Kevin Ward

  • Thread starter GTPorsche
  • 610 comments
  • 26,245 views
Also here is a quote from a guy who ran 360 and 410 Sprints with both Ward and Stewart, who we talked to tonight in our league race.

"No way possible Stewart could have seen him, I talked to the track official at the scene and he said Hebing (white 45) missed him by the thickness of a paper. I've been in Tony's situation with the initial wreck and I didn't even know I pushed the guy high until he got mad at me. Tony had no reason to hit the gas other than to turn, and with that, I don't know if you've (referring to another admin) ever driven a sprint car, but when you turn off throttle, nothing happens. Tony probably never even knew what happened until he was on Kevin."
 
Why don't you go back and read my first post. I said I believe this is what happened. Just my opinion like the rest of yours. Mine just happens to not be the same as yours.

Well, you came across like your goal was to be 100% right, and most people will agree with me, especially with all the double posts, and the repetition of what you said over and over again.

Some of the things you said didn't make sense. If Ward is standing in front of Stewart's car, then why did Stewart have to goose the gas to hit him or scare him. And with your logic, goosing the gas goes up. Which is wrong as the mod said goosing the gas makes this type of vehicle go down.

So it was unpreventable..?

EDIT: yet again he double posted! I think I'm going to report him now...
 
Also here is a quote from a guy who ran 360 and 410 Sprints with both Ward and Stewart, who we talked to tonight in our league race.

"No way possible Stewart could have seen him, I talked to the track official at the scene and he said Hebing (white 45) missed him by the thickness of a paper. I've been in Tony's situation with the initial wreck and I didn't even know I pushed the guy high until he got mad at me. Tony had no reason to hit the gas other than to turn, and with that, I don't know if you've (referring to another admin) ever driven a sprint car, but when you turn off throttle, nothing happens. Tony probably never even knew what happened until he was on Kevin."

At speed he is correct the front tires are all but useless, but once the car slows the front end acts as any car would. You turn the tires and the car will follow. Its only at speed are they useless.
 
Watch the last video that was posted.
Does the "last video" that was posted explain away the two points about driver visibility and the time there was for Tony to come up with this plan making out to be the case? Does the "last video" (which itself is an incredibly vague statement, with the amount of videos posted in this thread) show a driver running out in front of cars and the sprint car drivers trying their damndest to avoid him even at caution speeds? What about the points niky has made, regarding the visibility of drivers at speed as told by a professional racing driver? Does that "last video" explain away that? Now, taking the statement that you've driven sprint cars for what it's worth, what exactly about niky's detailed breakdown for why Tony might have done what is being claimed is wrong enough for you to also ignore it multiple times? Does the video show that?



Why don't you go back and read my first post. I said I believe this is what happened. Just my opinion like the rest of yours. Mine just happens to not be the same as yours.
You said this:
Tony seen the kid and thought if this kid don't get out of the way Ill hit him (expecting the kid to jump out of the way), he goosed the gas to get the car sideways (from many witnesses and drivers) and the car stepped out farther than he intended and hit him.
So why is it that you specifically refuse to answer questions raised about how implausible that scenario is? I mean, it could be the case, as Earth so eloquently tried to put it earlier, that "the internet has declared Stewart 100% innocent and the victim 100% at fault" and even the Canandaigua police are in on it and you're simply trying to go against that grain. But, perhaps maybe, when someone claims that Tony was trying to get close to the kid to scare him, multiple people examining that statement from multiple points of attack (such as the idea, which you ignored, that Tony couldn't have decided to do that in the incredibly small span of time you already admitted he had; or the idea, that you ignored, that Tony didn't see him to begin with when the driver up ahead also admitted to not seeing him in almost identical circumstances and several explanations were provided for what that could be the case) is a natural response on a public forum.
 
