Gran Turismo 7 “Power Pack” Paid DLC Now Available: New Races Including Endurance Events, Qualifying, and “Sophy 3.0”

  • Thread starter Thread starter juanffy18
  • 3,495 comments
  • 357,078 views

What do you expect the Power Pack DLC will cost?


  • Total voters
    470
  • Poll closed .
I want to step back a bit and talk about the Sophy 3.0 addition, because I get the impression that a significant part of the community have no idea why they should be excited about this part. If the events play anything like Sophy 2 with boost, then those events will be amazing!

I posted videos to the custom race thread so you can see what is in game now, and why some of us are excited.

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/gran-turismo-7-custom-race-thread.404820/post-14528074
 
Last edited:
You are conflating two pretty different meanings here.
You are replying to the post where I'm clearing it up though? Weird.

Anyway.

My opinion is well known now and before even more mods start ganging up on me I will move on from this disagreement.

:)
 
It's still surprising that there even was PS4 support in the first place.

Indeed there wasn't. Right up until SIE/PlayStation Studios decided there weren't enough PS5s to make it viable at launch and knee-jerked the PS4 version into existence (rather than, in the words on Yamauchi, looking at it from a longer-term point of view). If it wasn't for that, PS4 players wouldn't be able to play it at all.

It's actually remarkable that it's still supported at all given that it was replaced 18 months before GT7 even came out (and is in production phase-out right now) and, although not so much in the racing game space, plenty of studios that launched on both have ended support for eighth-gen devices. GT7 was, after all, the first title in the entire series to launch on two different consoles at once.

While I don't think they're going to end support for the game on PS4 before end-of-life, it's just inevitable that there's going to be less for the lesser version on the lesser console now. Especially as PD has always been trying to chase the next technology (anyone remember the big 3D push for GT5? I 'member) and spending its resources try to support a 12-year old console that wasn't even supposed to get the game at all and which is being discontinued isn't... that.


The writing has been on the wall for PS4 GT7 since Sophy, with PS4 players getting less out of (almost) every free update since. And that was February 2023; the PS4 version has been getting less than the PS5 version for over two years now.

That doesn't mean PS4 players should be happy about not having access to the Power Pack (and not having to spend money on it if they want the new races), but I don't think that being particularly angry about it makes so much sense either.

PS4 players will still have the exact same content as PS5 players, for example: 41 tracks with 120 (if Yas Marina only has one) layouts, 556 cars*. If you want to do one of the races that's in the Power Pack, with the regular AI, you can make it in Custom Race. Of course you won't be able to do practice against the AI (actually I'm not entirely sure why this is a particular draw; having other cars on track during practice sucks, and if they're smooth-brained sideswipe bots it sucks extra) or qualifying, but you can set the grid order however you like if being at the pointy end is important.

I've seen it said previously in the thread that the payouts are crap if you do this. So what? Do you want to do the race or do you want the virtual pat on the head for doing it? Sure, it'd be nice if PD curated the races so you could do both - as I've said many times and in our podcasts so it's on video too - but which do you value more? In any case the payouts are crap across the game (besides, you can now pick up about 2m a week for half-an-hour's effort; two minutes for a silver TT, the rest in the Weekly Challenges), and high rewards don't define which races are good - some of the best races don't even payout more than once...


*Unless those three we've seen so far really do land as "/Tuned" models, along with others, which would blow for PS4 players. Though I suspect that even if they do they'll not have different Collector's Book entries, like the RX-Vision Stealth/X2019 Anniversary (or maybe like the Dior Mangusta).
 
Last edited:
I get that pricing is an issue, but the PS5 is now 5 years old. And in two days, the PS4 will be 12 years old. That's a bigger time difference than the PlayStation 1 launch date and the release date of Gran Turismo 4.

If it was up to me, PS4 support for this game would be sunsetted (with an appropriate notice period) so that PD's resources don't have to continue to be dedicated to maintaining functionality on an aging platform, and the rest of the game functionality can be improved accordingly.
If I were a betting man, I'd say that the PS4 and PS5 development are two separate branches. And since the PS4 is old as dirt and people should've moved onto PS5 now, they've made the decision to stop spending so much time and energy keeping a dead horse alive and made the decision to focus the budget on moving forward.

