Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC

[Masscot]

ah a voice of reason. whenever a mod is posted that is encrypted someone will post a message explaining how they delicately three pointed it into their imaginary bin with a limp liberache style wrist

usually in some sort of petulant defiance, usually for something that was free in the first place. clearly raised by peasants.

no one cares.

99% of the most vocal anti encrypters have never had their work actk'd

that being said encrypting without lods should be illegal.

For me personally, bad encrypted mods are binned with more of a 'why did they even bother' shrug rather with a petulant flourish, but I take your point.
There are at least three different types under discussion here:
1. Those who have taken care and attention to provide original and unique high-quality mods, properly tested, with everything (and more) you could reasonably expect from a Kunos car, and who want to stop shysters from profiting from their work.
2. Those who slap any old crap together then freeze-dry it using encryption as a badge of honour.
3. Those who create (and then abandon) almost wonderful work but with one game-breaking fault that would normally be very easy to fix if it wasn't encrypted.

It's number three that's the frustrating one. Encryption doesn't matter with number one because the car is objectively perfect, and it doesn't matter with number two because it's so bad it'd get binned regardless of whether it was encrypted or not.

And objectively bad encrypted cars being 'free' isn't really a legitimate excuse for any apologists out there. The modder is wasting our time and our bandwidth by enticing us to try their crap that undoubtedly comes with some very bold claims and beguiling screenshots.
Anyway, its good that we can discuss this emotive and divisive topic in a level-headed way. I know it bores some people, but so do bad encrypted mods. Luckily, both are relatively easy to ignore.

 

[Nitnelav22]

Hi Guys ! Hope you're fine
I'm doing a Audi A4 DTM test for my Youtube Channel next week in Navarra Circuit.
Do you have any ideas where I can fine it for AC ?
Someone told me you can help me

Big thanks to everyone who can ! Have a nice day !
Valentin

 

[Paulo Ribeiro]

Hi Paulo. What track are you talking about? Most of the time the reason for this problem is a bad fast-lane.ai. Display the line by activating the in-game app AI_line_helper. Then check the fast-lane which is the purple/violett line. This line should be continous without any zick-zack-pattern at start/finish. When the modder does not drive around the track more than once for recording, this strange problem can appear. If it is that problem the only solution is a new fast-lane.

Hi mrtomcat66,
Thank you for your reply.

Maybe someone can share here only the files of the AI needed.
The track is Velocity Valley Circuit.

Many thanks.

 

[andrevr]

Hi Guys ! Hope you're fine
I'm doing a Audi A4 DTM test for my Youtube Channel next week in Navarra Circuit.
Do you have any ideas where I can fine it for AC ?
Someone told me you can help me

Big thanks to everyone who can ! Have a nice day !
Valentin

There are 3x options for Navarra in @Breathe's AC Track Listing sheet, on the "Real" tab:


Not sure exactly the A4 mod you're looking for, but this seems a good place to start:

DTM Championship 1996-2004

DTM Championship 1996-2004 for AC 1.16.3. These are all the mods that I found for DTM of the early 2000s plus Calibra DTM 1996. I was not looking for strict compliance. Just wanted to make a interesting championship with DTM cars. All cars, skins...

www.racedepartment.com

GLHF.

 

[Nitnelav22]

There are 3x options for Navarra in @Breathe's AC Track Listing sheet, on the "Real" tab:


Not sure exactly the A4 mod you're looking for, but this seems a good place to start:

DTM Championship 1996-2004

DTM Championship 1996-2004 for AC 1.16.3. These are all the mods that I found for DTM of the early 2000s plus Calibra DTM 1996. I was not looking for strict compliance. Just wanted to make a interesting championship with DTM cars. All cars, skins...

www.racedepartment.com

GLHF.

Big thanks !
I should be blind but I can't click on any link ?
it's normal ?

For the mod it's not exactly the same but very nice one !
I'll test the 2007 Audi of Tomczyk


Ok sorry got it ! big thanks ) Have a nice day

 

[kramerks]

Hi. Is there any way to make previews in content manager that integrate optional .kn5 files from the extension folder? For example: new headlights, extra wings...

Does anyone know?

 

[andrevr]

Does anyone know?