Does the "last video" that was posted explain away the two points about driver visibility and the time there was for Tony to come up with this plan making out to be the case? Does the "last video" (which itself is an incredibly vague statement, with the amount of videos posted in this thread) show a driver running out in front of cars and the sprint car drivers trying their damndest to avoid him even at caution speeds? What about the points niky has made, regarding the visibility of drivers at speed as told by a professional racing driver? Does that "last video" explain away that? Now, taking the statement that you've driven sprint cars for what it's worth, what exactly about niky's detailed breakdown for why Tony might have done what is being claimed is wrong enough for you to also ignore it multiple times? Does the video show that?




You said this:
So why is it that you specifically refuse to answer questions raised about how implausible that scenario is? I mean, it could be the case, as Earth so eloquently tried to put it earlier, that "the internet has declared Stewart 100% innocent and the victim 100% at fault" and you're simply trying to go against that grain. But, perhaps maybe, when someone claims that Tony was trying to get close to the kid to scare him, multiple people examining that statement from multiple points of attack (such as the idea, which you ignored, that Tony couldn't have decided to do that in the incredibly small span of time you already admitted he had; or the idea, that you ignored, that Tony didn't see him to begin with when the driver up ahead also admitted to not seeing him in almost identical circumstances and several explanations were provided for what that could be the case) is a natural response on a public forum.
What questions? I thought I answered them all, but might of missed a few. All I seen was a bunch of people attacking (for lack of a better word) my comments, with a couple questions thrown in here and there.
 
Just watched it, it's bad but not as bad as some were describing. Some people were saying that the wheel of the car flung him under and then out, when really he just gets clipped

EDIT: Tyler Graves is quoted as saying that Ward gets sucked under the wheel, while the video I saw just shows him getting hit
If you watch it in slow motion I think he does go round and under the wheel before being spat out. My big question is what kind of 🤬'n Douchbag walks towards traffic in dark racing gear at night:banghead:, I mean even if it was under caution your just asking for trouble.
 
At speed he is correct the front tires are all but useless, but once the car slows the front end acts as any car would. You turn the tires and the car will follow. Its only at speed are they useless.

Wait, wait, wait.

Are you saying you know more about how a Sprint car drives, at speed, than a Sprint car racer?

We're not talking "pootling" around the infield speeds here.

We're talking about going around the track at less than race speed, but obviously at speed. I can't calculate car speed based on a grainy video with no reference points, but the speed at which cars pass by Kevin Ward does appear to be in the 50-60 mph range. Which is why (along with the slick surface) it took Tony a hundred yards to come to a stop after hitting Kevin.

Of course, if you don't want to believe the driver in front of Tony, or information from several experts on accidents, as well as police investigators, that it is very likely Tony didn't see the guy... then I don't know if any amount of evidence will be enough for you.

-

Also, it's rude to ignore people. On this board, you're expected to support your arguments with facts or citations. That's just the way it is.
 
Wait, wait, wait.

Are you saying you know more about how a Sprint car drives, at speed, than a Sprint car racer?

We're not talking "pootling" around the infield speeds here.

We're talking about going around the track at less than race speed, but obviously at speed. I can't calculate car speed based on a grainy video with no reference points, but the speed at which cars pass by Kevin Ward does appear to be in the 50-60 mph range. Which is why (along with the slick surface) it took Tony a hundred yards to come to a stop after hitting Kevin.

Of course, if you don't want to believe the driver in front of Tony, or information from several experts on accidents, as well as police investigators, that it is very likely Tony didn't see the guy... then I don't know if any amount of evidence will be enough for you.

-

Also, it's rude to ignore people. On this board, you're expected to support your arguments with facts or citations. That's just the way it is.
If you had read the thread then you would know what I was ignoring now wouldn't you, but instead you assume you know what I was ignoring. :rolleyes:
 
At speed he is correct the front tires are all but useless, but once the car slows the front end acts as any car would. You turn the tires and the car will follow. Its only at speed are they useless.
So if the wheels are useless at speed why do they race on an oval instead of a long straight patch of dirt.

