Kevin Ward

  • Thread starter GTPorsche
  • 610 comments
  • 26,185 views
Oh wow you have biased, and thus are defaming a person due to said bias, and some how think your still intellectually capable of responding...




This right here tells me your congnitive thought and skills of deduction are horrible. @MustangRyan asked were the first 13 laps under caution, meaning that no they weren't and thus dirt built up on these cars due to them racing prior to caution. This isn't some magical world where dirt just washes away once the caution comes out. Just like Dirt bike racing these guys wear tear offs and and it doesn't take much dirt to go through a few, I should know because I use to race dirt bikes and so did my father.

In other words it is quite possible that dirt from the laps or racing could have obstructed Stewart's view and it's possible that it didn't. However, you thinking that there was hardly any dirt flying we debunk your thought on this being some scare tactic to kick up dirt on Ward. IF racing 13 laps prior wasn't enough then how would a quick power slide at caution speeds be enough...



And no I'm not joking about Robin Williams I find it quite sad to be frank.

Well it's obvious why I'm still here because I actually have common sense and deductive reasoning and rationality to make choice calls, as to you using pure emotion which doesn't get people too far in life on that alone. Also I don't care if you find me classy or not, or anyone else for that matter who agrees also. I'm just here to argue a point against ignorant minds that feel it's a good idea to perpetuate their ignorance on others.
No your hear to spread your ignorance in the hopes you can get more people to follow your thinking. If you where hear for a serious discussion on the subject you wouldnt be downing people who don't share your opinion.

It cracks me up how people THINK they are having a good discussion when you think every person who disagrees with you is ignorant. The only ignorant people I have seen in this thread is the ones calling others ignorant. :lol: How ironic.
 
Let's get this straight. See my first post? My initial reaction was pretty much the same as many people here. It was "Oh 🤬, what has that hothead done now?" I was ready to condemn the man to hell and a twenty year sentence, even if he only meant "to scare the kid."

However, after having viewed the footage, I can't find any way that Tony could have correctly predicted and/or avoided that. Like I said, it's very obvious that Kevin changed speeds and directions several times, was obscured by other vehicles (Easy to see him from half a track away, or if you're the first car coming at him. If you're the fourth (46) and fifth cars coming at him as he's playing in traffic, not so much) and ran over halfway down the track to confront Tony.

...


This is why any accusation that he willingly pointed his car at Kevin is a serious allegation. And why all the facts must be taken into account before rendering any verdict or damning opinion on the subject.

Agreed completely. My first post was based on the first available information. Needless to say, the first available information was made by a few people, all of which were local to the track, and somehow connected to the victim. The first statements were along the lines of "Stewart ran into the corner sideways, gunned it, and just sideswiped this other driver who was just standing in the track after Stewart smashed him into the wall on the previous lap."

In my haste, I forgot the old adage that states "Believe none of what you hear, and only half of what you see." That's my mistake, and one I certainly hope to not make in the future. This is the reason that the US judicial system starts with a supposition of innocence, until proven guilty.

It's going to be hard to take statements made by friends/competitors that have raced with/against Ward for the last 5 years, and not expect them to be biased in Ward's favor and/or against Stewart. It's been said that some of the local dirt track racers all across the country do not like racing against Tony Stewart. His car has way more money invested in it than most other cars in the fields. They also think that Tony doesn't care if he crashes, because it is so easy for him to fix or replace his car. Most local track guys don't have the same luxury.

After seeing the video (and realizing that it too is imperfect), and absorbing more information from more impartial sources, I honestly feel like this was just an unfortunate accident that was entirely preventable.

Even the video will sub-conciously bias anyone that watches it, as the guy filming it repeatedly yells "TONY STEWART JUST HIT THAT GUY!" Had he yelled three times that "THAT GUY JUST RAN RIGHT OUT IN FRONT OF TONY STEWART!" would that have changed, even slightly, how a lot of people viewed that incident?

What if it was Stewart that got ran over by Ward? Would we be blaming Ward for running him down in cold blood?

OR, would Tony "the hot head" Stewart have finally got what was coming to him for being such an insufferable tempermental jackass? I think the people that really don't like Tony Stewart would be blaming him for walking down the track, while they are currently blaming him for not racing with a spotter, night vision goggles, and a set of pillows mounted on the side of his sprint car.

What if any of the cars in front of Tony had hit Ward? Some certainly came very close, and he wasn't even trying to get in their way. Would we still even be talking about this? Would we have even heard about this had the 45 car hit Ward?
 
