But... That's exactly what a good career mode (like PCars and G:AS) do. Starting from with simple race cars in short races on short tracks and adding more difficultly (like Endurance races in G:AS to teach you about tire wear and fuel economy) over time.It wouldn't have fit for a game like GT Sport if the same career mode was implemented. Progressing and learning the basics of motorsport and driving I think is the best way to introduce someone to a racing game that at least wants to drive cleanly.
You are both looking at it from different perspectives is all.Who's everyone?
Also lol @7HO, half the tracks, a tenth the vehicles, no customization, less than half the premiums, no course maker and no single player career equals most content ever in a GT game?
This has the least content of any GT game since... GT1 and the autoshow demos?
So it's uniqueness boils down to an aspect that pretty much all racing games cam cover? I'm not exactly seeing how any of what you just said is unique.
I guess you think feature rich content is a matter of simply waiving a wand and it appears. Our difference of opinion stems from our different expectations and our difference in ability to see how one feature can be made up of a number of features making it a far more compelling experience and far more valuable and desirable but also requiring more work which may be at the expense of other less important features which are simply padding. I say that because there was so much more in the post that you quoted but this is all you got out of it.So outside of PSVR and liveries, there's not much about content within your post there. I'm not even sure if PSVR should be considered content, more so a feature. I've acknowledged the photomode aspect of the game, but you're not really selling much on your point.
Clearly PACARS AI is fun. We were not talking about fun though, we were discussing the detriment by being adverse to the primary objective and PCARS AI is clearly an example of that kind of AI. We were also talking about being detrimental by taking people away from the online gaming and there are online gamers who already use PCARS AI as an alternative to online racing on iRacing, they have both.I think Pcars does well enough in that aspect, perfect? No. But I definitely do get a good amount of fun out of it.
So because they haven't been able to do it before, means it can't be done. Weird to see you take that stance on that aspect, but not most of anything else.
No I didn't. While that may be one aspect, I myself like playing offline as well as online. Sometimes I feel like showing off my tunes and testing them in different environments against real players. Sometimes I don't want to worry about connection problems or idiot drivers smashing around the first turn so I'll play offline. However, with this set up, I'm stuck having to stay in one aspect that is just not a replacement for a lax career approach. Another issue with online is said connection, as well as those idiots mention. When I encounter those it would be nice to have something to fall back on.
Don't misrepresent me as I have demonstrated this is blatantly false.The way he puts things, is like GTSport will be the first game ever to have an online component...
And you don't get that GTS caters for this and seriousness and everything in between because clearly you guys haven't been listening or reading what PD has told you about this game, your still stuck on the missing rubber ducks.And he doesn't get the "turno on the console and chill" kind of approach of most gamers. After all, gaming is all about that.
You still don't get that GTS also caters for the casual gamer. You still don't get that Kaz doesn't want to compete against other sims, he want to compliment and build. You still don't get that there are a ton of great games that already offer what people are asking for and do it better than GT ever has? You know most days I just want to sit back and watch porn, why can't GT have VR grid girl porn? You don't get that this game doesn't need to be everything to every person, it is an impossible task, it doesn't need to cater to a market that is already crowded, it is pointless and bad business. You don't get that if GT filled their needs they still have the titles that did that, or don't they fill the needs anymore? Perhaps people have moved on and are actually looking for more.@7HO You still don't get that this game has somehow to please the casual gamer, who doesn't want to be obliged to race in a sanctioned racing series. You are basically saying the same as, since FIFA as Ultimate Team, they don't need any sort of offline mode. Keep in mind that some people enjoy the campaign, and some don't want to become virtual race drivers. They just want to play a game they like, the way they like. GT filled the needs for a lot of people, even though it wasn't a perfect game, some people played it for the tuning, some for the casual online gameplay, some to collect cars and take pictures of them, race against the AI just to have some fun, etc. Sport mode is an optional mode, don't expect everyone to be obliged play it just because you think they should.
Get this, not every single player wants to be a professional race driver through GTSport nor any other game. Lot's of people just want that pleasure of randomly driving a car in some track, with no compromises. The moment you take out all those other aspects of the game, some people won't enjoy it and will never see a reason to play it again.
