- 2,188
- Northwest Passage
Except the lettering behind him shows a sharp corner where the curve of the "D" should be...
Yeah, I noticed that earlier, but I can't put my finger on it like @The Bman .
Except the lettering behind him shows a sharp corner where the curve of the "D" should be...
Except the lettering behind him shows a sharp corner where the curve of the "D" should be...
I'm seeing it. I'm now fully convinced its DQ which is a shame as I loooovvvveee DQ but I can't stand BiffleIf you look closely, its red with white (letters) and a very thin orange stripe.
View attachment 208627
![]()
Maybe.
http://www.dairyqueen.com/us-en/Menu/Food/FlameThrower-Grillburger-/?localechange=1&Not sure how anyone could get Dairy Queen out of flames (not to mention the fact they've never been involved in sponsoring racing).![]()
Maybe they would rather spend their marketing dollars on their lesser-known products, in an attempt to gain market share?I'm well aware of the Flamethrower, but chances are if they did sponsor the car it would be a Blizzard scheme as that is their primary product.
Maybe they would rather spend their marketing dollars on their lesser-known products, in an attempt to gain market share?
They actually sponsored a sprint car and maybe a Champ Car/Indycar back in the day.
I'm well aware of the Flamethrower, but chances are if they did sponsor the car it would be a Blizzard scheme as that is their primary product.
I'm starting to see Firehouse Subs.
View attachment 208779
![]()
It has that thin orange outline, and the flames would make sense.
The letter font is different though, the points on the logo don't appear on the car.
Wild guess but what about...Hard Rock Café?
See it I might be able to agree and then research it to see how exactly from another user, but you've been shown to have bias against Toyota because they're not a domestic make before. So you'll have to excuse me if I don't find this bias especially when you say all of Toyota.
You can do all the IMO you want, that doesn't mean your opinion can't be argued just to avoid the argument, if you want avoid it don't respond. However, since you are let's take you through the reality of this. RFR only has one winning drive this season with two wins, that is still behind their non winning driver in points who also happens to have more consistency as shown by top tens and fives. In fact his top five count is equal to both the RFR drivers in the point as of now and nearly equal to their combine top ten. The engine is there the overall package and team probably isn't just like RFR it isn't, yet the chassis and engine are good enough that the entire team has the ability to make the chase even if being the weaker group.
They're worse that JGR because of what has been seen so far in the season, that RFR are only fast enough most weekends for top 15 and weekends where they can win it they butcher it. Carl could have won his third race this season hell he was just as fast as some of the faster drivers Friday and then it all came apart on Saturday only to be made worse on Sunday with horrible team decisions and moves on pit road. That's not to say that JGR hasn't had it's issue but the minimize much better than Roush.
I can agree to some extent, Kurt has been fast but I think he's at times is his worst enemy as Michigan showed us and I think the team has hurt him along with things out side his control. Harvick has had some bad moments here and there and should be higher in the standings but after the halfway point he doesn't seem nearly as strong on average. Either way I agree half the team is fast, the other half Stewart and Patrick (for obvious reasons) isn't nearly as fast. So let's be fair and just use the three good drivers. They are far more inconsistent than Gibbs but still fast and good enough with issues to be better than RFR.
Look I'm sorry but RFR just is nor hasn't been that great, and if they were then why are drivers leaving them, why are sponsors moving on to more prosperous teams. It'd be on thing if I was making this up but I'm not and with results also being for view, that tells even more of the story especially compared to a newer yet much better Ford team.
Saying that RFR is better than JGR just because Ford has 8 wins vs Toyota's 2 wins is like saying that Chip Ganassi Racing is better than RFR only because Chevy has 13 wins vs Ford's 8 wins. Roush Fenway can't take credit for Team Penske's success here just because they have the same blue oval sticker on the hood.
I mentioned manufacturer win totals to show how much Toyota as a whole are off this year compared with Ford
No, they're behind Penske and Penske only in this regard.
RFR is struggling, not Ford.
Which is exactly why I emphasized Ford and corrected you by saying Penske is the only blue oval team JGR is behind, as they are most certainly not behind RFR.
Never said they were.
So yes, RFR to JGR is more of a lateral move, IMO.
Yeah, I never said that.
I mentioned manufacturer win totals to show how much Toyota as a whole are off this year compared with Ford and Chevy.
