- 12,117

- Liverpool
- CARBOYXJR
He didn't force him off track, if you have some nutter trying a move on the outside that is clearly going to fail, you wouldn't let them past.Forcing a driver off track is the same as avoidable contact in my eyes...
He didn't force him off track, if you have some nutter trying a move on the outside that is clearly going to fail, you wouldn't let them past.Forcing a driver off track is the same as avoidable contact in my eyes...
Even when there's ZERO contact?
If that was true, they would have called it 6 minutes earlier than they did...
Forcing a driver off track is the same as avoidable contact in my eyes...
The penalty is for avoidable contact. You can't make stupid moves and expect others to back off because of it.Contact shouldn't be the deciding factor, the Audi could've spun and hit another car for example.
He didn't force him off track, if you have some nutter trying a move on the outside that is clearly going to fail, you wouldn't let them past.
That's what I'm referring to. Two am ferraris crashed two audis in that race. Then there was that ferrari that wrecked the toyota. And while obviously not as serious, the ferrari nearly putting the bmw in the wall at the end of the race just now.What about the LeMans 24 where the Audi went airborne a couple of years ago?
No no no. The Audi was next to him and the #555 should hold its inner line, just because you get the apex doesn't mean you can go out all wide. All he did was forcing him off track and Winkelhock made the right choice to avoid it's contact..
Last time I saw this was in 2006 when they called a Penalty on Carl Edwards for passing below the yellow line, to avoid a crash...Worst officiating in a long time.
The Ferrari had traction issues while accelerating out of the corner, Winkelhock's nose was already infront of the Ferrari before they were in the kink and the Ferrari didn't hold the inside line after the actual kink. He moved the car to the right so Winkelhock had no space left.The penalty is for avoidable contact. You can't make stupid moves and expect others to back off because of it.
Have you ever studied a car going round a corner before? They don't hug one tight line like a slot car.No no no. The Audi was next to him and the #555 should hold its inner line, just because you get the apex doesn't mean you can go out all wide. All he did was forcing him off track and Winkelhock made the right choice to avoid it's contact..
The GTD cars grip enough, otherwise the Audi would've gone wide too, which it didn't before he was forced off-track.Have you ever studied a car going round a corner before? They don't hug one tight line like a slot car.
The Audi would have gone off the track regardless running the line he took.The Ferrari had traction issues while accelerating out of the corner, Winkelhock's nose was already infront of the Ferrari before they were in the kink and the Ferrari didn't hold the inside line after the actual kink. He moved the car to the right so Winkelhock had no space left.
Have you ever studied a car going round a corner before? They don't hug one tight line like a slot car.
No and it was clearly visible in the slow motion.The Audi would have gone off the track regardless running the line he took.
The GTD cars grip enough, otherwise the Audi would've gone wide too, which it didn't before he was forced off-track.
I prefer Flying Lizard to Scott Tucker so my view is that Pier Guidi (most famous for spinning at the first corner of the Spa 24 hours) left no room for the Audi which was in the lead, it shouldn't be a penalty for avoidable contact but it should be a penalty for forcing another car off the road.
Avoidable contact without any actual contact... Nice job NASCAR. Was rooting for the Lizards, but nobody wants to win like that.
Oh for God's sake, what did Winkelhock think was going to happen? Let me make this clear -The GTD cars grip enough, otherwise the Audi would've gone wide too, which it didn't before he was forced off-track.