- 46

- United Kingdom
what will i lose in a integrity check?
any changes done to kunos car, mostly sound and kn5 relatedwhat will i lose in a integrity check?
thanks mateany changes done to kunos car, mostly sound and kn5 related
As far as I know, Kunos cars don't have the guid.txt file. This file is found only if you install a modded bank filehello all ,something really strange has happened to kunos cars sfx files ,the guid txt files are all missing ?? can anybody help thanks
Always use rubber guysThe update should hopefully be out soon. Just trying a few data tweaks and ironing out some creases.
A few more skins too, so huge grids should be possible with little repetition.
View attachment 1215224
Edit: oops, forgot this one.
View attachment 1215225
@Quark67 already mentioned it. Kunos cars (if still with original sfx) don't have these guid files. So no need to do an integrity check.hello all ,something really strange has happened to kunos cars sfx files ,the guid txt files are all missing ?? can anybody help thanks
@sean depledge as Quark67 said, this file must not exist in original sfx folders. Checking the integrity of the files I don't know if it's convenient, as steam will re-download all the missing files and replace all the files already present in the game but modified (e.g. if you have a mod for the flags, they will be replaced with the original ones) . Delete the guid file in the folders where it exists and if it is not a problem as I said above, proceed with the file verificationAs far as I know, Kunos cars don't have the guid.txt file. This file is found only if you install a modded bank file
its my ks porshe 962 long and short tail sounds that dont work ,the original sound files are there? im not sure...@sean depledge as Quark67 said, this file must not exist in original sfx folders. Checking the integrity of the files I don't know if it's convenient, as steam will re-download all the missing files and replace all the files already present in the game but modified (e.g. if you have a mod for the flags, they will be replaced with the original ones) . Delete the guid file in the folders where it exists and if it is not a problem as I said above, proceed with the file verification
If that doesn't work either, I don't know what to suggest. Unfortunately the sound problems are something supernatural LOL
Try deleting the sfx folder of the 962 and try the integrity check again. This way it should download the missing file. Let me know if it worksthe itegrity check didnt work ,it didnt download any files ....missing file priviges error ,so the game is still running ok
ill just live with it mate ,i dont want to screw it up ,its only 2 porsches lolTry deleting the sfx folder of the 962 and try the integrity check again. This way it should download the missing file. Let me know if it works![]()
inside sfx folders you should have onlyits my ks porshe 962 long and short tail sounds that dont work ,the original sound files are there? im not sure...
the itegrity check didnt work ,it didnt download any files ....missing file priviges error ,so the game is still running ok
Have a look on RD there will probably a sound mod. I did that with my Mc Claren GT1i have that but the short tail one doesnt work ,when i try to drive it it crashes and says cars sound may be broken?
www.racedepartment.com
Okay... that works...Still WIP but the Golf Mk1 Club Track will henceforth be known as the Golf Littlebird, because it chirps near the redline, and flies.
Plus, if you're not careful it will crap on you from a great height.
View attachment 1214923
View attachment 1214922
For those that downloaded already, the link has been updated because I put in the wrong ext_config. This only fixes the normals on the far, far treewall. It's black in some spots and overly bright in others. If that doesn't bother you, no need to download again. The fix will be included in the final version I post once I get the clock to work. Don't know when that will be. Not having any luck with it.New test version of Spa 1966 for anyone interested. This version covers both the original and THR versions of the track. Basically, it replaces all the flags (87 in total, what was I thinking) with animated versions and a couple of tweaks to the textures and ext_config. As always, please remember to make a copy of your existing track first. There are copies of all the original files I replace or change so you can easily revert back.
Spa 1966 Test #2
Package should be self explanatory, but i'll do a little explaining for those that are not computer savy. Each track version has it's own folder. Simply extract the content directory from whichever version you use to the main AC directory. In each versions folder are a few optional files. For Spa_1966, it's a slightly altered VAO patch. For Spa_THR, it's a vao patch (because it didn't have one) and edited ui files to add the geo tags.
