New Pink Floyd album in October?Music 

  • Thread starter Thread starter CodeRedR51
  • 26 comments
  • 1,059 views
I'll be furious if they change they're style to keep up with modern times. If it's based off stuff done during The Division Bell then this bodes well, very well.
 
@PeterJB from what I've read it's stuff written back when they were recording Division Bell. I can't wait for this. Here's hoping for a nice vinyl with bluray audio disk set.
 
Saw this in my twitter feed. And IMHO, I truly can't wait to hear their new album.
 
You'd be hard pressed to find a bigger fan of Pink Floyd than I, but frankly, I really wish they would have just included this material in the recently released 20th Anniversary Edition of The Division Bell (their last studio album). The material that we will be getting this fall (supposedly called The Endless River) is comprised of music that was recorded back in 1993/1994 during the recording sessions for The Division Bell. From the information that has been made public so far, these songs were basically unfinished ideas back in 1994 - mostly ambient music containing no lyrics - that Pink Floyd considered releasing back then (once polished up and finished) under the name "The Big Spliff".

In the last couple of years Pink Floyd has re-released remastered versions of their classic albums (The Wall, The Dark Side of the Moon and Wish You Were Here). They have also had "Immersion Editions" of these albums where you would get bonus material including multiple CDs containing demo sessions of the album's songs, previously unreleased live versions of albums, previously unreleased songs that were recorded during that particular album's recording sessions that never made it to the official album, bonus DVD's and more. These Immersion Editions weren't cheap (averaging around $125/copy) but for 6-7 CDs & DVDs of material and other bonus goodies, for the diehard Pink Floyd fan, they were a godsend.

Which brings me back to this upcoming CD, The Endless River. Recently, David Gilmour and Nick Mason (Pink Floyd's drummer) went into the studio and "finished" these incomplete works from the 1994 sessions. They brought in some session musicians (Rick Wright, the band's keyboardist died in 2008, for example) and backing vocalists and slapped down some singing on top of these tracks of mostly ambient music. In over 45 years of releasing music Pink Floyd has never released a CD of ambient music. Considering this is their first CD of "new" material in 20 years and most people are divided on whether Pink Floyd should have ever continued recording and touring under the banner "Pink Floyd" once principle songwriter and genius Roger Waters left the band in 1985, they should have just done the honorable thing and given this material away as a bonus CD in an Immersion Edition of The Division Bell.

I don't care how good this CD might be. It is going to get unfairly criticized by fans and the media because of the length of time between The Division Bell and this release, the fact that their 2014 release is comprised of stuff mostly recorded in 1993/1994 and the fact that it is yet another album that doesn't come close to matching the brilliance of material Roger Waters wrote for the band. And I say this as an enormous fan of David Gilmour. I'm not one of those Floyd fans who thinks you have to pick a side Waters or Gilmour.

The three remaining living corporate officers of Pink Floyd Music Limited don't need the money. They're all incredibly generous soul's who regularly donate millions of dollars per year to various charities and organizations, so I know they're not doing this for the cash. They've never given a crap about what the record company has wanted and they aren't under contract to release a new album, so I just don't understand why they're doing this now. A Pink Floyd fanboy like myself is always going to think "Any new Floyd material that I can add to my collection is good, in my opinion". I'm sure I will find reasons to love this new album. I just wish they would have gone about releasing it to the public in a different way.
 
I'm hyped for this album :)
I am too. I hope its good. I'm not expecting to be blown away by it, but I just want to at least be able to say "this album is really good! I dig it!"

I'm actually more excited about the new Leonard Cohen album coming out September 23rd. The fact that I'll be getting new material from both Pink Floyd and Leonard Cohen only one month apart makes me so happy. I never thought we'd get another studio record from Floyd. While I know this album is comprised of a lot of material actually recorded in 1994, it's still material I've never heard. I have to believe that Mr. Gilmour will make sure what they're releasing is quality. ::fingers crossed::
 
@R1600Turbo The only official news is that The Endless River is supposed to be released in October 2014. An exact date isn't known yet. At least, none of the major Pink Floyd fan sites, nor the official Pink Floyd site, has stated an exact date. If I'm not mistaken, new albums usually drop on Tuesdays of the month. So, in that case, expect The Endless River to be released either October 7th, 14th, 21st or 28th...
 