The dedicated servers will probably be great. Unfortunately they are only going to be used for the sanctioned events and they are only on the weekend. The rest of the time you are on your own.Did you miss the part about premium servers? Unless you are saying the connection issues are on your end preventing you from online gaming? If you have a stable internet connection what i mentioned as one of the massive upgrade of sport is the premium servers that offer a stable racing environment for 20 people. That's the problem, most people don't have any idea how good real racing is because they compare it to mediocre P2P pub racing where cars warp around a track and you have massive rubber band and you have phantom contacts and half the cars are wrecked in the first corner with just 2 people left racing after the first lap. Okay I'm not saying all those things happen in every race but they all happen regularly and finding good racing on p2p pub servers are rare. That is why iRacing was created, to provide a superior racing service so online racing is like real life racing and issue are rare rather than the other way around.
I bet you I said that first.Like I said, the next game being GT7 or not will be tied to the success of this game. Even if GTSport ends up being the best Sim ever made, it doesn't necessarily mean it will sell well and be a successful title.
But you just don't know, I don't know, PD doesn't know, know one knows and hence the gamble I talked about previously.After all, the biggest part of the gamers that buy GT games, are not sim racers, instead, casuals that buy a game to fit their needs, either being car enthusiasts, dragsters, tuners, drifters. A GT game needs to feel atleast good enough in several aspects, not perfect, but good enough.
I bet you I said that first.
But you just don't know, I don't know, PD doesn't know, know one knows and hence the gamble I talked about previously.
But PD should be commended and so should FIA because if I recall correctly didn't they say FIA originally approached PD? The thing is they are rolling the dice and what they are trying to give us is incredible and they are not trying to cater to a Niche, they are trying to bring Motorsports to everyone.
We know this game has rally, and drift has also been mentioned, they said they will teach us to drift, good luck teaching me how to driftThink about all the Motorsports this can add in the future, Motorkhana, Stadium Trucks, Speedway, the potential lies to add any Motorsport you can think of at some point. Some of you just don't want to acknowledge how big this is, and everyone gets to do it their way. I've got guys telling me here I don't get it because they think GTS is forcing a game on them they can't enjoy when it is exactly the opposite, it is liberating from the grind I hate for people like me, it is a game that lets you be casual and play your way. None of this "oh really my only teo options are to grind forever doing something I don't enjoy to see if I enjoy that car which I may not enjoy or pay real money?", that's a game that wasn't casual, it was insane. That was one of the reasons i gave up on the series.
You also really seem to be under the impression that this game is under some obligation to deliver what you think it should or what you think the market needs. PD is under no obligation, they are free to build the game they want to play and simply hope the world also loves it. I'm pretty sure Kaz gets to do whatever he thinks is best. I'd bet everyone at PD and Sony know this is a gamble and a hard sell but if people just took a step back and looked at what they are trying to deliver and appreciated it for what it is, they would see a gem.
Why are you arguing, it isn't lower price, it is where you live, that means nothing.
Now we are going in circles, no it isn't, yes it is, no it isn't. How do you know what the original idea was? Do you know if like George Lucas Kaz had a vision that he didn't have the technology to achieve and was forced to compromise? Do you know that throughout the series Kaz has mentioned compromises he had to make? Do you know that some of the ambitions Kaz has shared over the years that he didn't have the technology to achieve are complete transformations of the GT experience such as his open world ambitions that are yet to be achieved and may never be. Perhaps you think a band should change their name when they try a new direction, Metallica, GnRs, Arch Enemy, Bon Jovi, BON JOVI! The country rock band, it's still Bon Jovi to me.
A change in direction does not make a spin off. How many times has Supernatural become a spin off of itself according to you? Top Gear? Doctor Who the longest and most successful serial of all time? Doctor Who has changed direction multiple times and is not a spin off, Torchwood is a spin off. Are you starting to understand what a spin off is?
You really are misusing the term tuning. So to help clarify it for you I'll change the terminology, I already did earlier but this time I'm mentioning it so you pay attention.
I believe the ability to setup your car will be a sfully fetured or even more featured than ever. This is the most important aspect for this game.
The ability to bolt on fake parts and build a fake car will not be in this title. Honestly if you want to do this why are you even looking at GT in the first place? In the past I always considered GT the more appealing between Forza and GT for me because in standard form GT just felt better but it fell down with modifications. If you want to modify cars go to the king of modifying cars, go to Forza. It is a great game, don't worry, there is no need to feel guilty, have you seen Forza Horizon 3? Why are people upset that GT isn't doing this? It isn't realistic, it doesn't fit with the Real Driving Simulator title and Forza have been doing it better for a long time. That just has no place in this title.
