It's funny though, our generations are looking at graphics, what looks amazing, and our PCs suffer for it and gameplay is poor because of it, and we struggle for FPS, unless we have deep pockets.I do agree with you to a certain extent. If developers had stuck with the visual standards from 10 years ago (Alike vanilla AC?), no one would be craving more eye-candy graphics today. Back then, people were content with what was put available. But nowadays, it’s all about visuals. The flashier, the better or so it seems.
It’s the same with physical appearance in our current society. People feel pressured to look good, even if that means undergoing chemical or surgical “enhancements” (that often end up doing more harm than good...) Still, as long as someone looks “good,” life somehow seems easier or more rewarding.
Of course, we need a certain level of visual quality in racing games like Assetto Corsa for immersion. But when you're flying down the Le Mans straight at 200 mph, you're not exactly admiring every pixel, are you? Let’s not forget the importance of smooth gameplay. That’s what truly makes the experience.
Must admit; I bought a 4K monitor to have AC look good, but I also do edit RAW photograpghs, Photos MUST look good by default (Static picture).
And there's our kids, playing Minecraft, Terreria and Roblox... They don't give a stuff about graphics, they want gameplay and multiplayer. The world is changing.