People seem to think adding features is like flipping a switch. I would imagine adding practice and qualifying took a fair amount of work digging into the code to add. I don't believe a game like GT7, which is likely extremely well optimized since PD are very good on the technical side, is as modular as some people seem to think. Optimization means specialization which does not translate into flexibility.

What we end up with is a lot of people who decided PS5 wasn't worth it to them (or can't afford it for whatever reason) and are upset. And now it's developers fault. These conversations have existed as long as new and improved hardware has been coming out. People have a hissy fit about everything.

Someone from the Custom Race thread should throw together a game recording of what this would look like with the standard AI. Or at least give some feedback on how this would go @05XR8
  • Go to Time Trial on the respective course and drive around for 10 mins.
  • Next, start a Custom Race that's 5 laps or 5 mins or whatever with a grid of cars. At the end, write down everyones best lap time.
  • Finally, setup a Custom Race with those cars in grid order based on their best lap time.
(This is nearly what people already do in Custom Races)

And viola. If it's anyone decent at the game, even with the base AI on Professional, they'll qualify in first, and win the race by a gigantic gap. It's not even a race unless you sandbag yourself with a lower PP car.

tl;dr - It would be almost pointless to add "real" races to the standard AI. And it would probably take development time away from actually moving the game forward.. on the current platform that is already like 5 years old and rumors are already around about the next console.

I don't know. People got some crazy thought processes going on out here.
 
Let me guess, an LLM?

"PD" is "Polyphony Digital", the developer since 1998 (it was previously named Polys International). An LLM, particularly one used as a translation bot, might read "PD" and pluck out the most commonly used term abbreviated as PD for the expansion.
It's the standard Google Translate.

I don't know if it uses AI now. 🤷
 
As someone pointed out about the User being #24 from the Nurb TT screen shot. If we finally have 30 car grids I’m going to lose it.
I looked at it more and I'm inclined to believe it's just the number plate for the car because they have different colors and the colors match the car # on the list.
 
Something I'm curious about: Will there be any oval or dirt/snow races in here?

Neither type of track has any Sophy 2.1 support at present. Nor does weather, of course.
 
You can get 20 cars on track offline anyway.
The real curiosity is the player being #24.
Fingers crossed! there are 16 cars on track and 4 in the pits according to the results sheet making 20 but as you say the car number being 24 could indicate to larger grids!
 
You are replying to the post where I'm clearing it up though? Weird.

Anyway.

My opinion is well known now and before even more mods start ganging up on me I will move on from this disagreement.

:)
Apart from concluding that "optional" was a better way to put it, which is not in any way shape or form the same as what @Scaff was saying, implying or meaning with his statement, sure, you cleared it up.

To help, stating something is or is not core content does not mean said content is optional or not.
Stating something is or is not pointless and redundant does not mean said pointless and redundant thing is optional or not.

These things can be optional or not in addition to being not core content and/or pointless and redundant or not, but that is an aside.

You are free to think whatever you want about this new DLC and what was included in GT7 at launch and how the updates might impact the perceived value of a paid DLC that only includes new events and features and others are free to feel that it should have been part of the game from day 1. Neither opinion on that is wrong but it is a fair topic for discussion.

But if you are going to engage in a discussion, it doesn't help to start inserting your own defintion of terms that aren't the real definitions and accepted meanings.
 
Something I'm curious about: Will there be any oval or dirt/snow races in here?

Neither type of track has any Sophy 2.1 support at present. Nor does weather, of course.
The rally in GT is so...anecdotal. They tried to push it in GT Sport but no more. The people want more normal races than that, and sadly (For me) the rally tracks in GT7 are really forgettable.

The soul of the Grand Canyon, Smoky Mountain, Tahiti Maze for example are not there; this new rally tracks miss something. Maybe the new Canadian snow track is better than the old Ice Arena or the Chamonix but that's it.

I don't know why PD never used Northen Island or Route X. Route X needs sophy IA now badly.
 
