Sony Asks Gran Turismo 7 Players What They Want in Future Updates

[kjb]

This is more of something I would like to see when the game goes offline but I would love PD to Ubisoft and make a way to save liveries offline

 

[RACECAR]

With over 1500 hours played in GT7, I'm really disappointed that I have not been included in any of these .....🤨
Been a subscriber since the beginning and have all of the US market GT games.

As mentioned before, it appears basically randomized so it doesn't matter how many hours you have in this game or in the franchise overall, the chances of you getting one is 50-50.

At worst, its just RNG (which seems silly for a survey of all things but that is what they decided for some reason)

 

[Theufcveteran]

If I was making a poll like this I wouldn't have included you (or myself for that matter, as I have similar amount of hours played) as well. Why would I want an opinion on changes from someone who is already enjoying what is available enough to spend so many hours in the game?

I am not saying that is what is happening (as there is no evidence to back it up), but getting new players or convincing casual players to play more to attract more brand deals and subscriptions to PS Plus is how they get the poll converted into money for Sony.

They might enjoy parts of it, but not all. The folks who have a lot of playtime are going to be more familiar with the good and bad parts of the game. It IS good to get feedback from more casual players as well, but I think you shouldn't discount hardcores either.

 

[Racetoad]

btw forgot important feature i was thinking of.
they should add another level of mechanical damage (or even another category separate from it) which would simulate (so it's semi random affected by different factors) real mechanical failures to the point car is just broke and it's over (not the gimmick what is right now with the fuel i was kind a surprised...)

so some cars (which "are better manufactured") would have lesser chance of failing etc (and if you maintain it well). and how you drive also affects it, the more you overload the car the higher chance it will break etc. (like in real life) thats the aspect what misses and what makes the game feel more flat and less nuanced. but ofc you would only (usually) apply this system for 30+ minute races won't make much sense for shorter one. so in a nutshell you can be super duper driver and have a giga car but it can just break and thats it, or in case you can get into the pit and its reparable your could repair it. i am not a hardcore sim fan but this would make races much more interesting/less predictable.

 

[suomi1]

btw forgot important feature i was thinking of.
they should add another level of mechanical damage (or even another category separate from it) which would simulate (so it's semi random affected by different factors) real mechanical failures to the point car is just broke and it's over (not the gimmick what is right now with the fuel i was kind a surprised...)

so some cars (which "are better manufactured") would have lesser chance of failing etc (and if you maintain it well). and how you drive also affects it, the more you overload the car the higher chance it will break etc. (like in real life) thats the aspect what misses and what makes the game feel more flat and less nuanced. but ofc you would only (usually) apply this system for 30+ minute races won't make much sense for shorter one. so in a nutshell you can be super duper driver and have a giga car but it can just break and thats it, or in case you can get into the pit and its reparable your could repair it. i am not a hardcore sim fan but this would make races much more interesting/less predictable.

Interesting.

They could also create a generic visual damage model for broken suspensions, flat tires, brake failures, or engine overheating. They just need three things: flames, sparks, and black or white smoke. They already have all three. It's of course, a different story when it comes to tyres ; but a simple flat tyre provided it hasn't blown out or lost its tread would do the trick.

 

[Racetoad]

btw this is basically part of "big boi game" (gran turismo end game) so you have "pay to play" (potentially, not usually) but you also gain more, a semi gambling tradeoff. and one important aspect of this is, all the high rpm engines would toast and require frequent maintenance (like in real life) etc. so engines and other parts do matter in sense of economics/reliability etc. (one important aspect from game design pov is to prevent heavy favorites, choices which are just better and you don't need to think about it, all those should be nerfed and make others more competitive, so it's more about choice/tradeoffs) in some races you don't have other choice than to go full in (most performant configs) but also bear the consequences if something breaks etc.

it's actually what makes racing hard in real life idk. next step would be mortality of the driver >u>

 

[Nebuc72]

Interesting.

