There's no archive as such, you just need to trawl the thread or search. GTP Modding Team is a generic name put to a few collaborative mods from forum members here, but plenty of individual mods are posted here too.
yes more attendance = more activity but that not = good quality.There's no archive as such, you just need to trawl the thread or search. GTP Modding Team is a generic name put to a few collaborative mods from forum members here, but plenty of individual mods are posted here too.
No archive encourages regular forum attendance rather than drive-by posting, although we still get entitled (and often rude) first-time posters parachuting in demanding this and that. They generally get ignored.
I can tell you that the previous track I had went to the binUpdate for Ricardo Tormo Circuit - Valencia.
This could be a release candidate...
I've added all the contribute by this forum members, Slider666, EASY and all of you wo helped me.
I try to fix all is possible, but as usual i can't test it driving, so please test the track and report issues.... expecially about the road (i've renamed all the road grass sand kerb wall ecc objects, according to AC rules, i hope with no mistakes....
http://www.mediafire.com/file/8kfn85zgslt72va/ValenciaRT.zip/file
View attachment 897120 View attachment 897116 View attachment 897117 View attachment 897118 View attachment 897119
Huge quality update despite still having some fps drops issues. Probably you already know this but I noticed that the beggining of the pit limiter is too close to the track and if you cross the line at the exit of the last corner the pit limiter kicks in. Oh...and some cameras would be nice too. I already have the camtool replay. But a very cool track. Congrats...
yes more attendance = more activity but that not = good quality.
for me sometimes less can be more, 900 pages of same questions arguments and telling people to find themselves seem like double up work -like you say before no need to double up work- new coming members rather have 400 pages of quality than 900 of double up work.
FAQ or sticky or link is no bad idea
1 post in signature linking to post by one of GTPModding Team that shows all mods they work on, is good for new members -to not ask the entitled question you hate so much- and not double up on work you say before, as you provide information for them to make no need for asking such questions.
If no provide information users will join and ask -we should not hate new members for asking when we can solve issue in 1 post-
even i am member here, and dont know all mods done by GTP which is shame really, and even i ask and get no info after i search and only find 4 cars?
so i will add links to my signature to all GPT mod cars i know so far and link directly to them so new users can click my sig and get links to GTP stuff to try out is this ok?
You've made posts in the past about this. Its very very simple, learn to search. If you think its discouraging for new posters to not just have a platter to pick from - this is a forum thread, not a website hosting mods.
If searching is difficult, than one just simply needs to learn. This person wants "GTP" mods? Than search for that. A specific car modded by GTP, "GTP NSX", then search for that. You dont get things just handed to you, if your capable of using a pc, than you're capable of searching.
And its not "900 pages of same questions", refine your search, if that result didn't fit your fancy, backspace and click the next one in your search results. Put in an effort, I cant count long ago how much search time I did. You want it, go find it. Coming here and just saying, "give me links to all 'xx' mods'" is pathetic. Do your work, put an effort in.
Hell long ago, I wanted one model, it was in Japanese and required registration. And after google translate, registering and seraching in Japaneses than converted, I found it. I didn't come here or else where and ask for such a silly request. GO FIND IT
Yeah, I've not had much luck with it tbh. I figured it might be because I'm on Windows 7 and there's some missing libraries or something. Let me give it another shot and I'll try to see if I can make sense of the crash log
I may have figured it out. The errors I was getting were related to .NET Framework 4.8, so I simply repaired my installation and I'm not getting errors anymore. At least, with the one car I tested it with
Download the runtime here, and select repair. Good luck!
Did you try repairing .NET like I suggested? It's not that hard, and only takes a minute.
If it means anything, the errors appear to be only with the Car Tuner GUI. The actual duplicating and file editing seems to work fine even with the errors.
Edit: Nvm. Just noticed your edit. But like I said. The actual data editing seems unaffected by the GUI errors. I also hate .NET
and just go back to making skins. At least I can do that without errors everywhere lol.
Nice update. A small error remains in hotlap mode. Time between car start and the finish line first cross count as a complete lap. So you're able to create a track record under 29 secs
edit: and some tv cam for replay could be a nice addition.
@Ema Don't know if it's relevant or new...
but I love how you included the track logo.png for the loading screen so that there is no need to give up the outlines in the track selection. (tbh, I've always missed the track logos while the cars have it)
Sorry, if this post is considered as unnecessary, but this is news to me.
I can tell you that the previous track I had went to the bin
)
Oh yeah it does, I want you to recreate ALL of its official colors plus some liveries from its one make cup race from the 80sIs there a livery template for this so I can get making some?
Cheers
Tomo
go into the data folder, LODS.ini and rename the car thereThanks for this but rather than acknowledging that it overwrites the original car, why not just release it as a new car? It's not hard and doesn't take long, and not only respects and preserves the original car but will also help to protect your work (and stop it getting overwritten) if the original car gets updated. I think there is also more chance of it being installed if it gets tagged as a new car. Some people just won't be bothered with changing it to a new car.
Apart from anything else, people might prefer the original car, or want to test it side-by-side with the new one to see what the differences are. If the modder does this once then it stops every else who downloads it from having to do exactly the same exercise.
Very useful instructions from @gladbecker82 about how to duplicate a car:
Edit: I did it with your car and it literally took two minutes, and that included manually renaming all the GUID refs (when there's probably a much quicker semi-automatic way of doing this).
- copy the full car folder
- maybe paste it onto the desktop (so you can keep the old one)
- rename the folder
- copy the folder name!!!
- rename all KN5s with the old name with the new one.
- go into the data folder, LODS.ini and rename the car there
- go into the main SFX folder, rename the bank file and rename everything that you see with the old name in the GUID file
Here you go:
alfa_romeo_giulietta_spider_tcl
https://www.mediafire.com/file/xmblcys8ulo017h/alfa_romeo_giulietta_spider_tcl.7z/file
(nice update, by the way. I keep reaching for a fifth gear though
Edit 2: the RHS wing mirror reflection is flipped which I guess was the same in the original car. It'll need flipping in the mirror config unless somebody wants to update the kn5 (above my pay grade, I'm afraid).