How do you know if you don't care for something you haven't tried? It could be the best thing you have ever tried.
So out of curiosity, what percentage of people or even better how many people do you think are going to pay full price for GTS to use it the way you described? Why would they choose GT instead of PCARS, AC or Forza which clearly is much better than GT according to what you are looking for in a game? i tell you what as long as they head to the campaign mode like you said the game will be fine because....
I've raced with friends, It isn't fun beating them by 5 laps
Does none of that sound appealing to you?
It doesn't need to be super serious in GTS, you can do it your way. The beauty of matchmaking is if you are not the type of guy who likes to practice and test and you just want to jump on find a race and have some fun, the matchmaking system is designed to rate you according to your ability and fairness and put you with other people just like to for a fun fair fight. Some of the guys might be serious but just slow and others are talented but just jumped in for fun with the standard set, both run the same times and have a great battle with 18 other guys all running roughly the same times.
You still don't get that GTS also caters for the casual gamer. You still don't get that Kaz doesn't want to compete against other sims, he want to compliment and build. You still don't get that there are a ton of great games that already offer what people are asking for and do it better than GT ever has? You know most days I just want to sit back and watch porn, why can't GT have VR grid girl porn? You don't get that this game doesn't need to be everything to every person, it is an impossible task, it doesn't need to cater to a market that is already crowded, it is pointless and bad business. You don't get that if GT filled their needs they still have the titles that did that, or don't they fill the needs anymore? Perhaps people have moved on and are actually looking for more.
Well i don't see how you can't do that in GTS but if you feel for some bizarre reason that GTS does not cater to that then you also have AC and PCARS and Forza and Horizon and if you want there are way more gamey car games out there that also have a big following, it is crazy, I have so many car games that I can think of 3 that I have installed and I have never tried. Man from what I hear GTAV is one of the greatest car games ever made, or is that only on PC with mods? I can't believe I never got GTAV.
This is half correct. https://www.gtplanet.net/gt-sport-to-feature-dedicated-servers-for-sport-mode/The dedicated servers will probably be great. Unfortunately they are only going to be used for the sanctioned events and they are only on the weekend. The rest of the time you are on your own.
The connection issues are definitely on your end.Something is wrong with you man, you have some weird, freaky alien mindset that just throws me off.
Is English your second language or something and are we having translation issues or something?
All I'm getting is more cars, tracks and features doesn't mean more content and AI is the devil or something.
Are you Quarian?
Yes, both the FIA events and PD's own championships will use dedicated servers, but the regular 'Open Lobby' style of online play will be using P2P connections like in the past.This is half correct. https://www.gtplanet.net/gt-sport-to-feature-dedicated-servers-for-sport-mode/
Official servers will be used for both official FIA competitions and official PD competitions, these run all week.
From what I am seeing it appears that FIA run weekend Championship races. PD also run special Championships during the week and PD also host daily races.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Don't you get it? Less is more, well more or less. Less cars and tracks but with more detail and quality and those less take more development time to create. If you are now less confused I needn't go on any more.Something is wrong with you man, you have some weird, freaky alien mindset that just throws me off.
Is English your second language or something and are we having translation issues or something?
All I'm getting is more cars, tracks and features doesn't mean more content and AI is the devil or something.
Are you Quarian?
Are you serious now or kidding with me mate?
Are you playing GT only because the graphics?
I say that because of the new physics and wheel feeling from gts...
I'm thinking about all those "old" the car from the first hour when I try the GTS at Germany..
I like the new graphics but I play gt because of this special PD's car feeling..
Sorry for my bad English
![]()
This paragraph is full of contradictory statements. GTS is forcing a very narrow path through the game on you. No offline career so you are forced to race online. Unless you are organizing your own lobbies which carries it's own headaches, you're subjected to the whims of the structured lobbies. If you want matchmaking you are subjected to the whims of the software, likely put on a track you didn't choose with people you don't know. There will be literally zero choice which means zero freedom which is the exact opposite of "play your way". You're also going to be extremely limited in car selection. You'll have a class to race in that lobby, a handful of cars too choose from and that's it. I'm used to that in sim racing but GT fans are used to having massive garages full of cars to choose from so going from that to perhaps 5-10 cars is, again, the opposite of freedom.We know this game has rally, and drift has also been mentioned, they said they will teach us to drift, good luck teaching me how to driftThink about all the Motorsports this can add in the future, Motorkhana, Stadium Trucks, Speedway, the potential lies to add any Motorsport you can think of at some point. Some of you just don't want to acknowledge how big this is, and everyone gets to do it their way. I've got guys telling me here I don't get it because they think GTS is forcing a game on them they can't enjoy when it is exactly the opposite, it is liberating from the grind I hate for people like me, it is a game that lets you be casual and play your way. None of this "oh really my only teo options are to grind forever doing something I don't enjoy to see if I enjoy that car which I may not enjoy or pay real money?", that's a game that wasn't casual, it was insane. That was one of the reasons i gave up on the series.