They could also create a generic visual damage model for broken suspensions, flat tires, brake failures, or engine overheating. They just need three things: flames, sparks, and black or white smoke. They already have all three. It's of course, a different story when it comes to tyres ; but a simple flat tyre provided it hasn't blown out or lost its tread would do the trick.

This will never happen for a game like Gran Turismo. 0% chance any manufacturer is going to sign a license agreement that says, in a simulator, "our game will show that your brakes can fail, the engine can blow up and the car can ignite"

Most of the cars in-game are ones that you can, either realistically or theoretically, go out and buy and drive in real life. A fair chunk of them are cars brands are actively trying to sell. They aren't going to paint themselves in a bad light for the sake of a video game.

 

[Racetoad]

for me personally it would be fine even without any vfx idk, just car state change (what is already present)

 

[suomi1]

This will never happen for a game like Gran Turismo. 0% chance any manufacturer is going to sign a license agreement that says, in a simulator, "our game will show that your brakes can fail, the engine can blow up and the car can ignite"

Yet there are already failures shown by the HuD; applying a sparks effect in case of a suspension failure or smoke in case of a dead tyre should not unduly alarm the manufacturers. Furthermore, the tires are Dunlops, not Ferrari's or Porsche's; as for the brakes, they are generally Brembos. At the very least, they should significantly slow down the cars when there are mechanical damages and increase repair times.

If they really don't want bad publicity, their first move should be to stop leasing cars to dumb influencers that will publicly destroy their cars and film the mess.

 

[jonoholland29]

Yeah mechanical damage not initiated by the driver is never going to happen.

Also, the cosmetic damage is always superficial too. PD don’t do “guess work” so they’re not going to simulate how a car deforms for every car in the game - so therefore they don’t have it for any car.

 

[IngWeltschmer]

Event themes in GT Sport that are not in GT7:


The Passion of Dr. Wankel

Since the day I first saw a swapped car in GT7 (back when they were even a legend and PD didn't properly acknowledge them, since you couldn't buy them and they had to be won from regular tickets, before engine tickets were even a thing) I was thinking of an event called "The passion of Dr. Frankenstein" just as a nod to this series from GTSport (maybe even earlier? idk, I started in GT5 and it wasn't there), where you can only drive cars with swapped engines. To avoid the most game-braking maybe set a limit on power and a limit it to 1979 or earlier (so you can think of it a bit as "a corpse taken back to life from the graveyard demolition yard).
Events for it in Brands Hatch/Goodwood (as shelley was English), then of course Deep Forest and Eiger (for its setting and book inception in Switzerland) and Lago Maggiore (because the lake itself borders Switzerland, the track is great and Italy was the destination of the Grand Tour. Plus, Percy Shelley, Mary's husband died in Mar Ligure, "close-ish" to Piedmont.)

 

[sk1719]

They need to get rid of the cat and mouse races. It's so underwhelming when you always have to use a car that is way over powered than everything else on track. Where is the fun in that? There is no good racing offline like there use to be. Every race is a 1 and done thing now and I never want to touch them again.

Give us shuffle races back.

 

[TheDabbinDave]

A penalty system that actually deals with malicious behavior would be appreciated by anyone who remotely attempts to enjoy sport mode.

 

[Hlavco]

They need to get rid of the cat and mouse races. It's so underwhelming when you always have to use a car that is way over powered than everything else on track. Where is the fun in that? There is no good racing offline like there use to be. Every race is a 1 and done thing now and I never want to touch them again.

Give us shuffle races back.

Strongly agree about the race format. I liked it when I first got the game, because it was a novelty, but now I dislike it for a number of reasons.

First of all, it can be hard to figure out if you're even driving at a fast enough pace to catch the leader by the end. It's frustrating to waste a bunch of time only to realize several laps in that it's a lost cause.

Second, it feels less like a race and more like a time trial. In the older games, where you get to see the whole grid in front of you and make your way through that crowd, there was more of a connection there, and it felt like there was more going on even if the AI wasn't behaving in a particularly engaging manner. In GT7 I don't give any thought to who I'm racing against because I see them one time, several minutes into the race, and then they're behind me.

