- 55
- Brazil
Any idea of who owns the property rights of Cizeta now?
Last edited:
I just had to look up Chevy and see what’s on the market. Wow. A world of high riders and Corvette. That’s amazing.GM owning Holden doesn't forbid PD from adding Holdens to the game, the problem is that GM would probably ask PD to add something more marketable in return, like a Silverado (to compete with the existing trucks).
In a side note, I was never a fan of how GM treated Holden. The Zeta platform developed by Holden for the VE ensured the revival (and survival) of the Camaro and other projects. When it was time for GM to repay the favor to an ailing Holden, they didn't.
Same for Ford. Stellantis is even worse. One car that they can’t give away and the high riders. A shame.I just had to look up Chevy and see what’s on the market. Wow. A world of high riders and Corvette. That’s amazing.
Broadly... no.Any idea of who owns the property rights of Cizeta now?
In addition to its presence on the datamine list, if you look at the Notice of Intellectual Property credits in-game there is straight up a credit for "AUTOBACS, ASL and Garaiya names, emblems and body design" - a Garaiya, whether the road concept or the GT300, is very likely somewhere down the road.Autobacs is still around, and it's possible that the Garaiya comes to a Gran Turismo in the future (Datamined List).
A while ago I suggested for Kaz on Twitter that he add one of the Honda HSV models from GT5 or GT6. But I didn't say it was important.HSV is owned by Walkinshaw. There’s possibility the brand could still be represented. At least one Group A era HSV would fit nicely into GT7.
He won't listen to you mate.A while ago I suggested for Kaz on Twitter that he add one of the Honda HSV models from GT5 or GT6. But I didn't say it was important.
That website is brilliant. You don't see many like that these days.but aside from a somewhat combative website doesn't appear to be doing much with it.
You're still missing the point. Having the basic model in the game as you call it is a core part of GT because you have the capability to "tune" it. Sure, you could tune an already tuned car but it doesn't change the fact that's already tuned out of the box from the manufacturer. The experience of tuning a ****box VS tuning a Porsche GT3 RS is worlds apart.No. A game being about driving, doesn't force you to model some random car off the street. Because you can have everyday cars, that have quite a bit of performance in them.
A Golf GTI, is an everyday car, that has a sports pedegree to it, and more importantly, good enough performance to be driven around a track (which is what the game has, not an open world map like GTA).
So, for that "everyday car" category, they can get away with modeling sporty versions of road going vehicles, like GTI and R variants from VW, RS/ST from Ford, OPC from Opel, M from BMW, AMG from Mercedes, RS/S models from Audi, and so on. There's no reason to have the basic model.
Another thing that past GT games did great, that PD fully ignores now, was having lesser known brands. Saleen, Holden/HSV, FPV/Ford Australia, Tommy Kayra, Cizeta, Spiker, Autobacs, and many others. This was far more interesting than having some random SUV from Toyota.
Also, atleast for GT4, we had a decently up-to-date car list, without online updates! Nowadays, every brand is severely outdated in their line up, in all categories, road or race cars.
Variety is key. We need a healthy mix of ****boxes/slow cars and supercars. So you have the chance to run a 700PP event with an super tuned '05 118i or an R8. What we also need is an Modern Supercar Event or something like that. more events in general to be fair, but at this point just get them out of the oven perfectly cooked for GT8.You're still missing the point. Having the basic model in the game as you call it is a core part of GT because you have the capability to "tune" it. Sure, you could tune an already tuned car but it doesn't change the fact that's already tuned out of the box from the manufacturer. The experience of tuning a ****box VS tuning a Porsche GT3 RS is worlds apart.
When it comes to the competitive aspect of the game, I do agree there's a lot to be desired when it comes to GT cars, tracks, etc. and I hope GT8 will rectify this. But when it comes to GT7 and the future of the franchise in general, the game has to build an inventory of cars which is a slow endeavor considering the insanely high quality of each entry. GT8 will be a much stronger title because of that and PD will hopefully have more time in focusing on the competitive aspect of the game this time around.