You still don't get that GTS also caters for the casual gamer.
You still don't get that there are a ton of great games that already offer what people are asking for and do it better than GT ever has?
You know most days I just want to sit back and watch porn, why can't GT have VR grid girl porn?
You don't get that this game doesn't need to be everything to every person, it is an impossible task, it doesn't need to cater to a market that is already crowded, it is pointless and bad business. You don't get that if GT filled their needs they still have the titles that did that, or don't they fill the needs anymore? Perhaps people have moved on and are actually looking for more.
But PD should be commended and so should FIA because if I recall correctly didn't they say FIA originally approached PD? The thing is they are rolling the dice and what they are trying to give us is incredible and they are not trying to cater to a Niche, they are trying to bring Motorsports to everyone.
Think about all the Motorsports this can add in the future, Motorkhana, Stadium Trucks, Speedway, the potential lies to add any Motorsport you can think of at some point. Some of you just don't want to acknowledge how big this is, and everyone gets to do it their way.
I've got guys telling me here I don't get it because they think GTS is forcing a game on them they can't enjoy when it is exactly the opposite, it is liberating from the grind I hate for people like me, it is a game that lets you be casual and play your way. None of this "oh really my only teo options are to grind forever doing something I don't enjoy to see if I enjoy that car which I may not enjoy or pay real money?", that's a game that wasn't casual, it was insane. That was one of the reasons i gave up on the series.
if people just took a step back and looked at what they are trying to deliver and appreciated it for what it is, they would see a gem.
Yeh, that's my impression too.This is half correct. https://www.gtplanet.net/gt-sport-to-feature-dedicated-servers-for-sport-mode/
Official servers will be used for both official FIA competitions and official PD competitions, these run all week.
From what I am seeing it appears that FIA run weekend Championship races. PD also run special Championships during the week and PD also host daily races.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
from 3:20, Kaz's own words
Translated into English at 5:13
Sorry about that.@Tassie_tiger - No need to double-post, you can multi-quote users or use the Edit button. I've merged them just now. 👍
If you want to go that way... why don't you go play something else that meets your requirements? (See how stupid your argument was? Now let's move on.)
No but clearly you are having difficulty, I won't repeat what I said again, everyone else would be sick of seeing me having to repeat myself.So, what you are saying is, GTS is better, because it offers less choice?
No again I never said this. However I did say repeatedly that performance modifications don't fit in with the Sport mode and FIA competition. And I said I'm sure this game will still have the ability to tune your cars suspension, aero and the other real world items you are allowed to alter in FIA racing classes such as GT3 and that I expect it to be improved over previous versions.Now, just because it doesn't fill your needs or you don't like it, automatically shouldn't be part of the game?
Also didn't say this, it doesn't have a place in Sport and that is why it isn't there.Who in the world are you, to say if something that is beloved by lots of GT fans doesn't have a place in GT?
So lets get this straight, you are telling me that people will go out and buy a PS4 just for GTS without knowing anything about the game just because it is GT?First of all, GT is GT. You know, nostalgia, fanbase, etc. Some people will buy it, because it's GT. After they find that this new GT doesn't have some key features from the previous games that they like, they will abandon it, because they don't see all those things that made them play the last GTs for hours. Maybe because they don't like those games, either because they are hard or simply too different from what they are used to. I can't answer for them. But one thing I can answer for them is that no everyone has that much money to waste on a new console, specially when some of them already have a PS4. You know, 300$/€/whatever are hard to earn. It's not like choosing between a pizza or an hamburger.