Third, it can make races downright unwinnable. I was on the Nurburgring night race that serves as the end of the main Cafe "career", and before I could get close to the front, one of those arbitrary "don't pass anyone" flags popped up. While I was stuck behind some slow drivers, the leader jumped out to an insurmountable gap.

 

[MiniPinsel]

I think GT7 really needs a major overhaul of its online and multiplayer features.

The lobby system should be redesigned from the ground up, and for larger grids there should be an option to run races on dedicated servers. I'd even be happy to pay for this as part of a separate subscription if it means more stable and reliable races.

The lobby BoP also needs more flexibility. At the very least, lobby hosts should be able to optionally adjust vehicle weight for individual cars or drivers while still using BoP.

The spectator mode desperately needs improvements as well. Spectators shouldn't occupy a driver slot, and the broadcast tools should offer much better camera controls and race information.

Looking ahead, GT7 should also move towards proper endurance racing. Driver swaps during races are an essential feature that has been missing for far too long.

Finally, better timing and live timing tools are needed, along with the ability to export race results. That would be a huge benefit for leagues and communities that organize championships.

 

[Savolainen83]

- Full 24h clock and weather on all tracks.

- Current track time display like in GT5. No more guessing what time it is on track, or using a car with working clock to figure it out.

- Ability for the lobby host to disable all timing from lobby. No more split times, personal bests or overall best time. Reduces lap time chaser on cruise rooms, if they can't see any their times.

- Ability to disable the wrong way warning on lobbies.

- Bring back Tokyo Route 246.

 

[Thorson1987]

Being able to sort items in the showcase.

Let me see the items with the most likes, allow us to refine the search when it comes to wide cars.

 

[ArronWestley]

The M4 GT3 with the Evo parts.

You already have the sound (CSL '73 is a good fit).

You already have the relationship with Team WRT.

You already have the AI guy/GTWC representative to drive it in the WTC 800 event (S. Suzuki).

Just make it happen.

 

[CGT980]

If it were possible, it'd be sick if there was a feature for you to create your own championship series. That's something that could spice things up a bit since the single player experience is sorely lacking these days.

Honestly, I just want to see a return to form with a traditional career mode like the older games had where you had organized leagues, missions, and whatnot. That's the #1 priority I'd like to see a focus on right now, especially nowadays where racing games in general, not just GT, are dropping the ball on imo.

 

[hyperspeed980]

The M4 GT3 with the Evo parts.

You already have the sound (CSL '73 is a good fit).

You already have the relationship with Team WRT.

You already have the AI guy/GTWC representative to drive it in the WTC 800 event (S. Suzuki).

Just make it happen.

Let me know how often you drive it when they add it and the 992 GT3 R is still 5 tenths quicker around every circuit under BoP, which is the only place you'd use it anyway because anyone asking for more Gr.3 garbage is not creative enough to make their own fun and needs the game to feed them their slop.

 

[Theufcveteran]

Let me know how often you drive it when they add it and the 992 GT3 R is still 5 tenths quicker around every circuit under BoP, which is the only place you'd use it anyway because anyone asking for more Gr.3 garbage is not creative enough to make their own fun and needs the game to feed them their slop.

To be fair, modern GT3/race cars have their use outside of Sport mode in custom race. Might be a niche, but I'm sure people who want to make GTWC/endurance grids would appreciate it. I think a mix/balance of both modern race cars and more typical Gran Turismo cars can be struck.

