Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC 

  • Thread starter Thread starter daan
  • 151,454 comments
  • 46,205,126 views
A new adaptation....this time the Ferrari 512BB/78 (24 Hours of Le Mans 1978), one of the skins (Charles Pozzi) already existed in the original model (288)...I had to adapt the car (number 88) from Ecurie Francorchamps and Luigi Chinetti Sr.

Actually, they all have a particularity, but I only adapted one basic model...In the videos you can see the AI cars (Porsche 936/78 and Mirage M9-Renault) which will later be tested on the track.


 

Attachments

  • preview.webp
    preview.webp
    16.9 KB · Views: 1
  • preview1.webp
    preview1.webp
    65.2 KB · Views: 1
  • preview.webp
    preview.webp
    17.4 KB · Views: 3
  • preview1.webp
    preview1.webp
    67.1 KB · Views: 3
  • preview.webp
    preview.webp
    18.9 KB · Views: 1
  • preview.webp
    preview.webp
    19.1 KB · Views: 3
  • preview2.webp
    preview2.webp
    95.2 KB · Views: 2
View attachment 1502446
anyone else has this issue ? "game might be obsolete" ?? :lol:
1766961447696.webp


 
View attachment 1502503

His error message shows he's running 3.0p212, I'm running the same version and the car works for me, so that implies there likely isn't a conflict with the car and that specific CSP version. I'm guessing corrupted download of the car or csp, or bad csp settings as the most likely culprits.
 
A new adaptation....this time the Ferrari 512BB/78 (24 Hours of Le Mans 1978), one of the skins (Charles Pozzi) already existed in the original model (288)...I had to adapt the car (number 88) from Ecurie Francorchamps and Luigi Chinetti Sr.

Actually, they all have a particularity, but I only adapted one basic model...In the videos you can see the AI cars (Porsche 936/78 and Mirage M9-Renault) which will later be tested on the track.



Sorry, I have to ask. But are you showcasing these for us to download somewhere? I don't get these posts :confused:
 
His error message shows he's running 3.0p212, I'm running the same version and the car works for me, so that implies there likely isn't a conflict with the car and that specific CSP version. I'm guessing corrupted download of the car or csp, or bad csp settings as the most likely culprits.
Also its not a "drag&drop into CM" car
 
Nope, it's not just a VR issue, it displays the same in pancake mode too.

View attachment 1502110

I thought it might be an issue with digital_instruments.ini but I can't even try troubleshooting it for you because... encryption.
Yeah, Sorry about that. Unfortunelty i don't have access to any encryption tools that just lets me encrypt the 3D model & not the the data folder and stuff. If i knew someone who had an one that is trustful i'd switch to that instantly, Sadly no knowledge of one other than the one RSS uses, Which i doubt they'd ever let me access.
 
Roll back to 1.79 and you'll get a lot of detail back. Run the previews and then update back up to the present. It's the only way I could retain details like reflections etc.
Just tried your suggestion. 1.79 does not have CSP Preview option. Please advise if I missed something.
 
Here you go. I included the original version of any file I changed. After you extract these files, go into the extension folder and rename the camera and display folders to something like camera1 and display1. The name is not important as long as you rename them to something else.

Be aware that i'm am not a car mod guy so i'm sure I messed up something else on the car. So far I haven't noticed but i'm sure there has to be something. If any of the displays don't have text or numbers, it probably means you don't have a font I used. Also, if the middle display does not show a reverse camera view, you will need to configure it in the mirrors app.
tested and is really good:)
thank you
 
Yeah, Sorry about that. Unfortunelty i don't have access to any encryption tools that just lets me encrypt the 3D model & not the the data folder and stuff. If i knew someone who had an one that is trustful i'd switch to that instantly, Sadly no knowledge of one other than the one RSS uses, Which i doubt they'd ever let me access.
Is encryption even worth bothering with any more? Word on the street is the kids now all have the necessary tools to decrypt AC cars and do whatever they want with them, so all encryption seems to be doing these days is locking bad decisions or mistakes behind flimsy temporary barriers.
 
Is encryption even worth bothering with any more? Word on the street is the kids now all have the necessary tools to decrypt AC cars and do whatever they want with them, so all encryption seems to be doing these days is locking bad decisions or mistakes behind flimsy temporary barriers.
Encryption is useless. It just makes it a little harder to get the end result, because we have to rip with ninjaripper, import in blender. Rename all object to their real name in cmshowroom and same for the materials. Copy shader materials and make it fit to the physics. And you loose any applied 3D bones and animation, on the model, but the model is there. estimated time : 3 hours to extract an encrypted car.

I wanted the vrc F2007 and the rss F10, and I got them like that. Even though they are encrypted. If someone wants your model, they will get it without much issues aside time consumed
 
Last edited:
Encryption is useless. It just makes it a little harder to get the end result, because we have to rip with ninjaripper, import in blender. Rename all object to their real name in cmshowroom and same for the materials. Copy shader materials and make it fit to the physics. And you loose any applied 3D bones and animation, on the model, but the model is there. estimated time : 3 hours to extract an encrypted car.

I wanted the vrc F2007 and the rss F10, and I got them like that. Even though they are encrypted. If someone wants your model, they will get it without much issues aside time consumed
I believe it might be much quicker and easier than that now, based on the huge number of decrypted mods that suddenly seem to be popping up all over FB modding groups.
 
There is. Paranoid has no limits today.
WHAT?

Are you telling me people spent time working on creating an encryption method for TEXTURES, AKA something loaded in GPU MEMORY nonetheless and easily accessible? It takes a single minute for anyone to dump the GPU memory and get the skins that was loaded, heck even 30 second.

and while ripping a car needs skills in ripping, ripping a texture requires pressing a button.


Is there no one sane person out there that would tell the guy that this was just a useless idea because encrypting a texture is litterally just doing this?

1767011892681.webp
 
you may try 2.20 but there is no need for rolling back, all the previews are good with latest csp previews. Just a matter of the correct settings.
Unfortunately, it depends a lot on the time invested in the correct settings.
 
Last edited:
you may try 2.20 but there is no need for rolling back, all the previews are good with latest csp previews. Just a matter of the correct settings.
I’m happy to mess around with the settings if the Custom Preview window looks the same as the CSP Custom Preview actual. But they do not. I have only a handful of cars (of my 900+ cars) that I’m forced to use CSP Custom Preview.
 
I’m happy to mess around with the settings if the Custom Preview window looks the same as the CSP Custom Preview actual. But they do not. I have only a handful of cars (of my 900+ cars) that I’m forced to use CSP Custom Preview.
That, unfortunately won“t happen I am afraid.
 
Sharing a mod? Host it on GTPlanet Downloads. Free, public hosting for files up to 10GB in size.
Back