What rules, how many times do I have to say it? GTS has less rules than any other title. Kaz said it, the old games were too much work, he made this one easy becasue that is what people want today. You know casual gameplay not work disguised as gaming. It is a game for everyone where everyone can play it there own way.This says it all, just because you are an hardcore racer, doesn't mean everyone else has to be. You like to have competitive races, good for you. Some people just want to play casually, on a friday night after work, nothing serious, and they shouldn't be obliged to play by your rules. So, yes, a career mode is always needed even if it's just for a percentage of the players to enjoy.
Being obliged to play the way others want isn't appealing to anyone. You are just saying to those that like an offline mode, to go screw themselves if they don't want to play the way you want.
You know what is appealing? The ability to choose, and you don't want anyone to have that.
Where do you get this rubbish from? How does that fit in with Kaz saying (in my own words) that with the old games people wanted to grind but now people don't want to grind so GTS caters for the modern player? What you really don't understand is the comparison I made. The old offline campaign is comparable to the new sport mode in that they both include racing presented as a form of career. I know nothing about currency of the new title except that Kaz said the game is going to be less work.And what about those who don't want to race, and just want get online and do some drag racing, or show off their liveries or drift with random cars? Those are obliged to participate in those matchmaking sessions? When they could just do some quick offline races, to get some money and then buy the car they want? Oh no, for you there's no need for a campaign...
Wait, the slow guys as fast as the talented? How does that work? If one is slow, well, it's slow, if the other is talented, it's supposed to be fast, right? And why do you assume that the casual players are slow? Why not assume that the casual player doesn't have that much money to buy a good wheel, and that with a controler the times are slower? You clearly think you are above others, I see...
Well, you are crossing the line of ridiculous with that porn analogy...
GT sold a lot because it filled the needs of a lot of people. Period.
It's an impossible task to fulfill the needs of everyone? Yes, but GT kind of did it, since it joined a big community of players that play the game in numerous different ways. Do you get that?
The beauty of GT always was the amount of hours you could spend in it, and do things in one single 70$ game, which otherwise you could only achieve by buying several games.
Or perhaps, people have moved on because it appeared a new alternative (Forza) that gave them almost the same as GT, but without all the problems known with the GT series (Sounds, AI, livery editor, etc). And these are the biggest reasons why people started leaving GT, because the biggest problems weren't being addressed.
Again you are making this up. You just assume that is how it will be, how about you wait until the game comes out or until you have more information so you are not just talking rubbish all the time, just stick to what has been said, it is hard enough when you do that. That's what I do and I still have people like you saying it is wrong and that Kaz is just saying that to sell games.The moment you take out the campaign, you are obliging people to play online to earn credits,
Oh come on now, of course it turns around me, you're just upset because you can't build a 1000hp Skyline and I'm getting everything I want.Either way, I'm done. You don't want to understand that the world doesn't turn around you, and that other people want more than an online focused game. What you are suggesting is not freedom, is diminushing the choices for people to play the game so they play it your way.
It is a game for everyone where everyone can play it there own way.
This sort of mention had been more common back before Copper Box, but it makes sense for Kaz to brush off all mention of GT7 for a while.Sony and Polyphony Digital are still working on Gran Turismo 7, but in the meantime they’ve announced a new edition of the world’s most popular automotive video game.
The problem PD have had is that their development time between games is too long. I think you'll find that a good portion of those 7 million less people got tired of waiting for GT6 and with Turn 10 producing a great alternative in Forza with new games and content coming at a great rate many of them may have made the jump to XB and then not bothered with GT6 especially as it didn't offer a lot over GT5.And yet they walked away in droves from the last one which if no other GT title had ever been released would on its own be considered an incredible game. But everyone is over it, over 60% of GT's former loyal fans voted with their wallet and said we don't think GT is fun anymore. They all already had the console, they all already bought GT5 but over 7 million less people bought GT6. But If PD just stick to the same formula this time will be better, where's that GIF?
Some people don't seem to realise there can be a middle ground between the old games and Sport. We may never see a game exactly like GT1-6 again but that doesn't mean everything we see going forward will be exactly like Sport either. There is still a space in between for something fresh to exist, an advancement of the old game formula whilst keeping the newer elements as well.
I'm not a game designer so I don't have the answers but PD are, so I'm sure they have other ideas to move things forward whilst also keeping fans of the old formula happy. I just do not see how a game as focused as GT Sport is, is going to appeal long term to the millions of casual fans. PD cannot ignore those people who just want to build their 1000hp Skyline and race it in structured events against AI, at their own leisure. Or taking a "sleeper" econobox and turning it into a racer. That is what GT has always been about and I just don't see PD abandoning it entirely for the rest of their developing days.