In the drop-down next to the STANDARD showroom launch button, at the bottom of CM when you're viewing a car, there's an option to use CSP. I think all the ext_config and kn5 stuff shows up when using that. Downside is, screencap to make a shot for preview, and the range of showrooms available might not include/match the one you use in CM showroom.

Update:

Update. Yes, it does work. Soo...
Here, click options:

And in the next dialog, make sure "Use CSP Showroom" is checked, like this:

And voila! This car, with rim kn5 replaced by ext_config.ini, which shows up like this in CM showroom:

because the ext_config.ini is not evaluated there, as we know, but this is how it shows up in the CSP showroom:

with the wheels correctly replaced, and the fog lights, etc.

Boom-shakka!

 

[Greg_ST]

Update for the Nissan 300zx JGTC V8.1

Fixed flickering on the wire connector in the upper left corner of driver view (fix for VR users ) thanks to "jac0"

Changes/fixes in some interior textures "I don't know why"

New skin "Team ESSO LM"

I think "drag&drop" the .7z file to the Content Manager will update the mod


Free download: Patreon

Spoiler: More images

 

[24H]

do you know whether it´s possible to use a custom pp-filter in content manager custom showroom?

 

[Gregz0r]

Yeah, this can be a big VR ball ache with encrypted cars as it seems that a LOT of modders only play in chase cam and don't give a rat's ass whether the driver is even facing the right way or not.
I just successfully swapped a steer.ksanim and rescaled/repositioned the driver on an encrypted car but it wasn't a pleasant experience, swimming in a sea of little blue triangles. But it is possible.
Encryption should be a statement that "this car is as perfect as it can be", not "aren't I a clever modder, I've encrypted my crap with a whole host of errors lol".

Can the steering wheel positions also be changed using this(or similar) method?

I have quite a few cars with steering wheels that are with too low(most common), too close etc, where it becomes a real problem in VR.

 

[Alguecool]

For me personally, bad encrypted mods are binned with more of a 'why did they even bother' shrug rather with a petulant flourish, but I take your point.
There are at least three different types under discussion here:
1. Those who have taken care and attention to provide original and unique high-quality mods, properly tested, with everything (and more) you could reasonably expect from a Kunos car, and who want to stop shysters from profiting from their work.
2. Those who slap any old crap together then freeze-dry it using encryption as a badge of honour.
3. Those who create (and then abandon) almost wonderful work but with one game-breaking fault that would normally be very easy to fix if it wasn't encrypted.

It's number three that's the frustrating one. Encryption doesn't matter with number one because the car is objectively perfect, and it doesn't matter with number two because it's so bad it'd get binned regardless of whether it was encrypted or not.

And objectively bad encrypted cars being 'free' isn't really a legitimate excuse for any apologists out there. The modder is wasting our time and our bandwidth by enticing us to try their crap that undoubtedly comes with some very bold claims and beguiling screenshots.
Anyway, its good that we can discuss this emotive and divisive topic in a level-headed way. I know it bores some people, but so do bad encrypted mods. Luckily, both are relatively easy to ignore.

You forgot a fourth one : a quite rare car, nice, well made, visually exactly identical to the stock version except it's a "tuned" one, with too much bhp, but all you wanted was a stock version, and it's the only one you know... You could just go into the data, put the "right" numbers in the power.lut and engine.ini and that's it but nooo, encrypted... If that's not a frustrating one, I tell you

 

[Fanapryde]

Can the steering wheel positions also be changed using this(or similar) method?

I have quite a few cars with steering wheels that are with too low(most common), too close etc, where it becomes a real problem in VR.

I can assure you that on flats (triples) I have the same problems. I disabled drivers hands, but always set the view that my real steering wheel covers the virtual one, so that I have the right cockpit view. But doing that, I can't even see the road in some cars.

 

[OooAhh Cantona]

whenever a mod is posted that is encrypted someone will post a message explaining how they delicately three pointed it into their imaginary bin with a limp liberache style wrist

I also like to hold the pose and shimmy after hitting that long range bin.

 

[safi hellie]

I wasn't disagreeing with you, I was just remaking the old point that with great encryption comes great responsibility.
To be honest, when modders lock bad mistakes (or even worse - half-assed carelessness) behind encryption, all they do is make themselves look pompous and incompetent while ensuring that the work they considered good enough to encrypt goes straight in the bin.

I'd wager no one is encrypting because they think their mod is perfect.
They encrypt for various reasons but main one will be because they don't want other modders taking stuff off it or worst selling it on.