Last edited:
But if you are going to engage in a discussion, it doesn't help to start inserting your own defintion of terms that aren't the real definitions and accepted meanings.
Listen. I'm still German and I'm trying my best here. I'm not using AI or any translation tool. I'm writing my own posts as good as I can. Sorry if this is not up to your standard.

If your German is better than my English we can move this to DM and continue in German.

Or you can just let me off the hook because you know exactly what I tried to say, but just chose to make me look bad.
 
Cool! I'll buy it and I'll enjoy it.

DLC is always divisive I guess, it usually comes down to how you feel about the base game. For my part, I think base GT7 is excellent, I don't agree with the assertion that it is "missing features" or "half-baked". So, I just see it as a nice extra for those that want it, and take it from there.
It’s missing features in my opinion. No custom HUD, turn sharing is a royal pain in the butt, organizing the garage is brutal…one favs folder?! It’s missing features and it’s half baked even after three years.
The cutoff was always gonna happen eventually. You’re naive if you thought otherwise.

The important thing is that the core content - that is tracks and cars - remains available to everybody and remains FREE.
So they charged PS5 owners to utilize what mostly was coming our way anyway. When the game released (I pre-ordered) my first thought was same old AI I thought it would have been up to par with other games by now but it’s just as bad as it used to be.
It is kinda funny seeing Ppl beeing pissed off that their 12 Year old PS4 can't handle the newest tec, me as a PS5 Owner, i am pissed GT7 launched on PS4 at all, as it was certainly a cut to the full potential of the game in the first place.
So PS4 Users, please be happy you got GT7 at all, including all its free Updates, only beeing excluded from the Sophy Program, wich seems to be a hardware thing. Even PS5 is now exactly 5 Years old, you may think about an upgrade some day.

Regarding the OG Post, the DLC, i have to admit to many others that the main problem seems to be the price, wich isn't even officially announced, as well a big lag in information about the content itself.
I swear the graphics were much better the first bit I played it. I was in awe. I’m pretty sure they dumbed it down. People say they didn’t but I know what I saw.
You paid for what was in the game when you bought it. If you were not satisfied with what you would be getting for the price, you had the choice of voting with your wallet and not buying it. Buying a game does not mean you get to demand or expect that everything you personally feel should be in the game, will be given to you for free. In an industry where companies usually charge for every little bit of extra content, PD has constantly added to the game for over 3.5 years without charging for it once.

As for the argument that GT7 has fewer cars than previous games and thus we're entitled to all new ones for free, that is just silly. GT7 launched with over 400 of the most detailed car models in any game out there, more than its direct predecessor GT Sport. Fewer than GT5 and 6, yes, but that's par for the course when you go up in generations, unless we want a repeat of the standard vs premium debacle. GT3 went down to around 180 from the 650 in GT2. And you know what? PD gave us over 100 new car models free of charge in GT7 anyway.

There are a lot of things I'd criticize PD for, but the amount of content they've given for free or the fact that they're finally charging for one block of content after more than 3.5 years is pretty much at the bottom of that list.
Nah, I preordered thinking surely by now it won’t be a half baked game. I won’t be doing the same with GT8. They can wait for my money. If I do wait, and others, there’s a good chance they won’t see those people’s wallets.
I guess the thing with the cost is, if PD had released Gran Turismo 8 this year, with these extra circuits, new career mode, new AI, improved online, new cars, etc and charged us £70 for it, we would have all bought it in a heartbeat.
Wouldn’t buy it in a heartbeat. Learned my lesson on GT7. Had it released like it is now (after three years) great, but having to wait for them to sort physics out etc isn’t exactly the most enjoyable experience.
 
To help, stating something is or is not core content does not mean said content is optional or not.
Stating something is or is not pointless and redundant does not mean said pointless and redundant thing is optional or not.
Not that @GlamFM in any way needs my assistance, but let's make this complete:

Stating that something is not core content does not mean said content is redundant or pointless ... but yet that was literally what @Scaff said and what started this whole discussion about the meaning of words in the first place.
 
Fhew.. Just read through 7 pages since last night. You guys talk too much.