GT Sport has less features than the recent 'full' games, there is no denying that.
1- Offline Career Mode or any substantial offline progression separate from online.
2- Dynamic Time & Weather
3- Course Maker
4- B-Spec
5- Special Events, Goodwood etc
6- Deep car customisation
7- Data Logger
8- GPS Visualistion
All missing on top of the lowest car and track count since GT1. Call it a rebirth of the series or whatever you want but if you're going to claim it's a 'full title' you have to compare the features and content of previous full games, even if they're now a past chapter.
The content we do have is obviously better quality, but there is less of it overall.
Some people don't seem to realise there can be a middle ground between the old games and Sport. We may never see a game exactly like GT1-6 again but that doesn't mean everything we see going forward will be exactly like Sport either. There is still a space in between for something fresh to exist, an advancement of the old game formula whilst keeping the newer elements as well.
I'm not a game designer so I don't have the answers but PD are, so I'm sure they have other ideas to move things forward whilst also keeping fans of the old formula happy. I just do not see how a game as focused as GT Sport is, is going to appeal long term to the millions of casual fans. PD cannot ignore those people who just want to build their 1000hp Skyline and race it in structured events against AI, at their own leisure. Or taking a "sleeper" econobox and turning it into a racer. That is what GT has always been about and I just don't see PD abandoning it entirely for the rest of their developing days.
Okay we will start with the stretch 5 and 1 are the same thing but if you don't agree here is a pic od special events in GTS,
![]()
New features.
In addition to that these things are improved
- New 4 part Offline Career
- Sport Mode
- PSVR
- FIA Licence and Real life recognition.
- Special Championships
- GT Sport Live
- Livery editor including defined stickers and user creatable stickers
- Advanced Matchmaking
- Official Servers supporting 20 cars
I'm not sure what I have missed and we don't even know if we know all there is to know as there may be a surprise or 2 left to announce but some of these are substantial projects just like the reasoning for the car and track count being it is new content which is a substantial project and we have been promised more cars after release.
- Scapes photo editing
- Social Features
- Museum
- Physics
- Graphics
- Lighting
- VGT
- FFB (speculative based on the addition of DD)
- Camera views (according to E3 impressions)
Keep in mind we have not seen a build yet that includes damage but we have been told it is in the game so what other things have been hidden from us? I'm wondering if some of the things on your list might actually end up on the Sport list.
How? You can't open with that and in the very next sentence in the same paragraph change the topic without showing where you think it is doing that.This paragraph is full of contradictory statements.
GTS is forcing a very narrow path through the game on you. No offline career so you are forced to race online. Unless you are organizing your own lobbies which carries it's own headaches, you're subjected to the whims of the structured lobbies. If you want matchmaking you are subjected to the whims of the software, likely put on a track you didn't choose with people you don't know. There will be literally zero choice which means zero freedom which is the exact opposite of "play your way". You're also going to be extremely limited in car selection. You'll have a class to race in that lobby, a handful of cars too choose from and that's it. I'm used to that in sim racing but GT fans are used to having massive garages full of cars to choose from so going from that to perhaps 5-10 cars is, again, the opposite of freedom.
It's also the opposite of casual. Casual is relaxing, easy, fun, predictable, not too serious. Wanna race? Pick a car, hit a few buttons and you're racing offline. Online isn't so simple. Online racing is going to be serious business for many people, some of them will be freaking out over minor incidents that, in the past were meaningless, but now will affect their driver rating in a negative way. In GT5/6 you'd just say, "no big deal, that's racing". Now there is bound to be a great many butthurt Mr. Serious Gamers in many of the lobbies that are going to lose their lunch because you scraped them in a corner and maybe accidentally forced them into a barrier or slightly off track and they find out when the race is over that they've taken a hit of 6 or 7 points against their etiquette rating.
So is Kaz.You're also very dismissive of the GT fans who really enjoyed the grind and enjoyed the whole start with a budget car and grind your way to a big garage approach to the game. That is literally the bread and butter of GT so far and it's lead to 70 million + units flying out the door. There are a LOT of people that enjoy that game mechanic. To them that is casual. Yes, of course, it goes without saying that PD can create any game they want but it doesn't make the disappointment from the fans wanting the things that GT5 and GT6 brought to the table and they expected to be improved through the PS4