That does bring up the question of "well they took the model from Forza 5 but expect no one should take it off them".

It is fundamentally flawed and in context of this hobby, a pretty crappy thing to do.
Having said that, having now better insight to it all, if i see an encrypted mod i know i can go and get that model from somewhere and make my own one and have fun doing so.
So yes it bothers me less now.
That Bentley GT3 is a good example, i can find a model of that from at least 4 different games available online.
Encrypting it is bonkers I agree.
And at the end of the day he's made yet another sterile GT3 car, not his fault, GT3 is sterile with cars made for fat rich blokes to live out their fantasy of being a racing driver.

This goes right back to rfactor 1 and maybe further, I've come across encrypted rfactor mods.
I also know now how messy it all is, this crud about crediting people constantly for even daring to look at a mod for longer than 10 mins.
Many rfactor mods I've converted all have the whole or bits taken from other games.

The MG rally cross car i converted had come to rfactor via Dirt 3, i then converted it to AC.
I now know i should of just gone straight to gamemodels ru.

So encryption, its there to stop other modders. Its not there for the vast majority of player base.
So any amount of comments negatively about it won't change that.
We are, on this thread the very type of player base they are doing it for, rightly or wrongly.

Now anyone is obviously free to comment about it, but i doubt anyone will read this thread and have a rethink and not encrypt, in fact they will dig in more i'd guess.

Sorry turned into a wall of text again.

 

[CrisT86]

ah a voice of reason. whenever a mod is posted that is encrypted someone will post a message explaining how they delicately three pointed it into their imaginary bin with a limp liberache style wrist

usually in some sort of petulant defiance, usually for something that was free in the first place. clearly raised by peasants.

no one cares.

99% of the most vocal anti encrypters have never had their work actk'd

that being said encrypting without lods should be illegal.

No one asked for my point of view but here it is:

In the past i updated ACTK stuff (tracks of course) and then i discovered that he later have sell them.

I also was accused to act like him (even on this forum) by stolen stuff, make money because i'm using sharemods and so on which is totally no true, but i don't care because a lot of people know who and what kind of person i am and this is the only thing that counts for me.

I simply stopped sharing my stuff and keep them for myself unless i work with trusted people (which know who really i am, and why i do my configs) in order to let them release something that looks even better than their original work (i'm not able to make 3D stuff, so i have to trust other person, and these person, like @racinjoe013 trust me about my configs and tv cameras, which are for sure NOT perfect, not the best thing thing in the world, but are enjoyed by hundreds of simracing fan).

I never ever feel the need of encrypting anything (my config template was and still used and "raped" by modders out there which also keep using my name on it even i don't even saw their track before just because my config can be grabbed and edited), but i don't care because who knows me and my work, knows where they can found me and my works.

People like ACTK and others steal works and put their hands on it? Who cares, people should trust the work of the original modder and avoid those raped content, if they don't, who cares, is not your problem. You can'tencrypt the world in order to avoid people to touch stuff. The best thing is to keep doing the best, share in the way you prefer and be trusted by who supports you. If anyone keep downloading raped stuff is not your problem, let them download crap and waste their time.

Who stole make money on your work? Who cares too. Unless you pay for licenses, or make 100% scratch models, you should not care about money, because is not a job but a passion and even if you have a patreon, who pays for your conversion/mods, should know that what you do is better than raped stuff which were ripped because not encrypted...

I hope my point of view is clear, but in any case this is my point of view, all the encrypted mods for me are destinated to fill the recycle bin.

 

[Masscot]

Can the steering wheel positions also be changed using this(or similar) method?

I have quite a few cars with steering wheels that are with too low(most common), too close etc, where it becomes a real problem in VR.

Unfortunately not, but I definitely share your pain.

 

[lorelord]

No one asked for my point of view but here it is:

In the past i updated ACTK stuff (tracks of course) and then i discovered that he later have sell them.

I also was accused to act like him (even on this forum) by stolen stuff, make money because i'm using sharemods and so on which is totally no true, but i don't care because a lot of people know who and what kind of person i am and this is the only thing that counts for me.