Last edited:
Would we still even be talking about this? Would we have even heard about this had the 45 car hit Ward?
It wouldn't have even been a story...

Just a shame it takes an incident with a famous racer for safety reviews to be taken into action. The only good thing to come from this is that hopefully this type of behavior is stopped completely, because no one should be out on a live track putting their life at risk just to wave frantically at a passing car.

I think we'll hear Stewart's side of the story once he's moved beyond his grieving and is ready to speak. I don't know if he'll race a sprint car again though. He's harmed the one form of motorsport he loves the most, and it's going to be pretty difficult to get over that.
 
Agreed completely. My first post was based on the first available information. Needless to say, the first available information was made by a few people, all of which were local to the track, and somehow connected to the victim. The first statements were along the lines of "Stewart ran into the corner sideways, gunned it, and just sideswiped this other driver who was just standing in the track after Stewart smashed him into the wall on the previous lap."

I was honestly shocked with all the negative reactions. From the moment I heard the news I put accident at the top of the list. I'm not a NASCAR fan, I don't know much about the people involved, but running someone over with a car is a bit extreme. The video though leaves almost no doubt, I really don't understand why people are so quick to call it intentional.
 
He says while ignoring several more posts which break down the incident in great detail.
I haven't ignored anything. I have read every post and watched all the videos linked. Ill I get from others is you cant see out the car, you cant turn the car and somehow everyone thinks Tony needed to plan this or it had to be an accident, because we all know snap decisions cant happen. I have been behind the wheel of one of these and you can watch all the videos. You can see just fine out of the car and at low speed the car is very reactive to steering inputs, but that seems to get ignored because it doesn't fit most peoples theory. In my opinion there is more evidence to support Tony could of avoided Kevin, then there is that Tony was completely clueless as to what was going on in front of him.
 
No your hear to spread your ignorance in the hopes you can get more people to follow your thinking. If you where hear for a serious discussion on the subject you wouldnt be downing people who don't share your opinion.

It cracks me up how people THINK they are having a good discussion when you think every person who disagrees with you is ignorant. The only ignorant people I have seen in this thread is the ones calling others ignorant. :lol: How ironic.

It's ignorant because I and others have never claimed to have insight on the reality, what we've done is give you kracker and other is . Also I don't see any irony but the forced supposition you've claimed. The fact that you and a few others have to have something scripted the way you want it to be because you've settled and me and others are actually impartial to this.

If evidence comes to light that Stewart did in fact have all this foresight and knowledge and the tacit ability to come up with how to kill this person and get away with it in seconds, would make him the greatest killer ever. The fact that people are keen to him being able to do this is ignorant and irrational and bit disturbing.

Also you can ask the GTP community I'm too much of an ass to care if people follow my reasoning or not, don't make this about everyone else.
 
It's ignorant because I and others have never claimed to have insight on the reality, what we've done is give you kracker and other is . Also I don't see any irony but the forced supposition you've claimed. The fact that you and a few others have to have something scripted the way you want it to be because you've settled and me and others are actually impartial to this.

If evidence comes to light that Stewart did in fact have all this foresight and knowledge and the tacit ability to come up with how to kill this person and get away with it in seconds, would make him the greatest killer ever. The fact that people are keen to him being able to do this is ignorant and irrational and bit disturbing.

Also you can ask the GTP community I'm too much of an ass to care if people follow my reasoning or not, don't make this about everyone else.
Yeah because Tony either meant to kill him or nothing right? There is no way anything else is possible. The way I see it is your the one with the closed mind its either black and white or nothing. No gray areas around hear.
 
Yeah because Tony either meant to kill him or nothing right? There is no way anything else is possible. The way I see it is your the one with the closed mind its either black and white or nothing. No gray areas around hear.

Well if you read the thread as you indicate you did you'd know that I haven't said or implied this at all. Also if I was so black and white on the situation why am I the one that hasn't come up with a concise conclusion and you seemed to have?
 
Last edited:
Yeah because Tony either meant to kill him or nothing right? There is no way anything else is possible. The way I see it is your the one with the closed mind its either black and white or nothing. No gray areas around hear.
What is the gray area here? I sort of meant to kill him? I hope this only paralyzes him?

This is pretty black and white; either Tony meant to inflict bodily harm, or he didn't.
 
What is the gray area here? I sort of meant to kill him? I hope this only paralyzes him?