A few things:

Part 1 - In reference to continued debate on the value and cost of the Power Pack DLC:

For those who are saying the 50 races and Sophy AI 3.0 etc is not worth $40 or even $20 to them: Let's pretend this happened a different way:



How do you feel reading that? What would you pay for that Spec 3 update? $20? $30? $40+? What if you liked 6 of the cars in the update? What if you only liked two of the cars but it's two that you've be DYING to have in the game? What if you only liked 1 of the new tracks but it was one of your favorites ever? What if you bought the DLC, but your friend didn't, and now you can't play together with whatever car or track combination?

Now imagine that's what you're actually paying for.. It just isn't being presented as such by Sony.

Hopefully it helps you understand what you personally value and also how it's not as simple as it seems to offer additional content.

Part 2 - In reference to a lot of people saying that qualifying, endurance etc should be in from launch but it wasn't so it's "half-baked" which I think implies that they were going to add that eventually (fully baked) but didn't have time or money or whatever:

I imagine the reality is more like, they felt they had two different audiences:
  • One group who liked Sport mode/online racing in GT Sport. In their eyes, the "Hardcore". These are the people who want challenging racing. They are going to yell about other players crashing into them, complain about almost everything, and continue to play for the most part. They say offline AI is dumb and a waste of time in basically every game because they don't get the same "high" as competing against another real human being.
  • On the other end, you had the "Casual" players who preferred playing offline/solo and just wanted to pop in and out of the game, do quick/short races, move through a curated "experience" (Cafe), and likely had a lower skill level. They don't want to practice. They don't want to qualify. They want to get credits and collect cars.

Where would they get this idea? Because there are likely millions of players who do fit into the casual category and maybe 100,000 or less that that fall into the "Hardcore" group. So I don't think they had any intention of adding Qualifying or 24 Hr Endurance races to single player GT7. They probably didn't think anyone really cared except like a tiny 0.5% of players. And then some story would pop up in the news about a person dying in an internet cafe from health/food/thirst reasons, while ignoring their baby, while trying to complete the 24 Hr race and then bring stupid bad press.

The reality, which I don't think they had enough data to see based on GT Sport being primarily E-Sports focused, is that there is a large group of people who fall into the middle ground, and probably where I'd attach myself. I played a lot of GT Sport online because that's what there was to do and it was a novel experience. I've only touched it like 5 times in GT7 since release. But I believe there's a segment of people who want all of those "Hardcore" features but not online. They want more than a quick 3 lap easy race. They want a challenge, but not from some person whos going to throw a temper tantrum and then torpedo their car in the next corner for accidentally touching their bumper. So GT7 came out, they got some feedback, and now they had to go back to the drawing board and make or remake a bunch of features that the game was never designed to do.
I believe GT7 was fully baked in the eyes of PD. They thought it would serve all or most audiences. But a larger portion of the player base than they expected just didn't like the taste. They can't just "BAM!" and Emeril Lagasse it-- sprinkle a little salt on and everyone is happy. They have to go in and change ingredients and almost start over. And we have to wait for that time (years) in the oven. And meanwhile, Polyphony is continually paying crazy rent costs or whatever on a kitchen in the heart of a very expensive city to house that oven and dozens or hundreds of chefs who get paid a lot to live in and around that expensive city.

Nothing is free.

Part 3 - In reference to what the Power Pack is going to be

I'm going to make my prediction from a "realist" position. Meaning, not overly optimistic or pessimistic. This is based on what we can make educated guesses on so far. Hopefully it's better, but don't be surprised if it's not.