I simply stopped sharing my stuff and keep them for myself unless i work with trusted people (which know who really i am, and why i do my configs) in order to let them release something that looks even better than their original work (i'm not able to make 3D stuff, so i have to trust other person, and these person, like @racinjoe013 trust me about my configs and tv cameras, which are for sure NOT perfect, not the best thing thing in the world, but are enjoyed by hundreds of simracing fan).

I never ever feel the need of encrypting anything (my config template was and still used and "raped" by modders out there which also keep using my name on it even i don't even saw their track before just because my config can be grabbed and edited), but i don't care because who knows me and my work, knows where they can found me and my works.

People like ACTK and others steal works and put their hands on it? Who cares, people should trust the work of the original modder and avoid those raped content, if they don't, who cares, is not your problem. You can'tencrypt the world in order to avoid people to touch stuff. The best thing is to keep doing the best, share in the way you prefer and be trusted by who supports you. If anyone keep downloading raped stuff is not your problem, let them download crap and waste their time.

Who stole make money on your work? Who cares too. Unless you pay for licenses, or make 100% scratch models, you should not care about money, because is not a job but a passion and even if you have a patreon, who pays for your conversion/mods, should know that what you do is better than raped stuff which were ripped because not encrypted...

I hope my point of view is clear, but in any case this is my point of view, all the encrypted mods for me are destinated to fill the recycle bin.

Watching what another person makes is a quality or rather lack of quality usualy reserved for serpents.

To me money isnt a factor, outside of a select few modders there isnt much to be made.

Youve raised some good points however that have made me reconsider encryption as a reasonable practice.

As before and moving forwards, if anyone mentions encryption to me after I release something I will have to ignore you.

 

[safi hellie]

The other reason modders encrypt is to hide stuff.
Just looked at the Bentley GT3 car and it has "copyright of untied racing design" in the tyres ini and i'd guess there is much more that is URD physics that the modder then encrypted.
To hide, rather than claim i'd guess.
90 percent of AC users won't go all detective like a modder can.
Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.

There is a lot of stuff that people like to hide, same way as there is a way around stopping CM analyse tool recognising you took kunos cars physics just by changing a few spellings in the data files.

Data file encryption is so dumb because you just open the data file, copy and paste to another data folder make a totally new car folder and data isn't now encrypted.

If i can be bothered i am going to do a Bentley GT3 car and use the same data as that encrypted one to prove a point.
Not sure i have the energy as its such a run of the mill sim car and i could use my time to do something interesting.

 

[Red_Manuel]

I'm not a fan of encryption too, but lots of scammers takes physics or assets from other guys which maybe have spent times and times on work, trying to make a car better than possible, and then it comes the other guy which it take the asset, put in his car, and sell it in his Patreon or whatever site you have in mind. I have some friends of mine which stopped making mods because of guys stealing cars assets, so now they are all private, and i can understand them.

 

[CrisT86]

Youve raised some good points however that have made me reconsider encryption as a reasonable practice.

As before and moving forwards, if anyone mentions encryption to me after I release something I will have to ignore you.

You are free to do whatever you want, is free world.

Anyway i'm still on my point of view: if your politics is to keep using encrypt stuff, from me you will never ever gain a single cent because if i pay for something, and something is not done properly (like ie for onboards cameras), i want to be able and free to edit them if i'm able to do it and don't to be forced to ask you please do it.

I support modders who do 100% scratch stuff and don't uses encryption even they can, and i support modders which, once i notice a problem are open to improve things, but as happened a lot of times (and this is why i always released my standalone updates instead send them to the modders) i don't have time to wait for a reply or see my config cut or removed because they prefer their work even not complete.

They are free to do whatever they want of course, but if my config is more complete, you should at least improve yours with all the features that are available and not leave them uncomplete because you prefer move forward on another project in order to gain other money or supporter.

Anyway i'm not talkin about you, is a general consideration about all modders who are using patreon or similar stuff and act in this way.

 

[CrisT86]

I'm not a fan of encryption too, but lots of scammers takes physics or assets from other guys which maybe have spent times and times on work, trying to make a car better than possible, and then it comes the other guy which it take the asset, put in his car, and sell it in his Patreon or whatever site you have in mind. I have some friends of mine which stopped making mods because of guys stealing cars assets, so now they are all private, and i can understand them.

perfect physics pasted on another car means crap results, so you should avoid in any case. Scammers should be avoided, so why wasting time? Just support scratch modders like RSS or VRC and support the modders who maybe copy but edit and try to improve stuff and leave in the bin the scammers... Is not that difficult.

