2014 United Sports Car Championship

  • Thread starter Thread starter Earth
  • 6,133 comments
  • 323,015 views
I hardly count AMR since they essentially through a hissy fit over not having favorable BOP and we all know the Gainsco team was forced to sit out after that massive accident.
 
Here's a thought. Feel free to criticize or make adjustments:

2017:

New P will be out

LMP3 will more than likely be the new PC

GTLM=GT+

GT3/D=GT

Take the PC class and remove it from Tudor. Combine it with the IMSA prototype lites. That will become a 2 class system with one class being closed cockpit, PC, and the other one will be prototype lite, PL, will be open cockpit. Easily discernible with a sprint race format. Am drivers only. It'll have its own schedule

Take the GTD class and remove it from Tudor as well. Make it 2017 GT spec. Combine it with IMSA NA Porsche Cup, Lambo Trofeo whatever it's called, and the North American Ferrari challenge. Call it the IMSA GT Cup. A single class, pro am series that will have its own schedule. If done right, we'll see 40+ cars a race in that one class alone.

LEAVE CONTINENTAL TIRE SPORTS CAR CHALLENGE THE 🤬 ALONE

Tudor will now be P and GTLM/+. I'm hoping the 2017 P regs are done correctly with respect to cost containment to get some good grids. As for the GTLM/+ class, I don't know if it will need to be done away with or not. I mean, it's pretty solid now, but if there are 25 P and 8 GT, that's not much of a GT race watching 8 cars go for 24 hours. Same way with prototype. If there are 25 GTLM/+ and 8 P, that's watching paint dry imo especially in P if they're going for a class that's not like WEC LMP1

As I said earlier, this is just a random thought. I'm not necessarily in favor of it, but it's a possible route for the future and a solution to the mess that may be just now rearing its head
 
I'll formulate some of my own ideas later, but at the moment I'm more curious can anyone find results for Daytona including best lap? I can't find anything on the crap for navigating IMSA site. Grand Am used to have such things. What I'm really after is the fastest lap times for all the different classes (TUSC AND CTSC).
 
I'll formulate some of my own ideas later, but at the moment I'm more curious can anyone find results for Daytona including best lap? I can't find anything on the crap for navigating IMSA site. Grand Am used to have such things. What I'm really after is the fastest lap times for all the different classes (TUSC AND CTSC).
http://www.imsatiming.com/
 
I'd say get rid of the PC class and leave the rest the 🤬 alone. I don't think one year is too much to ask to let IMSA and the teams work things out. I find it odd that so many rail against spec series and then are so adamant about supporting PC, it's the only spec class in the series. Remember, having too many cars on the grid should be a good, unlike most racing series these days 👍
 
Remember the next race with GTD cars isn't until May, plenty of time to convert it between the 2 specs.
 
So basically what I've been saying all along, (albeit worded better) use a DTM style chassis as a base for the top class. I very much approve of that article.
That's what I would want. It has the sheer strength of the tube frame chassis with the rigid carbon cell.

Aesthetically speaking, I hope they don't go to the body style that looks like the underbelly of a pontoon boat though. Also, get rid of the stupid fins unless you want to show full length movies on them. Audi can show "Truth in 24" on the cars during the race in that case :lol:
 
Just read the article... guess we'll find out if they are leaving TUSC Monday? As a Grand Am fan I hope they stick around!

Do we have any further info on Turner and if they're leaving TUSC?
 
Wow ... following that article I found another one very detailed and interesting (no idea what truth is in it).

http://www.publicintegrity.org/2011...rate-facade-around-his-payday-loan-businesses


I must say I couldn't avoid a smile when I read the names of two of the most notorious companies in this article. They are:

- AMG Services
- CLK Management

The journalist has no clue on what's behind these names. And I had no idea Scott Tucker was a Mercedes Benz fan, but I had to :lol: at this excerpt

With CLK Management now in Colorado’s crosshairs, Tucker would make the situation even more confusing. He filed corporate papers in Kansas claiming that CLK no longer existed, that it had merged with a new company owned by the Indian tribes. The new company was called AMG Services. Tucker said he had no control over the company’s books.


EDIT: If you guys find a corporation in Kansas called
- CLS something
- W25 whatever
- C111 younameit
- SSK youknowwho

You'll know who you're dealing with, no investigative report is needed! ;)
 
Last edited:
You have to wonder how the drivers who drove for him feel after finding out that their paychecks came at the cost of other people's debts.
 
I hope this is a wakeup call for the series. I know between unnecessary yellows/full course cautions, lengthy cautions, NASCAR style late cautions for an "exciting finish", poor officiating, poor broadcasting/tv exposure, etc. there are a lot of very unhappy fans and quite a few have already written the series off.
 
