- 2,612

- United Kingdom
That one is from FM 3 and FM 4 - if I remember correct!Oh man, I thought he'd stopped doing FM7 tracks.
*pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised*
HA! All the automatic-everything users have just been BUSTED!!!11
Oh man, I thought he'd stopped doing FM7 tracks.
*pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised*
Of course, silly me! You know what this means, of course - FM3 & FM4 tracks can be exported.That one is from FM 3 and FM 4 - if I remember correct!) Great to have this one! It was pretty famous!
It is. I get 135.6 AVG fps (Stage A).Oh man, I thought he'd stopped doing FM7 tracks.
*pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised pleasebeoptimised*
Of course, silly me! You know what this means, of course - FM3 & FM4 tracks can be exported.
Hoping for Camino Viejo de Montserrat, Sedona Raceway Park, Iberian International, Ladera, Rally di Positano, Sunset Peninsula... all rich pickings and ripe for the plucking!
This port of Fujimi Kaido is fantastic, and probably benefits from being from an older game. Performance isn't bad (for hotlapping for me) and the sense of scale in VR is incredible. The changes in elevation are seriously scary! Nice touch with the animated water fall too, and having all the various layouts.
There are a thousand and one Japanese touge tracks in AC but this one kicks them all to the curb. I normally delete them after five minutes but this one's definitely a keeper, and part of that is because the road is nice and wide. Why do people make so many p2p tracks so damn narrow?
Have good memories of this track from FM3 and FM4 and so it's great being able to relive them in VR, just as God intended.
Thanks Esprit!
I let the AI run the car, maybe it's slower because of AI data change? (I don't know much about this)There's really no need for ballast of 65kg because 50 kg was already figured in as driver weight to the overall weight of the car, so maybe add 10 to 15 only. During testing and reconfiguration the car actually was too fast so we had to bring it back down. We didn't notice it's pace slowing below other GT3's at least. It was my take that the car was slightly faster than previous versions.![]()
i hit a 2.03.8 now around bathurst, which is realistic. i was 3 tenth faster yesterday, but not always possible to hit a perfect lap within just a few laps.@Apexxer Is the NSX significantly slower than previous versions?
I used 65 kgs of ballast on 1.0 and 160 kgs on 1.1. Now it falls behind Kunos Ferrari 488.
Haha, I guessed. Because I found that many mod cars (like Gue's M6) literally can't turn the bus stop chicane at Spa. AI data seems more important than I first thought.Thanks for the detailed info! I'll look into it more... AI can be tricky, it's funny because you can take a go kart and adjust the ai to run quicker than a formula 1 car lol![]()
Probably only the AI got slower then. I run tests with AI to create equal GT3 field. It got so much slower after last update.i hit a 2.03.8 now around bathurst, which is realistic. i was 3 tenth faster yesterday, but not always possible to hit a perfect lap within just a few laps.
Man alive, it pisses me off when people 'review' resources on RD when they haven't actually tried them, but use the review process to ask why they can't get it to work (thus admitting they haven't actually tried it), giving the resource a bad review in the process just because they couldn't get it to work, even though everybody else has with no problems whatsoever. Numbskulls!
I don't mind any level of reviews so long as people have actually tried the resource in the first place. Everyone's entitled to their opinions. But how the hell can anyone rate something when they've just proved that they've never even tried it? Beggars belief. People are baffling.You could always report the "review" and get it removed...apparently the 4 or 5 bad reviews for LAC were deleted because they were just moaning about it being a paymod and not actually reviewing the track. But yeah I get your anger at this....I mean there is a discussion specifically for asking for help so why don't people use their brains and use this instead. Oh yeah....I know why
Edit: oops just realised I forgot to give you your 4 stars cause I couldn't get this to work![]()
I don't mind any level of reviews so long as people have actually tried the resource in the first place. Everyone's entitled to their opinions. But how the hell can anyone rate something when they've just proved that they've never even tried it? Beggars belief. People are baffling.
Anyone wanna give COTA some more attention?
Okay, I tried google and it's not helping me a lot. I recall seeing a couple videos on youtube that have the Jaguar XJ220 LM Race Car from GT3-6, but I can't find a link anywhere to it. Does anyone here know where I can find such a thing or was it lost to time?
Also, I saw Zin5ki post this a year ago (found this page when googling something else):
![]()
Question: Where do I find that NSX and Nismo GT-R LM?
HONDA NSX GT3 ACC V1.2
View attachment 887653
CHANGELOG:
V1.2 **PLEASE DELETE THE OLD CAR FOLDER!
— added a temporary new engine sound
A NEW SOUND BY DJDialga1 WILL BE AVAILABLE SOON ON RACEDEPARTMENT. STAY TUNED!
— fixed engine damage display
— fixed engine damage parameters
— improved damage textures
— adjusted engine parameters
— added 2 ADAC skins
— added GoPro 8 cameras in cockpit
— adjusted cockpit shaders (thanks to M4MasterKey)
— adjusted exhaust glow (thanks to M4MasterKey)
— created new Racelogic font
— minor tweaks to cockpit light
View attachment 887700 View attachment 887701
Mazda RX-7.3 Mad Mike.
Not really my type of car but those flames alone deserve a mention. Roll on BBQ season!
Nicolas Brunetto, Assetto Corsa Mod Central 24/7
After some fix...time to release guys