Yeah, it's no secret the competitive aspect of GT took a backseat after Sport, even though PD still heavily promotes GTWS. But if you think of Sport and 7 as building blocks, then GT8 could be absolutely massive. A theory, of course, but when I see all these (mostly) monthly updates with all these random yet super high effort detailed cars it's very hard for me to believe they are meant just for GT7.Variety is key. We need a healthy mix of ****boxes/slow cars and supercars. So you have the chance to run a 700PP event with an super tuned '05 118i or an R8. What we also need is an Modern Supercar Event or something like that. more events in general to be fair, but at this point just get them out of the oven perfectly cooked for GT8.
About outdated racing cars:
I can't get why they promote so much GTWS, yet they dont update the roster thats used for the ****ing competition. Total no-sense. Typical 2010-now PD. As you said, maybe it is because they have to build an inventory of this type of weird/slow/****boxes cars, and im fine with it. That's also GT. But GT is also having variety, of all kinds of cars. I have the hope your theory about GT8 car list is true. Its highly probably, since they are future proofing all these cars, so in 10 years they dont have to remodel every single Civic, and can focus on the latest relevant releases.
I think all of those were added because you can’t have one of their brand without the other. Similar with Super Formula - I imagine they didn’t want to aggravate the relationship with the other engine builder.I'm still of the opinion that they'll eventually get round to things like the 499P and the 296 GT3, licensing permitting, because those cars have won something.
But PD have added 368 cars since GT Sport's launch, and less than 10* of those could be described as "real, contemporary race car that didn't win an important race or championship before PD added it". It's been clear for years that PD have no interest in racing cars whose entire résumé is "it's the current one".
*My count: 2016 Audi R18, BRZ drift car, 2017 Lexus RC F GT3, the two 2016 Super GT cars that didn't win, the two Super Formula engine versions that didn't win. I genuinely don't think there's any others.
A little recount of GT3 cars that got crowned champions of any mid-important racing GT3 series in the world. (Not counting aldready in-game cars) (2019-2025)I'm still of the opinion that they'll eventually get round to things like the 499P and the 296 GT3, licensing permitting, because those cars have won something.
But PD have added 368 cars since GT Sport's launch, and less than 10* of those could be described as "real, contemporary race car that didn't win an important race or championship before PD added it". It's been clear for years that PD have no interest in racing cars whose entire résumé is "it's the current one".
*My count: 2016 Audi R18, BRZ drift car, 2017 Lexus RC F GT3, the two 2016 Super GT cars that didn't win, the two Super Formula engine versions that didn't win. I genuinely don't think there's any others.
A brand having financial issues, doesn't stop it from making an appearance in the game. Heck, the money they gain from the license for their inclusion in one or more games, could actually be used to help their finances a bit, while their cars get some publicity.I agree with what you wrote, but most of the brands you specified are either dead/defunct, or with financial issues. Of course, that doesn't stop PD from maybe getting cars from those brands in the future (just look at Pontiac, Plymouth and Autobianchi, for example), but I would argue that it may be more difficult. Maybe I am wrong though, so correct me if that's the case.
For those that don't know:
They could get new lesser known brands instead. But most of them seem to only make EVs, which the GT community absolutely adores.
- Saleen Automotive has a lot of financial problems and are constantly asking for investors/investment, so they could (maybe) release their Saleen S1. Not sure if anything changed since I last checked them, but honestly it's a big mess, and a bit sketchy (The S1 is "Coming Soon", and after 7 years it still hasn't arrived);
- Holden and HSV went defunct in 2021 and 2020, respectively;
- FPV went defunct in 2014;
- TommyKaira is still around;
- Cizeta went defunct in 2021 (Claudio Zampolli, the founder, died that year);
- Spyker filed for bankruptcy in 2021, not sure what happened afterwards;
- Autobacs is still around, and it's possible that the Garaiya comes to a Gran Turismo in the future (Datamined List).
