I agree to an extent but you guys are thinking about these copied physics in the best of cases. i went through and looked at many many mod cars and what im finding is not even remotely close trust me i was aware company's do some duplicates. i was a technician for 8 years. so you can imagine how many parts i've ordered for cars. and how many i've seen that use the same parts being its the same platform. the example picture i showed was a Mercedes using a BMW suspension and aerodynamics. a 2017 c63S using m4 aero and suspension?! they are not even close and that has never happened in real life.
We arnt playing need for speed here, this is supposed to be a Simulation. so copied physics is unacceptable for a simulation. You would never see that done on a kunos car. We are supposed to be doing our best to match kunos quality. if not then whats the point? we might as well be playing forza horizon or need for speed
The discrepancy's i'm talking about are a big deal. im talking about a Mercedes GTR gt4 car using the rear end of a Lotus 98T F1 car, im talking about a special edition 458 ferrari using the Aero and Suspension of a Nission GTR. you should see some of the horrible stuff im seeing. trust me i wouldn't be here complaining if i saw a Audi using a VW part on it, or vice versa. im talking Massive discrepancy's. And even when cars do use the same platform across their brands, they are not always the exact same fitment of suspension components. the older jeep compass and the Mitsubishi lancer shared the same GS platform for example. but they arnt going to feel the same driving them for that reason.
when the data says 100% match on that analyzer that means it is EXACTLY the same. that 2017 C63 S in my example is just a Reskinned 2014 M4.
View attachment 883860 AMG 63S
View attachment 883861M4
You tell me if those look the same to you. to me those look very very different and indeed they are, we have all the tools necessary to attempt to make it correct. those tools should be utilized. lazy cars are lame cars.