- 566
- Pizza
Question: why, with CSP previews enabled, there's so much difference between the preview settings screen and the actual generated preview? There's so much details loss witch csp 🤔
You'll have to take that up with Kunos, The Saleen and the 787b uses the same dashboard so we just copied their values. Regardless we tried 1,1,1,1 and it does the same thing.
Hi, i checked looks like with csp enabled for previews it calculates light completely differently. what You see in previews parameters window is non csp version. i took few screens to demonstrate better.
Thank you for this amazing mod. As a VR driver, I can tell you that your driver animation are outstanding.
You are replying to the former owner of URD. Dave was not a founding member and bought it off Ales.
Hey Ales, its been a while. I hope everything is going well with you.
I can if anyone wants it. I'm not sure how people will feel about the driving physics though. It won't drive like RSS intended it to that's for sure. To make the car work with an older CSP version, I had to swap physics from another Aston GT3 car that was compatible. I don't mind it because i've never driven a real life Aston to know whether it drives realistically or not. I'm just happy to be able to drive it.You are my Hero
I hope you post your solution here
Yes give me please instructions how to do, or the files that you make please
I also noticed whilst driving their Lexus in VR last night a weird graphical triangle shaped glitch/mirrored texture glitch in the upper left part of the windscreen. So I'd definitely vouch for what you're saying.
Roll back to 1.79 and you'll get a lot of detail back. Run the previews and then update back up to the present. It's the only way I could retain details like reflections etc.
From the beginning?
Hey. Yes, I'm ok, thanks for asking. Don't have much time to spend simracing. But I come here and read this thread regularly. For nostalgia if nothing else. 😊
Hello, I have the same issue, what did you do exactly to fix this? Thanks.Problem solved. I placed the extension files in the wrong path.
Each skin ext_config references the path "urd/configs/coyote/<whatever.ini>".
Here you go. I included the original version of any file I changed. After you extract these files, go into the extension folder and rename the camera and display folders to something like camera1 and display1. The name is not important as long as you rename them to something else.
Yeah, URD have obviously spent a lot of time on the little details, like perfectly replicating the inertia and oscillation of the cockpit safety webbing, which moves incredibly naturally in the GT3 EVO. Hell, even the cable into the front-view camera moves around realistically under g-forces too. None of this is vital of course, it's just gravy, but it all enhances the VR experience immeasurably. Another thing worth mentioning is the smooth uninterrupted wiper sweep, which a lot of mod cars with vertically-parked wipers seem to struggle with, wrongly introducing a micro-pause in the motion at the 12 o'clock position. URD should tell Ilja how they made the motion seamless so it can be coded into the next CSP update.
Thank you, I'll try it out.
His error message shows he's running 3.0p212, I'm running the same version and the car works for me, so that implies there likely isn't a conflict with the car and that specific CSP version. I'm guessing corrupted download of the car or csp, or bad csp settings as the most likely culprits.View attachment 1502503
AC Bayro 4 GT3 EVO
We’re excited to unveil our latest project: the BAYRO 4 GT3 EVO!The BAYRO 4 GT3 EVO continues with our new standard for realism. This project offers an unprecedented level of authenticity, bringing the car to life with exceptional precision.Featuring a wide range of customization options, the BAYROshop.unitedracingdesign.com