Nov. 10 is the day

Album Art.
PFFull.jpg


Pink Floyd, ‘The Endless River’ Track Listing
‘Things Left Unsaid’
‘It’s What We Do’
‘Ebb and Flow’
‘Sum’
‘Skins’
‘Unsung’
‘Anisina’
‘The Lost Art of Conversation’
‘On Noodle Street’
‘Night Light’
‘Allons-y (1)’
‘Autumn’68′
‘Allons-y (2)’
‘Talkin’ Hawkin”
‘Calling’
‘Eyes to Pearls’
‘Surfacing’
‘Louder Than Words’
 
Having read a little more about this album, I'll remain skeptical until I hear it. If it is strongly related to the Division Bell in terms of it's character I'll be happy, but my fear is that it will be too much of a compromise, and too much has changed since the Division Bell. Having listened to most of the guys solo efforts, I've always felt Pink Floyd is stronger than the sum of it's parts... and whilst reaching back into the past might help to recover the sound the band had in the early 90's, the fact is that it's not the early 90's anymore, and with 20 years to mature, I'm not sure the songs will work quite as well.

I guess we'll see in 48 days time.
 
Being a big fan of Pink Floyd, I've already pre-ordered the CD/Blu-Ray. At least from the short clips below, it sounds like it should be pretty good. With it being partially recorded during the Division Bell sessions, I imagine it'll sound somewhat similar. Pink Floyd certainly wasn't the best after Roger left, but The Division Bell remains one of my favorite albums.

Also I'm glad to hear David using the Digitech Whammy again! If you haven't seen the second video, it gives us a glimpse into David's new studio. Though I'm sure only the guitar geeks, like myself, will be more interested in all the cool stuff in there(like the fretless black Strat:drool:).



 
Okay, so, Louder than Words...

What do we think?

It's definitely a grower, I think my biggest problem with it is the use of a xylophone that seems to be prominent - perhaps it's just my crappy laptop speakers. It would fit in on Division Bell very well... but it would probably only be my third or fourth favourite track. It just needs about another minute of Gilmour's guitar before it plays out.
 
I've listened to it, probably ten times now... I like the song. I was hoping that this track would be a little more edgy. Have a little bit more of a rockin' groove to it, like old Floyd. Still, I do enjoy this track. I love all the mellow stuff from their catalog too. One thing bothered me. How the heck can they include those bells at the beginning of the song, the same bells that they used in High Hopes? It almost sounds like an exact sample... Unless this is some kind of inside joke/reference that Gilmour & Mason wanted us to pick up on. Both songs end their respective albums. I don't know. It just seemed kind of weird to hear those bells ringing again.

I'm definitely bummed that this is the only track that contains lyrics. That is a major bummer for me...Even though I'm not exactly thrilled with Gilmour having his damn wife write the lyrics, I think having some lyrics is better than not having any for 95% of the album.
 
I've been listening to The Endless River non-stop. Obviously, it's very different than anything the Floyd has ever released. In fact, it's more similar to 1960's Floyd, in a way, since it's all instrumental. I am pleasantly surprised by how much I like this album. Perhaps it's my Pink Floyd bias coming through, but I don't think so. I think they truly made a decent record out of this 20+ year old material. Richard Wright's organ playing from 1968 that appears on the song Autumn '68 was a welcome surprise too!
 
Giving it a run through this morning, I'm not sure yet... there's bits that I like, but I can't shake the feeling that there is a lot of 'Filler'. It's almost as though, it picks up, into something that sounds like it should be a great song, only to tail off a minute later...

I'm not saying I don't like it.. but I think I'm going to need to get pretty familiar with it to get the best out of it, and to be fair... at my office desk (albeit through reasonable hi-fi) isn't the best listening environment... I sense a bottle of SoCo and a subtly lit listening session tonight.
 
As the record was put together as 4 different "sides", each representing a side of an LP, I try not to think of the individual tracks that they have listed. To me, this release contains four "songs" as each side changes mood & tempo. This album has to be taken for what it is -- a release to honor their late friend, Richard Wright, who we hear throughout the record via previously recorded bits from 1993/1994 and in one "song" 1968. I think it's an interesting experiment. Sure, it's not even close to their greatest works, but I still think it's a lot better than the studio album from Ummagumma.
 
I haven't listened to it yet, but even if the album sucks, I love the packaging.:cheers:

It definitely doesn't suck. It's been a long time since I've sat down with the HiFi I so lovingly spent thousands on, and actually listened to an album. The Endless River certainly is a well deserving candidate for a return to the old times.
 
After the first listen I think it's a solid album considering it's pretty much a collection of left overs. That being said I can see it being a "mixed review" album as it's not what most people would expect of a Pink Floyd album (I'm guessing most people will expect it to sound like the popular albums, which it doesn't). I will have to give the BluRay tracks a listen on my next day off.
 
