Assetto Corsa PC Mods General DiscussionPC 

  • Thread starter Thread starter daan
  • 154,902 comments
  • 48,763,845 views
giphy.gif
Just to clarify, I don't mean to insult the modder, it looks solid. I just think it's an ugly car lol
 
@Masscot and @racinjoe013 please keep on with all your improvement, you both have a passion for AC modding. Be aware sometimes it’s a bit difficult to explain a mod can be better, without a starting a confusion.
I find it also very difficult to explain that a free track most be better made, without losing the modder.
AND not to mention : not everyone in the world is fluent in english, mistakes are meant to be tolerated :cheers:
 
I have a driver that can be made to fit very well in the cockpit, using the tool in CM to set it. BUT, no matter what I do, when I click on "Save pos." it always moves the driver somewhere else, inevitably to an unacceptable position. Anyone know how to get it to save it exactly where I put it?
View attachment 1258272
It's a pain, but I find that saving after every individual adjustment seems to minimise the repositioning.
 
I'm not really into road cars, but holy smokes those driver animations are LEGIT!
I always assumed there was some sort of hard-coded, baked-in reason why I haven't seen these before.
The separate wiper, headlights and gated shifting animations look amazing! I always dreamed of details such as these in a prototype at Le Mans etc, reaching over to flash the lights on the Mulsanne.
Just wait until you see what happens when you honk the horn 😉 yeah @Young78 this is a masterpiece, thank you!
 
Well, you nailed it; usually my races are like this...



... and I imagine races with +50 cars must be like...



... yeah, for that crowded races are needed the LOD's blessings.

By the way, my PC is poweful enough for my needs, I never do races with so much cars; not all of us need to recreate the Paris-Madrid of 1903 taking care of even the smallest detail.... 😊

I was not questioning people's pc, don't feel threatened :D
...and I don't care for 1903. Without proper LODs you can't even manage a 30+ grid which is pretty standard stuff.

Plus if you wanna fly there's always the good ol' Wreckfest.
Go Season 3 GIF by Law & Order
 
Ok, ok... I must be the only one who enjoys AC mostly hotlaping, or doing trackdays or F1 races with 20 cars, or cruising alone at dusk... I feel alone in the world... 😟
Oh no you don't... Just replace "F1" by "vintage GT" :cheers:

Speaking of this, I want to take a moment to thank @Rainmaker87 for Charade '67, I had a blast on it with the 60's Legends.
 
Oh no you don't... Just replace "F1" by "vintage GT" :cheers:...
Me I enjoy let the AI run and walk around the track, with some good combos it's a top notch!...
Jokes aside, this is the beauty of AC: it encompasses all kinds of tastes, manners, choices... there is nothing that is mandatory, or better, or more correct; everyone can choose what to do. Even driving muscular guys in their underwear on weightlifting bars. (Yikes, I said jokes aside... 🤦‍♂️)
 
Last edited:
Surely you arent playing in VR with 3k per eye, in this case, you would understad how important are the lods.
That's why is said 'in 2D at least'
Main point was that the CSP lods thing is placebo, someone did some random tests and it was worse than no lods.
I tried VR and hated it, so I speak for myself and I didn't run into issues when using lod less cars in 2D, in fact I've started to remove cockpit LR from some of my most used cars if it has it as i hate the cockpit switching in replays.
If you use VR why would i care? I'm talking about me.
For sure i'm dammed if i'd bin a nice mod because it had no lods.
And i'm not sure the people that always announce that they bin stuff if its encrypted or has no lods or whatever, actually ever do.

But then i can happily load up rfactor and have a ball with it. I like stuff to look good, but i can fade out certain stuff and still have fun if needs be.
 
I changed my mind. 😀 After some more investigation🧐I found some interesting NeelJ GTR2 track (I do have permission for all NeelJ tracks). Not a graphic wonder but fun to drive. Plan to put that into the GPLmania updates.

View attachment 1258324

View attachment 1258325
These historic tracks are fantastic. I did some small tests with the 72 pack (with Matra, Lotus and Ferrari) just fantastic.

Just one detail. To get closer to the real times of 1972 ( Matra (PP) - 2m53 - Ferrari (4th) - 2m55Lotus (8th) 2m58 ), I changed the "surface" file in the "DATA" folder, to have a little more grip.

In some first tests (without changing), with Matra it was turning around 3m12, after several modifications I reached 2m59....more or less good. Bring on the circuits in Mexico, maybe a version (more detailed in Reims (2 versions), maybe Circuit do Porto and Monsanto in Portugal.

An improvement in the graphics for Aintree?. And if it's not too much to ask, there would be a chance of making the Dundrod track (World SportsCar), used most often in the 50's for the (Tourist Trophy).
 
Hi guys,

I need your help for identifying some stickers on the #59 Konrad Motorsport Porsche 964 Carrera RSR 3.8 from the 1994 Le Mans race.

1684697758421.png

I marked the positions of the stickers, which I can not identify. Would be so cool if you guys could help me again.

Thanx
Daniel
 
View attachment 1258332
Does anyone know how to convert this 2020 Audi Q7 from GTA 5 into assetto corsa
Personally i'd see where the GTA guys got that model in the first place, then convert that, i'd guess thats available in all sorts of places, its pretty bog standard.

I think a lot of GTA stuff is encrypted, if i dare say the E word.

Some more French stuff without LODS!!

__custom_showroom_1684698353.jpg
__custom_showroom_1684698238.jpg
 
Last edited:
These historic tracks are fantastic. I did some small tests with the 72 pack (with Matra, Lotus and Ferrari) just fantastic.