  • The Power Pack DLC could cost anywhere from $20 to $50. Credits do not cost them anything to offer. It's a couple 1s and 0s in a digital note tied to your save file. It's more of a perception thing. A "Value Add". Removing the credits from the DLC does not make it any cheaper for them to produce.
  • The Power Pack DLC could be intended for late game, high level/experienced players. Meaning, it may unlock races gradually or the whole feature may not unlock til level 50. They could argue $50+ for the base game gets you all of that base content and this is intended to be just an expansion pack for players who want an additional challenge but is not required content.
  • These are likely going to be similar to Missions; Some will have specific cars. Some will have a certain type of car. I would hope, but not expect, that there are some events that are just PP based and let you use any car within a theme.
  • I would not expect new, unique cars as gifts. My assumption is they are just pre-modified cars. Not special "Racing Modifications", but base cars that already have all the bodywork/accessories/tuned parts on it.
  • The events might not reward any money. I haven't seen a shot with prize money. The reward could just be the gift car at the end.
K I need to go pick up groceries and cat litter so I have to cut this short cough No time to proof read.
This post is far too sensible for this forum.
 
Nah, I preordered thinking surely by now it won’t be a half baked game. I won’t be doing the same with GT8. They can wait for my money. If I do wait, and others, there’s a good chance they won’t see those people’s wallets.
I'm very much in favour of never pre-ordering a game, with the possible exception of smaller projects I specifically want to support. There's no reason to give a publisher as big as Sony your money before the game has gone through a review cycle.
 
I'm very much in favour of never pre-ordering a game, with the possible exception of smaller projects I specifically want to support. There's no reason to give a publisher as big as Sony your money before the game has gone through a review cycle.
The problem is they build it up so you buy into the hype and think well I’m probably going to buy it anyway. Easier said than done, I’m holding off on Project Motor Racing and they’re smaller, but GT7 stained that experience. Not to mention many other games. Should have learned my lesson with GT6. They promised a lot of features that never made it to launch, did eventually make it to game but I was long gone. For preordered there should be a law… lost what’s available on pre launch and lost what’s guaranteed to come.

It feels like this paid DLC is just a way to seperate what can go on PS5 vs PS4. We paid more for PS5 version too and then get charged more (voluntarily) when I think we can all admit the game would have been better for PS5 only right off the bat.

Funny thing is, I’d have no problem with $50-$70 for dlc that looks something like this:

Three new tracks
Donnington
Autumn Ring (w alternative layouts)
Apricot Hill Raceway

Car packs
5 historic trans am cars
5 group 5 cars
5 can am cars

Custom hud
Tune sharing
Practice and qualify and grid starts
AI in multiplayer lobbies
10 custom garage folders
 
Listen. I'm still German and I'm trying my best here. I'm not using AI or any translation tool. I'm writing my own posts as good as I can. Sorry if this is not up to your standard.

If your German is better than my English we can move this to DM and continue in German.

Or you can just let me off the hook because you know exactly what I tried to say, but just chose to make me look bad.
Look, I don't intend to sound rude, but this is an English speaking forum. Of course, if English is not your first language I appreciate that can present challenges. But it was you who decided what was said didn't mean what it meant and started challeninging what words meant instead of discussing the point.

Maybe take a step back before you try to argue the meaning of words and phrases if you are unsure, or ask what is meant. There's nothing wrong with that.

I don't need to let you off the hook, you were never on it. I am simply explaining to you that your interpretation of the phrases used were not correct. It is up to you to take note of that or not.
Not that @GlamFM in any way needs my assistance, but let's make this complete:

Stating that something is not core content does not mean said content is redundant or pointless ... but yet that was literally what @Scaff said and what started this whole discussion about the meaning of words in the first place.

Apart from it literally not being what he said at all.

Shame Facepalm GIF by MOODMAN


This is my final comment on this matter, it was just supposed to clear up the difference in meanings that was clearly lost/misunderstood in the earlier discussion.
 
Last edited:
Funny thing is, I’d have no problem with $50-$70 for dlc that looks something like this:

Three new tracks ... Car packs
And, to reiterate, PD has been resistant to fracturing the multiplayer offering by issuing paid DLC tracks since GT Sport launched.
Donnington
There's 367 likes on the Donington Park thread in the Suggestions forum. You are not among them. I suppose that at least you did post it in the Wishlist Thread (with the same inappropriate number of Ns).

Again, if there's content you would like to see, the bare minimum you should be doing to address it is Suggesting/voting on Suggestions. This forum was created at PD's behest (the Wishlist thread is just an attempt to stop wishlists being uselessly spaffed all over the forum, but does also provide an easier-to-browse environment when used properly) and given that it was very recently re-stated that PD uses forums as one resource when curating long- and short-lists for future content, using the exact thing that's set up to provide them this information would appear to be a no-brainer.
 