I have a quick question for you. Do you have instances of consecutive coherent thoughts or are you perpetually distracted by shiny things?
 
My apologies, I'm following several conversations on different boards as well as writing an article. But you are also not supposed to ignore a reminder not to double post. Jordan put in a nice new multi-quote button (+Quote) at the bottom of each post for that. ;)
 
My apologies, I'm following several conversations on different boards as well as writing an article. But you are also not supposed to ignore a reminder not to double post. Jordan put in a nice new multi-quote button (+Quote) at the bottom of each post for that. ;)
I wasn't reminded by a mod about double posting.
 
I have a quick question for you. Do you have instances of consecutive coherent thoughts or are you perpetually distracted by shiny things?

Quick reminder: Please play the ball, not the man. Thank you.

I wasn't reminded by a mod about double posting.

Doesn't matter who reminds you. They're the rules. Use the +Quote button from now on when responding to multiple posts. If you've already posted, you can use +Quote, copy the text by using CTRL-A (select all) and CTRL-C (copy), then reopen the post for editing and use CTRL-V (paste). Thank you.
 
Tony was a good 50 feet behind the 45 car, probably even more than that. They weren't bumper to bumper. As far as having to goose the gas that's straight bull 🤬. You don't need to goose the gas to make them turn at low speeds. That is coming from people who have no clue how these cars work in real life. :rolleyes:
I remember reading that another driver in the race also said he could see Ward ok, cant remember who it was. It was the driver with all the tatoos on his arms, forgot his name. To me what seems likely is it was one of those moment where Tony was not sure which way Ward was going and both dodged in the same direction. Like when your coming at somebody head on in a hallway and both of you move to the same side to go around the other.

Either that or Tony deliberately hit him which I cant in my own mind rule out. I have to leave the manslaughter option on the table because the incident just looked like it and I've never liked Tony one bit either.

If it was Jeff Gordon in this position I would already be on the innocent/accident bandwagon so it is very true that I have factored in Tony's personality into my mind as being unstable.
 
My friends in Louisville Ky. (where I grew up) are much bigger NASCAR fans than I am. They think Tony Stewart is done. They think he will lose his sponsors.
 
Stewart has yet to release a statement giving his version of the events.

The police have not finished their investigation and have not submitted their report.

A few drivers passed Ward, one said he saw him clear as day another said he didnt see him.

All thats available to the public is one cell phone video.

But the internet has already decided he did not see the kid and that he gunned the gas in an attempt to avoid him. And at the same time the internet has found a way to accuse me of thinking something otherwise could be a possibility.

Congratulations internet, or should I call you Sherlock Holmes. You cracked the case, while at the same time accusing me of jumping to a conclusion, when, hilariously, I have not reached any conclusion. while you have.
 
Indeed there is a mountain of reasonable doubt but I think that in this case people are making the argument that Tony would not have done it out of fear for ruining his career or going to prison. According to those same people and according to the Sheriff's dept. neither looks likely. They say poor visibility, Tony would have known this too before he hit Ward. They say the car needs throttle to turn, Tony would have known this. Tony has been in numerous fights over the years, he races 100 times a year in multiple cars, he's one of if not the most experienced race car driver on this planet......

So in all about ten to twenty seconds he had the tacit knowledge of all this and thus that's how you are somewhat sure he had intent...

Wow your rational almost parallels Earth. Also it doesn't matter if he's Jesus is a damn car, if your not expecting the unexpected you can't account for it and thus things like this happen. If you can't rationalize that simple common sense then I have nothing else to say to you. The idea that he had the foresight to do all you're claiming like some evil mastermind is far more silly than those defending Stewart.

I feel it's certainly a possibility that Tony simply had a disagreement with someone, they lost their cool & Tony saw somebody vulnerable he was angry at, he could kill and get away with it, blaming the guy for playing with the traffic which is what pretty much everybody here is doing apart from a few people. That and the "star power" Tony has which is is no doubt well aware of.

