- 2,904

- Germany
- GlamFM
- GlamFM
Again... that's not what you're being criticized for.
You’d think he’d get that given how sharp his mind is..
Again... that's not what you're being criticized for.
I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.
In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.
View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478
If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
My hope is that they will be similar to the nice special weekly challenge races we had over the time where all the opponents had these nice liveries.It looks like specially tuned/liveried cars matching the theme will be used in the events, so it does make sense that they are pre-selected. I think there are enough offline and online races so far in the game where you can use garage cars!
We can tell when you are translating versus getting it to write out an entirely new point for you.Here’s the English translation of your text:
---
It’s a blatant sign of human stupidity.
I’m French — it’s stated on my profile — and I don’t speak English fluently. I use ChatGPT to translate what I write, not to generate automatic responses. Your lack of kindness is astonishing to me.
I’m making an effort to express myself here, because translating every single message to reply to you is quite a challenge, especially from my phone. When you see evil everywhere, there’s nothing left to do… it’s a shame.
And yes, this message was translated by ChatGPT again — surprise.
Here’s the English translation of your sentence:The question I have is: will we be able to turn off the emoji sounds with Sophy? That really irritates me!
Here’s the English translation of your sentence:We can tell when you are translating versus getting it to write out an entirely new point for you.
The first is fine, it maintains the human in the writing.
The second nobody wants to see.
It looks like this is event-dependent.I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.
In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.
View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478
If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
OMG M3 DTM!!! AND R33 JGTC!!!! (or just custom liveries.....?????)Interesting that I occasionally write in Weekly Challenge articles how nice it would be to have some of the Special Event races back as Menu Books and...
View attachment 1491425
View attachment 1491429
...
The Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.Right now, I'm saving money for PMR. Bad timing for this DLC. I'll buy it if the price is low. But honestly, this is content that should have been in the game from the beggining. GT7 is very limited compared to GT5. I already paid a lot of money for the Deluxe version, and I don't really feel like paying for DLC in this situation.
First thing I noticed was this. Plus, side mirrors, etc.Are these factory seats? Obviously, it's hard to tell from this image, especially for the Beetle, but both interiors seem modified beyond the standard rollcage, at least to me.
View attachment 1491464
If so, could this be some kind of racing modification feature considering the new extreme body parts?
It does seem plausible if PD don’t want players using modified cars for certain races. Well, for those AE86 races, I hope the cars aren’t on stock suspensions because the gift Levin is definitely not.I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.
In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.
View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478
If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
To be fair they could easily have put endurances races in the game from day one. Sophy isn’t a necessity for this featureThe Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.
Also, will you be buying all the already-announced paid DLC for PMR that really should've been in that game from the begining?
Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:Here’s the English translation of your text:
---
It’s a blatant sign of human stupidity.
I’m French — it’s stated on my profile — and I don’t speak English fluently. I use ChatGPT to translate what I write, not to generate automatic responses. Your lack of kindness is astonishing to me.
I’m making an effort to express myself here, because translating every single message to reply to you is quite a challenge, especially from my phone. When you see evil everywhere, there’s nothing left to do… it’s a shame.
And yes, this message was translated by ChatGPT again — surprise.
My feelings exactly. All the people who said "these free updates are rubbish I'd happily pay" appear to have disappeared.33 free content updates so far, but sure they should all have been in day 1 and having a paid expansion now is the last straw![]()
Well… it does after 6 hours in a 24 endurance race and you’re already 14 laps ahead of the AI…To be fair they could easily have put endurances races in the game from day one. Sophy isn’t a necessity for this feature
Agree about Sophy AI, but "carrer/racing mode" should be from the beggining.The Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.
Also, will you be buying all the already-announced paid DLC for PMR that really should've been in that game from the begining?
I seem to remember some of them specifically saying they would pay for endurance racesMy feelings exactly. All the people who said "these free updates are rubbish I'd happily pay" appear to have disappeared.
For me, your analogy with McDonald’s doesn’t hold up — it’s far too narrow a view. To continue with your analogy, I’d say that if we’re such a large and loyal community, it’s because we truly enjoyed the previous installments, with GT5 and GT6 offering a ton of content for their price. We could compare that to a Big Mac menu with fries and a Coke.
On the other hand, GT Sport felt more like a menu with just fries and a Coke — no burger. We’ve all been waiting for GT7 to bring back our usual Big Mac menu, and for the more ambitious among us, we were even expecting a “Menu 280” given the price increase of PS5 games.
But instead, Polyphony has given us, for a higher price, a McFirst menu disguised as GT7 — and now a paid DLC to make up for the rather poor menu: less content and higher cost. That’s the reality — there’s no other way to put it.
It’s perfectly normal to see some fans unhappy, though there will always be people willing to accept it. Personally, if GT7 had been a Big Mac menu at launch and today they were offering a paid DLC to add a brownie, an ice cream, and some extra whipped cream, then yes — I’d gladly pay for that.
We’re not ungrateful — just realistic. That said, since the situation is what it is, I’ll still buy the DLC, but that doesn’t mean I’m any less disappointed.
I think the fact GT7 players are so divided to online and offline players is why this DLC will get very divided reception. While to me the licence test style structure that hopefully also has different prices for different outcomes either depending from difficulty level or finishing position would seem very smart, I see the poinless nature this DLC has to someone like me who has played only online since GT5. Only reason for offline "career" has been a mandatory chore to open the game and get money for cars to play online.I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.
