Good to hear it's turning out well, despite what some in here would have people believe. If things like Dirt Rally and Assetto Corsa can do well, there's no reason at all that GT Sport can't, except for vindictive old "fans" who want to see things burn.
Racing games is basically what they do. Omega Boost was a fluke, just like how Einhander was a fluke for Square. They're both also two decades old, and I don't understand people who demand sequels for a couple of random projects like that.
It'd be nice if people who are obviously not at all familiar with '90s racing games stop claiming that this game resembles anything in that decade. Or the early '00s, for that matter. But, if you wanna talk about the '90s and early '00s, I miss when games didn't need betas for people to like them, when everyone wasn't constantly whining about how "busy" they claim to be or about games that are actually cheaper new than they used to be, when people weren't up in arms about some minor bug or DLC and claiming all day that games use to ship "complete" (damned lie), and so on. I ****ing wish this game even remotely resembled an actual '90s racing game.
This isn't a change in standards, it's a change in personal conduct. Hiring someone to sit around GTPlanet is a terrible idea, now more than ever. The Steam forums have proved this. And, let's face it, this forum has kinda proved it too. The replies to my older posts are pretty disgusting... and they're also upvoted into the stratosphere, go figure. I have no hope for this fanbase, and PD shouldn't either.
So I'll just keep buying GTs, because they've always been great games so far, especially 6. I have yet to see an actual reason to doubt anything PD is doing. I'm playing Grid Autosport as I type this, by the way, for what that might be worth.