Wow...yeah you're about as sensible as Earth, and you've yet to answer my questions just assuming is what you've done. Here's another question that is reworded of a previous, how did he know for one he wrecked someone and also know they were going to get out of the car and come after him?

I remember during the Lance Armstrong scandals (there was several over a 10 year period as the French investigated him) the "star power" was unbeatable. Lance had 90% of the public including amongst Europeans. People love to latch on to a personality and make them a god. Examples of this exist throughout human history.

Okay well that's great but you're talking to me and not the inflated hyperbole 90%, I really couldn't care less about Armstrong it's obvious he cheated and it was his call.

Tony has a long history of fights and disagreements with drivers so to me its not a huge stretch to say he would run somebody over. A fight is one small step away from homicide in my opinion. Proving that is a different story and if it was deliberate maybe Tony has found the ultimate perfect crime.

Funny thing about this part is people use this because the media has disproportionately blown this up to get more views and thus make a story to not only trample on the death of Ward but also Stewart. So people like you that don't follow NASCAR and get the info second hand run with it. If you had followed you'd see that the way Stewart -especially in recent years- handles this is by slamming the opposing driver in media, face to face after the race, or a la helmet to car driving down pit road with four on track officials making sure he doesn't get too close.

Also you read too much Hardy Boys or something, this almost seems like a comedy skit "he's found the ultimate perfect crime!"

The sensationalism some of you exude is just funny.
 
But the internet has already decided he did not see the kid and that he gunned the gas in an attempt to avoid him. And at the same time the internet has found a way to accuse me of thinking something otherwise could be a possibility.

Are we reading the same internet?

All across the internet, tens of thousands of fans and commenters are lambasting Stewart for his "reckless behaviour" and "homicidal intent"... having decided that he definitely saw a kid wearing a black racing suit against a dark background who'd come out from behind another car, and chose to veer towards him and sideswipe him to teach him a lesson.

-

Let's recall the principle the legal system in the United States is founded on:

Innocent until proven guilty.

Which means you must grant reasonable doubt.

Is there reasonable doubt that he saw the boy? Yes, from testimony from drivers on the track, there is.

Is there reasonable doubt he was aiming at the boy? Yes, from the angle of his car at the point of collision, there is.

Is there reasonable doubt as to whether he had any ill will towards the boy? Considering the kid didn't ruin his race or even dent his bodywork... yes there is.

Without seeing a smoking gun signaling intent, malice and premeditation, there is no way to decide for sure whether Stewart is guilty or not. But most of us are not willing to condemn him without further evidence.
 
Sigh. Don't you just miss the times when you could actually browse GTP and not find TenEightyOne involved in some kind of Internet argument with someone?

I don't get it, he's arguing against people acting ignorant and deciding that the world must do as they say or they wont be convinced, that's about as Darwin as stepping out of your car on to an active race track. Also @TenEightyOne has the right to argue as much as anyone else here...I don't see the problem unless this was some joke.
 
Last edited:
Are we reading the same internet?

All across the internet, tens of thousands of fans and commenters are lambasting Stewart for his "reckless behaviour" and "homicidal intent"... having decided that he definitely saw a kid wearing a black racing suit against a dark background who'd come out from behind another car, and chose to veer towards him and sideswipe him to teach him a lesson.

-

Let's recall the principle the legal system in the United States is founded on: Innocent until proven guilty. Without seeing a smoking gun signaling intent, malice and premeditation, there is no way to decide for sure whether Stewart is guilty or not.

The racetrack was lit up. You think these guys are driving in the dark? A lousy cell phone camera clearly identified Ward halfway across the track. That sounds like grasping for excuses.

Who is saying Tony intentionally hit him? Is that what this is to you? Black and white? Either Tony wanted to run over Ward or he is completely innocent?

LMSCorvetteGT2
about as Darwin as stepping out of your car on to an active race track.

Keep up the classy comments. I bet you have a whole bag of crappy Robin William jokes your cracking somewhere. If Darwin works as you say it does, then why are you still here?
 
I remember reading that another driver in the race also said he could see Ward ok, cant remember who it was. It was the driver with all the tatoos on his arms, forgot his name. To me what seems likely is it was one of those moment where Tony was not sure which way Ward was going and both dodged in the same direction. Like when your coming at somebody head on in a hallway and both of you move to the same side to go around the other.

Either that or Tony deliberately hit him which I cant in my own mind rule out. I have to leave the manslaughter option on the table because the incident just looked like it and I've never liked Tony one bit either.

If it was Jeff Gordon in this position I would already be on the innocent/accident bandwagon so it is very true that I have factored in Tony's personality into my mind as being unstable.

Oh wow you have biased, and thus are defaming a person due to said bias, and some how think your still intellectually capable of responding...



This right here tells me your congnitive thought and skills of deduction are horrible. @MustangRyan asked were the first 13 laps under caution, meaning that no they weren't and thus dirt built up on these cars due to them racing prior to caution. This isn't some magical world where dirt just washes away once the caution comes out. Just like Dirt bike racing these guys wear tear offs and and it doesn't take much dirt to go through a few, I should know because I use to race dirt bikes and so did my father.

In other words it is quite possible that dirt from the laps or racing could have obstructed Stewart's view and it's possible that it didn't. However, you thinking that there was hardly any dirt flying we debunk your thought on this being some scare tactic to kick up dirt on Ward. IF racing 13 laps prior wasn't enough then how would a quick power slide at caution speeds be enough...

Keep up the classy comments. I bet you have a whole bag of crappy Robin William jokes your cracking somewhere. If Darwin works as you say it does, then why are you still here?

And no I'm not joking about Robin Williams I find it quite sad to be frank.

Well it's obvious why I'm still here because I actually have common sense and deductive reasoning and rationality to make choice calls, as to you using pure emotion which doesn't get people too far in life on that alone. Also I don't care if you find me classy or not, or anyone else for that matter who agrees also. I'm just here to argue a point against ignorant minds that feel it's a good idea to perpetuate their ignorance on others.
 
Last edited:
The racetrack was lit up. You think these guys are driving in the dark? A lousy cell phone camera clearly identified Ward halfway across the track. That sounds like grasping for excuses.
Yes, the video is pretty average quality, but it is not doing 60mph with other cars in front of it. Some drivers may have seen Ward because there was a bigger gap in front of them, or the car in front was a little further left to allow them the fortune of seeing around it.
If you were driving down the highway behind another car which suddenly swerved, could you be held responsible for deliberately hitting the object it avoided?

---

My opinion (not fact) is that it was an accident. For these reasons:
- visibility on the outside of the track doesnt seem great (I have been to speedways, and the light normally dims quickly once you are outside the racing line on the far side)
- Ward made it worse by wearing a black suit
- I cant fathom a professional racing driver deliberately hitting someone
- Sprint cars are notoriously hard to control precisely, at any speed. Even if he saw Ward at the last minute, hard braking would have straight lined the car into him, and acceleration and steering to the left would have kicked the right rear outwards
- The comments made by people much closer to the incident than anyone here.
 
Who is saying Tony intentionally hit him?

About half the internet, at last count.

Is that what this is to you? Black and white? Either Tony wanted to run over Ward or he is completely innocent?

Either Tony pointed a deadly motor vehicle at another human being and hit him with it, or that other human being simply walked out in front of said vehicle.

-

Let's get this straight. See my first post? My initial reaction was pretty much the same as many people here. It was "Oh 🤬, what has that hothead done now?" I was ready to condemn the man to hell and a twenty year sentence, even if he only meant "to scare the kid."

-

However, after having viewed the footage, I can't find any way that Tony could have correctly predicted and/or avoided that. Like I said, it's very obvious that Kevin changed speeds and directions several times, was obscured by other vehicles (Easy to see him from half a track away, or if you're the first car coming at him. If you're the fourth (46) and fifth cars coming at him as he's playing in traffic, not so much) and ran over halfway down the track to confront Tony.

