- 755
- 127.0.0.1
Man look, ofc you would say that if you didn't see what he wrote. So i'm going to bring an exampleNot sure we are agreeing on what ad hominem means. I haven't read everything he wrote but I can't remember him issuing targeted personal attacks when stating his position. Telling someone they're not a modder isn't quite the same thing at all. Anyway, we've probably flogged this particular horse so I'm happy to back out and bow to popular opinion.
The guy just asked kindly if he could add more pitbox. Instead of talking about the point, he makes personal attacks toward the guy, not just to say that he isn't a modder so he doesn't know best, but just to humiliate the guy in place, and tell him to bow down.
Again are you sure you want to defend this kind of person? Do askin a feature warrant the 7 line trashtalk about the guy personally?
If this doesn't fit your definition of "ad hominem" then I don't understand how you can call what we did (which is strictly speaking, talking about flaws of his work and how his eflated ego makes him talk to people like they're peasants) "ad hominem" when we are tackling the core issue.
Again, who is the bully?
This is not a matter of "popular opinion". Human decency isn't an opinion.
Last edited: