Gran Turismo 7 “Power Pack” Paid DLC Now Available: New Races Including Endurance Events, Qualifying, and “Sophy 3.0”

  • Thread starter Thread starter juanffy18
  • 3,900 comments
  • 458,068 views

What do you expect the Power Pack DLC will cost?


  • Total voters
    470
  • Poll closed .
I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.

In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.

View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478

If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.

It looks like specially tuned/liveried cars matching the theme will be used in the events, so it does make sense that they are pre-selected. I think there are enough offline and online races so far in the game where you can use garage cars!
My hope is that they will be similar to the nice special weekly challenge races we had over the time where all the opponents had these nice liveries.

If garage cars are prohibited then I would at least suspect that you could select any of the eligible cars rather than one specific car like in missions. The latter would be rather unfortunate I agree.
 
Here’s the English translation of your text:


---

It’s a blatant sign of human stupidity.
I’m French — it’s stated on my profile — and I don’t speak English fluently. I use ChatGPT to translate what I write, not to generate automatic responses. Your lack of kindness is astonishing to me.

I’m making an effort to express myself here, because translating every single message to reply to you is quite a challenge, especially from my phone. When you see evil everywhere, there’s nothing left to do… it’s a shame.

And yes, this message was translated by ChatGPT again — surprise.
We can tell when you are translating versus getting it to write out an entirely new point for you.

The first is fine, it maintains the human in the writing.
The second nobody wants to see.
 
power-pack.webp


Did not watched the video until a few seconds ago, I lolled so hard seeing the location of upcoming power pack

PD really struggles with sailboats, conceptually and visually (also seen in some samples in Yas Marina)

And given the size of this thing, we clearly won't get any more power packs, there won't be enough space on the worldmap 😅
 
Right now, I'm saving money for PMR. Bad timing for this DLC. I'll buy it if the price is low. But honestly, this is content that should have been in the game from the beggining. GT7 is very limited compared to GT5. I already paid a lot of money for the Deluxe version, and I don't really feel like paying for DLC in this situation.
 
The introduction of Sophy integrated into Career Mode looked set to be one of the most prominent selling points of a potential GT8.

Continued support for GT7 requires significant effort from the Polyphony Digital team, effort that no longer directly translates into revenue. While GT7 maintains an active community, it has likely already sold the vast majority of its potential lifetime copies. The sale of credit packs for real money, though data is lacking, is unlikely to generate substantial income; in fact, their in-game presence can be disabled via an option, leading many to forget that this feature even exists.

Therefore, this DLC appears to be a strategy to extend GT7's lifespan and delay GT8, a move that could prove beneficial for everyone. Those who value this content and purchase the DLC can enjoy it while funding the game's continued development, which helps ensure future free updates for all. On the other hand, players who see it as a "money grab" can avoid the expense, continue enjoying extended support for the game (funded by others), and stave off the end-of-support that the release of GT8 would normally imply for the previous title.
 
I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.

In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.

View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478

If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
It looks like this is event-dependent.

The screenshot of the Civic one-make race on the website does not have a car there, for contrast:

1762939500402.webp
 
Right now, I'm saving money for PMR. Bad timing for this DLC. I'll buy it if the price is low. But honestly, this is content that should have been in the game from the beggining. GT7 is very limited compared to GT5. I already paid a lot of money for the Deluxe version, and I don't really feel like paying for DLC in this situation.
The Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.

Also, will you be buying all the already-announced paid DLC for PMR that really should've been in that game from the begining?
 
Are these factory seats? Obviously, it's hard to tell from this image, especially for the Beetle, but both interiors seem modified beyond the standard rollcage, at least to me.

View attachment 1491464

If so, could this be some kind of racing modification feature considering the new extreme body parts?
First thing I noticed was this. Plus, side mirrors, etc.
IMG_7007.webp


If interiors are modified, maybe seats and steering wheels. Maybe return of custom gauges. I wonder what other cars will get new parts.
I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.

In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.

View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478

If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
It does seem plausible if PD don’t want players using modified cars for certain races. Well, for those AE86 races, I hope the cars aren’t on stock suspensions because the gift Levin is definitely not.
IMG_7010.webp
 
Last edited:
The Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.

Also, will you be buying all the already-announced paid DLC for PMR that really should've been in that game from the begining?
To be fair they could easily have put endurances races in the game from day one. Sophy isn’t a necessity for this feature
 
Here’s the English translation of your text:


---

It’s a blatant sign of human stupidity.
I’m French — it’s stated on my profile — and I don’t speak English fluently. I use ChatGPT to translate what I write, not to generate automatic responses. Your lack of kindness is astonishing to me.

I’m making an effort to express myself here, because translating every single message to reply to you is quite a challenge, especially from my phone. When you see evil everywhere, there’s nothing left to do… it’s a shame.

And yes, this message was translated by ChatGPT again — surprise.
Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:
  • It Lacks Authenticity and Personal Insight: Forums value contributions from real players who've logged hours in Gran Turismo. AI can't "play" the game or draw from your unique setup trials or online race mishaps. Posting generic AI output feels impersonal and can come across as lazy, eroding trust in the community. For example, other forums have noted that AI text often falls under "non-constructive posts" because it prioritizes fluency over substance.

    forums.taleworlds.com
  • Risk of Inaccuracies or Hallucinations: AI models, even advanced ones, can invent details—like outdated tuning advice for GT7's physics updates or fictional track records—that mislead others. In a niche space like GTPlanet, where precision matters (e.g., exact PP limits or penalty mechanics), this could frustrate users or spread bad info. GTPlanet's rules emphasize "thoughtful contributions" and discourage posts that don't add new value, which AI might violate if it's off-base.

    gtplanet.net
  • Community Etiquette and Moderation Risks: GTPlanet frowns on "spam," "useless posts," or thread-bumping without substance, which could flag overly polished, AI-like replies (especially if they're lengthy and irrelevant).

    gtplanet.net
    Similar communities, like Garmin forums, have cracked down on AI replies for flooding discussions with low-effort content.

    facebook.com
    Users might report it, leading to warnings, infractions, or bans under the site's Acceptable Use Policy.
  • Ethical and Transparency Issues: Not disclosing AI use can mislead readers into thinking it's your expertise, bordering on deception. Broader gaming discussions highlight concerns over AI diluting "real" content, with some groups preferring authentic posts over generated ones.

    facebook.com
    If GTPlanet adopts explicit rules (as other sites have),

    forum.digilent.com
    you could face retroactive issues.
  • Diminishes Discussion Quality: Forums aren't search engines—they're for dialogue. AI answers often end conversations rather than sparking them, reducing the back-and-forth that makes GTPlanet fun (e.g., debating liveries or modding workarounds).
In short, contribute your own knowledge to keep the community strong. If you're stuck on a question, search the archives first or ask for help— that's what makes places like GTPlanet special. If policies change, check the FAQ for updates.
:lol:
 
Last edited:
The Sophy AI looks to be a big part of this and that couldn't have been in the game from the beginning, unless they delayed it by years and ditched the PS4.

Also, will you be buying all the already-announced paid DLC for PMR that really should've been in that game from the begining?
Agree about Sophy AI, but "carrer/racing mode" should be from the beggining.

PMR - I'll buy standard edition. It's all I need. :)
 
Like everyone here lets hope it's not too expensive but lets put some perspective on all of this, it's a game that has had ongoing updates and tracks/cars released since it came out for free until this power pack (remember spec 3 is also free). Sure SUVs are not what people are screaming out for, but they have also included some cool free cars over the last few years and a few tracks all for the low low price of $0, also for those that have experienced it like myself, an amazing VR experience in a update again for free.

So as a long time GT player who likes to detox from work and life in general at the end of the week by putting on a headset and driving/racing cars and tracks I love with no subscription service (not including PSN as I don't have that also) with many many...and I mean many hours of enjoyment, yeah I'm happy to support Polyphony Digital Inc. for their attention to detail and caring as much as we all do about cars and racing to give them well earned money for their quality work we all take pleasure from.

If you don't agree that's fine too, so why spend time complaining in life, use that time to do something you enjoy, unless you just enjoy complaining? 🙃

Bring on Spec 3 and Power Pack! 😎
 
For me, your analogy with McDonald’s doesn’t hold up — it’s far too narrow a view. To continue with your analogy, I’d say that if we’re such a large and loyal community, it’s because we truly enjoyed the previous installments, with GT5 and GT6 offering a ton of content for their price. We could compare that to a Big Mac menu with fries and a Coke.

On the other hand, GT Sport felt more like a menu with just fries and a Coke — no burger. We’ve all been waiting for GT7 to bring back our usual Big Mac menu, and for the more ambitious among us, we were even expecting a “Menu 280” given the price increase of PS5 games.

But instead, Polyphony has given us, for a higher price, a McFirst menu disguised as GT7 — and now a paid DLC to make up for the rather poor menu: less content and higher cost. That’s the reality — there’s no other way to put it.

It’s perfectly normal to see some fans unhappy, though there will always be people willing to accept it. Personally, if GT7 had been a Big Mac menu at launch and today they were offering a paid DLC to add a brownie, an ice cream, and some extra whipped cream, then yes — I’d gladly pay for that.

We’re not ungrateful — just realistic. That said, since the situation is what it is, I’ll still buy the DLC, but that doesn’t mean I’m any less disappointed.

I have a new concern about these events that I've only just noticed.

In the race selection screen, it appears that the car on the race icon is what you'll be forced to use for the event, instead of being able to use a car from your garage. You can see that the player is in the road NSX, but the Castrol NSX has been "given" to the player in the same way as missions and time trials.

View attachment 1491477
View attachment 1491478

If this is actually how the events work, this'll be the dumbest blunder PD has ever made in the history of the game. I'm hoping and praying that there's something I've missed, but if not then someone absolutely has to protest against this.
I think the fact GT7 players are so divided to online and offline players is why this DLC will get very divided reception. While to me the licence test style structure that hopefully also has different prices for different outcomes either depending from difficulty level or finishing position would seem very smart, I see the poinless nature this DLC has to someone like me who has played only online since GT5. Only reason for offline "career" has been a mandatory chore to open the game and get money for cars to play online.

But I really hope like I said that the events are hardcore and there are different prices for finishing in top10/top5/3rd/2nd/1st. This way they teach that winning is not the only outcome in every race, but instead your "career" is about honing your skills and getting better and better results in these legendary races. It would also make a lot more re-play value, if you are not right away able to smash your way to p1 and claim the main price. If its just a one time career grind giving you cars you already at this point have its not worth much. Then again - making the price cars hard to get and visually exclusive special versions. Now that could tickle also the online players to show off in lobbies a car that only a bad ass driver can obtain.
 
Thinking more about it, it seems that GT auto is going to be given a big refresh. Not just these offroad modifications, but way more parts for some cars, and even interior modifications.
 
First thing I noticed was this. Plus, side mirrors, etc.
View attachment 1491481

If interiors are modified, maybe seats and steering wheels. Maybe return of custom gauges. I wonder what other cars will get new parts.

It does seem plausible if PD don’t want players using modified cars for certain races. Well, for those AE86 races, I hope the cars aren’t on stock suspensions because the gift Levin is definitely not.
View attachment 1491490
Im sure PD isnt that dumb. Its probably that you got to rent one of the available cars for that racing series, and the png of the car you choose just apears there, like a reminder or something.
 
Agree about Sophy AI, but "carrer/racing mode" should be from the beggining.
Don't think this is a career as such, certainly not like the old (boring) GT League. Looks more like a series of missions/challenges, but we'll see. I agree that racing stuff like qualifying should've been in from the start if possible, but the base AI is just too dumb & slow for that a lot of the time.
 
The "Ignore" button is your friend. Just click on the avatar of the user you want to ignore and you'll see the "Ignore" button at the bottom of the pop-up box.

Anyway, I really hope that you can repeat these races for cash. That's my biggest bugbear about the existing Endurance missions.
 
Last edited:
Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:
  • It Lacks Authenticity and Personal Insight: Forums value contributions from real players who've logged hours in Gran Turismo. AI can't "play" the game or draw from your unique setup trials or online race mishaps. Posting generic AI output feels impersonal and can come across as lazy, eroding trust in the community. For example, other forums have noted that AI text often falls under "non-constructive posts" because it prioritizes fluency over substance.

    forums.taleworlds.com
  • Risk of Inaccuracies or Hallucinations: AI models, even advanced ones, can invent details—like outdated tuning advice for GT7's physics updates or fictional track records—that mislead others. In a niche space like GTPlanet, where precision matters (e.g., exact PP limits or penalty mechanics), this could frustrate users or spread bad info. GTPlanet's rules emphasize "thoughtful contributions" and discourage posts that don't add new value, which AI might violate if it's off-base.

    gtplanet.net
  • Community Etiquette and Moderation Risks: GTPlanet frowns on "spam," "useless posts," or thread-bumping without substance, which could flag overly polished, AI-like replies (especially if they're lengthy and irrelevant).

    gtplanet.net
    Similar communities, like Garmin forums, have cracked down on AI replies for flooding discussions with low-effort content.

    facebook.com
    Users might report it, leading to warnings, infractions, or bans under the site's Acceptable Use Policy.
  • Ethical and Transparency Issues: Not disclosing AI use can mislead readers into thinking it's your expertise, bordering on deception. Broader gaming discussions highlight concerns over AI diluting "real" content, with some groups preferring authentic posts over generated ones.

    facebook.com
    If GTPlanet adopts explicit rules (as other sites have),

    forum.digilent.com
    you could face retroactive issues.
  • Diminishes Discussion Quality: Forums aren't search engines—they're for dialogue. AI answers often end conversations rather than sparking them, reducing the back-and-forth that makes GTPlanet fun (e.g., debating liveries or modding workarounds).
In short, contribute your own knowledge to keep the community strong. If you're stuck on a question, search the archives first or ask for help— that's what makes places like GTPlanet special. If policies change, check the FAQ for updates.
:lol:
Please tell me you did not use AI to write this answer 😅
 
Public forums like GTPlanet—a vibrant community for Gran Turismo fans sharing tips, setups, race strategies, and game discussions—thrive on genuine human interaction and expertise. While GTPlanet's current guidelines (as of November 2025) don't explicitly prohibit AI-generated content, relying on it for answers can undermine the forum's spirit and lead to practical issues. Here's a breakdown of key reasons to stick to your own words and experiences:
  • It Lacks Authenticity and Personal Insight: Forums value contributions from real players who've logged hours in Gran Turismo. AI can't "play" the game or draw from your unique setup trials or online race mishaps. Posting generic AI output feels impersonal and can come across as lazy, eroding trust in the community. For example, other forums have noted that AI text often falls under "non-constructive posts" because it prioritizes fluency over substance.

    forums.taleworlds.com
  • Risk of Inaccuracies or Hallucinations: AI models, even advanced ones, can invent details—like outdated tuning advice for GT7's physics updates or fictional track records—that mislead others. In a niche space like GTPlanet, where precision matters (e.g., exact PP limits or penalty mechanics), this could frustrate users or spread bad info. GTPlanet's rules emphasize "thoughtful contributions" and discourage posts that don't add new value, which AI might violate if it's off-base.

    gtplanet.net
  • Community Etiquette and Moderation Risks: GTPlanet frowns on "spam," "useless posts," or thread-bumping without substance, which could flag overly polished, AI-like replies (especially if they're lengthy and irrelevant).

    gtplanet.net
    Similar communities, like Garmin forums, have cracked down on AI replies for flooding discussions with low-effort content.

    facebook.com
    Users might report it, leading to warnings, infractions, or bans under the site's Acceptable Use Policy.
  • Ethical and Transparency Issues: Not disclosing AI use can mislead readers into thinking it's your expertise, bordering on deception. Broader gaming discussions highlight concerns over AI diluting "real" content, with some groups preferring authentic posts over generated ones.

    facebook.com
    If GTPlanet adopts explicit rules (as other sites have),

    forum.digilent.com
    you could face retroactive issues.
  • Diminishes Discussion Quality: Forums aren't search engines—they're for dialogue. AI answers often end conversations rather than sparking them, reducing the back-and-forth that makes GTPlanet fun (e.g., debating liveries or modding workarounds).
In short, contribute your own knowledge to keep the community strong. If you're stuck on a question, search the archives first or ask for help— that's what makes places like GTPlanet special. If policies change, check the FAQ for updates.
:lol:
Here’s the English translation of your text:


---

How can I make you understand that these aren’t AI-generated responses, but simply translations? I could use Google Translate, but from experience, I know it’s less accurate. I could also post directly in French, but I don’t think that would make the exchange enjoyable — or even acceptable — on the forum.

So please, explain to me how a French person who isn’t bilingual is supposed to post on the forum without being subjected to the persistent accusations of a few individuals.
 
Has anyone else noticed that the player level is at 70?

That might be the new maximum.
It's right there in the article:

 
Last edited:
Back