Thank you for your dim view of GTPlanet.
Speaking of which, please tell me you guys are making a little podcast/discussion vid. I love hearing level headed discussion about the game.

On a different positive note: @jrbabbitt 's free PS5 is now in the hands of UPS. Should only be a couple days. I hope he comes back to the forum and gives his opinions on how he likes GT7 on PS5 vs the PS4 and maybe convinces some people that it is a meaningful difference worth peoples money. I also hope Sophy crushes him under her boot! And I also hope he isn't on here stirring up trouble, being mean, makes me regret this decision :lol:

20251113_095553.webp
 
Last edited:
Look, I don't intend to sound rude, but this is an English speaking forum. Of course, if English is not your first language I appreciate that can present challenges. But it was you who decided what was said didn't mean what it meant and started challeninging what words meant instead of discussing the point.

Maybe take a step back before you try to argue the meaning of words and phrases if you are unsure, or ask what is meant. There's nothing wrong with that.

I don't need to let you off the hook, you were never on it. I am simply explaining to you that your interpretation of the phrases used were not correct. It is up to you to take note of that or not.


Apart from it literally not being what he said at all.

Shame Facepalm GIF by MOODMAN


This is my final comment on this matter, it was just supposed to clear up the difference in meanings that was clearly lost/misunderstood in the earlier discussion.

Fun fact: I never argued the meaning of words and I’m almost confident that the misunderstanding is on your side.

Maybe you’re just missing context because you didn’t go far enough back.
 
Apart from it literally not being what he said at all.

Shame Facepalm GIF by MOODMAN
Well apologies, but English isn't my first language either. Help me better understand what was said then.
You don't think that practice and qualifying could be considered core features of a driving/racing title?
In the context of SP GT? Honestly no.
By that logic this DLC is, in part, pointless and redundant then.
 
Furthermore, I felt like every update was already paid for, since neither the number of races nor the number of cars and their variations still doesn't come close to the predecessors.
The updates were already paid for because it was included in the price of the game -  not because GT7 didn't have x number of cars at launch. There was never a promise to have as many cars are some of the predecessors so your feeling that they owed you the updates because of that is irrational.
(No station wagons / FAR too few cars from the last 5 years (it almost feels like playing a classic car game) / instead of hypercars, sports cars, or current models, we got clunkers / hardly any pickups / no MR or FF races for everyone / no races for supercharged cars)
None of that content was promised to be in the game.
Now making us pay for endurance races feels like a slap in the face
Why? What makes you think you've already paid for them?
 
It'll be fascinating to witness their notion of real motorsports (this is the people who will BoP Group C, LMP1, Hypercars and stupid VGTs together for no reason).

Can't wait for the new design choices that will baffle us all to oblivion.
 
The writing has been on the wall for PS4 GT7 since Sophy, with PS4 players getting less out of (almost) every free update since. And that was February 2023; the PS4 version has been getting less than the PS5 version for over two years now.

That doesn't mean PS4 players should be happy about not having access to the Power Pack (and not having to spend money on it if they want the new races), but I don't think that being particularly angry about it makes so much sense either.
Agreed, and we should all expect that Sony will offer a PS5/GT7+Power Pack bundle before GT8 launches, to try and get the last stragglers off the PS4

With support ending this coming Spring, time is ticking.
 
It’s missing features in my opinion. No custom HUD, turn sharing is a royal pain in the butt, organizing the garage is brutal…one favs folder?! It’s missing features and it’s half baked even after three years.
Fully disagree, and that's fine. Game is not perfect but the experience is complete, in my opinion.
 
The rally in GT is so...anecdotal. They tried to push it in GT Sport but no more. The people want more normal races than that, and sadly (For me) the rally tracks in GT7 are really forgettable.

The soul of the Grand Canyon, Smoky Mountain, Tahiti Maze for example are not there; this new rally tracks miss something. Maybe the new Canadian snow track is better than the old Ice Arena or the Chamonix but that's it.