This is pretty black and white; either Tony meant to inflict bodily harm, or he didn't.
I don't know maybe scare the kid and have him jump out the way?

Here is a video of these cars in the pits. Watch from 1:05 and you will see that car make a 90 degree right and left turn with out any goosing the throttle or the front tires just sliding through the dirt. The car made the turns with no drama just rear end of the car following the front. http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...&mid=64BEEEE7CC5030CBC34264BEEEE7CC5030CBC342
 
The maneuverability of a car at a jogging pace is hardly representative of what it is capable of a 30+ mph. Also, something this asymmetrical is always going to be a dog to handle doing anything it not designed to (80mph, sideways, turning left). Screenshot from your video @fatkrakr
upload_2014-8-12_16-37-12.png
 
I don't know maybe scare the kid and have him jump out the way?

Here is a video of these cars in the pits. Watch from 1:05 and you will see that car make a 90 degree right and left turn with out any goosing the throttle or the front tires just sliding through the dirt. The car made the turns with no drama just rear end of the car following the front. http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Sprint Cars in pits&qs=n&form=QBVR&pq=sprint cars in pits&sc=0-18&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&mid=64BEEEE7CC5030CBC34264BEEEE7CC5030CBC342

That would still be intent to the degree of manslaughter and if the DA can make it really stick vehicular assault.

Um well considering that you're coming out of pit road at hardly any speed it makes sense it would be easy 40-50 miles an hour at last second not so much. It's like claiming a pro mod drag car is great at making turns after it has made a 200mph + run and is afterward traveling a 10 to 15mph
 
The maneuverability of a car at a jogging pace is hardly representative of what it is capable of a 30+ mph. Also, something this asymmetrical is always going to be a dog to handle doing anything it not designed to (80mph, sideways, turning left). Screenshot from your video @fatkrakr
View attachment 203093
That would still be intent to the degree of manslaughter and if the DA can make it really stick vehicular assault.

Um well considering that you're coming out of pit road at hardly any speed it makes sense it would be easy 40-50 miles an hour at last second not so much. It's like claiming a pro mod drag car is great at making turns after it has made a 200mph + run and is afterward traveling a 10 to 15mph

Whatever guys, just ignore the fact that your argument about not being able to steer the cars at low speed is BS. If you cant even admit the people you got your info from are cluless about these cars there is no point in going any futher with this discussion. Just keep believing these cars are running around the pits and during caution laps with the drivers having no control on where they go on the track. :cheers:
 
Whatever guys, just ignore the fact that your argument about not being able to steer the cars at low speed is BS. If you cant even admit the people you got your info from are cluless about these cars there is no point in going any futher with this discussion.
You might be the one who needs to take note of this.
 
Whatever guys, just ignore the fact that your argument about not being able to steer the cars at low speed is BS. If you cant even admit the people you got your info from are cluless about these cars there is no point in going any futher with this discussion. Just keep believing these cars are running around the pits and during caution laps with the drivers having no control on where they go on the track. :cheers:

I see the point sailed over your head not surprised. Like I said if the world isn't scripted as you see fit you rather have a cop out. We just said we're sure these cars and turn but not as sharp as you are trying to get us to believe, nor at the speeds your trying to get us to believe. You give us citations of this proof via pit videos of the car driving under what Stewart and others were doing during caution.

Also you keep factoring out the reaction time in which he had to do it in as well.
 
I don't know maybe scare the kid and have him jump out the way?

Here is a video of these cars in the pits. Watch from 1:05 and you will see that car make a 90 degree right and left turn with out any goosing the throttle or the front tires just sliding through the dirt. The car made the turns with no drama just rear end of the car following the front. http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Sprint Cars in pits&qs=n&form=QBVR&pq=sprint cars in pits&sc=0-18&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&mid=64BEEEE7CC5030CBC34264BEEEE7CC5030CBC342

There are a couple of things wrong with that video, and your usage of it.

First, all of the cars are being pushed around at pedestrian speeds by push cars. Maybe 10-15 mph at the most. Under a yellow flag condition, the speeds are more like 35-40. Which is going to make a significant difference in handling.

Secondly, at about 1:10 in the video, we see a car making a right hand corner at idle speeds. Even then. The front wheels are skipping across the surface of the ground, and pushing. When he turns left, the car turns on a dime...like its designed to do...turn left.

So I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is, because your own video just kind of debunked you.
 
There are a couple of things wrong with that video, and your usage of it.

