- 131
- Netherlands
- wimbo1993
ay mate, can you tell me how to get that orange matte paint chip?
I could if I remembered how, but I really don't know anymore. Probably won at a seasonal event.
Interesting/Cool Modifications
- Thread starter ewitspaul
- 1,061 comments
- 344,374 views
I could if I remembered how, but I really don't know anymore. Probably won at a seasonal event.
- 206
- Newport News
- GxldenNickle
It was a prize through one of the seasonal events. Can't remember which one exactly off the top of my head but I know it's how I got mine.ay mate, can you tell me how to get that orange matte paint chip?
- 404
- Jakarta, ID
- 34
- Yorkshire
- ChrisFax4Ever
- 8,239
- United Kingdom
City of Arts and Sciences. Photomode location.
- 34
- Yorkshire
- ChrisFax4Ever
- 1,148
- United States
Here are all the screenshots I took from Photo Travel. All images are from Gemasolar. They're in a spoiler because some people have slow connections, bandwidth caps, or are using a mobile device like a phone or handheld like a PS Vita or Wii U. I also included pictures of the car in its stock form.
Stock:
Side
Front
Rear
Top view of rear wing
Side view of rear wing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aero Kits:
Type A:
Front
Rear
Type B:
Front
Rear
Type C:
Front
Rear
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rear Wing:
Type A:
Side
Top
Rear
Type B:
Side
Top
Rear
Type C:
Side
Top
Rear
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (livery section behind the front wheels):
Part A:
1 badge
Part B:
2 badges and the number 12
Part C:
3 badges without the 12
Note: Wheels can not be changed or the front wing.
Side
Front
Rear
Top view of rear wing
Side view of rear wing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aero Kits:
Type A:
Front
Rear
Type B:
Front
Rear
Type C:
Front
Rear
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rear Wing:
Type A:
Side
Top
Rear
Type B:
Side
Top
Rear
Type C:
Side
Top
Rear
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (livery section behind the front wheels):
Part A:
1 badge
Part B:
2 badges and the number 12
Part C:
3 badges without the 12
Note: Wheels can not be changed or the front wing.
I personally use the following:
Aero:
Type C
Wing:
Type C
Other:
Type C
Last edited:
- 97
- Alabama, USA
- Christopher12284
- Christopher0184
No more interesting or unique modifications have been found since January? Although, to be honest, I was kind of surprised that the Alpine VGT was a pair of cars and not a single car with the rear wing being an aftermarket part.
Last edited:
- 1,964
- wocsoM
Im pretty sure they have been funded, nearly everybody wants the unique parts on their cars!
- 4,089
- Utah
Have you ever wanted a factory-style wheel on an Audi, painted black? Well, wait no more! For it's called a Enkei SC05!
I must say, I do like it quite a lot.
Love the RS6, but that's one of those cars you can't get to look right (or better than stock) no matter what you do. Same problem in Forza.
- 3,264
- Salt Lake City,
I just noticed from doing the Viper seasonal that if you have the '08 Viper ACR, adding the (non-body colored) carbon hood keeps the stripe on the left side. Paint the car and it turns the stripe the same color. Also does it on the stock rear wing endplates and stripe.
- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
I don't know if it's been said already, but the Daihatsu Midget II used to have the best rear wing placement when the game first came out, which was sitting in the middle of the tray, with massive wing stays, very racing truck style. For some reason an update moved it to the roof with almost non-existent stays....
Wow thanks for fixing that for us PD... Don't worry about fixing all the actual bugs in the game, just remove the one thing that made the midget in GT6 awesome....🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Wow thanks for fixing that for us PD... Don't worry about fixing all the actual bugs in the game, just remove the one thing that made the midget in GT6 awesome....🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
- 10,916
- Sweden
- eran0004
You must have been dreaming, it has always had the wing on the roof. Here's a video from December 7th 2013:
As for your rant: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/the-gt6-epic-whining-and-crying-thread.282208/
- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
Except for the fact it has. I never took a photo of mine, but I never updated the car icon in the garage, so it still has the old wing in that image.
It was a very cool mod, because it made the thing look like a mini race truck. I have no idea why they changed it, but they did.
Bare in mind that I didn't have the net when GT6 came out, so I didn't do any updates to the game until it had been out for 6 months or so, so it might have been a day one update "fix".
I'll get a photo of the garage icon later on with my phone and post it.
- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
No way it was a glitch, it was completely different. If it was a glitch it wouldn't have looked right.
The wing stays connected to the centre of the tray, and were quite long, and the wing itself sat a bit higher than half way up to roof height. I actually said to a friend of mine who was there when I was doing the car up that they should have made it longer so the wing was at the same height as the roof, and how cool it would've looked. I also said that where the wing sat, IRL it wouldn't get much airflow to it, as it'd just get turbulent air from over the top of the roof.
