- 1,632
- UK
- YT__TJCGAMING
Those two sentences mean different things. One is what is actually true and one is what you think is true. You habitually conflate the two as if only what you think is true is true - that there can be nothing you have not thought of...Aside from the fact that your statement of his statement is itself untrue, it would only be an untrue statement at the time it was made if you believe that the observed result matches the expected or intended result - which it seems that you do.
What we know of features like the Course Maker is that they were listed on the official site as features that would come in future updates - which instantly kicks any concept of it being intended for day 1 into touch, but that's sort of beside the point at this juncture.
If the intent was to get it in at a known area in the near future and the statement was that it would arrive in the near future, it is not an untrue statement. If the intent was not to release it for 18 months and the statement was that it would arrive in the near future, it is an untrue statement.
You are assuming that because there was a statement that a feature was in a sufficiently late stage of development and the feature has not arrived yet, either the statement was a lie or the PD team are so inept (or badly managed) that they haven't yet finished the feature.
You are not allowing for the possibility that something beyond anyone's reasonable control has occurred and are heading straight for Kazunori and the PD team being liars and/or incompetent. You are then presenting this opinion as a stated fact, which it isn't.Do you believe that you are sufficiently well-informed to have all the information and sufficiently intelligent to calculate all of the possible outcomes without the need to allow for something you haven't thought of?
Or can I look forward to you changing your attitude from statements of fact to statements of opinion?
This is basically the same post you posted in the about the course maker thread . It comes across as " We the mods know what you don't , and you lot still haven't guessed the reason " etc . From a statement of fact standpoint , to a you can't guess what it is standpoint is all well and good . However your opinion always leads me to suspect PD legal issues with it .
But seeing as the mod staff won't/can't tell then I will see the truth in what information is available at this current time . As like many others will until PD or GTP drop the secrecy regarding it . Anything else that is said , either by yourself or a user on the course maker is still open to debate , unless proved otherwise .
So it's not enough for me to have hints that something has happened . Proof speaks much louder 👍
Very much so, but it was not "stated" as TJC said. Makes a pretty big difference if you're claiming to be a fan of the truth.
and I think you need to better understand what Lie means. I know exactly what cutting it close means, but that doesn't mean to say that I agree he "lied". In the real world people make estimates and predictions all the time in good faith, and for whatever reason they are not always correct. This is different to stating something you know to be False.... Do I think he did the latter? No I don't. If we do take the reasonable inference that it was due shortly after release, you've still got no evidence either way to say whether Kaz knew it wouldn't or not... so your claim that it was "obviously a bold face lie" is based on what exactly?
Did you know Kaz didn't actually state "The course maker would make it into the game just shortly after release" when you claimed he did... were you just telling a bold face lie? did you just make it up? or did you think it said something different?
If what you state is true , then where' s the update from PD ? You are of the opinion that Kaz was telling the truth . Which is , all said and done , your opinion . Inference is still inference . And when you are inferring a feature is close to being ready , yet at a further point in the future it is inherently clear that it is not , then you either lied or you should communicate to your consumer that what you said wasn't accurate , but you believed said statement was a paramount truth at the time of publication .