TRD knows it, thus they are working on a new engine package.
Let's look at this season, shall we? 23 races in and JGR only has 2 wins, Toyota's only wins of the season. MWR has none.
Compare that to 8 wins for Ford, and 13 for Chevy. I would call that struggling for Toyota. Even they admit the are behind in the horsepower department and are working to rectify it.
Let's look at the numbers for this year.
Joe Gibbs Racing (3 drivers):
Wins: 2
Top 5s: 19
Top 10s: 33
Poles: 5
Laps Led: 805
Roush Fenway Racing (3 drivers):
Wins: 2
Top 5s: 9
Top 10s: 21
Poles: 0
Laps Led: 242
You said JGR is before Ford. Didn't specify any team. Naturally anyone would assume you're referring to Ford as a whole.
This is the comment that my reply was more aimed toward.
I totally disagree here. Carl is the only redeeming factor keeping RFR above water, and his move to JGR will only make JGR stronger and RFR weaker.
You are proving other people's points though. So you are saying Ford's better then Toyota, why is RFR doing worse then? Why do the stats show JGR is better then RFR then? Yeah, the driver skill, but if you are saying Ford is really that good(and RFR is sooooo great), skill shouldn't matter.
Would it be fair to counter that MWR is struggling, not really Toyota as a whole?RFR is struggling, not Ford.
Counter-point: Danica Patrick is in a Hendrick-prepped and powered SHR Chevy. This is the same basic car that has 12 wins (Gordon x3, Earnhardt x3, Johnson x3, Harvick x2, Kurt Busch) in the first 23 races, plus powered Jamie McMurray's winning car in the All-Star race.Yeah, the driver skill, but if you are saying Ford is really that good(and RFR is sooooo great), skill shouldn't matter.
As it's shown below, that's not correct.Going to JGR seems like a lateral move. I guess Edwards wanted/needed a change, but JGR isn't really doing much better than RFR this year.
Let's look at the numbers for this year.
Joe Gibbs Racing (3 drivers):
Wins: 2
Top 5s: 19
Top 10s: 33
Poles: 5
Laps Led: 805
Roush Fenway Racing (3 drivers):
Wins: 2
Top 5s: 9
Top 10s: 21
Poles: 0
Laps Led: 242
Currently Biffle is in a position to make the chase on points, if he does, RFR will have 2 of 3 drivers in.
Matt did win 7 last year, but is winless this year. JGR, like RFR, is a bit off this year.
It's no secret JGR and Toyota's in general are struggling this year. Their engine package is off. Haven't found the balance between power/reliability.I'm not surprised you missed my point. I guess you didn't notice that was a reply to @Jahgee1124's comment that RFR only had one car in contention, when they currently have two.
My point was valid. Both RFR and JGR (plus Toyota as a whole) are struggling, albeit in different areas. (Engines for JGR/Toyota, aero/balance for RFR)
Definitely not a "good leap" ahead as you say. RFR not having Stenhouse in the chase doesn't make them any worse than JGR. So yes, RFR to JGR is more of a lateral move, IMO.
Let's look at this season, shall we? 23 races in and JGR only has 2 wins, Toyota's only wins of the season. MWR has none.
Compare that to 8 wins for Ford, and 13 for Chevy. I would call that struggling for Toyota. Even they admit the are behind in the horsepower department and are working to rectify it:
http://www.jayski.com/cupnews.htm#20140820f
OK, and you stated your opinion that JGR is well ahead of RFR. Clearly we disagree.
Nowhere did I say that RFR was doing better than JGR. I said they were both struggling.
I guess I can agree on SHR, especially about Kurt and Kevin. Tony's leg was still a distraction for him this year. Still in pain and having to do therapy. Then of course, the incident with Kevin Ward Jr.
Danica is just Danica.
As for why RFR, I never claimed they were doing great. Making the chase is one thing, being a championship contender is another. Neither JGR or RFR have shown that they have the ability this year to beat Penske or Hendrick for the title once the chase starts.
RFR is struggling, not Ford.
I never said that. I was comparing manufacturers. Toyota vs. Ford, Chevy.
Not JGR (team) vs. Ford (manufacturer)
We will find out next year, won't we? Especially with the new proposed engine/aero packages.
And RFR isn't the only Ford team. Ford teams (and Chevy) as a whole are doing better than Toyota as a whole.