First, all of the cars are being pushed around at pedestrian speeds by push cars. Maybe 10-15 mph at the most. Under a yellow flag condition, the speeds are more like 35-40. Which is going to make a significant difference in handling.

Secondly, at about 1:10 in the video, we see a car making a right hand corner at idle speeds. Even then. The front wheels are skipping across the surface of the ground, and pushing. When he turns left, the car turns on a dime...like its designed to do...turn left.

So I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make is, because your own video just kind of debunked you.

The point is he holds all the cards he knows far better than you or me or anyone else that's had racing experience, or known anyone with experience, engineering understanding or basic common sense. He like Earth is sure of what happened that night which at worse is Stewart purposely killed a man, at best Stewart didn't do it on purpose but acted as a jack ass and tried to scare the guy and ended up killing him. Either way Stewart is guilty of killing this poor guy.
 
I don't know if this point has been brought up yet, but where did Tony enter turn 1 at? His line on entry will do a lot to determine whether he saw Kevin or if he tried to avoid, or maybe juked right at first, then juked left and they both reacted in the same direction etc.

But either way, we have no idea currently as to what lane he was in when he entered turn 1 under yellow from the video, and that's really having an affect on opinions
 
Whatever guys, just ignore the fact that your argument about not being able to steer the cars at low speed is BS.

40mph may be relatively slow but it isn't actually slow, not by any means. I think you're struggling with the whole relative speed/grip thing. Showing that a car with the engine off at 15 mph turns well with no torque across the rear wheels (and therefore no diminished front balance) is irrelevant when you're illustrating a powered car on dirty banking doing 40.
 
Read back over the last couple of pages, and it seems like many people are still kind of weighing in on the whole thing. So i thought i would offer my own dollars worth on the situation.

I would like to lay some foundation for my comments before i make them, so that there isnt any room for making assumptions, or apparent bias. I dont like NASCAR, never have, never will, and subsequently i dont care about Tony Stewart, or Kevin Ward in any capacity. So there is not, and will not be any fanboyism in my commentary. Just facts as i see them.

Ive been involved in racing for years. As a driver, as a crew member, and as a driving instructor. Between those, thousands of track miles, and thousands of hours of time at the track have been logged. In all of those cases, one thing was forced upon any individual who passes the paddock gate: a safety meeting, and a health and safety waiver. In both of these cases, one of the primary things that is talked about, is death. The fact that it can happen anywhere, at anytime, and in any situation. And because we are dealing with heavy things going at high speeds, more often than not, when something goes wrong, it will go horribly wrong. Safety procedures on how to deal with an accident are also heavily discussed. First thing that is said in virtually every meeting, is if you have an accident, stay in your car until the safety crew arrives. If you have a fire incident, and need to extricate yourself from the vehicle, it is your responsibility to get to a safe location, and contact a marshal as quickly as possible. This is usually followed by instructions about specific corners to watch out for, exit locations in the fence, and staying away from the racing line, never crossing a live track, even in yellow conditions, and always looking out for other cars. And finally how it is every drivers responsibility to avoid an accident as much as possible, but in the end, it is the your personal sole responsibility to be aware of your own safety, and protect yourself from danger. Bottom line, racing is dangerous, prople die doing it. Accept that risk, or leave.

In this particular situation, the "accident" that started the whole thing was about as common an accident in sprint car as you are going to get. Tony undercut his line and made a pass, and moved up to block Kevin, and protect his line, Kevin didnt back out to let the pass happen, got up onto the outer apron, lost traction, and spun out into the wall. Wards car was hardly even damaged from the accident, receiving nothing more than a flat tire, and maybe a couple bent tie rods. Any sanctioning body would have categorized that as any other typical racing incident. Tony leaned on him, he didnt yield, and he ended up in the wall. It didnt ruin his car, it didnt endanger him in any way, He should have been grateful the car was as intact as it was, and let it go at that. It was certainly not worth the tempertanturm that followed it.