People have been killed walking out onto the straightaway of racetracks in a straight line, in clear daylight, while wearing reflective gear (I won't post the videos, they're just too gruesome). Without any murderous intent on the part of the driver. It's not far beyond reason someone could get killed doing the same at night on a dirt oval.

-

You need to have a lot of respect for motor vehicles. A motor vehicle is a deadly weapon. No ifs, no buts.

If Tony pointed his car at Kevin Ward and hit him, that is either manslaughter or murder, whether the intention is to kill him or not. This is much the same as with a gun. Which is why vehicular assault is a thing in the eyes of the law.

You do not point a gun in someone's general direction, pull the trigger and later on say "I didn't mean to shoot him. I just wanted to scare him a little." It doesn't work that way. Which is why people go to jail for shooting their guns into the air inside the city.

This is why any accusation that he willingly pointed his car at Kevin is a serious allegation. And why all the facts must be taken into account before rendering any verdict or damning opinion on the subject.
 
Last edited:
It's quite obvious that there are several people posting in this thread that have never raced anything let alone a dirt car.

Play keyboard racer all you want but it is clear that you have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

@LMSCorvetteGT2 Even MotoGP riders use tear offs, and they're on the cleanest tracks in the world.
 
Read back over the last couple of pages, and it seems like many people are still kind of weighing in on the whole thing. So i thought i would offer my own dollars worth on the situation.

I would like to lay some foundation for my comments before i make them, so that there isnt any room for making assumptions, or apparent bias. I dont like NASCAR, never have, never will, and subsequently i dont care about Tony Stewart, or Kevin Ward in any capacity. So there is not, and will not be any fanboyism in my commentary. Just facts as i see them.

Ive been involved in racing for years. As a driver, as a crew member, and as a driving instructor. Between those, thousands of track miles, and thousands of hours of time at the track have been logged. In all of those cases, one thing was forced upon any individual who passes the paddock gate: a safety meeting, and a health and safety waiver. In both of these cases, one of the primary things that is talked about, is death. The fact that it can happen anywhere, at anytime, and in any situation. And because we are dealing with heavy things going at high speeds, more often than not, when something goes wrong, it will go horribly wrong. Safety procedures on how to deal with an accident are also heavily discussed. First thing that is said in virtually every meeting, is if you have an accident, stay in your car until the safety crew arrives. If you have a fire incident, and need to extricate yourself from the vehicle, it is your responsibility to get to a safe location, and contact a marshal as quickly as possible. This is usually followed by instructions about specific corners to watch out for, exit locations in the fence, and staying away from the racing line, never crossing a live track, even in yellow conditions, and always looking out for other cars. And finally how it is every drivers responsibility to avoid an accident as much as possible, but in the end, it is the your personal sole responsibility to be aware of your own safety, and protect yourself from danger. Bottom line, racing is dangerous, prople die doing it. Accept that risk, or leave.

In this particular situation, the "accident" that started the whole thing was about as common an accident in sprint car as you are going to get. Tony undercut his line and made a pass, and moved up to block Kevin, and protect his line, Kevin didnt back out to let the pass happen, got up onto the outer apron, lost traction, and spun out into the wall. Wards car was hardly even damaged from the accident, receiving nothing more than a flat tire, and maybe a couple bent tie rods. Any sanctioning body would have categorized that as any other typical racing incident. Tony leaned on him, he didnt yield, and he ended up in the wall. It didnt ruin his car, it didnt endanger him in any way, He should have been grateful the car was as intact as it was, and let it go at that. It was certainly not worth the tempertanturm that followed it.