@Justin I completely agree. It's a solid album and that's all that really needs to be said. No, it doesn't come close to the genius that was Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals or The Wall. If anyone was expecting it to, they should be checked into a mental institution immediately. I just listened to the album, in it's entirety again, after closing up my bar for the night...as I type this I'm listening to The Gunner's Dream from The Final Cut. Alphabetical album sorting in my media player, apparently. Anyway, Pink Floyd has gone through three major, distinct phases. The original, Syd Barrett led Floyd. The Roger Waters led Floyd. Then the David Gilmour led Floyd. We all knew this album would be made up mostly of leftover pieces tinkered with during The Division Bell recording sessions. ****, you can hear several snippets of sound on this album that are on The Division Bell!

But with Richard Wright dead, there was really only so much they could do to shape this album. I mean, they could have had Jon Carin just completely re-do the keyboard parts or add a lot of new keyboard parts, but from what Gilmour and Mason have said, this album was really a way to showcase the talents of Richard Wright. Keyboards, piano, his Leslie are all front and center on this album. Many people are going to be upset at the lack of lyrical content. At first, I was a bit bummed too. But then I thought about it...Gilmour hates writing lyrics. Wright has passed. That means Gilmour's wife would have written 95% of the lyrics, probably, if they tried to make a traditional album. She wrote all the lyrics to "Louder Than Words", the only song that contains lyrics on this album.

I think almost everybody would agree that Roger Waters was the lyrical genius behind Pink Floyd. I know many people who actually prefer the Gilmour-led ear of Pink Floyd, but they'll always admit that it's solely because they dig Pink Floyd's sound rather than their messages (lyrics). Myself? I think the four albums I mentioned above are their strongest work. Musically, I think Pink Floyd was at the top of their game around 1977 during their In The Flesh tour supporting the album Animals. I would give anything to be able to go back in time and see a Pink Floyd show during 1977 - even the infamous Montreal show where Roger Waters spit on that kid in the front row and encouraged the audience to beat the **** out of him... :lol: :D

Well, I'm rambling as the song The Final Cut plays... Obviously, this album won't see much airplay because of the way the "songs" are represented. You really need to play an entire "side" and count that as one song, in my opinion. But I encourage everyone who even moderately likes Pink Floyd to give this album a chance. It probably won't find its way into many people's daily rotation except for the die hard Floyd fans, but I think you could easily drop one of the "sides" into a playlist and enjoy a 6-12 minute instrumental piece.
 
But then I thought about it...Gilmour hates writing lyrics. Wright has passed. That means Gilmour's wife would have written 95% of the lyrics, probably, if they tried to make a traditional album. She wrote all the lyrics to "Louder Than Words", the only song that contains lyrics on this album.

...

I think almost everybody would agree that Roger Waters was the lyrical genius behind Pink Floyd. I know many people who actually prefer the Gilmour-led ear of Pink Floyd, but they'll always admit that it's solely because they dig Pink Floyd's sound rather than their messages (lyrics).

I have to say, whilst I don't mind Polly's input on Division Bell, the lyrics for Louder than words are terrible, the first couple of lines really make me cringe. But yes, I tend to prefer the sound of Gilmour's Floyd.. though to be honest, as far as Waters goes, Radio Kaos was a great album, but I'm really not a fan.
 
When I heard Gilmour say "diss each other on sight" I threw up in my mouth, just a little bit.

Her stuff on Division Bell isn't bad, but that's probably also because Gilmour shared co-writing credits on any track she is credited on. I'm assuming he wasn't just protecting himself financially, as the two weren't married until July 29, 1994 (just looked it up) -- the Division Bell Tour had already been on the road for a couple of months at that point. So, I'm sure he was very much a part of the process when his "girlfriend" was helping him write lyrics.

But this time she gets the only credit for writing the lyrics of Louder Than Words. Frankly, I don't know anything about her talents as far as a novelist goes. A song writer, however, she is not. I get what they were aiming for in Louder Than Words. I actually think it's a cool concept, but David Gilmour, CBE does not say "diss"...never ****ing ever!!

I didn't want to really get into it in my last post, but thank ****ing god this is an instrumental/ambient music album. I don't think I could have taken 10 songs of her writing. I can see it now... "David..remember that quiet section, where you're strumming the acoustic guitar over Rick's piano? I've just written this...tell me what you think?" :mad: :sick:

Hang on...did you hear that? That was the sound of me pulling the hammer back on the gun next to my head... :lol:

Shine On...
 
Back