An important thing to note about sprint cars, is that they run a ginormous offset in the rear wheels to force them to turn left. The front axle is also set up to promote this left turn only setup. The cars do not drive straight at all. Driving "straight" in a sprint car, involves the car crabbing awkwardly to the left, while having to apply right hand opposite lock to counter act it. And even then, you are usually pushing the front wheels, because there is so much positive lock in the rear axle. Given all of this, turning to the right, up an embankment, in a sprint car, is easier said than done, and not done in any way that would be considered graceful, or fluid.
Equally of importance is the braking setup of a sprint car. Usually they have a single rear axle brake. Typically it is located on the inside left rear axle. This is nothing more than a drag brake to help induce differential bias to rotate the car, and control the angle of rotation. It is not a "brake" as it would be described in most circle. Some cars do run a second brake on the outer right hub, but it is typically smaller than the inboard brake on the left axle.
On the front, the story is much the same. There is only a single brake, on the left front wheel, with the sole purpose of hooking the left front to control and correct the drift angle of the car.
Neither of these brakes are the typical heavy vented rotors you find on a road car (sometimes the left rear axle brake is a vented type), but are the single floating disc type usually found most commonly on a motorcycle. And in fact, in some of the lower midget sprint car formulas, they are sourced directly from a motorcycle. Running a motorcycle front brake on the rear axle, and a motorcycle rear brake on the front axle.
The majority of the "braking" in a sprint car comes from engine compression. As the engine is hooked directly to the rear axle without a transmission, simply lifting the throttle can create a massive amount back pressure, dramatically slowing the rear axle. The likelihood that Tony could have stopped, or swerved, to miss Kevin is a little absurd. These cars do not steer well, nor do they handle well, and especially not at slow speed. They are designed to go fast sideways. Not run a slalom course, or stop on a dime. Just look at the chaos that ensues from any sprint car crash. The cars flop around like fish out of water spinning and dash off all over the track. Its chaos. Sideways at speed is the only way they are reasonably controllable.

Once Kevin got out of his car, and started to walk out into the middle of the track, he just took every rule that he agreed to in the drivers safety meeting, and threw it out the window. No matter how much people want to argue over vague semantics, and assumptions, the fact is, from a legal standpoint, Kevin Ward violated safety protocol of the circuit when he walked out into the racing groove of a live track. Caution flag or not, doesnt matter. He took his life into his own hands, and paid the ultimate price.
If you watch the video, you will see that as Kevin gets out of his car, he is buzzed by a car on the high groove of the track. He then starts to walk out into the middle groove of the track. The blue and white #45 car nearly clips him, and Kevin even steps back a little to avoid the #45, and then moves even further into the racing line while gesticulating at Tonys car. The camera moves away here for a moment tracking the #45 that almost hit him. Only to snap back and catch Kevin right in front of Tonys car. Kevin is still pointing and gesticulating for a frame or two, up until Tonys car is literally 2-3 feet away from him. Its at that moment that we then finally see his left leg come up as he starts to jump out of the way, albeit it too little to late. Keep in mind that even under yellow conditions, the cars are still moving at 35-40 MPH. Nobody here would play chicken down to a game of feet with a road car traveling at that speed, would they? So it makes sense you wouldnt do it with an 800 BHP car that cant drive straight, and has, near enough to might as well be, no brakes.

It is worth looking at, and tracking the groove lines in the track, were you can see that Tonys car was in the same groove line as the #45. It wasnt until he had already hit Kevin that his car jumped up to the higher groove, were Tony eventually pulled over. As the camera pans back slightly, after the incident, you can see the #1 car down on the track apron, and a second car pass him on the outside. That second car was only slightly lower than what Tonys car was on the track. It is a lot tighter on that section of track than the camera angle really shows, and Kevin was, quite literally, right in the middle of it.

There has been much talk of the "throttle blip heard round the world", about how tony blipped the throttle into him. I also dont see how this is possible. Tonys car isnt lifting its nose, or moving in any way other than what it would for traveling at a consistent speed. The blip was likely from a car on the front straight that was slowing down, and had an engine stall. As i said, sprint cars have no transmission, and are direct drive to the rear wheels (this is also why they are push started). So if the wheel speed gets low enough, the engine will stall. You try to get the engine back by giving it a boot of throttle to force it back to life, and keep it ticking over at idle speeds. Its not exactly the safest procedure when there are a dozen other cars all bunching up and doing the same thing. I think it is extremely unlikely that Tony blipped the throttle at all based on what we can see of his car in the video. Unfortunately there is no telemetry on a sprint car, so we will never see any steering angle, or throttle tracking to know for certain sure what Tony did or didnt do. If this were F1 or WEC, it would be an open and shut case.

Now, i dont believe Tony is perfectly innocent, I do believe that he had some room he could have moved down into the track to try and avoid Kevin. I also have no doubt that if he had moved down, Kevin would have moved down along with him, and likely been in the way of the two abreast cars following behind Tony, and that would ended with similar consequences.

At the end of the day though, the question that must be asked is "Could this have been completely avoided if Kevin Ward had stayed in his car, instead of trying to retaliate over a flat tire", and the answer is "absolutely, yes". When you break track safety protocol, and run into the middle of a hot track, you either have a death wish, or arent thinking straight. Either way, youve taken your life into your own hands, and you will pay the consequences of those actions, and Kevin Ward paid the ultimate price.

I think the case here, is that a hot headed young driver got upset over the hot shot NASCAR millionaire pushing him up and off the track, even though he should have yielded the pass, and decided to give Captain NASCAR a piece of his mind for giving him a flat tire and ending his race. And through the red mist, the adrenaline, and the testosterone, he likely completely misjudged the speed of Tony's car, focusing more on shaking his fits in rage at Tony, and less about the fact that an 800 BHP car was hurling at him at 35-40 MPH. By the time he took stock of the situation, and tried to jump out of the way, it was to late. He got hooked up in the rear tire, sucked under the car, and spat out. Likely dead before he even hit the ground.

There is no doubt that this is an absolute tragedy. Its terrible any time any racing driver dies at the track for any reason. But going back up to my first paragraph, you have to take responsibility for your own safety, and Kevin Ward did not, and that to me (speaking as someone who has done multiple incident investigations at tracks) puts him squarely at fault.

Sadly, thanks to The Court of Public Opinion, Tony Stewarts career will be over. NASCAR is run almost purely on advertising dollars, and once one of Tonys primary sponsors believes that he is no longer the representation they want for their product because of the fan outcry, thats it. Once one of them pulls their sponsorship money, there is nothing else to back the investment of the other primary sponsors, and they will all pull out one by one. The sad thing is, this effects more than just Tony Stewart, but the Stewart/Haas Racing Team, and all of their drivers. So before its all said and done, it may be the end of several careers.

If there is one silver lining to this whole thing, i hope to hell it changes the way that NASCAR, and especially other smaller circle track speedways, police themselves and their drivers. YouTube is FULL of videos of dirt track races turning into destruction derbies. All because one guy spun out another guy, and by god hes gonna give that other guy a piece of his mind, and his front bumper. In some of these videos, it seems as though the track operators are almost encouraging these outbursts, by giving blow by blow commentary of the stupidity. Likely because such antics put butts in seats. And here lately that same fist waving, helmet tossing, and car kicking has started to become a common scene in NASCAR as well. And in all of those instances you never see the safety crew or security try to step in and stop it from happening. In come cases you can even see safety crew laugh at the tantrums as they happen. To me its an absolute shame that someone had to die for this issue of irresponsibility to be brought to the forefront as a serious problem. But i hope from here on out that any retributions, tantrums, or needless finger wavings that pur drivers in harms way, results in stiff penalties and fines for the driver in question. Hopefully discouraging, and preventing any of this stupidity from happening again, before someone else ends up in a body bag on account of trying to act tough, and prove a needless point.

If youve made it this far, youre a trooper. I welcome your comments and questions.

Very well said, @Buck-O. 👍
 
Looking over the NASCAR Rulebook from a year ago, I cannot find anything on what the driver should do in case of an accident, as to if they can or cannot walk out of the cars before safety crews get there. Judging by years of watching and reports that NASCAR is having meetings today on the subject, I'm going to guess there's nothing in there on it.
 
"From what I saw, Tony did everything in his power to turn down away from Kevin to avoid him," said sprint car driver Cory Sparks.

Sparks was just a few cars behind Stewart during Saturday's race. He said videos that have been posted online do not give an accurate picture of what happened.

"People say that they heard the engine rev up and he gassed it. In a sprint car, the only way to steer is you steer with the rear wheels as much as you do the steering wheel. In my opinion, what he did was he gassed it to turn down away from him," said Sparks.

Sparks also said drivers are very limited with the amount they can see out of the right side of the car.

"Kevin was wearing all-black. A black fire suit, a black helmet, which in normal situations isn't a big deal, they are to go with the colors of your car. It was tragic accident and a mistake was made," said Sparks.

Povero said investigators have spoken to Stewart twice, and they are continuing to speak with other racers, track staff, and those in the stands to figure out exactly what happened.

"I think that the biggest thing is to remember Kevin Ward as a great race car driver, not a victim of Tony Stewart," said Sparks.


-------------------------------------------------

http://rochester.twcnews.com/conten...-could-not-have-avoided-hitting-other-driver/


I can't wait to see who knows more about the conditions of those cars, on that track, on that night than a guy that was there, competing in that very same race.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back