 

[VinylRichie]

• Some road cars that come with rear wings do not generate downforce, while others yes.
• Camera view differs depending on the car, some have it on the hood, the others on their roof.
• Some race cars have their evo version as parts at GT Auto, while others are a totally different car to buy(R8 LMS vs 296 GT3).
• Some race cars have race parts as purchasable items at GT auto, while others are a totally different car to buy (M6 GT3 vs AMG '20).
• More generally, recently added cars offer far more customization options than older ones. The level of disparity is significant.
• The car's mileage is counted during races, not in time-trial mode, while still counted for daily marathon (I don't know about online mode).
• The difficulty level and/or duration of the races are completely unrelated to the rewards, it's all over the place.
• PP are far from good, often misleading especially when in comes to fuel economy and tyre lifetime.
• The group system is all over the place. The performance of certain cars is completely misrepresented just so they can fit into this group system.
• The tag system too is all over the place. The fact that race cars, road cars and professionally tuned cars being self exclusive is a nonsense for some of them, especially for classic cars.
• Some tracks have a full 24h day night cycle, while others not.
• Some tracks have a full weather simulation, while others not.
• Some tracks have a high fidelity and quality when it comes to environment, while others not.
• The livery editor allows you to correctly center the camera with some cars, but not all of them.
• In some cases, going off-track or having a crash (regardless of whether time is gained or not) results in a penalty, while in others it does not.
• In some cases, going off-track (regardless of whether you gain time or the automatic track reset option is enabled) causes the game to teleport your car back onto the track, while in other cases it does not.
• We have 3 AIs : PD's, Sophy 2.1 and Sophy 3.0.
• Sophy isn't available on every track.
• Sophy can't drive all the cars, and can't drive any of the new cars added in recent updates.
• There are absurd spikes in difficulty buried in an ocean of mediocrity. The proposed rate of progression is highly relative for the player.
• Clean Race Bonus : This bonus is awarded in completely different ways depending on the circuit or race, and it is impossible for the player to know what they need to do to obtain it. Sometimes you have to avoid any contact, sometimes going off-track, sometimes both; and at other times neither, simply paying attention to the yellow flags. Moreover, this system stands in total contradiction to the proposed race format: starting last, 30 seconds behind the leader, and winning within three laps. It at least needs a cooldown system and a clear explanation before to start the race.
• UI could be better but different option are only available for some game modes. Gap as laps or time, current tyres fitted, brands logos instead of player's flag, etc..
• Even rubber-banding doesn't apply to every race.

Are we serious now ?

No, no we are still not serious yet, sorry.
While there would be plenty to say about your list, which in some points are just complaints that just don’t go the way or as fast as you want them to be, some are I would say are bugs or have reasons like limited development resources, or it’s maybe that PD just can’t come up with a better solution (like the PP-System you mentioned).
It maybe come as a surprise to you, but PD isn’t perfect, and so PD will do some things that ain’t perfect, and they ain‘t the only developers who have that kinda „problem“.

But I don’t wanna go trough every point of your list, it isn’t necessary, because there’s only one question to ask:
What is your definition of the word „everything“?
That is what my reaction „are you serious?“ was about.

Just type in „GT7 Details“ into YouTube for example, watch some them videos, maybe read some comments after that with some more things people discovered, and then tell me again that PD is „half-assing everything“..

There is no question that PD is half-assing stuff, that GT7 isn’t what it could be, that they promised things that they didn’t kept, that it’s far from a perfect game.. But it’s also so great in so many other ways, they go with some things more than the extra mile, set new standards, so it’s ain’t doing them justice saying something like that, it’s just not true.

 

[JTB10000]

Whether this was prompted by Sony or PD themselves, it's cool that they're taking feedback on the game after being somewhat set in their own ways. Hopefully it's actually being put to use instead of being for optics though.

 

[MroczMR]

To be fair, modern GT3/race cars have their use outside of Sport mode in custom race. Might be a niche, but I'm sure people who want to make GTWC/endurance grids would appreciate it. I think a mix/balance of both modern race cars and more typical Gran Turismo cars can be struck.

Some people just can’t understand that different people like different things and hyperspeed is extremly toxic about it.

 

[peniu]

Let me know how often you drive it when they add it and the 992 GT3 R is still 5 tenths quicker around every circuit under BoP, which is the only place you'd use it anyway because anyone asking for more Gr.3 garbage is not creative enough to make their own fun and needs the game to feed them their slop.

Is this meant to be a complaint about gr. 3 cars, BOP being bad or just a random insult towards anyone wanting gr. 3 cars?