I honestly couldn't care less if people don't believe me, but I actually find it funny that people are flat out dismissing it without having a clue themselves. You would need to have bought the car and modified it without having done any updates to the game to even have an opinion on if I was making it up or not, which you obviously didn't.
Ask yourself what I would have to gain by making up something so random lol. I don't waste my time with making **** up.
Edit* Quick google search later, here we go:
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...ented-changes-also-listed-in-op.306554/page-3
Post #69, Obviously PD had accidentally left the brackets there when they changed the wing placement.
Edit#2** Just put the game on and took these photos:
The wing stays connected to the centre of the tray, and were quite long, and the wing itself sat a bit higher than half way up to roof height. I actually said to a friend of mine who was there when I was doing the car up that they should have made it longer so the wing was at the same height as the roof, and how cool it would've looked. I also said that where the wing sat, IRL it wouldn't get much airflow to it, as it'd just get turbulent air from over the top of the roof.
I honestly couldn't care less if people don't believe me, but I actually find it funny that people are flat out dismissing it without having a clue themselves. You would need to have bought the car and modified it without having done any updates to the game to even have an opinion on if I was making it up or not, which you obviously didn't.
Ask yourself what I would have to gain by making up something so random lol. I don't waste my time with making **** up.
Edit* Quick google search later, here we go:
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...ented-changes-also-listed-in-op.306554/page-3
Post #69, Obviously PD had accidentally left the brackets there when they changed the wing placement.
Edit#2** Just put the game on and took these photos:
Last edited:
- 10,916
- Sweden
- eran0004
No way it was a glitch, it was completely different. If it was a glitch it wouldn't have looked right.
The wing stays connected to the centre of the tray, and were quite long, and the wing itself sat a bit higher than half way up to roof height. I actually said to a friend of mine who was there when I was doing the car up that they should have made it longer so the wing was at the same height as the roof, and how cool it would've looked. I also said that where the wing sat, IRL it wouldn't get much airflow to it, as it'd just get turbulent air from over the top of the roof.
I honestly couldn't care less if people don't believe me, but I actually find it funny that people are flat out dismissing it without having a clue themselves. You would need to have bought the car and modified it without having done any updates to the game to even have an opinion on if I was making it up or not, which you obviously didn't.
Ask yourself what I would have to gain by making up something so random lol. I don't waste my time with making **** up.
Edit* Quick google search later, here we go:
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...ented-changes-also-listed-in-op.306554/page-3
Post #69, Obviously PD had accidentally left the brackets there when they changed the wing placement.
Edit#2** Just put the game on and took these photos:
Well, that has got to be 1.00 then, because in 1.01 the spoiler was on the roof.
- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
As I said.... They changed it in an update. As I didn't update the game 'till 6 months after it came out, I didn't know which update changed it.
So if you're happy I've gone to enough trouble to prove I wasn't making it up, even though I can't imagine why anyone would make up such a thing, I would like to say once again a big thanks to PD for addressing such a big problem with the game... Don't worry about making the physics actually work...
On a more serious note, I'll never update that picture in the garage, the car looks stupid now... I just wish I had've gotten some good photos and a replay of it with the old wing
If I didn't mind re-downloading 19 gig worth of updates I would delete the game data just to be able to drive that beast again.
- 10,916
- Sweden
- eran0004
As I said.... They changed it in an update. As I didn't update the game 'till 6 months after it came out, I didn't know which update changed it.
So if you're happy I've gone to enough trouble to prove I wasn't making it up, even though I can't imagine why anyone would make up such a thing, I would like to say once again a big thanks to PD for addressing such a big problem with the game... Don't worry about making the physics actually work...
On a more serious note, I'll never update that picture in the garage, the car looks stupid now... I just wish I had've gotten some good photos and a replay of it with the old wing
If I didn't mind re-downloading 19 gig worth of updates I would delete the game data just to be able to drive that beast again.
It's 1.01 because the video I shared is from December 7th. The game was released on December 6th and 1.01 was released on December 5th. That would also explain why you're the only one who remember it, because most players started on version 1.01 or later.
The physics do work, and even if they didn't it's not the car modelling team that's responsible for the physics so I don't know why you're blaming them for it.
- 2,810
- Tasmania, AU
- stigsdaddy
I wouldn't think that most people who bought GT6 have the internet, so I doubt that's correct that most players started on 1.01.
So in your opinion, there's nothing wrong with the physics? camber doesn't have any use in the real world? high front ride height promotes oversteer? what about the top speeds of the cars in GT6? they must be accurate too then hey? The moon physics when you roll over? I could go on if you like...
I didn't blame the modelling team for screwing up the physics... I'm not sure how you got that from what I wrote... My problem was with who ever decided that it was important enough to get someone to change that wing, and yet no one at Polyphony Digital feels the countless problems with the physics in GT6 are important enough to fix. Does that explain it in enough detail? Typical PD, ignore any problems with the game, and "fix" what isn't even broken.
