O indeed, i'm not knocking it, i simply think there's been one hell of a gulf in the images i've seen. I know its a bad thing to do, but the only comparison I have to FM4 is GT5 and between the two the autovista mode seems to have the best graphics. However, whenever I see an in game shoot with a track environment around it just doesn't match up to GT5 for me.
GT5 vs. FM4 (or FM3, for that matter) is always a tough one when it comes to graphics. In carefully selected, static shots, GT5 seems clearly superior.
While in motion, it's a tough call. It all depends to how you react to the tearing, the frame-rate drops, the flickering shadows, blocky smoke, ocassional standard car or the less detailed tracks. For me, that's really taking the beauty out of GT5's graphics. The first time I fired it up, I was like 'WTF?!' because all of this stuff.
For others, it might be barely noticible - I don't know, but I guess it's much more subjective between other games.
What claims?
This game isn't even out yet and people are continuing to complain.
If you don't like what you see: fine. Go back to the GT5 forums.
I'll take the consistent detail and smoothness of Forza's graphics over the highly variable and often disappointing GT5 graphics any day.
O indeed, i'm not knocking it, i simply think there's been one hell of a gulf in the images i've seen. I know its a bad thing to do, but the only comparison I have to FM4 is GT5 and between the two the autovista mode seems to have the best graphics. However, whenever I see an in game shoot with a track environment around it just doesn't match up to GT5 for me.
SuperShoudenOkay, there IS a GT vs FM thread. No need to make another one. Sorry to the mods for this pseudo modding, but I don't like off track threads.
GT5 vs. FM4 (or FM3, for that matter) is always a tough one when it comes to graphics. In carefully selected, static shots, GT5 seems clearly superior.
While in motion, it's a tough call. It all depends to how you react to the tearing, the frame-rate drops, the flickering shadows, blocky smoke, ocassional standard car or the less detailed tracks. For me, that's really taking the beauty out of GT5's graphics. The first time I fired it up, I was like 'WTF?!' because all of this stuff.
For others, it might be barely noticible - I don't know, but I guess it's much more subjective between other games.
HoodboiNo Night, No Weather in FM4. 25 cars in autovista....
http://forzamotorsport.net/en-us/underthehood2/
HoodboiI'm mostly disappointed with Pistano being cut. I think I'll be holding onto my FM3 disk for a looooooong time. One thing I don't understand is how come they couldn't get wet tire data from Pirelli.
This just made me go WTF out loud. Im serious.
At least I get good cars to start with 👍
Only 500 cars? What the hell?
I'm sorry, but this made me dissapointed.
I dont understand why this game has less cars then the FM3 UC...
which is pretty reasonable if you remember how F12010 struggle in the wet.
500 cars are plenty imo.
Turn 10 forgot about the racers.
Under The Hood 2 crushed my hopes.
Only 26 Autovista Cars. New York, Sidewinder and Amalfi Full removed (No city tracks? WTF?) And as a cherry on top. No night racing or weather.
Seriously, what!? Forza 3.1
There's also the hint of Bathurst...