- 5,587
- Edison NJ
- jdmking13
- Lucid killer 58
Did you drive the evo yet? Drives and sounds so good! I have a group of 10 and we are going to have some fun with Evo vs Sti events!The best update ever
400 sounds perfect
Did you drive the evo yet? Drives and sounds so good! I have a group of 10 and we are going to have some fun with Evo vs Sti events!The best update ever
400 sounds perfect
It doesn't need no more.The best update ever
400 sounds perfect
I wish, I'm stuck at work for 5.5 more hoursDid you drive the evo yet? Drives and sounds so good! I have a group of 10 and we are going to have some fun with Evo vs Sti events!
It'll be more to do with the weight transfer issues some cars have I think, MR has a major issue with it so cutting the weight begins to solve that problemTidg,
At a first glance it appears that a lot of the MR cars have lost weight and the FR cars have gained weight.
Could this possibly be to even out the difference in tyre wear between the two drivetrains that you have highlighted in your car profiles I wonder🤔
Well, it was bound to happen eventually. Now I have a new project to work on. 🤪In other news, @Moose78's work on Gr.4 cars just went out the window as the category just underwent a massive BoP adjustment (thanks @FluxWildly)
At least there's a couple weeks before the Manufacturers Cup starts (which won't help anybody who signed on already).Well, it was bound to happen eventually. Now I have a new project to work on. 🤪
This will be purely down to Manufacturer permissions I suspect. I can't ever imagine Ferrari agreeing to anything for example, based on even real world events (That Mouse guy, with the purrari I think it was?)What could be the reason why only certain cars have the ability to swap engine and only with a certain engine?
What could be the reason why only certain cars have the ability to swap engine and only with a certain engine?
This will be purely down to Manufacturer permissions I suspect. I can't ever imagine Ferrari agreeing to anything for example, based on even real world events (That Mouse guy, with the purrari I think it was?)
Here's my Video on the new patch for those interested!
It definitely isn't PDs Authority. I can tell you from ACC and Project Cars that Manufacturers have the final say in everything as it's their licence. The trailers for example you'll notice most of the time never race other cars because manufacturers don't want their car seen in a bad light (This is even more of a factor with modern/latest cars, check ACC trailers out for a similar experience). Project cars you weren't allowed to customise the livery on Ferraris (And Mclaren became picky later). Big manufacturers have all the power with their licencing. It's probably one of the reasons why we don't have later Ferrari GT3 cars.That's PD authority, I don't think it's about manufacturer permission.
also dripfeed
This reminds me of how 458 GT3 used to have something similar to AF Corse livery during first showcases of GT Sport (way before release) and later got a plain red colour. So maybe there is actually something going on with Ferrari's GT3. But it's weird, why would Ferrari prefer players in a very popular game race a very outdated car against newer models from other manufacturers, especially with the whole e-sports thing going on. Maybe it's actually PD who don't want to deal with complications of licensing Ferrari's GT3s?It definitely isn't PDs Authority. I can tell you from ACC and Project Cars that Manufacturers have the final say in everything as it's their licence. The trailers for example you'll notice most of the time never race other cars because manufacturers don't want their car seen in a bad light (This is even more of a factor with modern/latest cars, check ACC trailers out for a similar experience). Project cars you weren't allowed to customise the livery on Ferraris (And Mclaren became picky later). Big manufacturers have all the power with their licencing. It's probably one of the reasons why we don't have later Ferrari GT3 cars.
If you could NOT make up facts like that, that'd be great. Its been well known for a while how a Much say Manufacturers have (Especially Ferrari, who's limitations with Customizations were made abundantly clear in GT Sport).That's PD authority, I don't think it's about manufacturer permission.
also dripfeed
Someone seems to draw that conclusion every month and there's literally no basis for it, whether it happens to be true or not.It's looking like the development cycle of GT7 is coming to an end, we know GT8 or whatever it's going to be called is been worked on and a PS5 only game will probably be announced over the summer for a probably Q4 25 or Q1 26
Last month it was me, but this update proves they are still on the regular scheduleSomeone seems to draw that conclusion every month and there's literally no basis for it, whether it happens to be true or not.
^this 100%Someone seems to draw that conclusion every month and there's literally no basis for it, whether it happens to be true or not.
"Looks like because we didn't get alot of cars or a track like that one update, this game is done"Someone seems to draw that conclusion every month and there's literally no basis for it, whether it happens to be true or not.
Soooo, thread's up.
If you could NOT make up facts like that, that'd be great. Its been well known for a while how a Much say Manufacturers have (Especially Ferrari, who's limitations with Customizations were made abundantly clear in GT Sport).
We know the next game is in development, it's the lack of other content like scapes, menu books, new tracks for Sophy etc, The finally added the multi facetted BOP, which is probably last piece of the puzzle,Someone seems to draw that conclusion every month and there's literally no basis for it, whether it happens to be true or not.