I don't know why PD never used Northen Island or Route X. Route X needs sophy IA now badly.
For me the tracks are fine, I just don't think the offroad/snow physics are good or fun.
 
It'll be fascinating to witness their notion of real motorsports (this is the people who will BoP Group C, LMP1, Hypercars and stupid VGTs together for no reason).

Can't wait for the new design choices that will baffle us all to oblivion.
While I sort've understand their bizarre vehicle groupings, I agree there is going to be some shenanigans.

I'm excited for all the new content but I'm sure I will be on here immediately on release complaining (within reason I hope) about some specifics. My biggest complaint I'm predicting is that the majority or all events will have lame restrictions. Like, give me a Historic Trans Am series and let me pic whichever car fits that theme from my own garage with my own tuning. I suspect many events will make you use a specific car with no tuning etc because they've tried to perfectly balance the difficulty against Sophy and train it etc.

I'm also betting there are no actual championships and it's just individual events. Even though that one event says All GT Japan Championship or whatever.. I think thats just the theme and not an actual championship.

Plus I can already see thumbnails for events I don't have interest in like.. SEMA cars or Rally events. I also don't really enjoy modern GT3 cars so theres more stuff to ignore.

It is what it is. I'm going to buy the DLC assuming all of this ahead of time. Some stuff is for me and some is for other people.
 
Last edited:
Will be interesting to see if we actually do win prize cars or have to compete using certain cars.
IMG_7012.webp


If these are championships similar to gifting rewards in Weekly Challenges(where finishing top three grants the top award), it looks like players only need to participate to unlock the next race. However, the prototype category shows the 787B locked. Maybe players have to win to unlock all races.

Power Pack shows 10/47 completed with 1/12 gifts. Then, 8/50 below. 0/16 gifts and there’s the Levin gift. I mean, it could be like the Toyota GT86 having a height measurement as high as a building when we got the GT Auto teaser. :lol:
IMG_7014.webp


Anyway, for the Group C race, look like it’ll be the Weekly Challenge Group C events. For those races we didn’t have the full 20 car grid. Hope we’ll get the full power of the PS5 with a larger grid size.
18/18 for Group C. Wonder if PD have a couple more cars planned to add like the Group C Toyota and Peugeot. Similarly like the DTM 19/19 grid. There’d be room to add an Opel/Lotus Carlton( ;) ) in that Weekly Challenge.
(From the recent teaser)
IMG_7013.webp
 
And, to reiterate, PD has been resistant to fracturing the multiplayer offering by issuing paid DLC tracks since GT Sport launched.

There's 367 likes on the Donington Park thread in the Suggestions forum. You are not among them. I suppose that at least you did post it in the Wishlist Thread (with the same inappropriate number of Ns).

Again, if there's content you would like to see, the bare minimum you should be doing to address it is Suggesting/voting on Suggestions. This forum was created at PD's behest (the Wishlist thread is just an attempt to stop wishlists being uselessly spaffed all over the forum, but does also provide an easier-to-browse environment when used properly) and given that it was very recently re-stated that PD uses forums as one resource when curating long- and short-lists for future content, using the exact thing that's set up to provide them this information would appear to be a no-brainer.
I don’t come on here that much, wasn’t aware of the Donnington thread, hence my absence there.

As for my “wish list” it’s not a wish list, it’s an example, so feel free to change it to, three random tracks, and three groups of classed cars that compete with one another not requiring a bunch of tuning, with some AI in multiplayer lobbies etc.

Only meant my comment as an example of what I’d expect for paid dlc. Not just some race events and improved ai, sorry our ai is bad, here pay us some more and we’ll make it better...

Feels like they’ll be charging for some weeklies but dumping them all on us at once. Again if it doesn’t include cars or tracks and some other fix to the game like custom hud etc and ai in lobbies I’ll be keeping my money. That’s a no brainer, I’m baffled by the amount that are ok paying money for better ai. It feels like you bought an air fryer, all the programs are poor, but they’ve got an update you can buy, don’t worry, for sure these preset programs will be better, we promise.
 
Back