- 2,157

- Australia
Anyway i worked out how to bake AO, just about.
Update to version 1.0. Final version for now. I may revisit it in the future. Everything is packaged together, including the 54 pit optional layouts.Le Mans 1967
Le Mans 1967 v1.0
This is my take on the le_grand_circuit_1967 track done by Terra21 and updated by WooChoo and Virtua_LM. All credit for the track goes to those guys. I simply added some CSP features and altered a few textures\meshes to give it a look I prefer. It is a standalone track so as not to mess with the original and will come up as Le Mans 1967 in your track list. If you have a preferred ai you use with the original track, just copy it over to this version if you decide to use this. I'm not sure which ai version the track currently has right now because I was swapping out different versions.
Additions:
-- Seasonal changes.
-- Animated flags.
-- Animated CSP smoke in the fall and winter.
-- Slightly altered grass textures to fit my eye better. Three versions for this you can try if you want with a simple ext_config edit. Towards the bottom of the config is a section named Grass Look. There are two [SHADER_REPLACEMENT_...] sections for the GRASS_A_MUD material that you can set Active or Inactive to slightly change the look. If you set them both to ACTIVE=0, the grass will be much greener and more saturated. The two alternatives give a progressively more brown tint. I like having the second one set active, which is how it is by default. You can monkey around with the ambient and diffuse values to get a brightness you prefer.
-- Reworked sand areas to give them some character and eliminate the monotonous look. I took some creative liberties with this so it's not 100% accurate to the real track at that time. There are two ways you can have the sand areas look on the Mulsanne Straight. By default it has more green grass than it probably should, but it helps to break up the look. The second way has less grass and more of a brown tint. To enable the alternate version, open up the models.ini file and in the [MODEL_2] section, change the line that reads FILE=le_grand_circuit_1967_terrain.kn5 to FILE=le_grand_circuit_1967_terrain2.kn5.
-- New pine trees texture. This one has some faults because the trunks don't quite line up with the uv mapping correctly. The original pine tree texture had slightly curved trunks. Mine doesn't so you can see some double trunks in spots if you are really looking for them. It doesn't bother me, but if it does for you, just disable the Trees track skin.
-- The Misc track skin doesn't need to be enabled. It's a skin created by Instevs36 that I got from RD that I use at times. As mentioned, the Trees track skin can be disabled as well, but always leave the Terrain skin enabled.
View attachment 1248085
View attachment 1248086
You have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.youve been warned, we know how to handle such cases. simply cause kunos doesnt care doesnt mean we wont care either. isnt like you worked your ass off testing physics to match irl counterparts. all you say is basically i could do this and that, in the end nothing happens. seems like there is no value behind your word besides "i hope nothing will happen" since you asked so often what we can do. the usage is strictly forbidden for anyone not granted permission, such as chem got and we dont care if its private or not, in the end the outcome is the same, you take something youre not allowed to. you also totally seem to ignore every fact stated as soon as you read encrypted, its his damn decission to encrypt model work on a car, the port or scratch parts. better think twice what you will say in the future and dont blame yourself again for half knowledge. cause thats quite embarrasing what you demonstrated here xD
I never said that you shouldn't look into the data files xDYou have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.
How you can moralise when you rip from ACC is laughable.
You just talk dribble, URD can't even stop sites giving their stuff away for free, this literal thread has ACC cars and track rips being shared, this is GTplanet as in Gran Turismo, which has people sharing out GT rips again of tracks and cars.
And nothing, happens.
To be clear then, the chap with the Bentley he ripped from ACC including its physics, he said "The rest of the physics is ACC based....." so then locks away the ripped model and ripped physic's...
And gets his gang involved in calling out others who might dare to go into the data file of the ripped mod.....
Actual wow. Just beyond anything before and I've seen a lot on here...
Whole thread devoted to messing with cars and tracks and somehow everyone is quiet and I'm the bad one.....
If people ripping ACC tracks and cars is acceptable how is fair that you think you can warn me about anything?
That whole Bentley is stolen off 505 games IP, real IP not some made up IP by some kid in his basement.
Might send them an email tomorrow.
Download links are present but as mentionned on my update posts :I'm sorry to interrupt this (fair and old) debate on encryption but can you point me to the best visual version of Long Beach... I've taken a look on the Breathe list but I can't understand how does it work proper 😅. Also, he reported a version from a dude called "fn" which is maybe the most recent one but there isn't a download link...
Without wanting to fuel this anymore, it was the other guy making threats to me about what URD will do to me for talking about possibly using their tyres.ini without asking them first.The only reason why AC is still alive are Mod conversions out of other games.
Without that you can close this thread😅
... Stealers warning stealers how they will sue them for stealing their steal.
One night pass and the trainwreck is even better.
Gosh that is epic.
Stealers warning stealers how they will sue them for stealing their steal.
![]()
You have admitted that the Bentley is from ACC including the physics, so the modder is on far more shaky ground including URD who are part of it via signing off on the tyres.
How you can moralise when you rip from ACC is laughable.
