of the Spykers, Saleen Mustangs, BMW M3 GTRs, WR LMP, LOLA's and a couple of Courage's! I think there is enough evidence to support that kind of nostalgia.
Yeah, me too! They have to release another pack at some point - just seems a bit strange to label it pack one.
You can't say that and then not share your ffb settings. There must be a law somewhere making it illegal.Obviously you need 10+ year old force feedback to create a great racing simulator in 2025, huh?
No surprise. This is the first track to use the newly added technology in Assetto Corsa.
The issue with that is finding a paying audience. Sure, people say they want this kind of content but are they actually willing to pay for it? Considering how quickly URD, RSS, and VRC content ends up on piracy sites, and the amount of downloads those get, I doubt any modding team would want to take that risk solely for that reason. Maybe a hundred people would buy it, but another thousand would just pirate it instead.
Was about to ask if there were other tracks with such features lol
(Proudly sponsored by Satisfyer).
we've done a bang on 2000 spec Audi R8 (which is different to the VRC Audi R8...biggest difference is the rear)
Gosh. I'm really saddened to hear that news. I had exchanged private messages with Fanapryde a few times over the last couple of years to keep up to date with his health situation and offer whatever comforting words I could. As you say, he was a lovely guy. Despite knowing how serious his situation was, this is still something of shock to me. 😔
DRM Revival and Tommy78 are definitely NOT bad mods. What did this guy smoke for saying that?
Why is this subjective Klown Posse nonsense getting airtime again after all these years, as if it's something to be respected?
But it's one very biased and deliberately provocative list from a group of self-proclaimed 'expert' circle-jerkers that's already been discussed and debunked ad nauseum many years ago when it first surfaced.I do not know maybe because it’s also have a list of the good modders.
Tyrone tracks too. They could be better if only he would be divide some meshes for the grass for example in order to have grass separated from the gravel which is a limitation of RaceTrack Builder, but for sure they are not bad at all. RMi too? What kind of problems have this guy?DRM Revival and Tommy78 are definitely NOT bad mods. What did this guy smoke for saying that?