 

[puerk0spin]

I'm not a fan of encryption too, but lots of scammers takes physics or assets from other guys which maybe have spent times and times on work, trying to make a car better than possible, and then it comes the other guy which it take the asset, put in his car, and sell it in his Patreon or whatever site you have in mind. I have some friends of mine which stopped making mods because of guys stealing cars assets, so now they are all private, and i can understand them.

I suspect one of this friends could be the owner of several "most wanted" mods. I comprehend them, cause there's a lot of time and efforts spent on their job to let someone else randomly take profits of this work. But... I still in touch with open code game mentality, and I would like to be able to get all the specific mods I look for, when I realize they exist (paying if it's deserved, as I have spent money buying mods before I have known that they were presumible stolen), to get which I consider is the most remarcable difference between AC and other sims, the "impossible is nothing" thing.

 

[shi]

Tamiami Park v1.0

Tamiami Park | shin956

Get more from shin956 on Patreon

www.patreon.com

View attachment 1247699
A temporary street circuit in Tamiami Park a small outdoor sports facility in the nearby suburb of University Park. (Florida, USA) (Wikipedia)
Conversion from rFactor.

-CSP recommended
-36 pit/start
-AI, cam

Credits & Thanks;
rFactor Original Track by AR rFactor Tracks
-Thank you for giving me permission.

AC Converted by @shi (shin956)
logo.png and sections.ini by @Fanapryde
.lua and font by @gunnar333
marshall, cameraman and some textures by kunos
Test and Feedback by @Breathe , @slider666

Download (mediafire)

Enjoy.
Converted upon request by Patreon member Gavin Stewart.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
v1.01 changelog;
-Fixed an issue where cut penalties were being detected in the final corner.
-Renamed the font.
-Updated ai_hints.ini
(Thanks for the report, Manstein1111 and FFF789.)
-Updated ext_config.ini.
(Thanks for the report, slider666.)
-Added cam by DaBaeda.

Tamiami Park v1.01
The link is in the quote.

v1.01 changelog;
-Fixed an issue where cut penalties were being detected in the final corner.
-Renamed the font.
-Updated ai_hints.ini
(Thanks for the report, Manstein1111 and FFF789.)
-Updated ext_config.ini.
(Thanks for the report, @slider666 .)
-Added cam by @DaBaeda .

 

[lorelord]

You are free to do whatever you want, is free world.

Anyway i'm still on my point of view: if your politics is to keep using encrypt stuff, from me you will never ever gain a single cent because if i pay for something, and something is not done properly (like ie for onboards cameras), i want to be able and free to edit them if i'm able to do it and don't to be forced to ask you please do it.

I support modders who do 100% scratch stuff and don't uses encryption even they can, and i support modders which, once i notice a problem are open to improve things, but as happened a lot of times (and this is why i always released my standalone updates instead send them to the modders) i don't have time to wait for a reply or see my config cut or removed because they prefer their work even not complete.

They are free to do whatever they want of course, but if my config is more complete, you should at least improve yours with all the features that are available and not leave them uncomplete because you prefer move forward on another project in order to gain other money or supporter.

Anyway i'm not talkin about you, is a general consideration about all modders who are using patreon or similar stuff and act in this way.

Again a few valid points but bringing money into the equation is a whole different subject.

I dont see why people get so fixated on money.

Also I think its somewhat hypocritical in that when your config or w.e was copied you went one step further than encryption and decided to stop publicly releasing altogether. Thats a defeatist attitude.

I have a clear policy in regards to my mods.

1. If its a straight convert from another game with no improvements - public release for free unencrypted
2. If its a model I paid for - Patreon exclusive
3. If its a mod I spent a **** load of time improving and adding bits - Patreon Encrypted.

Seems fair to me.

 

[Masscot]

Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.

Your post triggered a vague memory from many years ago where I think it was proven that a commercial games developer took an amateur modder's scratch built car (or parts of it, at least) and put it in their own game, without permission. Codemasters maybe?
Can't remember the details.
Maybe I dreamt it.

 

[Short_Circut]

How can I add reflections to a car? I have touched several parameters in cm showroom but the result is far from the original kunos cars

Adjust fresnel values

Does anyone know?

you'd have to take the screenshots manually in game. model replacement is a csp feature and previews use cm showroom (which doesn't use csp)

 

[CrisT86]

Again a few valid points but bringing money into the equation is a whole different subject.