You just talk dribble, URD can't even stop sites giving their stuff away for free, this literal thread has ACC cars and track rips being shared, this is GTplanet as in Gran Turismo, which has people sharing out GT rips again of tracks and cars.
And nothing, happens.
To be clear then, the chap with the Bentley he ripped from ACC including its physics, he said "The rest of the physics is ACC based....." so then locks away the ripped model and ripped physic's...
And gets his gang involved in calling out others who might dare to go into the data file of the ripped mod.....
Actual wow. Just beyond anything before and I've seen a lot on here...
Whole thread devoted to messing with cars and tracks and somehow everyone is quiet and I'm the bad one.....
Everyone looks away, stays silent lets bonny who rips ACC models get on his high horse.
If people ripping ACC tracks and cars is acceptable how is fair that you think you can warn me about anything?
That whole Bentley is stolen off 505 games IP, real IP not some made up IP by some kid in his basement.
Might send them an email tomorrow.
Tommy's mods are not worth any money anyway. That's just cements it even more. Hell, even for free they're not that great. Not to mention, that I always had a feeling that his mods are not 100% scratch made.90 percent of AC users won't go all detective like a modder can.
Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.
Go ahead, no problem at all from my side, you're more than welcome to use my config. Hope it will be done well and it doesen't need my rework (i have too much tracks to update yet for another one in list@CrisT86 i want to release the beta of Spa 83 by the end of the week. it is based off the 1988 version which in turn features your config etc.
Pretty sure my dad is stronger than your's, at least mentallyas lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.
lost case aswell, same thing said, only concerning urd assets. i dont even care about where acc ports are from, its obvious and accepted at this place. remember all those mods that came from the gtp modding team, which are all from acc, mind typing a mail for all those aswell? or mind you typing a mail to ferrari for using masterkeys acc port in their trailer, or dinamic for using crashs acc port for a livery showcase on their official socials? no. should we head out to sms to tell them what youre doing? guess they wouldnt be as happy to hear that. and putting yourself into a position trying to be a victim all of a sudden, but for certain haveing all of the cars and ports you listed on your ssd just shows crazy inconsistancy in every word youre telling. judgeing people for using models of a game, but doing the same aint beeing dumb is it? got better to do then looking at this burning place again, a 992 is waiting for a better fate...

You didn't followed the subject, do you ?as lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.
So sorry mate, didn't read that. I'm sorryDownload links are present but as mentionned on my update posts :
PS : The icon for the track links disapeared but all the links are always presents. I am busy putting them back but it takes time
Still missing the point, yet proving it at the same time.as lost as your other friend, i stated that solely for the urd content used here. if you cant read that between the lines, shouldnt even comment in the first place. he got perms to use them and thats what matters, not where the car is, which origin it has or some other ass pulled bs you come up with. chem is doing his thing what and how he likes to, he helps me in my doing aswell, both on acc ports and urd mods. doesnt matter which circumstance, he got perms to use that stuff no matter what, or where beeing used.
lost case aswell, same thing said, only concerning urd assets. i dont even care about where acc ports are from, its obvious and accepted at this place. remember all those mods that came from the gtp modding team, which are all from acc, mind typing a mail for all those aswell? or mind you typing a mail to ferrari for using masterkeys acc port in their trailer, or dinamic for using crashs acc port for a livery showcase on their official socials? no. should we head out to sms to tell them what youre doing? guess they wouldnt be as happy to hear that. and putting yourself into a position trying to be a victim all of a sudden, but for certain haveing all of the cars and ports you listed on your ssd just shows crazy inconsistancy in every word youre telling. judgeing people for using models of a game, but doing the same aint beeing dumb is it? got better to do then looking at this burning place again, a 992 is waiting for a better fate...
I just wish a moderator would step in at some point and put an end to this pointless argument. I'm not even sure who's right and who's wrong. I just know it's getting old. Just just let it go and move on or take it to PM's. It's getting tough trying to find real content having to sift through all the BS.I am lucky my English is that poor, I even can’t understand this whole drama 😂
It will be done semi-well and will probably need a reworkGo ahead, no problem at all from my side, you're more than welcome to use my config. Hope it will be done well and it doesen't need my rework (i have too much tracks to update yet for another one in list)
I think you guys don't understand at all how "license" worksLike i said there was more to it as codemasters didn't need permission as they owned the license.
Not so much passing it off as there own as a multimillion pound developer has plenty of in house guys and have the resources to get models done.
I guess they saw a model and just took it as the modder had no official rights to complain.
It may of been an old fashioned FU.
Thing about encryption is that i guess the worst part of all of this is people being able to obtain pay mods, encryption doesn't stop that.
If i were a modder trying to sell stuff I'd be far more concerned about that than someone working out your encrypted data file is actually a URD GT3 car or the nice Sierra DTM car you scratch made is actually from PCars.
But again i fall into the bubble trap myself, i assume that because i see pay mods going for free on massive spread sheets, that everyone is getting them, but clearly they aren't.
Well, please remember this is a mod discussion thread, not a content library. As per the advice given to people who disagree with encrypted mods, just ignore and keep scrolling.It's getting tough trying to find real content having to sift through all the BS.