About the only thing left I want to do is make the clock work and make adjustments to the textures based on feedback, although I never really hear any when I ask for it. Never know if that's a good or bad thing.
View attachment 1215310
Not available unfortunately....New test version of Spa 1966 for anyone interested. This version covers both the original and THR versions of the track. Basically, it replaces all the flags (87 in total, what was I thinking) with animated versions and a couple of tweaks to the textures and ext_config. As always, please remember to make a copy of your existing track first. There are copies of all the original files I replace or change so you can easily revert back.
Spa 1966 Test #2
Package should be self explanatory, but i'll do a little explaining for those that are not computer savy. Each track version has it's own folder. Simply extract the content directory from whichever version you use to the main AC directory. In each versions folder are a few optional files. For Spa_1966, it's a slightly altered VAO patch. For Spa_THR, it's a vao patch (because it didn't have one) and edited ui files to add the geo tags.
About the only thing left I want to do is make the clock work and make adjustments to the textures based on feedback, although I never really hear any when I ask for it. Never know if that's a good or bad thing.
View attachment 1215310
Odd, it works for me when I click the link.Not available unfortunately....
Could I suggest a third option? Maybe you could do a new kn5 and release the whole track with your new config and haybale collision physics under an updated name? That way we could keep the original as it is and everyone could decide which version to keep or delete as they choose.Odd, it works for me when I click the link.
Question for those who care. I want to make the haybales around the track on Spa_1966 have collision physics. As they are now, you pass through pretty much all of them. I have to make a new kn5 file to do that because I need to rename the objects. Would people prefer I do it as a new layout or just as a replacement for the existing objects so you don't need to change layouts to use the new haybale physics.
There's benefits to doing it both ways. For me, doing it as a new layout is the easiest because I just have to rename the objects and include a new full track kn5 file. The second way is harder for me, but is a smaller download for you all and you don't have to worry about changing layouts in CM. I'll do it the way most people would prefer.
I thought of that, but with two versions already flying around, that would make more confusion. There's the original and the THR version. I'd have to make replacements for both or pick the one that's better and do my version based off of that. To be honest, i'm still trying to figure out the difference between the original and the THR version, other than the added 1934 layout.Could I suggest a third option? Maybe you could do a new kn5 and release the whole track with your new config and haybale collision physics under an updated name? That way we could keep the original as it is and everyone could decide which version to keep or delete as they choose.
What I'm finding most confusing these days is trying to sort out tracks that have had multiple configs/skins done for them by multiple modders - and often months or even years apart! You never know what each new config has or hasn't got from other config files, what's conflicting with what, etc. For that reason, I much prefer 'new builds with new names'. Then you can try each one individually and keep your favourite.I thought of that, but with two versions already flying around, that would make more confusion. There's the original and the THR version. I'd have to make replacements for both or pick the one that's better and do my version based off of that. To be honest, i'm still trying to figure out the difference between the original and the THR version, other than the added 1934 layout.
I think it's only "128 instead of 32 pitboxes" and the 1934 layout. Their focus seems to be mainly online racing, less on aesthetics?I thought of that, but with two versions already flying around, that would make more confusion. There's the original and the THR version. I'd have to make replacements for both or pick the one that's better and do my version based off of that. To be honest, i'm still trying to figure out the difference between the original and the THR version, other than the added 1934 layout.
A new beautiful and funny car :-)
![]()
CSP doesnt work with acs_x86.exe, it requires the 64Bit acs.exe.Is this a CSP/Shader, Sol or something that caused this issue?
has been updated on 30th Nov 2022. "Overhauled most aspects of physics".That’s not new. That mod has been around on Racedepartment for years now. But it’s a fun mod for sure.
…but this mod/car is not new !has been updated on 30th Nov 2022. "Overhauled most aspects of physics".