Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC

[Perico Lospa]

On my side...

... Wich CSP Version are you using?...

Public 0.1.79

... Have you unchecked the "extended physics" option?...

Not at my rig now and I don't remember if was active or not; I will test that afternoon...

... Have you manually installed the car or drag'n'drop install via CM?...

Manually.


And anyone else with sound problems, please, or I'm the one and only?

 

[DaWallace]

GT3 and no flashlights, Marcel?

Drag and drop works flawlesly btw.

Oh... forgot to check the flashlights🤦‍♂️

On my side...

Public 0.1.79

Not at my rig now and I don't remember if was active or not; I will test that afternoon...

Manually.


And anyone else with sound problems, please, or I'm the one and only?

There are no sound problems😆

I tried to test on the sound, to come closer to the real Sound of interior. So the Transmission is louder then the engine, inside the car.
But i think i will redo the sound settings back to the original sound Levels.

 

[Perico Lospa]

... i think i will redo the sound settings back to the original sound Levels

Ouh yeah, you're The Man...

 

[Cote Dazur]

Atm i don't know, why some can't drive the Viper. 🤔

Wich CSP Version are you using?

Have you unchecked the "extended physics" option?

Have you manually installed the car or drag'n'drop install via CM?

I have had zero issue with the Dodge, 0.2.3 preview 211, drag’n’drop. It drives very well, everything works as intended, it is competitive with the rest of the group.
Only thing I least like is that the transmission whine is too loud for my taste.
Additionally, the transmission in that car is a :BorgWarner T56 or TREMEC[6] 6-speed manual, so I changed it to manual.

 

[Schussnik]

By far the best open wheel car done in AC.
Details / Physics etc is top notch. (taking advantage of the massive rewrite of the AC hybrid via csp)


Just my opinion here VRC 2024 is much harder to drive on edge compared to VRC 2023.

When you turn in with VRC 2024 if tires don't have enough grip the car will just snap on you without warning and it can't be saved.

For example Spa after Kemmel Straight going into right and left hander in Les Combes.

Tires will just let go if you come in too hot and it will spin out violently.

I've noticed exactly the same thing when driving it on Spa, I suspect that something which can be corrected/managed via the setup of the car but I have no idea where to start 😅

 

[fleskebacon]

View attachment 1376518

Yeah, that's what I'm talking about! The coolest driver in the championship, by a mile!

VRC is already a very fast car with a huge aero.
I think VRC is more like a real F1 in terms of grip, front, turning but also too easy to handle while you don't know the car, you never accomplised a lap.

RSS is harder to handle, more understeery, really slower but i feel the traction more "mechanical", you have to work to extract the speed.
And that's why i prefer RSS.

The biggest con of RSS is the hybrid system. it's so outdated, sometimes on a long circuit even in mode 3 your battery is empty after 3 laps, so you have to use mode 2 that is so underpowered.

I am not objective, i am a biggest fan of RSS, i love their FFB, physics, everything works so well in what i am looking for in a sim.
(except the BMW hybrid that lack so much of downforce, their worst car to be honest)

All the RSS cars are also very, very good, absolutely agree. So the competition is tough and most often decided by feelings and personal preferences, rather than objective points. I love this world of options and possibilities!

I agree to the feeling of the VRC being more planted to the surface, but I think that feeling mostly comes from the felt FFB, not necessarily a big difference in actual physics. I'm also not very good at setting up cars, so much of the difference may also be because of differences in the default setups, which I obviously always use as a base. I usually only make minor setup changes, otherwise I often end up with a very unbalanced car, which doesn't suit my simple driving style...

As a side note, I have also been driving the RSS Formula 2 V6 2020, recreating the 2023 season. (Of course driving as Dennis Hauger, despite his lack of prominent hair style and facial hair. I think he's saving up for a proper mullet though.) Very fun car to drive, fast enough for the F1 tracks, but still a lot more manageable than the F1 cars. The VRC Formula Beta 2008 is also very good, perhaps better, but the 2008 season is for me not very memorable, so I haven''t used that one so much.

The RSS F3 and F4 are also frequently used here, when having guests who generally have a very heavy right foot... Very nice and polite cars.

 

[andrevr]

There is no RSS or URD 296 GT3 so i still use it.

