- 2,454
- Germany
Big Kudos to you @Peter Boese and Ilja, it´s just amazing how good AC looks with the latest updates you gave us. This is just an example with stock pure filter, nothing edited etc. I am in love. 
Is that what causes that behavior of the AI?
I don't know how I overlooked the transparency issue; I've reviewed and corrected it. As for the shift animation, I haven't seen any problems. Thanks for letting me know.
Yup. Dang. I've been thinking that my AIWhisperer work had gone too far and nobody was passing...(going fast, but no passing). Thanks for that tip!
for most people yes, since "Straighten AIs trajectory when starting" is for controlling cars at the start of the race for not crashing at the front cars i believe that they forgot to add a time frame ... so cars follow that rule infinity. anyway it will probably be fix in the next update ,until then just uncheck the box for "Straighten AIs trajectory when starting"
Do you mind posting the BTCC skin packs? I'm not sure where to find them.
Looking good at the photos, only like in real life nothing is perfect, as there is always dirt, scratches, garbage, painting wear or clearly to see repaired damages. They should not forget that aspect when publish the final version as in my opinion this is an essential factor for the immersion.
Big Kudos to you @Peter Boese and Ilja, it´s just amazing how good AC looks with the latest updates you gave us. This is just an example with stock pure filter, nothing edited etc. I am in love.
View attachment 1521226View attachment 1521227
Thank you for fixing the transparency.
Did not fix it for me sadly......
Hm, I only use live weather and timing, really don´t have clue. But as I wrote, only pure filter + LCS, no further things adjusted. Maybe some CM settings may cause a substantial difference, but I donno. For me this was the final proof that I don´t need any extra ppfilter from external creators.maybe you could tell me the settings you used?
time, weather etc.
track is Autodromo de la Pampa what the screenshot name told me
think mine is not looking that good
If anyone d/l that one from ACTK (even tho the update is offered thru CM by the OG author) lets see what ACTK "changed" with the CSP wipers.
)
[MESH_ADJUSTMENT_...]
MESHES = Geo_Wiper_R3_black, Geo_Wiper_L3_black
IS_RENDERABLE = 0
[ANIMATED_WIPER_...]
MESHES = Geo_Wiper_R1,Geo_Wiper_R2,Geo_Wiper_R3,Geo_Wiper_L1,Geo_Wiper_L2,Geo_Wiper_L3
UNDERLYING_SURFACE = EXT_windows
DEBUG = 1 ; remove when everything is ready
[MESH_ADJUSTMENT_...]
MESHES = Geo_Wiper_R1,Geo_Wiper_R2,Geo_Wiper_R3,Geo_Wiper_L1,Geo_Wiper_L2,Geo_Wiper_L3
MOVE_TO = modelRoot:y
[BASIC]
DISABLE_WIPER_KSANIM = 1
[ANIMATED_WIPER_0]
DEBUG = 0
MESHES = Geo_Wiper_R1, Geo_Wiper_R2, Geo_Wiper_R3, Geo_Wiper_L1, Geo_Wiper_L2, Geo_Wiper_L3
UNDERLYING_SURFACE = EXT_windows
GROUP_0 = 'Geo_Wiper_R3@A=*', 'Geo_Wiper_R2@A=*', 'Geo_Wiper_R1@A=*'
GROUP_0_ANGLE_FROM = -1.8
GROUP_0_ANGLE_TO = -78.2
GROUP_0_AXIS = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_0_AXIS_OFFSET_0 = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_0_AXIS_OFFSET_1 = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_0_END = 0.11781817, 0.95962465, 0.79526925
GROUP_0_PIVOT = -0.63895035, 0.91357076, 0.8162471
GROUP_1 = 'Geo_Wiper_L1@A=*', 'Geo_Wiper_L2@A=*', 'Geo_Wiper_L3@A=*'
GROUP_1_ANGLE_TO = -92.1
GROUP_1_AXIS = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_1_AXIS_OFFSET_0 = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_1_AXIS_OFFSET_1 = 0, 0.70710677, 0.70710677
GROUP_1_END = 0.6498165, 0.9507274, 0.6328659
GROUP_1_PIVOT = -0.006219864, 0.9630696, 0.87816715
GROUP_1_BASE_AXIS = 0, 0.7071068, 0.7071068
GROUP_1_BASE_PIVOT = -0.006219864, 0.9630696, 0.87816715
