Gran Turismo 7 “Power Pack” Paid DLC Now Available: New Races Including Endurance Events, Qualifying, and “Sophy 3.0”

  • Thread starter Thread starter juanffy18
  • 3,538 comments
  • 363,305 views

What do you expect the Power Pack DLC will cost?


  • Total voters
    470
  • Poll closed .
I wonder what collector level 70 gets you 🤔
No more 3 stars tickets ???

Follow Me Please GIF
 
I mentioned earlier, let’s say if someone new to the series through to a casual player, on December 4 just buys a PS5 Pro, GT7 and the Power Pack. They’re not going to be able to use the PP content if they have to jump through the hours to get to Level 38+
What if someone been playing the game for over a year and has missed buying some of the LCD cars required for PP events? That’d be a waste of money. We’ll see how it works. If it means we can’t use garage cars, it’s most likely for the benefit of everyone to have access to experience the events.
I'm sorry, but those do NOT excuse this potentially bad choice here. Limiting car options for what's supposed to be a mini, challenging career mode hurts the enjoyment of it and kills the replay-ability. Not to mention it's a terrible solution to specific problems they're wanting to solve, a rental car system like in Forza Motorsport would've been a better option. Either that or just not locking these races behind level ups.
 
I'm sorry, but those do NOT excuse this potentially bad choice here. Limiting car options for what's supposed to be a mini, challenging career mode hurts the enjoyment of it and kills the replay-ability. Not to mention it's a terrible solution to specific problems they're wanting to solve, a rental car system like in Forza Motorsport would've been a better option. Either that or just not locking these races behind level ups.
I’m not excusing anything. I don’t know how it’ll work. Only trying to guess by PD’s way of thinking. Maybe rental cars is a way, which I pointed to. Also pointing out optional PD designed livery choices for some type of immersion variety:
I think this is where the Sport Mode Route X and the World Tour races with pre-Tuned sports cars would come into play. I wouldn’t mind using a “rental” car to do the new events if PD have tuned the engines, transmissions and set up proper race suspensions and somewhat stickier tyre compounds than standard.
If the rally Porsche and Beetle are what we could expect to be used, I’m for it. Selecting any of the five Group C cars(hopefully with an optional livery choice) with BOP rather than from my garage, would be good, in my opinion, as well. Besides, many players, especially players just picking up the game and buying the DLC, might not have bought certain cars for many of the races.
It’s the PD way. They release something that’s really cool on the surface and then always design choice or decision made that cause an option or detail to disappear. For all the joy they implement in the games, something goes missing and/or not gone the extra mile to completion.
I wish they’d stop doing that, but it’s still happening. I work with what is given.
 
I’m not excusing anything. I don’t know how it’ll work. Only trying to guess by PD’s way of thinking.
Got it, it's just that your comment when quoting mine made it seem more like a defense than an analysis.
It’s the PD way. They release something that’s really cool on the surface and then always design choice or decision made that cause an option or detail to disappear. For all the joy they implement in the games, something goes missing and/or not gone the extra mile to completion.
I wish they’d stop doing that, but it’s still happening. I work with what is given.
The problem is that PD is doing it more so than they have in the past, or at least it seems that way. Which is lead to why I have more problems with GT7 than even the PS3 games despite it technically being a higher quality product. There's more "catches" to their design choices.
 
First and foremost, each and everyone is entitled to a different opinion and point of view. In the end, we, as costumers hold the end of the bargain, either by buying a product or by not buying it, even not buying anything else from that provider in the future if you feel it has let you down or ripped you off.

But as hard as I'm trying to understand your logic, I'm unable to follow it.
I don't get why you think certain features are set in stone as "can't do" in a payed-for DLC. If it's not worth to you, that's fine, just don't buy it.

I pay for features every time I pay for a game and/or a DLC, it's just a question of thinking whether it's worth to me or not, as the player/customer.
In the end, it's more than likely than we'll pay for Sophie 4.0 o 5.0 ... It'll just be called GT8.
The "if you don't like it don't buy it" stance is fine, but it's also the backbone of corporate greed. Of course without pricing or any details it's hard to judge, but the details that we have so far are typically things that you don't pay extra for.

If we're talking something the calibre of AC's free roam being added, yeah there's a perfectly reasonable expectation that there would be an added cost. But we're talking about practice & quali sessions, and AI. These are pretty standard across racing games, why is it extra in this one?
 
"Why would they give you 5 million credits and the DLC for a lower price then what you would pay if you just buy the credits?"
I had this thought but then thought of several reasons why (pure speculation of course!).

A lot of people like myself would never buy credits anyway so would not be happy being forced to pay full price for credits in order to get the DLC.

Including discounted credits is an easy way to make the DLC feel great value and convince people to buy it. It is a hard number to judge value with as opposed to guessing what an experience you haven't had yet is worth.

Sony/PD may well be considering price elasticity data (basically charging as much as they can without losing too many customers for the maximum overall profit) rather than benchmarking it to credits.

I feel that since it's a one off the 5m credits can be discounted without it feeling unfair to people who have purchased credits, especially if they buy this anyway.
 
It’s still mathing. There are 16 cars on the timing screen. If I add the #20(17th), #16(18th), #13(19th), #5(20th) and #3(21st). Hope I’m doing my addition right. If it’s a bug, or just a display discrepancy it’s throwing the math off, I guess.
There's no #20 in the table or on the track.
 
Got it, it's just that your comment when quoting mine made it seem more like a defense than an analysis.

The problem is that PD is doing it more so than they have in the past, or at least it seems that way. Which is lead to why I have more problems with GT7 than even the PS3 games despite it technically being a higher quality product. There's more "catches" to their design choices.
Not being silly with my usual Dad jokes and I’m really not being silly when I type this:

Mo money. Mo problems. Right?

Kaz isn’t going to put out the games exactly like the past games and give players everything we remember utilising that made past games fun and memorable. Probably a good thing, but also could be bad that he’s not money hungry. Maybe rehashing GT-GT4 instead of what we got from GT5 Prologue-GT7 would have players in a more joyful state and Sony making even more money than currently. Yet, here we are still wanting anwaiting answers to game design choices.

@bduddy I know. Where is the #5? I don’t want to assume there is a #5 if they’re skipping numbers and I don’t want to assume there are more than 16 cars on track. I then don’t want to assume that yellow dot under the #0 is the #5 since I can’t see it anywhere. Right? If you can show me in case I’m missing something I’d appreciate that.
 
Last edited:
While that is true, I think the fact they’re charging for Sophy 3.0 and some races is what’s got people frustrating and saying maybe fix this and that first.

Things that were ether promised or hinted at that never actually made it to game. I myself wasn’t all that disappointed in the car count on release. I know people were going off the rails about how low it was. My disappointment was missing cars. I still think the game has too many cars haha. It’s not very focused on racing it’s more focused on the one offs or first of its kind rather than here’s these muscle cars all competitive with each other very minimal tuning required.

We’ll see maybe I’ll buy the dlc and be able to have decent grid start races versus the chase the rabbit garbage we have now. I do agree it’s wrong for me to assume grid starts and good AI was going to be in the game… but it’s GT, they’ve always been behind other race games in that regard. GT7 now, is only on par for sounds with what GT Legends was doing in like 2003. Project cars, I had way better AI races, so my assumption was surely gran Turismo has caught up with that by now, it’s been many years and a whole new console. Nope, same old same old. At least they’re trying with Sophy.
Maybe wanting good (or at least better) AI seems more costly than what people expect like how it's one of the only features that can only be used in PS5 for GT7 and that it's really GPU hungry, with it not even be able to be widely implemented in all the game still. Promised and hinted, but the execution is more demanding than what people'd think (as people also complain about Power Pack can't be played in PS4). Maybe a case of be careful what you wish for.
Welp, that ruins the pack. I don't want racing where I'm confined to one car, then it's just more glorified driving missions.
I guess you've said that you don't like the more motorsport-based career that people here seem to prefer and want GT to become. Seems that Power Pack having you choose those car is about like motorsport-based career where you're given a car of a specific discipline, and that you don't need to save up and buy required one to want to enter certain races, albeit honestly one should choose between different team and the cars related to the race (e.g. between Skyline, Supra, NSX GT500) for those events.
 
Kaz isn’t going to put out the games exactly like the past games and give players everything we remember utilising that made past games fun and memorable. Probably a good thing, but also could be bad that he’s not money hungry. Maybe rehashing GT-GT4 instead of what we got from GT5 Prologue-GT7 would have players in a more joyful state and Sony making even more money than currently. Yet, here we are still wanting anwaiting answers to game design choices.
It's a good and bad thing at the same time. But my point in that last post isn't a "it isn't like it used to be", but more so that it seems the games just got riddled with way more flaws than there used to be. Almost as if their quest for detail has lead to other areas to be badly neglected.
I guess you've said that you don't like the more motorsport-based career that people here seem to prefer and want GT to become.
Nope. I don't remember if I ever demanded it myself, but no. I personally want a career mode more akin to classic GT combined with things added to the newer games here and there. But still has some more challenging racing.
Seems that Power Pack having you choose those car is about like motorsport-based career where you're given a car of a specific discipline, and that you don't need to save up and buy required one to want to enter certain races, albeit honestly one should choose between different team and the cars related to the race (e.g. between Skyline, Supra, NSX GT500) for those events.
It could be doing that, which makes sense. For a lot of racing disciplines, you can't pick your car in real life. Though I'm pretty sure you can do that in certain kinds of racing. There's motorsports where you build your own car for the regulations. Also yes, they most definitely should be allowing players to choose cars based on the racing division. I wanted to be able to pick my own JGTC car so I can use my custom liveries while racing.
 
Last edited:
Simply because people are frustrated when changes or updates to the game are not what they personally want or value.
That doesn't explain why it's upsetting that the dlc is not free.
PD releases some paid DLC, you look at it and wonder why you should pay more money for things that should have been in the game in the first place.
A problem with that kind of reasoning is that from a customer's perspective anything should have been included in the first place. Course maker, hillclimb, B-spec, moon missions, Nascar, WRC, etc. etc. The fact you think those features should have been in the game from the beginning doesn't mean that PD owes you those features free of charge.
If PD released 2 versions of GT7, one as-is, and one that's $20 extra that had all of the Power Pack features, PD would be a laughingstock. No racing game is charging you for offline quali & practice sessions. And if Sophy 2.0 has it's issues, they're banking ALOT on putting 3.0 behind a paywall. And then what happens with 4.0, 5.0 etc etc...
All commercially developed racing games that have those features are charging you for it, one way or another. The question is whether these development costs are baked in with the price of the base game or if it's sold as a separate add-on. In either case you are paying for those features. If these features should be included for free (i.e. the argument is that we have already paid for them when we bought the game), then the logic is that game publishers should charge the consumers in advance for features that may or may not exist in the future. I'm sure you see that's not a good idea.
 
And now here we are being asked to pay for what was missing in the first place.
There is no concept of “in the first place” there just things that weren’t included.

This is not the same as locking a feature(s) already in the game and making you pay for the heated seats unlock (BMW cough!)

Expectation, is not analogous with “it should be” it’s “I think this is how it should have been”
So it is upsetting to people who purchased the game, finished the single player events and championships in a few weeks… against pretty bad AI, spending the rest of their time re-racing events to grind credits to collect cars, to race yet again in those same events
But here is the big rub, that’s how YOU play the game, went through the game and what YOU want from the game.

I completed the game, have all the cars, the platinum trophy etc and only play sport mode now. Is my way better? Is it worse?

It’s just how I get my enjoyment.

Not specifically at you but there seems to be a slight disconnect from reality, the game was sold as a live service game and to be fair they have largely delivered on that.
 
These mysterious special tuned cars are giving me flashbacks:


Just over a month before launch, evidence was caught of engine swaps. It was never an officially announced feature, and it was only found on day of launch (page 10 in that article’s thread) to be something present in the game. They could be something new for Spec III (parts or new tuned variants), rewards exclusive to the Power Pack, or something else entirely. We have precedent for just not knowing about features or content until after its in our hands.
 
Sorry for the slightly awkward offtopic (and extremely long) post you're about to read, but there's a few things I have to say.
Right... so, I'm back here again, but this time with a totally different mindset compared to how I was a couple of days ago.
Just in case anyone's wondering what I mean, feel free to check out my previous post right here (WARNING: it's bad... I mean REALLY bad lol)

Well, to my defense, I must say I was already having a pretty rough day at work by the time I found out about this DLC, which acted as the "icing on the cake" to me... being a PS4 player, the moment I realized it's going to be a PS5-exclusive thing i just lost it, and allowed anger and frustration to take the best of me, culminating in that post.
This doesn't normally happen to me, I always try to not get ahead of myself and not take rushed-out conclusions and what not but... this time it was different, I guess I was under the "perfect storm" here and just over-reacted.
I almost feel embarrassed by this...

Anyway, after reading and thinking about some of you guy's arguments on this thread, and with all the bad feelings out of the way, now I can see things differently and realized my previous post just doesn't reflect my current opinion on this subject anymore.
So, I'd like to apologize you guys for the bad choice of words, and if I may, allow me to "reset" my opinion on this:

First and foremost, this looks like a very nice DLC overall, with a pretty good number of races being added, and being endurance races makes it even more special which is something most of us have been waiting/hoping to see for ages on this game.

At this point, information is still a little scarce so there's not a whole lot we can safely conclude or expect from this DLC, but this "qualifying" thing seems to be very interesting, it certainly brings a breath of fresh air into the game to not have to do things the same old way.

As I am a PS4 player, I can't really talk much about Sophy as I've never tried it before, but I guess it's always great news to see it being update and improved. With Sony/PD continuously investing on it, I'm sure the next installment in the series will use it as the "standard" AI to race against.

I'm not gonna lie, knowing this DLC is not coming to PS4 is still a little hard to swallow... like I said on my previous post, PD could simply release this DLC without Sophy and it would pretty much work on PS4, if they wanted to do it I'd happily pay for it for a reasonable price (although there's no such thing as a "reasonable price" these days, even for the most basic essential things, let alone for a game's DLC) but I understand this is not even a matter of hardware limitations anymore, they simply don't want to continue investing and releasing content for a 12-year-old console when they already have a more powerful console on the market for 5 years now, can't really blame them for that.
Previously I blamed PD for "not showing gratitude" regarding PS4 players, but that's just not true because let's face it: I'm sitting on top of nearly 3 years worth of free content (cars, tracks and events) which has been steadily released on a nearly monthly basis, and probably will continue that way for some time (probably not for long but at this point I'll take whatever they want to give me).
Turns out I'm the one not showing enough gratitude in the first place... :ouch:

Some people even argue this game shouldn't even exist for PS4 at all, and I have to say, after playing this game for nearly 2 years I'm truly surprised with how smooth it runs and how nice it looks, PD as certainly did a great job taking the best out of the PS4 to make GT7 run this good.

As pointed out by @Fezzik a few posts after mine, my statement of "the vast majority of the GT7 player base is made of PS4 players" is also wrong, for some reason I had a different perception of things on that subject, so thanks for clarifying that up for me Fezzik!

Some of you might be wondering: why haven't you bought a PS5 already?! Firstly, my PS4 is only 6 years old (if that...) bought it used from a work colleague, pretty good deal actually, and I still have quite a few games I haven't played on it yet, and on top of that, believe it or not I still go back to my PS3 from time to time, to play some older games that I've missed back in the day.
So, buying a PS5 is not something I'm willing to do at this point, due to a variety of reasons like the pricing, even the used ones are quite pricey, and let's not get started with the PS5 Pro (800 euros for a new one?! C'mon Sony, what are you smoking?).
Here in Portugal, the national minimum wage is just above 900 euros... tell me how that's not a steep price for a console?
Sure the technology and the quality is there, but this is getting to a point where I think it'll make much more sense to use that money to buy a decent PC that allows me to play games as well as doing a lot of other things... if only Gran Turismo gets released on PC someday (doubt it though).
And honestly, I just don't feel the need to buy one... I'm still very satisfied with my PS3 and PS4, for the most part I haven't seen a single game that'll make me go out and say "that's it, I'm buying a PS5"... most of them are just remakes/remasters from older generations so why spend that much money.
Anyway, I don't want to start World War III here because of my personal decision to not buy a PS5, I'll be just fine without it.
totally agree with your post. Buying a PS5 will have its advantages, and I don't think it's all about budget, regardless of how much you want to spend. This is all about the PC. I'm doing the exact same thing you wrote about. If you want to stay ahead of the curve, the PC is the best choice. It depends on what you want to achieve.
 
In your opinion, what are the chances of seeing the spec 3 + power pack coming out on the same day?
Power Pack is said to be a part of Spec III and supposedly both should be released December 4th. But they only announced the date for Power Pack specifically and didn't really mention it as the date for Spec III as well. Which is a bit weird, but it's not like there's any other option though, they gotta release at the same time.
 
I had this thought but then thought of several reasons why (pure speculation of course!).

A lot of people like myself would never buy credits anyway so would not be happy being forced to pay full price for credits in order to get the DLC.

Including discounted credits is an easy way to make the DLC feel great value and convince people to buy it. It is a hard number to judge value with as opposed to guessing what an experience you haven't had yet is worth.

Sony/PD may well be considering price elasticity data (basically charging as much as they can without losing too many customers for the maximum overall profit) rather than benchmarking it to credits.

I feel that since it's a one off the 5m credits can be discounted without it feeling unfair to people who have purchased credits, especially if they buy this anyway.
Yeah, I also never bought credits and I never would. Same for most ppl on this forum I guess.

But the truth is that we're probably just a minority. We have no idea how many people are there who are willing to spend money on credits. PD knows.
So I guess all we can do is wait until they announce the price.
To quote a famous Jedi: "I have a bad feeling about this" But I hope I'm wrong😉
 

Latest Posts

Back