I know this way they demonstrate their abilities to high/end clients, but that product is basically made for players. Imo, one product can't do two things at once. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I think it's a step backwards (albeit a small one) from optimization for example.
I'm pretty sure I'm running the standard physics model, but I'll try reinstalling it and trying the CSP version.Absolutely perfect, my friend. Thank you so much!
View attachment 1527023
Mine here is ok, buddy.. running here the CSP version... which one r you running?
View attachment 1527024
Can you also do this for the armco rails from the ks_Nordschleife or is it just a matter of copy/paste into the KS_Nordschleife.ini file like:
Of course, I completely agree, the level of detail is amazing and I admire it; when I make a little joke about the subject, it's just that, a joke, but...
...this statement also hits the nail on the head.
Everyone has own priority it seems
I know this way they demonstrate their abilities to high/end clients, but that product is basically made for players. Imo, one product can't do two things at once. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I think it's a step backwards (albeit a small one) from optimization for example.
Obviously it's just a thought
Damages unfortunately it depends on AC engine, which seems not capable of support things (if not few visual with bad behaviour). So i don't think is modders fault or lack of interest in make it unfortunately.
Not that I see so far.
A member here has a visual and physics update of that car which is quite good, that you can find at https://assettoworkshop.pro/resources/
It might seem like a silly question, but have you tried deleting the car and doing a clean install of all the folders from the RSS .zip file? I'm not sure if it's just a missing font issue, since your LEDs also seem to be off...
As in life, there's no free lunch in AC. While I think RSS puts in a lot of effort, and I don't mean to diminish their efforts, I'd prefer to invest my FPS in something more useful, like a cosmic suspension. But I also understand that these are completely different priorities and areas of knowledge and development: one is graphics and the other physics/mechanics. Considering it's a simulator, and given our limited computing power, what do you prefer?
So no, They don't exists since i'm not going to pay an guy who lies about his income for patreon pitty, for an mod that is based of someone elses work. It would not surprise me if he's still using the stolen data from RSS & VRC for GT3 and LMP cars, and the Guerilla physics for "his" GT4 cars.
This is absolute it. There is a reason Bugatti used them for their private sims. Their level of detail is also the reason they have so many real teams and manufacturers using them. Racing unleashed sim systems are using them. Several F1 teams, GT3 drivers, and LMH drivers use their cars. They have some rather large exclusive contracts that they will be making public in the near future. You dont have this many people coming to you for your product if it is not accurate. They also will quit using your product if the FPS sucks. Go throw a grid of RSS cars out there and run them. Try that with the others cars. See which one has better performance.
FPS is the less interesting things for real motorsport clients. They run sim for PHYSICS not GRAPHICS data. So none cares of fps with 60+ cars since most of them run sim with one car only...
You can try it, it might work.
Well said.................................brake pad animations are gay as fcuk
Ok? that's not what the conversation i responded to was talking about at all anyways. URD uses cosmic physics based on irl data provided to them by irl drivers also, So the whole RSS physics is completely irrelevant also considering both URD and VRC get feedback from real drivers who drive the car they are making.
absolutely not true with the latest URD GT3s.
okay dude. Im reading a lot in this forum and almost never comment here, but you really seem to have an issue with RSS or? Just drive what you want and be happy, at the end of the day we all just want to have fun with the cars we prefer. It's good to have choice and it is fine to have preferences.
I could say the same for you...Dave has deep pockets it seems. Also, VRC has to make an non-csp car so FPS does not tank when AI is on track. There is a price to pay for hiding 7 steering wheels on every model that is on the track. Also, what real driver does VRC have? That lie about Mclaren using their cars? They had to take that down off social media quite quickly. Racing Unleashed no longer uses their cars. Does anyone other than 12 year old know it alls?
how about starting with your resolution and settings? if that's 1440p of any flavor, that's really not a frame rate worth bragging about.
Not really, I don’t have an issue with RSS as a whole. My problem is mainly with CC’s inflated ego.
Their CSP cars are not meant to be used by AI, they’re designed specifically for the player. Of course you’re going to run into FPS issues if you try to use a player-focused car for AI, since it isn’t optimized for that. They’ve stated multiple times that you should use the non-CSP versions for AI and keep the CSP versions for yourself as the player.
I’m running 2560×1440 at max settings with a bunch of ExtraFX enabled. I double-checked, and with a full IMSA grid using VRC, URD, and RSS cars, I’m sitting at a steady 120 FPS both in the pits and during the first-lap chaos.
Okay, but that wasn't what I asked. I asked specifically about URD GT3 cars, not a full IMSA grid - especially one with VRC and RSS cars, which in my experience run significantly faster than URD's "new" work. To add variables to this comparison is tantamount to muddying, if not invalidating, the results.