An important thing to note about sprint cars, is that they run a ginormous offset in the rear wheels to force them to turn left. The front axle is also set up to promote this left turn only setup. The cars do not drive straight at all. Driving "straight" in a sprint car, involves the car crabbing awkwardly to the left, while having to apply right hand opposite lock to counter act it. And even then, you are usually pushing the front wheels, because there is so much positive lock in the rear axle. Given all of this, turning to the right, up an embankment, in a sprint car, is easier said than done, and not done in any way that would be considered graceful, or fluid.
Equally of importance is the braking setup of a sprint car. Usually they have a single rear axle brake. Typically it is located on the inside left rear axle. This is nothing more than a drag brake to help induce differential bias to rotate the car, and control the angle of rotation. It is not a "brake" as it would be described in most circle. Some cars do run a second brake on the outer right hub, but it is typically smaller than the inboard brake on the left axle.
On the front, the story is much the same. There is only a single brake, on the left front wheel, with the sole purpose of hooking the left front to control and correct the drift angle of the car.
Neither of these brakes are the typical heavy vented rotors you find on a road car (sometimes the left rear axle brake is a vented type), but are the single floating disc type usually found most commonly on a motorcycle. And in fact, in some of the lower midget sprint car formulas, they are sourced directly from a motorcycle. Running a motorcycle front brake on the rear axle, and a motorcycle rear brake on the front axle.
The majority of the "braking" in a sprint car comes from engine compression. As the engine is hooked directly to the rear axle without a transmission, simply lifting the throttle can create a massive amount back pressure, dramatically slowing the rear axle. The likelihood that Tony could have stopped, or swerved, to miss Kevin is a little absurd. These cars do not steer well, nor do they handle well, and especially not at slow speed. They are designed to go fast sideways. Not run a slalom course, or stop on a dime. Just look at the chaos that ensues from any sprint car crash. The cars flop around like fish out of water spinning and dash off all over the track. Its chaos. Sideways at speed is the only way they are reasonably controllable.

Once Kevin got out of his car, and started to walk out into the middle of the track, he just took every rule that he agreed to in the drivers safety meeting, and threw it out the window. No matter how much people want to argue over vague semantics, and assumptions, the fact is, from a legal standpoint, Kevin Ward violated safety protocol of the circuit when he walked out into the racing groove of a live track. Caution flag or not, doesnt matter. He took his life into his own hands, and paid the ultimate price.
If you watch the video, you will see that as Kevin gets out of his car, he is buzzed by a car on the high groove of the track. He then starts to walk out into the middle groove of the track. The blue and white #45 car nearly clips him, and Kevin even steps back a little to avoid the #45, and then moves even further into the racing line while gesticulating at Tonys car. The camera moves away here for a moment tracking the #45 that almost hit him. Only to snap back and catch Kevin right in front of Tonys car. Kevin is still pointing and gesticulating for a frame or two, up until Tonys car is literally 2-3 feet away from him. Its at that moment that we then finally see his left leg come up as he starts to jump out of the way, albeit it too little to late. Keep in mind that even under yellow conditions, the cars are still moving at 35-40 MPH. Nobody here would play chicken down to a game of feet with a road car traveling at that speed, would they? So it makes sense you wouldnt do it with an 800 BHP car that cant drive straight, and has, near enough to might as well be, no brakes.

It is worth looking at, and tracking the groove lines in the track, were you can see that Tonys car was in the same groove line as the #45. It wasnt until he had already hit Kevin that his car jumped up to the higher groove, were Tony eventually pulled over. As the camera pans back slightly, after the incident, you can see the #1 car down on the track apron, and a second car pass him on the outside. That second car was only slightly lower than what Tonys car was on the track. It is a lot tighter on that section of track than the camera angle really shows, and Kevin was, quite literally, right in the middle of it.

