- 271

- Turkey
where can i download this app. I searched and couldn't find it. my app is another app
where can i download this app. I searched and couldn't find it. my app is another app
Oh, I believe you. Innocence is sweet.Well, is true, no LOD's... but I'm having such a good time in Bathurst that I don't care about that little detail (nor the fact that the steering wheel is on the wrong side on many of those cars 😁)... and I've only tested the Starion and the Datsun 1200... Thanks, @MasterFocus!
Updated Version(v1.1) is released.
Please, Re-Downloading gentlemans
Ferrari 308 GTB(v1.1) by F40 LM Lover
It is Required CSP 1.76 or above Version.
Change Logs
1. Physics Update by VR Driving.
- Thank you to him!
2. Driver's Animations are Updated and Fixed.
3. Little bit Optimized.
4. AI's Pitting Issues are fixed.
5. Front Radiator Fans are Rotating now.
6. New Download link is in the video.
Thank You!
Problem is that the LOD maker on CSP is in some cases worse than no lods, but so long as they are there people feel better.Oh, I believe you. Innocence is sweet.
But huge grids will offer you even better fun, that's why LODs are no little detail.
And there's Velo's Starion too, optimized and with MisterWaffles tweak to push against RJE's atcc92 trio.
It's just the idea of gathering +50 cars, skins, whatever and then leave out LODs that it's meh.
Always better than those ridicolous bopped Patreon packages with tons of horrible looking gt1 cars like the old Marcos mods, masochist tendencies probably.
Hey ! Is a new model ! ^^URD made the 2018. Is this the same or a new model?
Steering is always on the right it's the rest of the world that's got it wrong.Well, is true, no LOD's... but I'm having such a good time in Bathurst that I don't care about that little detail (nor the fact that the steering wheel is on the wrong side on many of those cars 😁)... and I've only tested the Starion and the Datsun 1200... Thanks, @MasterFocus!
Gentlemen I need your help, thank you. A few days ago I had to reinstall CSP after unsuccessfully trying to make it rain, and since then the brake light generates a trail. I have tried to make changes in CSP but I can't find the solution. Some insight from the experts.
View attachment 1254269
How can you do that?As temporary fix I deleted the collision for this kerb
you do realize I have an ongoing effort on this... (hint: check Discord)Taking another stab at the Goodwood grass. Could use an opinion or two. Does the grass in these two pics look right? Too green? Too saturated? Too bright? Any thoughts are welcome.
View attachment 1258194
View attachment 1258195
Dolt. No I didn't. I will gladly sit back and wait for your updates. Thanks for letting me know.you do realize I have an ongoing effort on this... (hint: check Discord)
Try and disable extended physics in Drive menuHi All. Does anybody know how to stop this happening with the latest CSP. Thanks.
To me is more a case of modders wanting to feel better without doing the proper work of separating models' parts efficiently.Problem is that the LOD maker on CSP is in some cases worse than no lods, but so long as they are there people feel better.
I'm pretty sure that Legion has said stuff about this, doing lods the old skool proper way is fine, but that CSP lods thing EASY uses, almost pointless.
Any half decent PC will chomp up any large grids pretty much in 2D mode at least, lods or no lods, certainly i rarely have any issues.
Isn't it a little pointless throwing these grass colours out for random opinions from random people with random settings on random hardware? This isn't a focus group under controlled conditions using calibrated images, and even if it was you're only getting opinions from anyone who bothers to answer. You've identified grass that you think needs improvement based on your settings, so surely you need to change it to suit your own preferences and judgement. People can then try it, and if they like it, keep it. If you adjust it to suit a random stranger and not what YOU want then I'm not sure why you're doing it in the first place. Maybe just trust your own judgement, then you know it's 100% right for you.Taking another stab at the Goodwood grass. Could use an opinion or two. Does the grass in these two pics look right? Too green? Too saturated? Too bright? Any thoughts are welcome.
View attachment 1258194
View attachment 1258195
looking good. imo it would be good, if there would be more difference of grass and trees. trees a little bit darker and grass is realy nice now.Taking another stab at the Goodwood grass. Could use an opinion or two. Does the grass in these two pics look right? Too green? Too saturated? Too bright? Any thoughts are welcome.
View attachment 1258194
View attachment 1258195
Problem is that the LOD maker on CSP is in some cases worse than no lods, but so long as they are there people feel better.
I'm pretty sure that Legion has said stuff about this, doing lods the old skool proper way is fine, but that CSP lods thing EASY uses, almost pointless.
Any half decent PC will chomp up any large grids pretty much in 2D mode at least, lods or no lods, certainly i rarely have any issues.
Yes, this is a point, it would be good to have a reference then. Sure i'm not objective then, if i show it with Pure and it standard "pure" filter, which is balanced to fit nearly all tracks.Isn't it a little pointless throwing these grass colours out for random opinions from random people with random settings on random hardware? This isn't a focus group under controlled conditions using calibrated images, and even if it was you're only getting opinions from anyone who bothers to answer. You've identified grass that you think needs improvement based on your settings, so surely you need to change it to suit your own preferences and judgement. People can then try it, and if they like it, keep it. If you adjust it to suit a random stranger and not what YOU want then I'm not sure why you're doing it in the first place. Maybe just trust your own judgement, then you know it's 100% right for you.
... Innocence is sweet... It's just the idea of gathering +50 cars...
Thanks will give that a go.Try and disable extended physics in Drive menu
Grass is perfect for my tastes. Trees could go a hair darker, I reckon. (lolz, pardon for pointing to something you weren't)Taking another stab at the Goodwood grass. Could use an opinion or two. Does the grass in these two pics look right? Too green? Too saturated? Too bright? Any thoughts are welcome.
View attachment 1258194
View attachment 1258195
Updated Version(v1.1) is released.
Please, Re-Downloading gentlemans
Ferrari 308 GTB(v1.1) by F40 LM Lover
It is Required CSP 1.76 or above Version.
Change Logs
1. Physics Update by VR Driving.
- Thank you to him!
2. Driver's Animations are Updated and Fixed.
3. Little bit Optimized.
4. AI's Pitting Issues are fixed.
5. Front Radiator Fans are Rotating now.
6. New Download link is in the video.
Thank You!
Isn't it pointless to question what other people do on a public forum? I and i'm sure other's don't need you to tell us what we should and shouldn't do here.Isn't it a little pointless throwing these grass colours out for random opinions from random people with random settings on random hardware? This isn't a focus group under controlled conditions using calibrated images, and even if it was you're only getting opinions from anyone who bothers to answer. You've identified grass that you think needs improvement based on your settings, so surely you need to change it to suit your own preferences and judgement. People can then try it, and if they like it, keep it. If you adjust it to suit a random stranger and not what YOU want then I'm not sure why you're doing it in the first place. Maybe just trust your own judgement, then you know it's 100% right for you.
Apologies, but I think you've totally missed my point, which was just what you see on your hardware with your PPF won't necessarily be what other people see on this forum, never mind what they'd see on their gaming PC with their own PPF and settings, so asking for comments based on images rather than letting people test it themselves might give misleading feedback. At no point did I "tell you what to do".Isn't it pointless to question what other people do on a public forum? I and i'm sure other's don't need you to tell us what we should and shouldn't do here.
And for the record, I do it because I value other people's opinions. You don't think I realize the number of variables that could make a picture I post look completely different for someone else? It still helps to hear feedback. Things like @Peter Boese and @andrevr posted regarding the trees helps me make things better and more accurate.
I'll let you have the last word because this is the last comment i'm going to make on the subject. I'm not about to get in to a war of words over something that shouldn't have come up in the first place. Have a nice day...