In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.
View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478
If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
Im sure PD isnt that dumb. Its probably that you got to rent one of the available cars for that racing series, and the png of the car you choose just apears there, like a reminder or something.First thing I noticed was this. Plus, side mirrors, etc.
View attachment 1491481
If interiors are modified, maybe seats and steering wheels. Maybe return of custom gauges. I wonder what other cars will get new parts.
It does seem plausible if PD don’t want players using modified cars for certain races. Well, for those AE86 races, I hope the cars aren’t on stock suspensions because the gift Levin is definitely not.
View attachment 1491490
Don't think this is a career as such, certainly not like the old (boring) GT League. Looks more like a series of missions/challenges, but we'll see. I agree that racing stuff like qualifying should've been in from the start if possible, but the base AI is just too dumb & slow for that a lot of the time.Agree about Sophy AI, but "carrer/racing mode" should be from the beggining.
Please tell me you did not use AI to write this answer 😅Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:
In short, contribute your own knowledge to keep the community strong. If you're stuck on a question, search the archives first or ask for help— that's what makes places like GTPlanet special. If policies change, check the FAQ for updates.
- It Lacks Authenticity and Personal Insight: Forums value contributions from real players who've logged hours in Gran Turismo. AI can't "play" the game or draw from your unique setup trials or online race mishaps. Posting generic AI output feels impersonal and can come across as lazy, eroding trust in the community. For example, other forums have noted that AI text often falls under "non-constructive posts" because it prioritizes fluency over substance.
forums.taleworlds.com- Risk of Inaccuracies or Hallucinations: AI models, even advanced ones, can invent details—like outdated tuning advice for GT7's physics updates or fictional track records—that mislead others. In a niche space like GTPlanet, where precision matters (e.g., exact PP limits or penalty mechanics), this could frustrate users or spread bad info. GTPlanet's rules emphasize "thoughtful contributions" and discourage posts that don't add new value, which AI might violate if it's off-base.
gtplanet.net- Community Etiquette and Moderation Risks: GTPlanet frowns on "spam," "useless posts," or thread-bumping without substance, which could flag overly polished, AI-like replies (especially if they're lengthy and irrelevant).
gtplanet.net
Similar communities, like Garmin forums, have cracked down on AI replies for flooding discussions with low-effort content.
facebook.com
Users might report it, leading to warnings, infractions, or bans under the site's Acceptable Use Policy.- Ethical and Transparency Issues: Not disclosing AI use can mislead readers into thinking it's your expertise, bordering on deception. Broader gaming discussions highlight concerns over AI diluting "real" content, with some groups preferring authentic posts over generated ones.
facebook.com
If GTPlanet adopts explicit rules (as other sites have),
forum.digilent.com
you could face retroactive issues.- Diminishes Discussion Quality: Forums aren't search engines—they're for dialogue. AI answers often end conversations rather than sparking them, reducing the back-and-forth that makes GTPlanet fun (e.g., debating liveries or modding workarounds).
![]()
Here’s the English translation of your text:Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:
In short, contribute your own knowledge to keep the community strong. If you're stuck on a question, search the archives first or ask for help— that's what makes places like GTPlanet special. If policies change, check the FAQ for updates.
- It Lacks Authenticity and Personal Insight: Forums value contributions from real players who've logged hours in Gran Turismo. AI can't "play" the game or draw from your unique setup trials or online race mishaps. Posting generic AI output feels impersonal and can come across as lazy, eroding trust in the community. For example, other forums have noted that AI text often falls under "non-constructive posts" because it prioritizes fluency over substance.
forums.taleworlds.com- Risk of Inaccuracies or Hallucinations: AI models, even advanced ones, can invent details—like outdated tuning advice for GT7's physics updates or fictional track records—that mislead others. In a niche space like GTPlanet, where precision matters (e.g., exact PP limits or penalty mechanics), this could frustrate users or spread bad info. GTPlanet's rules emphasize "thoughtful contributions" and discourage posts that don't add new value, which AI might violate if it's off-base.
gtplanet.net- Community Etiquette and Moderation Risks: GTPlanet frowns on "spam," "useless posts," or thread-bumping without substance, which could flag overly polished, AI-like replies (especially if they're lengthy and irrelevant).
gtplanet.net
Similar communities, like Garmin forums, have cracked down on AI replies for flooding discussions with low-effort content.
facebook.com
Users might report it, leading to warnings, infractions, or bans under the site's Acceptable Use Policy.- Ethical and Transparency Issues: Not disclosing AI use can mislead readers into thinking it's your expertise, bordering on deception. Broader gaming discussions highlight concerns over AI diluting "real" content, with some groups preferring authentic posts over generated ones.
facebook.com
If GTPlanet adopts explicit rules (as other sites have),
forum.digilent.com
you could face retroactive issues.- Diminishes Discussion Quality: Forums aren't search engines—they're for dialogue. AI answers often end conversations rather than sparking them, reducing the back-and-forth that makes GTPlanet fun (e.g., debating liveries or modding workarounds).
![]()
It's right there in the article:Has anyone else noticed that the player level is at 70?
That might be the new maximum.