Shinez:
Give me a break. You're just trying too hard at this point. Most of what you're saying is too laughable to bother responding to.
Again, let me point out for the 9 millionth time that my original statement was simply that it was BS that there is a 1360hp street legal Skyline out there, and again let me point out that even you agree that this Skyline is not street legal. Wait a minute, now you just contradicted yourself! Now you're saying it
is street legal but would fail emmissions. I don't think I care enough to try to explain to you that a car isn't street legal just because it has a front bumper.
And PLEASE! This is an article about juicing up a car, and they don't even attempt to legitimize the statement that is has 1369hp. Even crappy magazine like
Import Tuner gives dyno numbers in every article. 1369hp is a ridiculous number, especially for a 6-cylinder, and they would definitely be showing some evidence, because it would be quite an accomplishment.
And you're actually bothering to try and tell me how a 1369hp 6-cylinder would have "less stress" on the engine than an 880hp V-8 that is produced in quantity. There's no use responding to that.
And you need to stop it with this funny car business, because it's just sad. My point was that your argument was irrelevant. A Mustang funny car that did 900 MPH would not mean Mustangs were fast cars, because the two have nothing in common.
I've had enough of this, Skyline Fanboy. It's impossible to argue with someone who is just going to keep pulling out random absurd stuff like that. If someone doesn't put an end to this discussion, you'll probably start posting links to a GeoCities site saying there is an 8,000hp Skyline that runs 4.95. After all, I can't
prove that an 8,000hp Skyline doesn't exist, can I?
I can certainly see why you keep getting banned!