- 17

- Sweden
Further, Isn't YT aiding and abetting thieves? Don't they have an obligation to research such claims and make informed choices? I'm not a lawyer, but it would seem sensible that YT could be held liable for actively assisting criminals in harassing innocent others.
That's not how it works, at present at least. (Fortunately, I have to add!)
The law, as it currently stands, obliges any "platform provider" (youtube, twitch, et al.), to immediately remove any content accused of copyright infringement, pending (voluntary) investigation.
This is the uneasy truce agreed upon between the internet- and media conglomerates.
It entirely favors the owners of "Imaginary Property" (as Legion would say), and leaves everyone at the mercy of the unreasonable demands of media companies, and copyright trolls alike. (You might be aware of the current "vod-purge" on twitch...)
The concession is that ISPs and internet platform providers aren't held personally responsible for content posted by their users. And this is a very good thing indeed, otherwise sites as this would not exist, I'm afraid.