Say wut? Another shop to visit

AC Ferrucci GT3 2023

Presenting the FERRUCCI 926 GT3 V2.0 - Feb 15, 2026The new FERRUCCI 926 GT3 Version 2.0 has been 100% redesigned and developed from scratch, all new 3D model, textures, sounds, physics, cockpit displays, skins and animations. We have left no details out when building this car.The FERRUCCI 926 GT3 ha

unitedracingdesign.sellfy.store

 

[fleskebacon]

is there any good Spa texture update available? especially the trees don´t look that good View attachment 1376627

I only use the AC_ColorCorrections skin/extension from the Pure discord, makes the track look much better. I keep it enabled for the Pyyer extensions as well, no problem.

 

[racinjoe013]

This is the track I was talking about earlier that I'm having trouble with so maybe you can help me. Once you download the file, then extract it, there are choices. One of them is labeled "Track Installation". Is this where you install the actual track or do you have to open up that sub folder to get to something else to install the track? If you open up Track Installation there is assettocorsa, then content, then tracks, then spa. That's what's confusing me. Once installed you should see a track called spa 2022 right? I'm not on my gaming pc right now so I'm having to go by memory.

I am assuming you are trying to install the original track created by guigui0256 that's available on Overtake because my versions do not have a 'Track Installation' folder. My mods are alternatives for that version to fix some treeline lighting issues (plus a few other tweaks) the original version has. You don't need the original track from Overtake to use mine. Just pick the version you prefer to use and manually extract it into the root assettocorsa folder and overwrite anything it asks.

 

[shi]

Boromo Superveloz v1.2

https://www.patreon.com/posts/boromo-71963042

View attachment 1192686
Fictional circuit in Brazil.
Conversion from Grand Prix 4.

-CSP recommended
-32 pit/start
-AI, cam

Credits & Thanks;
Original Track by Gildoorf Rozencrantz, Paulo Blanco (Prblanco), Ruben Greidanus (Turbo Lover)
-Thank you for gave me permission (Gildoorf)

AC Converted by @shi (shin956)
.lua and font base by @gunnar333
logo.png and Sections file by @Fanapryde
marshall and some textures by kunos
Test and Feedback by @Fanapryde , @Breathe

Enjoy.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
v1.1 changelog;

Added 3D terrain.
Added Sections file by Fananpryde. (Thanks)
Updated ext_config.ini.
Changed crowd textures by Kniker97. (Thanks)

v1.2 changelog;

Updated pit_lane.ai by TITI. (Thanks)
Re-created fast_lane.ai and sidelines.
Re-created groove/ skidmarks.
Updated ext_config.ini.
Updated tree wall normals.
Fixed tree mapping.

Boromo Superveloz v1.2
The link is in the quote.

v1.2 changelog;
Updated pit_lane.ai by TITI. (Thanks)
Re-created fast_lane.ai and sidelines.
Re-created groove/ skidmarks.
Updated ext_config.ini.
Updated tree wall normals.
Fixed tree mapping.

 

[TURBOMATIZ]

Say wut? Another shop to visit

AC Ferrucci GT3 2023

Presenting the FERRUCCI 926 GT3 V2.0 - Feb 15, 2026The new FERRUCCI 926 GT3 Version 2.0 has been 100% redesigned and developed from scratch, all new 3D model, textures, sounds, physics, cockpit displays, skins and animations. We have left no details out when building this car.The FERRUCCI 926 GT3 ha

unitedracingdesign.sellfy.store

Rss have the 296 coming out soon too.

 

[Fanapryde]

is there any good Spa texture update available? especially the trees don´t look that good View attachment 1376627

spa_2022...stock... no stupid 3D trees...sol... looks OK to me:

 

[Fanapryde]

View attachment 1376534​

DW Mods Belcar Pack Update:​

BMW Z4 M Coupe GT3 v3.0​

Marcos Mantis GT3 v3.5​

Gillet Vertigo Streiff v3.5​

Ultima GTR v2.0​

Mosler MT900 GT3 v1.5​

Dodge Viper Competition Coupe v1.0​

Changelog:​

• massive physics rework
• minor bug fixes

Big thx to "chihaeru" for his 24h Nürburgring Livery. 🥰

Download:

File folder on MEGA

mega.nz

​

For me all cars are looking good and driving well.
Something I forgot to mention before: afaik the hood of the Mantis has a more pronounced louver/vented construction.
Picture IRL

 

[Jezza819]

I am assuming you are trying to install the original track created by guigui0256 that's available on Overtake because my versions do not have a 'Track Installation' folder. My mods are alternatives for that version to fix some treeline lighting issues (plus a few other tweaks) the original version has. You don't need the original track from Overtake to use mine. Just pick the version you prefer to use and manually extract it into the root assettocorsa folder and overwrite anything it asks.

Ok I'll try that.