Just one detail. To get closer to the real times of 1972 ( Matra (PP) - 2m53 - Ferrari (4th) - 2m55Lotus (8th) 2m58 ), I changed the "surface" file in the "DATA" folder, to have a little more grip.

In some first tests (without changing), with Matra it was turning around 3m12, after several modifications I reached 2m59....more or less good. Bring on the circuits in Mexico, maybe a version (more detailed in Reims (2 versions), maybe Circuit do Porto and Monsanto in Portugal.

An improvement in the graphics for Aintree?. And if it's not too much to ask, there would be a chance of making the Dundrod track (World SportsCar), used most often in the 50's for the (Tourist Trophy).
Aintree is in the making. I will not get permission for Dundrod. Hehe. Story from the Isle of Man project. Reims of somewhat for track makers not converters. I tested Porto and Monsanto in GPL unfortunately in AC it looks not good.
 
Personally i'd see where the GTA guys got that model in the first place, then convert that, i'd guess thats available in all sorts of places, its pretty bog standard.

I think a lot of GTA stuff is encrypted, if i dare say the E word.

Some more French stuff without LODS!!

View attachment 1258378View attachment 1258379
Fantastic!!! Is it christmas time? Just one question : why the R5 TL instead of the R5 Alpine turbo? So, I suppose the R4 is missing too and it will be perfect for iconic french cars.
 
Last edited:
That's why is said 'in 2D at least'
Main point was that the CSP lods thing is placebo, someone did some random tests and it was worse than no lods.
Absolutely not true. The LODs made with default settings are always better than no LODs at all, anything that reduces object count and triangle count will always gain performance, whether that is noticeable or not to some people in certain situations is debatable. "someone" is either an idiot or the tests were that random, they did not know their own results or randomised those too :lol:

Now if you spend time with the LOD generator and tweak it on a per car basis, the results can be outstanding compared to no LODs. Then ideally they need bringing back into 3D software for a final clean up and to fix any dummies that were removed or broken in the process. This should take at least a couple hours per car and is worth it in terms of performance gained overall.

There's what, 4 main options to modders really? In order of time taken:

  • No LODs
  • Simplygon Auto LODs with minimal to no tweaking
  • Heavily tweaked and modified Simplygon LODs
  • Hand made LODs
Then there's the option of importing the original LODs that a lot of models have included with them, but these also need working a little.

Reality is though, as our computers become more and more powerful, the need for a good set of LODs becomes less obvious. Hot lappers, screenshotters, lone wolves etc etc may never really need LODs in the first place if their system is not too low powered and would probably benefit from disabling all or increasing the distance drawn in CSP. On the other hand, the chaps that like to do large grid races or online league racing etc that regularly have 20,30,40+ cars on track absolutely need a decent set of LODs.

So if a modder decides to pour his or her heart and soul into bringing such and such car into the game with many many hours spent doing this, why not also spend another 2 or 3+ hours (or 5 minutes as per option 2) making a set of LODs? Even if said modder decides that this car is only a screenshot car or should not be raced in large grids, making a set would still then cater for most end users, no ?


Oh and PS... the Rover is still in the works! I am just taking a little break from the PC until I get my internet back up and running! It's no fun on a mobile hot spot :ouch::crazy:
 
Absolutely not true. The LODs made with default settings are always better than no LODs at all, anything that reduces object count and triangle count will always gain performance, whether that is noticeable or not to some people in certain situations is debatable. "someone" is either an idiot or the tests were that random, they did not know their own results or randomised those too :lol:

Now if you spend time with the LOD generator and tweak it on a per car basis, the results can be outstanding compared to no LODs. Then ideally they need bringing back into 3D software for a final clean up and to fix any dummies that were removed or broken in the process. This should take at least a couple hours per car and is worth it in terms of performance gained overall.

There's what, 4 main options to modders really? In order of time taken:

  • No LODs
  • Simplygon Auto LODs with minimal to no tweaking
  • Heavily tweaked and modified Simplygon LODs
  • Hand made LODs
Then there's the option of importing the original LODs that a lot of models have included with them, but these also need working a little.

Reality is though, as our computers become more and more powerful, the need for a good set of LODs becomes less obvious. Hot lappers, screenshotters, lone wolves etc etc may never really need LODs in the first place if their system is not too low powered and would probably benefit from disabling all or increasing the distance drawn in CSP. On the other hand, the chaps that like to do large grid races or online league racing etc that regularly have 20,30,40+ cars on track absolutely need a decent set of LODs.

So if a modder decides to pour his or her heart and soul into bringing such and such car into the game with many many hours spent doing this, why not also spend another 2 or 3+ hours (or 5 minutes as per option 2) making a set of LODs? Even if said modder decides that this car is only a screenshot car or should not be raced in large grids, making a set would still then cater for most end users, no ?


Oh and PS... the Rover is still in the works! I am just taking a little break from the PC until I get my internet back up and running! It's no fun on a mobile hot spot :ouch::crazy:
I've seen a few car mods with 4 decent LODs but with puzzlingly terrible performance in AI spec races. Closer inspection usually reveals that there's only one LOD entry in lods.ini, so only LOD A is being used.
Maybe whoever came to that 'placebo' conclusion was using one of these goofy cars?
Like you say, even bad LODs perform better than no LODs at all. I can't see how performance with LODs could ever be worse, unless LODs B, C and D are actually more detailed than the original LOD A. But that would take deliberate ****assery to implement. As a joke maybe?
 
Hello your wheel for the Rb19 is great but the DRS diode on the screen are very very dim. Is that possible to fix that , if i may ask ? Sorry if i'm a bit blunt, English is not ma tongue. Have a great day !
 
Sharing a mod? Host it on GTPlanet Downloads. Free, public hosting for files up to 10GB in size.
Back