- 7,986
- GTP_Royalton
This guy is pretty rough on PD after the latest reveal
http://www.gamesradar.com/gran-turi...utm_medium=emp&utm_campaign=gt6starseditorial
http://www.gamesradar.com/gran-turi...utm_medium=emp&utm_campaign=gt6starseditorial
This guy is pretty rough on PD after the latest reveal
http://www.gamesradar.com/gran-turi...utm_medium=emp&utm_campaign=gt6starseditorial
"the reason these annoyances" (about standards)
Err he hasn't even played GT6 or seen the standards so isn't really in a position to judge. In fact most people are not.
This guy appears obsessed with complaining about a product he hasn't played.
GamesradarBut I can only go by what I'm shown.
This guy is pretty rough on PD after the latest reveal
http://www.gamesradar.com/gran-turi...utm_medium=emp&utm_campaign=gt6starseditorial
Just a smidge longer than his driveway.
This guy is pretty rough on PD after the latest reveal
This guy appears obsessed with complaining about a product he hasn't played.
I don't recall saying that, in fact the opposite.I'd like to reiterate the fact that I don't consider him an artist. It's just that Johnnypenso said that artists have to listen to feedback/work harder etc. if they're under fire, and I was saying that they don't.
All that matters to him is what he [Kaz] thinks. If he thinks he's an artist, it makes sense he follows his own path and pays little attention to critics. Vanity, thy name is artist. Goes with the territory.
I don't recall saying that, in fact the opposite.
For the weak, yes. Others pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, worked hard, and became true artists. Not everyone folds like cheap tent in a rainstorm. If they do, then artist is not their calling.
For the weak, yes. Others pulled themselves up by their bootstraps, worked hard, and became true artists. Not everyone folds like cheap tent in a rainstorm. If they do, then artist is not their calling.
Of course we care. Thats probably why this thread is still alive.Oh, so suddenly no one cares about the E30 M3, E36 M3, McLaren P1, Koenigsegg Agera, or Ferrari F12? And how about those classic F1 cars, not very impressive either right?
Seriously, you have to admit that they have a far more diverse and interesting car roster.
Na this reviewer is right on the money,instead of wasting time on this realistic star system they could've been making a very good livery editor or damage system,PD is working to hard on things they shouldn't be doing,this is something I would expect on GT7 but they would rather waste all this time and put it in GT6 where no ones even going to care,I know I don't.This guy is pretty rough on PD after the latest reveal
http://www.gamesradar.com/gran-turi...utm_medium=emp&utm_campaign=gt6starseditorial
Get back to work Kaz there is less than 30 days to release, Go on chop chop!
I completely agree, the stars thing is just a bit crazy really.Na this reviewer is right on the money,instead of wasting time on this realistic star system they could've been making a very good livery editor or damage system,PD is working to hard on things they shouldn't be doing,this is something I would expect on GT7 but they would rather waste all this time and put it in GT6 where no ones even going to care,I know I don't.
Na this reviewer is right on the money,instead of wasting time on this realistic star system they could've been making a very good livery editor or damage system,PD is working to hard on things they shouldn't be doing,this is something I would expect on GT7 but they would rather waste all this time and put it in GT6 where no ones even going to care,I know I don't.
No, he seems to be complaining about GT5 issues and how instead of showing how/if they have been adressed, they decide to show off accurately mapped stars which nobody ever asked for or will be able to tell.
Seems like a very valid complaint to me. So many things wrong with GT5 and with less than a month to go, we still know next to nothing about the critical areas.
SO instead, they should stay behind in times or stay complacent while other game(s) are doing it as well? Should they have waited to introduce day/night cycles until next gen simply because we can only have 16-car grids? Should they not have test ran rally and snow physics in previous GT's while the competition went on ahead and left GT irrelevant?I'm with the guy. Knowing they probably spent a huge chunk of time on those stars just just made me step back and scratch my head.
👍They already had a day night cycle etc, who is to say they didn't just tack on some free, open source planetarium software http://www.stellarium.org/
SO instead, they should stay behind in times or stay complacent while other game(s) are doing it as well? Should they have waited to introduce day/night cycles until next gen simply because we can only have 16-car grids? Should they not have test ran rally and snow physics in previous GT's while the competition went on ahead and left GT irrelevant?
A lot of us figured that GT6 could or might have brought every track with weather and time change so imagine if they didn't do it in GT5.
👍
I completely agree, the stars thing is just a bit crazy really. ...but...it also illustrates what makes GT games so great: The crazy attention to detail.
..it also illustrates what makes GT games so great: The crazy attention to detail and the great real world physics....yes, the career mode sucks and is stuck back in 1997. Yes, there are some strange design decisions (including the old standards in the cause of the 'car encyclopedia', no brake tuning, very limited damage system etc.) but overall, for me GT5 was a major success.
...but...it also illustrates what makes GT games so great: The crazy attention to detail and the great real world physics.
What also disturbs me is the whole hype around his person (Kaz), just check out this vid:Funny guy
Sooner or later you guys have to realize PD has a basic disconnect with sim racing games in general and it's fanbase in particular. It shows up in everything they do and in the finished product. The reason for this is Kaz's "vision" for what this game/series should be. His vision is personal, based on his own likes and desires and what he wants to see and it's not going to change unless there is a massive shift in the marketplace. So long as they continue selling 7-10 Million units you'll continue to get bells and whistles instead of core gameplay features brought up to at least current standards, let alone beyond. Only if GT6 is an epic fail in terms of sales will we see any movement towards a radical overhaul of the series.
What also disturbs me is the whole hype around his person (Kaz), just check out this vid:
Ok he created the GT series back in the day and they used to be the best racing games around, cudos for that, but nowadays he's portrayed as some sort of messiah for god's sake.
I can't wait for the first reviews from IGN and gamesradar in a couple of weeks, and see what they have to say when there is 0 improvement in sounds, AI, career mode and all the other flaws of GT5...
But it doesn't matter anyway, millions of fans around the world already who eat out of PD's hand anyway, notwithstanding that they deal with a developer that throws sand in their eyes with moonrovers and starconstellations, whilst they keep dead silent on what we really want to know.
Well that might be your opinion, but I bought gt5 and I enjoyed it, I was able to see past the flaws it had, and for me it was worth the money. Just because millions have bought the game doesn't mean they eat out of PDs hand as you put it, I know I don't. As I said I think it was worth the money, and so is gt6 from what I've seen.
You say you don't eat out of PD's hand, yet you already know that GT6 is "worth the money" that right there my friend is eating out of their hand.
You left out the part where he says, "...from what I've seen." Selective reading much?You say you don't eat out of PD's hand, yet you already know that GT6 is "worth the money" that right there my friend is eating out of their hand.
That's true. The only way it isn't true is if most video game sequels are disliked by the majority of the players who liked the previous game.Well if he like 5 he'll most likely like 6 as well.
Exactly what I was going to say back to him aj, selective reading much? LolYou left out the part where he says, "...from what I've seen." Selective reading much?
That's true. The only way it isn't true is if most video game sequels are disliked by the majority of the players who liked the previous game.
Based on the GT series's sales record, people come back for more than don't.