There has been much talk of the "throttle blip heard round the world", about how tony blipped the throttle into him. I also dont see how this is possible. Tonys car isnt lifting its nose, or moving in any way other than what it would for traveling at a consistent speed. The blip was likely from a car on the front straight that was slowing down, and had an engine stall. As i said, sprint cars have no transmission, and are direct drive to the rear wheels (this is also why they are push started). So if the wheel speed gets low enough, the engine will stall. You try to get the engine back by giving it a boot of throttle to force it back to life, and keep it ticking over at idle speeds. Its not exactly the safest procedure when there are a dozen other cars all bunching up and doing the same thing. I think it is extremely unlikely that Tony blipped the throttle at all based on what we can see of his car in the video. Unfortunately there is no telemetry on a sprint car, so we will never see any steering angle, or throttle tracking to know for certain sure what Tony did or didnt do. If this were F1 or WEC, it would be an open and shut case.

Now, i dont believe Tony is perfectly innocent, I do believe that he had some room he could have moved down into the track to try and avoid Kevin. I also have no doubt that if he had moved down, Kevin would have moved down along with him, and likely been in the way of the two abreast cars following behind Tony, and that would ended with similar consequences.

At the end of the day though, the question that must be asked is "Could this have been completely avoided if Kevin Ward had stayed in his car, instead of trying to retaliate over a flat tire", and the answer is "absolutely, yes". When you break track safety protocol, and run into the middle of a hot track, you either have a death wish, or arent thinking straight. Either way, youve taken your life into your own hands, and you will pay the consequences of those actions, and Kevin Ward paid the ultimate price.

I think the case here, is that a hot headed young driver got upset over the hot shot NASCAR millionaire pushing him up and off the track, even though he should have yielded the pass, and decided to give Captain NASCAR a piece of his mind for giving him a flat tire and ending his race. And through the red mist, the adrenaline, and the testosterone, he likely completely misjudged the speed of Tony's car, focusing more on shaking his fits in rage at Tony, and less about the fact that an 800 BHP car was hurling at him at 35-40 MPH. By the time he took stock of the situation, and tried to jump out of the way, it was to late. He got hooked up in the rear tire, sucked under the car, and spat out. Likely dead before he even hit the ground.

There is no doubt that this is an absolute tragedy. Its terrible any time any racing driver dies at the track for any reason. But going back up to my first paragraph, you have to take responsibility for your own safety, and Kevin Ward did not, and that to me (speaking as someone who has done multiple incident investigations at tracks) puts him squarely at fault.

Sadly, thanks to The Court of Public Opinion, Tony Stewarts career will be over. NASCAR is run almost purely on advertising dollars, and once one of Tonys primary sponsors believes that he is no longer the representation they want for their product because of the fan outcry, thats it. Once one of them pulls their sponsorship money, there is nothing else to back the investment of the other primary sponsors, and they will all pull out one by one. The sad thing is, this effects more than just Tony Stewart, but the Stewart/Haas Racing Team, and all of their drivers. So before its all said and done, it may be the end of several careers.

If there is one silver lining to this whole thing, i hope to hell it changes the way that NASCAR, and especially other smaller circle track speedways, police themselves and their drivers. YouTube is FULL of videos of dirt track races turning into destruction derbies. All because one guy spun out another guy, and by god hes gonna give that other guy a piece of his mind, and his front bumper. In some of these videos, it seems as though the track operators are almost encouraging these outbursts, by giving blow by blow commentary of the stupidity. Likely because such antics put butts in seats. And here lately that same fist waving, helmet tossing, and car kicking has started to become a common scene in NASCAR as well. And in all of those instances you never see the safety crew or security try to step in and stop it from happening. In come cases you can even see safety crew laugh at the tantrums as they happen. To me its an absolute shame that someone had to die for this issue of irresponsibility to be brought to the forefront as a serious problem. But i hope from here on out that any retributions, tantrums, or needless finger wavings that pur drivers in harms way, results in stiff penalties and fines for the driver in question. Hopefully discouraging, and preventing any of this stupidity from happening again, before someone else ends up in a body bag on account of trying to act tough, and prove a needless point.

If youve made it this far, youre a trooper. I welcome your comments and questions.
 
Back