I hope this is a wakeup call for the series. I know between unnecessary yellows/full course cautions, lengthy cautions, NASCAR style late cautions for an "exciting finish", poor officiating, poor broadcasting/tv exposure, etc. there are a lot of very unhappy fans and quite a few have already written the series off.
I think it seems like there's a lot of unhappy fans due to all the negativity being blown into the stratosphere. It's not nearly as bad as it seems, but it certainly can be better
 
I think it seems like there's a lot of unhappy fans due to all the negativity being blown into the stratosphere. It's not nearly as bad as it seems, but it certainly can be better
I love the series as I loved ALMS and Grand Am, and I love multiclass racing. However I expected more of the main concerns early on coming from BoP issues, not all the ones I mentioned above.

Truth is there are fans already walking away from TUDOR so things need to be addressed soon. I was at the 12hrs of Sebring so I saw it all live. The people that didn't only got to see about 45min of racing on TV due to cautions/commercials from the already short 3 hour coverage of a 12hr race.
 
Last edited:
I love the series as I loved ALMS and Grand Am, and I love multiclass racing. However I expected more of the main concerns early on coming from BoP issues, not all the ones I mentioned above.

Truth is there are fans already walking away from TUDOR so things need to be addressed soon. I was at the 12hrs of Sebring so I saw it all live. The people that didn't only got to see about 45min of racing on TV due to cautions/commercials from the already short 3 hour coverage of a 12hr race.
We all expected the problem to be the hard part. That being the BoP. We all expected the easy parts: race control, tech bulletins, race procedure, etc. to be a given. IMSA has done a pretty good job of BoP, but they've missed the party on what should be simple stuff. That's what's getting everyone caught up so far. There will always be those same 9 or 10 idiots in the IMSA "fan group" who foam at the mouth to spew negativity. Those same people claim to be done with the series only to watch the next race or not but yet still keep complaining over and over and over. I wasn't at Sebring, so I can't say what the atmosphere was there, but at the Rolex 24, the atmosphere was amazing. Fans were excited to be there. There wasn't any animosity from what I saw.
 
I'm not writing off the series, I enjoy it even with its growing pains but improvements need to be made. I was at both the Daytona 24 and Sebring and the crowds at both were packed, full of excitement, and overall enjoying it. However at Sebring the amount of cautions and whether or not they should of been local or full course, and the length of them was very frustrating and many people there were vocal about it.
 
I'm not writing off the series, I enjoy it even with its growing pains but improvements need to be made. I was at both the Daytona 24 and Sebring and the crowds at both were packed, full of excitement, and overall enjoying it. However at Sebring the amount of cautions and whether or not they should of been local or full course, and the length of them was very frustrating and many people there were vocal about it.
From talking to various other people who were there, that was their big complaint, and I have to agree. The amount of cautions as well as the time per caution was unacceptable. They have to get better, but I'm not writing it off either. Pointing fingers doesn't help, but when IMSA has it this bad with race control and caution procedure, it's pretty obvious that there's some issues to resolve
 
Funny how they are skipping 2 rounds where they have the big advantage.

I also see this in the same vein as AMR. The "I'm not winning, so I'm not racing" mentality. At least they're coming back to give it another go

Except unlike AMR, Pickett Racing only five weeks between receiving their car and having to be on track at Daytona so they don't have nearly the amount of test data on their car (that and having a power steering problem is both a competitive issue AND a safety issue).
 
Except unlike AMR, Pickett Racing only five weeks between receiving their car and having to be on track at Daytona so they don't have nearly the amount of test data on their car (that and having a power steering problem is both a competitive issue AND a safety issue).
MM should have known this could be an issue going in. We've seen Signatech have the same problems with the car in prior races. In order for MMPR to race in 2014 no matter what series here or overseas, they had to get a new car. They could have gone with a safe route and gotten the HPD. Then, they could have collaborated with ESM and shared data while working on a car that's very similar to the one they had been using. Also, Pickett at least used to own a DP chassis. If he still had that, he could have used it. There's also plenty of DP chassis out there, or he could buy a new one.

It's a self inflicted problem in my books
 
Both Matteo Malucelli (from Risi Ferrari) and Gaston Kearby (of PC 'light 'em up' fame) have been banned for the next round.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/113106

I think it's a step in the right direction. Kearby is an enthusiastic amateur (although he did win Formula Atlantic and regularly takes part in historic races) but in my opinion he should be banned permanently after that stunt. And Malucelli, as a professional, well, the less said the better. He already made a number of questionable moves last year and all but wrote off the car at Lime Rock.
 
Banned for the next round, and on probation for the round after that.
 
Back