 

[hyperspeed980]

Is this meant to be a complaint about gr. 3 cars, BOP being bad or just a random insult towards anyone wanting gr. 3 cars?

All of the above.

 

[suomi1]

No, no we are still not serious yet, sorry.
While there would be plenty to say about your list, which in some points are just complaints that just don’t go the way or as fast as you want them to be, some are I would say are bugs or have reasons like limited development resources, or it’s maybe that PD just can’t come up with a better solution (like the PP-System you mentioned).
It maybe come as a surprise to you, but PD isn’t perfect, and so PD will do some things that ain’t perfect, and they ain‘t the only developers who have that kinda „problem“.

But I don’t wanna go trough every point of your list, it isn’t necessary, because there’s only one question to ask:
What is your definition of the word „everything“?
That is what my reaction „are you serious?“ was about.

Just type in „GT7 Details“ into YouTube for example, watch some them videos, maybe read some comments after that with some more things people discovered, and then tell me again that PD is „half-assing everything“..

There is no question that PD is half-assing stuff, that GT7 isn’t what it could be, that they promised things that they didn’t kept, that it’s far from a perfect game.. But it’s also so great in so many other ways, they go with some things more than the extra mile, set new standards, so it’s ain’t doing them justice saying something like that, it’s just not true.

Beautiful Ouroboros style message. How are we supposed to help them improve certain things that ain't perfect without pointing them out? There is no better time to tell them than when they ask for it themselves. We might just as well take this opportunity to grease their palms, but I’m not sure GT7 would come out of it looking any better.

The elements I have cited are a good representation of what can legitimately be considered as half-finished work, or could give the impression that game's quality is inconsistent. Sometimes it feels like we were back in the era of "premium" and "standard" cars, but applied to almost every gameplay element. The more they lean towards realism, the more the flaws become noticeable.

And I’m only talking about a single game here; when it comes to the franchise as a whole, it’s quite frustrating to see them introduce great ideas in one game, only to scrap them in the next. If they combined everything they’ve done best in terms of gameplay or quality-of-life features since the beginning, we’d have an incredible game.

 

[VinylRichie]

Beautiful Ouroboros style message. How are we supposed to help them improve certain things that ain't perfect without pointing them out? There is no better time to tell them than when they ask for it themselves. We might just as well take this opportunity to grease their palms, but I’m not sure GT7 would come out of it looking any better.

The elements I have cited are a good representation of what can legitimately be considered as half-finished work, or could give the impression that game's quality is inconsistent. Sometimes it feels like we were back in the era of "premium" and "standard" cars, but applied to almost every gameplay element. The more they lean towards realism, the more the flaws become noticeable.

And I’m only talking about a single game here; when it comes to the franchise as a whole, it’s quite frustrating to see them introduce great ideas in one game, only to scrap them in the next. If they combined everything they’ve done best in terms of gameplay or quality-of-life features since the beginning, we’d have an incredible game.

E-v-e-r-t-h-i-n-g

It obviously isn’t as important to you as to me, and you probably see this as nitpicking, but if you criticize then criticize in a constructive manner.
Saying they are „half-assing everything“
isn’t constructive nor fair, especially when they are actually far away from doing that.
Even though I’m unsatisfied with a lot of things, I’m at the same time grateful for many other aspects of the game, things that no other racing game is able to offer.

 

[suomi1]

E-v-e-r-t-h-i-n-g

It obviously isn’t as important to you as to me, and you probably see this as nitpicking, but if you criticize then criticize in a constructive manner.
Saying they are „half-assing everything“
isn’t constructive nor fair, especially when they are actually far away from doing that.
Even though I’m unsatisfied with a lot of things, I’m at the same time grateful for many other aspects of the game, things that no other racing game is able to offer.

Nitpicking indeed, I am not the one who expressed its complaints by overreacting. His reaction was deliberately exaggerated; it didn't necessarily call for a literal response. I just came to shed some light on what he might have been feeling.