![]()
We don't need random everyday cars. For the lower tiers, you should have older cars/classics and lower tier sports cars, like hot hatchbacks and small sports cars like the Miata. We don't need anything bellow this, bar a few exception like the Autobianchi.Variety is key. We need a healthy mix of ****boxes/slow cars and supercars. So you have the chance to run a 700PP event with an super tuned '05 118i or an R8. What we also need is an Modern Supercar Event or something like that. more events in general to be fair, but at this point just get them out of the oven perfectly cooked for GT8.
About outdated racing cars:
I can't get why they promote so much GTWS, yet they dont update the roster thats used for the ****ing competition. Total no-sense. Typical 2010-now PD. As you said, maybe it is because they have to build an inventory of this type of weird/slow/****boxes cars, and im fine with it. That's also GT. But GT is also having variety, of all kinds of cars. I have the hope your theory about GT8 car list is true. Its highly probably, since they are future proofing all these cars, so in 10 years they dont have to remodel every single Civic, and can focus on the latest relevant releases.
How do you jump from a random everyday car, s***box as you call it, to a 911 GT3RS? Why are you pretending there's nothing between those two?You're still missing the point. Having the basic model in the game as you call it is a core part of GT because you have the capability to "tune" it. Sure, you could tune an already tuned car but it doesn't change the fact that's already tuned out of the box from the manufacturer. The experience of tuning a ****box VS tuning a Porsche GT3 RS is worlds apart.
When it comes to the competitive aspect of the game, I do agree there's a lot to be desired when it comes to GT cars, tracks, etc. and I hope GT8 will rectify this. But when it comes to GT7 and the future of the franchise in general, the game has to build an inventory of cars which is a slow endeavor considering the insanely high quality of each entry. GT8 will be a much stronger title because of that and PD will hopefully have more time in focusing on the competitive aspect of the game this time around.
I did specifically say "new lesser known brands". Of those you said, I'd argue that only Automobili Pininfarina, Apollo Automobil (Gumpert), Czinger, Arrinera, Brabham Automotive, and maybe Zenvo, Ultima Sports and Donkervoort (these last 3 are a stretch, IMO) fit in that category. The rest are either decently well known, or not new at all, even if they are active today.Plus, there are plenty of lesser known brands nowadays, that make pretty cool cars. Like Ariel Motor Company, Apollo, Arrinera, Brabham, Caterham, Czinger, Donkervoort, GMA, Gumpert, Hennessey, Jeep (for the Trackhawk), LCC (Rocket from GT6), MG, SEAT/Cupra, Morgan, Mosler, Pininfarina, Polestar, Rimac, SCC, Zenvo, Noble, Koenigsegg, Kia, Isuzu, Chrysler, Ascari. And we could even include brands like Bentley and Cadillac, and other known brands that are glaring omissions.
They can't get any of these brands? As you can see, most of them are not for EVs.
I get what you're saying, and I agree there's clearly more middle ground between a ******* and a GT3 RS as you've pointed out. However, adding everyday cars is a staple of GT. You don't have to like it, but you need to accept that's how it has always been and GT fans expect it.How do you jump from a random everyday car, s***box as you call it, to a 911 GT3RS? Why are you pretending there's nothing between those two?
Before you reach the GT3RS, you would have to go past any older variants of the 911, plus the Cayman, and potentially some Porsche SUV. Before you reach Porsche, you still have "normal" brands, which have their own lower tier entries, like Polo GTI, Lupo GTI, Twingo RS, Micra RS, or the much older Clio Williams.
These are just a few examples, of cars that can be fun to drive stock, even though they are not the most powerful cars in the game, and they still have the full potential for tuning, just like any regular car.
Adding a random everyday car just for the sake of tuning is nonsense.
I love when going to both brand’s options to click Cars and it reads “Family of Cars” and it’s just the one Mustang or Corvette. Welp, guess there’s no slowing down for future GT7 updates. Lots of SUVs to get through yet.Same for Ford. Stellantis is even worse. One car that they can’t give away and the high riders. A shame.