I dont see why people get so fixated on money.

Also I think its somewhat hypocritical in that when your config or w.e was copied you went one step further than encryption and decided to stop publicly releasing altogether. Thats a defeatist attitude.

I have a clear policy in regards to my mods.

1. If its a straight convert from another game with no improvements - public release for free unencrypted
2. If its a model I paid for - Patreon exclusive
3. If its a mod I spent a **** load of time improving and adding bits - Patreon Encrypted.

Seems fair to me.

Money in modding are not important for me, if they was i would have opened a patreon and never ever invested my time (TONS OF HOURS in the latest 2-3 years) every weekend working on tracks to update them, 1000% for free.

If i would have focused on money i would have opened a patreon and asked the subscriber to tell me which track they want to see updated.

I stopped releasing stuff not for money or else, just becase i don't have time and interest to fight with stressed modders who discharge their real life frustration on a person who, for free, try to improve their stuff helping them and being accused to stole and make money via sharedmods. As said i keep doing with trusted people like @pugsang, @racinjoe013 which are the most common recurrent people which i work with in the latest period.

As said i was not talkin about you, but you are free to do whatever you want but again: If you don't do onboards camera as they should i want to be able to edit them without being forced to ask you (some modders even not respond on request even for pay mods).

 

[StoffelWaffle]

The other reason modders encrypt is to hide stuff.
Just looked at the Bentley GT3 car and it has "copyright of untied racing design" in the tyres ini and i'd guess there is much more that is URD physics that the modder then encrypted.
To hide, rather than claim i'd guess.
90 percent of AC users won't go all detective like a modder can.
Same as when i went into Tommy 78's sierra RS500 mod recently to take some bits for my RS500 PCars conversion.....
Guess what...... Tommy's is PCars RS500.
OK so he did some stuff to it, but he claims scratch made I believe and charges money.

There is a lot of stuff that people like to hide, same way as there is a way around stopping CM analyse tool recognising you took kunos cars physics just by changing a few spellings in the data files.

Data file encryption is so dumb because you just open the data file, copy and paste to another data folder make a totally new car folder and data isn't now encrypted.

If i can be bothered i am going to do a Bentley GT3 car and use the same data as that encrypted one to prove a point.
Not sure i have the energy as its such a run of the mill sim car and i could use my time to do something interesting.

Re : the Tommy bit : when I was making a RUF BTR mod I used the CTR FM4 model for the spare parts and the CTR Kunos model as a base and guess what ? The Forza parts were dead-on perfect for the Kunos CTR. Now I'm not saying Kunos have nicked T10's model but... Might be a coincidence? If it's the PC model sold for 5€ or whatever the cost is then it's ****** no doubt.

 

[Nuck Chorris]

Renault Sport Clio V6 Phase I Release!!

Download: https://www.patreon.com/posts/renault-sport-v6-78458666

Converted From Gran Turismo 6 By Peter Crill,3D help By Norms
-AO inside and out
-Realistic Dashboard
-CSP Settings
-Physics by Jandrovi physics
-Driver Animation by Mascot
-Working Wipers
-Self Ligth
-Paint colors and pbr by walkinginmyshoes87
-Panoramic session Start config Daniel Nogal
-Beta testing and help ,@norms,@takum1,@Mascot,and others

View attachment 1247815View attachment 1247816View attachment 1247817View attachment 1247818View attachment 1247819View attachment 1247820View attachment 1247821View attachment 1247822View attachment 1247823

Good old memories from Gran Turismo 2.

Camtool for Broadford Speedway
Enjoy!

Which one is this pp filter?

 

[safi hellie]

Your post triggered a vague memory from many years ago where I think it was proven that a commercial games developer took an amateur modder's scratch built car (or parts of it, at least) and put it in their own game, without permission. Codemasters maybe?
Can't remember the details.
Maybe I dreamt it.

Yep codemasters, irony being they had the license so could do what they wanted with the model.
Because even a scratch built car without a license is actually in its extremes if anyone bothered, not allowed.
Hence all the stupid RSS and VRC names, which even then just them taking the same shapes and adding different names isn't actually meant to be allowed.

Its messy.