Now go tell Polyphony Digital you're grateful for what is good, a bit less for the flows, without telling them what these are. I am not sure that this will be more constructive than a simply random hot-tempered message. No response along the lines of "it's all garbage" or "there are some good things and some not-so-good things" will help them achieve their goal.

They are in their own bubble and need an outside perspective that will home in on very specific points. But good news, they are aware of it, otherwise they wouldn't be asking for our opinions.

 

[GBalao888]

Based on the cars added in GT7's updates, it's as if there's somewhat of a recurring "theme" or trend with every year's updates, such as, by looking at the update history:

Spoiler: Cars added throughout GT7's history

2022:

1. Subaru BRZ S ’21
2. Subaru BRZ GT300 ’21
3. Suzuki Cappuccino (EA11R) ’95
4. Roadster Shop Rampage
5. Suzuki Vision Gran Turismo
6. Toyota GR010 Hybrid ’21
7. Suzuki V6 Escudo Pikes Peak Special ’98
8. Suzuki Vision Gran Turismo (Gr. 3 Version)
9. 1932 Ford Roadster
10. Maserati A6GCS/53 Spyder ’54
11. Nissan Skyline Super Silhouette Group 5 ’84
12. Porsche 918 Spyder ’13
13. McLaren MP4/4 ’88
14. Pontiac GTO “The Judge” ’69
15. Porsche Cayman GT4 ’16
16. Nissan Silvia K’s Type S (S14) ’94
17. Porsche Vision Gran Turismo Spyder
18. Volkswagen ID.R ’19
19. Maserati Merak SS ’80
20. Mazda Roadster NR-A (ND) ’22
21. Nissan GT-R NISMO GT3 ’18
22. Nissan Skyline 2000GT-R (KPGC110) ’73
23. BMW M2 Competition ’18
24. Ford Sierra RS 500 Cosworth ’87
25. Nissan Silvia K’s AERO (S14) ’96
26. Alfa Romeo Giulia GTAm ’20
27. Bugatti Chiron ’16
28. Chevrolet Corvette Stingray (C8) ’20
29. Ferrari Vision Gran Turismo
30. Toyota Celica GT-Four Rally Car (ST205) ’95

2023:

1. Citroen DS 21 Pallas ’70
2. Honda RA272 ’65
3. Italdesign Exeneo Vision Gran Turismo Street Mode
4. Italdesign Exeneo Vision Gran Turismo OIf-Road Mode
5. Porsche 911 Carrera RS (901) ’73
6. Audi RS 5 Turbo DTM ’19
7. Mazda 3 X Burgundy Selection ’19
8. Porsche 959 ’87
9. Porsche Carrera GTS (904) ’64
10. Toyota Alphard Executive Lounge ’18
11. Dallara SF23 Super Formula/Honda ’23
12. Dallara SF23 Super Formula/Toyota ’23
13. Jaguar XJ220 ’92
14. Mercedes-AMG GT3 ’20
15. Alfa Romeo Giulia Sprint GT Veloce ’67
16. Greening Auto Company Maverick
17. Nissan GT-R NISMO (R32) ’90
18. Aston Martin Valkyrie ’21
19. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution III GSR ’95
20. Subaru Impreza Sedan WRX STI ’04
21. Chevrolet Corvette (C1) ’58
22. Maserati MC20 ’20
23. Toyota Ambulance Himedic ’21
24. Toyota GR Corolla Morizo Edition ’22
25. Garage RCR Civic
26. Honda Civic Type R (FL5) ’22
27. Mazda 3 Gr. 4
28. Dodge Challenger SRT Demon ’18
29. Dodge Charger R/T 426 HEMI ’68
30. Lexus LFA ’10
31. Mercedes-Benz 190 E 2.5 - 16 Evolution II ’91
32. NISMO 400R ’95
33. Porsche 911 GT3 RS (992) ’22
34. Tesla Model 3 Performance ’23

2024:

1. Bvlgari Aluminium Vision Gran Turismo
2. Genesis X Gran Berlinetta Vision Gran Turismo Concept
3. Suzuki Jimny XC ’18
4. Audi TTS Coupe ’09
5. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR GSR ’06
6. Renault R4 GTL ’85
7. Audi R8 Coupe V10 plus ’16
8. Lamborghini Urus ’18
9. Toyota GT-One TS020 ’99
10. Afeela Prototype ’24
11. Chevrolet Chevelle SS 454 Sport Coupe ’70
12. Škoda Vision Gran Turismo
13. Honda Civic SiR-II (EG) ’93
14. Honda NSX GT500 ’00
15. Nissan Skyline GTS-R (R31) ’87
16. Volvo 240 SE Estate ’93
17. Volvo V40 T5 R-Design ’13
18. BMW M3 ’97
19. Ferrari 430 Scuderia ’07
20. Genesis X Gran Racer Vision Gran Turismo Concept
21. Lamborghini Gallardo LP 560-4 ’08
22. Subaru Impreza Rally Car ’98
23. RUF RGT 4.2 ’16
24. Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII MR GSR ’04
25. Nissan GT-R Premium Edition T-spec ’24
26. Toyota HiAce Van DX ’16
27. Ford Escort RS Cosworth ’92
28. Mercedes-Benz W 196 R ’55
29. Porsche 911 Turbo S (992) ’20
30. Porsche Mission X ’23
31. Suzuki Jimny Sierra JC ’18

2025:

1. Gran Turismo F3500-A
2. Honda Civic Si Extra (EF) ’87
3. Hyundai Ioniq 5 N ’24
4. Toyota C-HR S ’18
5. BMW Z4 3.0i ’03
6. Mercedes-Benz Unimog Type 411 ’62
7. Peugeot 205 GTI ’88
8. Aston Martin Vantage ’18
9. Mazda CX-30 Smart Edition ’21
10. Renault Kangoo 1.4 ’01
11. Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C5) ’01
12. Ferrari 812 Superfast ’17
13. Honda CR-V e:HEV EX Black Edition ’21
14. Suzuki Carry KC ’12
15. Citroen BX 19 TRS ’87
16. Lancia Delta HF Integrale Rally Car ’92
17. Peugeot SUV 2008 Allure ’21
18. Honda N-ONE RS ’22
19. NISMO R34 GT-R Z-tune ’05
20. Nissan Qashqai Tekna 190 2wd e-Power ’22
21. Afeela 1 ’26
22. Chevrolet Corvette CX.R Vision Gran Turismo Concept
23. Chevrolet Corvette CX Concept ’25
24. Renault Avantime 3.0 V6 24V ’02
25. Hyundai Elantra N ’23
26. Mazda Spirit Racing Roadster 12R ‘25
27. Opel Corsa GSE Vision Gran Turismo
28. Toyota Land Cruiser FJ40V ‘74
29. Toyota RAV4 Adventure ‘20
30. Ferrari 296 GT3 ‘23
31. Ferrari 296 GTB ’22
32. Fiat Panda 30 CL ’85
33. Gran Turismo F3500-B
34. Mine’s BNR34 Skyline GT-R N1 base ’06
35. Mitsubishi FTO GP Version R ’97
36. Polestar 5 Performance ’26
37. Renault Espace F1 ’95

2026:

1. Hyundai Elantra N TCR ’24
2. Porsche 911 GT3 R (992) ’22
3. Xiaomi SU7 Ultra ’25
4. Chevrolet Camaro 1969 Race-Mod
5. Mazda éfini RX-7 Type R (FD) ’91
6. Renault Captur S Edition TCe 140 ’21
7. Porsche 911 Turbo S Leichtbau (964) ’93
8. Renault Twingo ’93
9. Yangwang U9 ’24
10. BMW M Hybrid V8 ’25
11. Ferrari 499P ’23
12. Peugeot 9X8 ’25
13. Porsche 911 Turbo S Safety Car (992)
14. Porsche 963 ’24

2022 - Returning fan favorites
2023 - Modernization
2024 - Past, present and future
2025 - Everyday vehicles and crossovers
2026 - Modern racing cars

If anything, maybe 2027 could focus on exotics and supercars?