 

[FrustratedUse]

I just have the 296 GT3, it's mediocre. Not horrible, not okay. too much traction even with TC off...
Dashboard and realisation are good.

There is no RSS or URD 296 GT3 so i still use it.

Chem has an fantastic conversion for free and it's just as good as URD's version physics wise. Model wise Chem's is using either LMU or rF2? 3D model and it looks better than URD's. Still waiting for URD to re-work their 3D model.
Chemflummi's site

 

[ImNotVettel]

Chem has an fantastic conversion for free and it's just as good as URD's version physics wise. Model wise Chem's is using either LMU or rF2? 3D model and it looks better than URD's. Still waiting for URD to re-work their 3D model.
Chemflummi's site

I can only confirm that
good 3D model and good driving physics
and many real skins
the best model so far I have tested many different ones

 

[Fall Guy]

I can only confirm that
good 3D model and good driving physics
and many real skins
the best model so far I have tested many different ones

Hmm, the flummi one misses the car´s shadows so I personally tend to use the version from FSR which is a convert from ACC I think.

 

[alexlockout]

looks OK to me:

I'm looking out the window, there are coniferous and deciduous trees, different, but everything is noticeably lighter than those in your screenshot. Don't you think that your trees are too dark?

 

[Schussnik]

Say wut? Another shop to visit

AC Ferrucci GT3 2023

Presenting the FERRUCCI 926 GT3 V2.0 - Feb 15, 2026The new FERRUCCI 926 GT3 Version 2.0 has been 100% redesigned and developed from scratch, all new 3D model, textures, sounds, physics, cockpit displays, skins and animations. We have left no details out when building this car.The FERRUCCI 926 GT3 ha

unitedracingdesign.sellfy.store

Unfortunately it's not very good. I have it and actually much prefer ChemFlummi's rendition of the 296 GT3.

 

[ImNotVettel]

Hmm, the flummi one misses the car´s shadows so I personally tend to use the version from FSR which is a convert from ACC I think.

I dont know what Version you have but Chemmflummy version 2.0 and even 1.8 has carshadows
look on my video at time 1.01
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/assetto-corsa-video-thread.290887/post-14293437

FSR one is crap!

next video time 0.34
when this is no carshadow what is carshadow?
look at your Content Manager Settings
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/assetto-corsa-video-thread.290887/post-14293438

 

[DaWallace]

For me all cars are looking good and driving well.
Something I forgot to mention before: afaik the hood of the Mantis has a more pronounced louver/vented construction.
Picture IRL

View attachment 1376762

True, but sorry, i don't add these "vents" to the hood. 🤷‍♀️ That means i need to redo the UV mapping for this detail and all skins need to be redone too.

Because the Mantis was driven in different versions:

 

[racinjoe013]

Ok I'll try that.

Try the standalone version first. That way if you have any issues, you can easily get rid of it be deleting the track folder. If you use the version that installs into the Kunos Spa folder, it's much harder to revert back unless you backup that folder first.

 

[ImNotVettel]

attention please

@FallGuy
and maybe others with the problem of no carshadows

i dont know why new versions of ContentManager dont have this setting anymore
i have found this setting 2 years ago accidentally
read and look at the picture

do a
fake_shadow_fx.ini
with this entry

[BAKING]
ENABLED=0

or take this file and delete the .txt at the end of file that you have a .ini file

 

[andrevr]

... Surplus to requirement

 

[Juppek]

Hello,

does anyone know where I can find a 1998 F1 full grid mod for AC?

 

[NivekBS]

(I'm dying of envy to see that others enjoy the Viper and I can't... sniff! 😭)

Same problem with the Viper here. I am on CSP 179p5 so i suppose it´s just a CSP releated roblem

 

[DaWallace]

Same problem with the Viper here. I am on CSP 179p5 so i suppose it´s just a CSP releated roblem

You can try a higher CSP version, no?

 

[Perico Lospa]

... the Mantis was driven in different versions...

Here in all his "Hardware Store Style" full glory, endorsed by my own trustworthy neighborhood mechanic.

 

[Jezza819]

Try the standalone version first. That way if you have any issues, you can easily get rid of it be deleting the track folder. If you use the version that installs into the Kunos Spa folder, it's much harder to revert back unless you backup that folder first.

I will. I was trying to get the track loaded first before going to the extension and that's when I ran into trouble. But if it loads correctly it should show up as a separate track right? Spa_2022 or something like that?

 

[Quikslvr]

You can try a higher CSP version, no?

Some of us prefer to stick with our old "tried and true" CSP version...