Tony was a good 50 feet behind the 45 car, probably even more than that. They weren't bumper to bumper. As far as having to goose the gas that's straight bull 🤬. You don't need to goose the gas to make them turn at low speeds. That is coming from people who have no clue how these cars work in real life.
Look bud, I have no other way to explain it to you, but you just don't go that low. There is no reason to be at the bottom groove of the track to voice displeasure at a driver.
Jack Baruth
Tony was a good 50 feet behind the 45 car, probably even more than that. They weren't bumper to bumper. As far as having to goose the gas that's straight bull 🤬. You don't need to goose the gas to make them turn at low speeds. That is coming from people who have no clue how these cars work in real life.
I'm looking at the video right now. He was standing in the middle of the track long before the 45 car even got there. He was standing in the middle of the track for almost the same amount of time as he was after the 45 passed and Tony hit him. He was standing in the middle of a track which is a big circle, meaning he was directly in front of the 45 car before it got there.
So now you're saying that Tony saw the crashed car. Tony saw the driver immediately even though the other guy didn't and the other guy was still in the way. Tony linked the driver to the crashed car. Tony linked the crashed car and the angry driver to Tony crashing it the lap prior, despite having absolutely no way of seeing the crash until then. Then came up with a plan to scare the guy for being so brazen.
Enlighten us, then. I'm sure the automotive journalist is just talking out of his ass compared to the guy who not only doesn't understand the concept of what higher ground does for visibility, but also a can't grasp spacial relationships between objects as it relates to reaction times, but it might actually be worth a read anyway.As far as having to goose the gas that's straight bull 🤬. You don't need to goose the gas to make them turn at low speeds. That is coming from people who have no clue how these cars work in real life.
Look Bud I said many times Kevin was dumb for being on track. No arguments from me on that, but he was and Tony knew he was and goosed the gas to scare him. That makes Tony liable as well. He could of easily drove to the bottom of the track, but instead decided to be a wise guy and it cost the kid his life.Look bud, I have no other way to explain it to you, but you just don't go that low. There is no reason to be at the bottom groove of the track to voice displeasure at a driver.
By that logic, if I see a guy driving wrecklessly down the road, I should stand on the shoulder of the road to shake my fist
But Tony didn't brake, swerve or anything. He kept driving straight at him.
Oh, so you've talked to Tony and without a shadow of a doubt, you are 100% sure, hand on the Bible, ready to testify in court that Tony goosed the gas to scare a person he had just seen a split second prior? Amazing that you've gathered this all from the hearsay of people who were at the track. Why did we waste these past 48 hours analyzing anything we could find on this incident, when you knew from the beginning?
Watch the last video that was posted. Do you see them cars struggling to turn at low speeds? Do you see them sliding the front tires because they wont turn at low speed? NO? Didn't think so. Like I said I have been behind the wheel of one several times. Anyone who says any different is talking out their rear ends.
Yes, after analyzing the video Kevin was struck with the RR. Doesn't look like he was ever under the car, but he was body slammed by the tire and that alone threw him across the track.
I honestly want to see proof that he has in fact been behind the wheel of any motorized vehicle
Nope not 100% just like none of you are. I don't know why you didn't ask me first would of saved a ton of time though.
Around 40 seconds in, the two cars are going slow around the turn, and
whats that? it sounds like they're both throttling the cars to go around the turn slowly
I can barely respond before someone else post there comments.
Not how to direct this. Report the post, don't do that in order to "ask for a warning".
I guess you're just going to ignore that Tony had his car pointed far more to the left than the 45 car who had just barely missed him. I don't know what other proof you need.Nope not 100% just like none of you are. I don't know why you didn't ask me first would of saved a ton of time though.
Where did you see Tony trying to avoid him? I didn't, wheels weren't turned, tires weren't locked up. The only thing he did was goose the gas.
Not sure what you know. It appears to be not much though.
Why don't you go back and read my first post. I said I believe this is what happened. Just my opinion like the rest of yours. Mine just happens to not be the same as yours.
It may be slightly more, but that is even pushing it.I guess you're just going to ignore that Tony had his car pointed far more to the left than the 45 car who had just barely missed him. I don't know what other proof you need.
